Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 98
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transfusion ; 64(10): 1940-1948, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39189045

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently in Australia, men are deferred from donating blood if they have had sex with another man within the past 3 months. However, a proposed gender-neutral assessment (GNA) process will ask all donors questions about sex with new or multiple recent partners, with deferral based on responses to a question about anal sex. Understanding the acceptability of such questions among existing and potential blood donors is paramount for successful implementation of GNA. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from a nationally representative survey to estimate the levels of comfort with the proposed GNA questions among the Australian population and subgroups, defined by self-reported ethnicity and religion. Respondents were aged over 18 and living in Australia. Results were weighted to represent the population. RESULTS: Most of the 5178 respondents described themselves as comfortable with answering questions about new partners (73.1%) or anal sex (64.0%) to donate blood. However, 2.2% and 4.5% indicated that questions about new sex partners and anal sex, respectively, would stop them from donating, and 4.4% and 7.7% respectively, said they were "completely uncomfortable." By religion, the least comfortable were Muslim or Eastern Orthodox respondents, and by country of birth, the least comfortable were those born in the Middle East, followed by those born in Southern Europe and Asia. DISCUSSION: GNA appears to be broadly acceptable in the Australian context, but our findings suggest that key GNA questions are less acceptable in some population subgroups, indicating a need for targeted campaigns that consider cultural sensitivities.


Asunto(s)
Donantes de Sangre , Conducta Sexual , Humanos , Donantes de Sangre/psicología , Donantes de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Adulto , Australia , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Parejas Sexuales/psicología , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Donación de Sangre
2.
Transfusion ; 64(3): 493-500, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38348786

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Australia, a man cannot donate blood if he has had sex with another man within the past 3 months. However, this policy has been criticized as being discriminatory as it does not consider lower risk subgroups, and led to calls for modifications to the policy that more accurately distinguish risk among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from a nationally representative survey to estimate the proportion of GBM aged 18-74 years old who would be eligible to donate under current criteria and other scenarios. RESULTS: Among the 5178 survey participants, 155 (3.0%) were classified as GBM based on survey responses, Among the GBM, 40.2% (95% CI 28.0%-53.7%) were eligible to donate based on current criteria, and 21.0% (95% CI 14.5%-29.5%) were ineligible due to the 3 months deferral alone. Eligibility among GBM, all men, and the population increased as criteria were removed. Under the new Australian plasma donation criteria, 73.6% (95% CI 64.4%-81.1%) of GBM, 68.4% (95% CI 65.5%-71.2%) of all men, and 60.8% (95% CI 58.8%-62.8%) of the full population were estimated to be eligible. Only 16.1% (95% CI 8.6%-28.1%) of GBM knew that the male-to-male sex deferral period is 3 months. DISCUSSION: Changing the deferral criteria and sexual risk evaluation would lead to a higher proportion of GBM being eligible to donate blood. Knowledge of the current GBM deferral period is very low. Improved education about the current criteria and any future changes are required to improve blood donation rates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Homosexualidad Masculina , Donación de Sangre , Donantes de Sangre , Australia , Conducta Sexual , Asunción de Riesgos
3.
Intern Med J ; 54(1): 149-156, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37488980

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a critical replacement therapy for immunodeficiencies and immunomodulatory treatment for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Adequate supply of IVIg is a global issue, necessitating supply restrictions. In Australia, despite strict criteria for use, demand for IVIg has increased over time and exceeds domestic supply. OBJECTIVE: Factors associated with the upward trend in overall IVIg use were examined, including in the number of unique patients, IVIg dosing and treatment frequency and variations by prescribing discipline and disease group. METHODS: De-identified data of IVIg dispensed in the largest Australian state (New South Wales) from 2007 to 2013 were provided by Australian Red Cross Lifeblood. Trends and projections were calculated using log-linear regression of unique patients, treatment episodes and grams of IVIg for overall use and use stratified by discipline and disease group. RESULTS: During the study period, 169 453 treatment episodes were recorded for 12 547 unique patients accounting for 5 827 787 g of IVIg use. Overall, IVIg use increased by 12.0% (11.5-12.6%) per year representing a 97.7% increase (91.6-104%) over the study period. The highest growth was among neurological conditions (16.0% (14.9-17.1%) per year). An increase in the number of unique patients was the primary driver of this growth, augmented by increases in the frequency and average dose per treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically acceptable measures to improve management of IVIg supply are needed including optimising dose, frequency and duration of treatment. Formal evaluation of IVIg versus alternatives, including cost-effectiveness and comparative efficacy, is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Intercambio Plasmático , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Australia/epidemiología
4.
Aust Crit Care ; 37(5): 686-693, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584063

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted from the emergency department to the wards, who progress to a critically unwell state, may require expeditious admission to the intensive care unit. It can be argued that earlier recognition of such patients, to facilitate prompt transfer to intensive care, could be linked to more favourable clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, this can be clinically challenging, and there are currently no established evidence-based methods for predicting the need for intensive care in the future. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyse the emergency department data to describe the characteristics of patients who required an intensive care admission within 48 h of presentation. Secondly, we planned to test the feasibility of using this data to identify the associated risk factors for developing a predictive model. METHODS: We designed a retrospective case-control study. Cases were patients admitted to intensive care within 48 h of their emergency department presentation. Controls were patients who did not need an intensive care admission. Groups were matched based on age, gender, admission calendar month, and diagnosis. To identify the associated variables, we used a conditional logistic regression model. RESULTS: Compared to controls, cases were more likely to be obese, and smokers and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular (39 [35.1%] vs 20 [18%], p = 0.004) and respiratory diagnoses (45 [40.5%] vs 25 [22.5%], p = 0.004). They received more medical emergency team reviews (53 [47.8%] vs 24 [21.6%], p < 0.001), and more patients had an acute resuscitation plan (31 [27.9%] vs 15 [13.5%], p = 0.008). The predictive model showed that having acute resuscitation plans, cardiovascular and respiratory diagnoses, and receiving medical emergency team reviews were strongly associated with having an intensive care admission within 48 h of presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study used emergency department data to provide a detailed description of patients who had an intensive care unit admission within 48 h of their presentation. It demonstrated the feasibility of using such data to identify the associated risk factors to develop a predictive model.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Sex Transm Dis ; 50(3): 144-149, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gay and bisexual men (GBM) who use HIV preexposure prophylaxis (HIV-PrEP) have high rates of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The use of daily antibiotics as STI preexposure prophylaxis (STI-PrEP) may be appealing to GBM who are using or have previously used HIV-PrEP (HIV-PrEP-experienced) for the prevention of bacterial STIs. METHODS: We examined willingness to use daily STI-PrEP among a cross-sectional sample of HIV-PrEP-experienced GBM in Australia who participated in an observational online cohort study from August 2018 to March 2020. Factors associated with willingness to use daily STI-PrEP were determined using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 1347 participants, half (54.3%) were willing to use daily STI-PrEP. Factors independently associated with greater willingness to use daily STI-PrEP included having >10 sexual partners in the last 6 months, using methamphetamine in the last 6 months, being more conscious about avoiding STIs, having a greater number of STIs since commencing HIV-PrEP, being willing to take HIV-PrEP for as long as they were at risk of acquiring HIV, and only using condoms when a sexual partner requested them. Conversely, factors associated with less willingness to use daily STI-PrEP included being university educated, using nondaily dosing regimens of HIV-PrEP, preferring event-driven HIV-PrEP, and being concerned about long-term HIV-PrEP adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Sexually transmitted infection PrEP is likely to be appealing to many HIV-PrEP-experienced GBM, especially those who engage in activities associated with a higher risk of STI transmission. However, they are less likely to be willing to use STI-PrEP unless it aligns with their HIV-PrEP dosing regimen, suggesting that research into the safety and efficacy of alternative STI prophylaxis dosing options should be prioritized.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Enfermedades Bacterianas de Transmisión Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Masculino , Humanos , VIH , Homosexualidad Masculina , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Enfermedades Bacterianas de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Enfermedades Bacterianas de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Australia/epidemiología
6.
Transfusion ; 63(8): 1519-1527, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37464879

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reliable estimates of the population proportion eligible to donate blood are needed by blood collection agencies to model the likely impact of changes in eligibility criteria and inform targeted population-level education, recruitment, and retention strategies. In Australia, the sole estimate was calculated 10+ years ago. With several subsequent changes to the eligibility criteria, an updated estimate is required. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional national population survey to estimate eligibility for blood donation. Respondents were aged 18+ and resident in Australia. Results were weighted to obtain a representative sample of the population. RESULTS: Estimated population prevalence of blood donation eligibility for those aged 18-74 was 57.3% (95% CI 55.3-59.3). The remaining 42.7% (95% CI 40.7-44.7) were either temporarily (25.3%, 95% CI 23.5-27.2) or permanently ineligible (17.4%, 95% CI 16.1-18.9). Of those eligible at the time of the survey, that is, with the UK geographic deferral for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease included, (52.9%, 95% CI 50.8-54.9), 14.2% (95% CI 12.3-16.3) reported donating blood within the previous 2 years. Eligibility was higher among men (62.6%, 95% CI 59.6-65.6) than women (52.8%, 95% CI 50.1-55.6). The most common exclusion factor was iron deficiency/anemia within the last 6 months; 3.8% (95% CI 3.2-4.6) of the sample were ineligible due to this factor alone. DISCUSSION: We estimate that approximately 10.5 million people (57.3% of 18-74-year-olds) are eligible to donate blood in Australia. Only 14.2% of those eligible at the time of survey reported donating blood within the previous 2 years, indicating a large untapped pool of potentially eligible blood donors.


Asunto(s)
Donación de Sangre , Donantes de Sangre , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Prevalencia , Australia/epidemiología
7.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 1257, 2022 06 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35761264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the emergence of COVID-19, issues have been raised regarding the approach used to engage with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CaLD) communities during this public health crisis. This study aimed to understand the factors impacting communication and engagement efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of crucial CaLD community stakeholders and opinion leaders. METHODS: Forty-six semi-structured telephone interviews were undertaken with key stakeholders who have an active role (established before the pandemic) in delivering services and other social support to CaLD communities in Australia. RESULTS: Seven key themes emerged: (1) the digital divide and how to connect with people; (2) information voids being filled by international material; (3) Differentiating established with new and emerging communities' needs; (4) speaking COVID-19; (5) ineffectiveness of direct translations of English language resources; (6) coordination is needed to avoid duplication and address gaps and (7) recognising the improvements in governments' approach. CONCLUSION: Alliances must be set up that can be activated in the future to reduce issues around resource development, translation, and dissemination of messages to minimise gaps in the response. Financial assistance must be provided in a timely way to community organisations to support the development and dissemination of culturally appropriate communication materials.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Comunicación , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Lenguaje , Pandemias
8.
J Viral Hepat ; 28(10): 1400-1412, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34309992

RESUMEN

Chronic hepatitis B prevalence is low in most Australian populations, with universal infant HBV vaccination introduced in 2000. Migrants from high prevalence countries are at risk of acquisition before arrival and non-immune adults are potentially at risk through skin penetrating procedures and sexual contact, particularly during international travel. The risk profile of young adult students, many from high prevalence countries, is inadequately understood. A cross-sectional online survey conducted among university students collected data on demographic, vaccination and travel characteristics and blood samples were tested for hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb). Analyses identified factors associated with HBsAb seroprevalence and self-reported vaccination. The serosurvey was completed by 804 students born between 1988 and 1993, with 613/804 (76.2%, 95% CI 73.2-79.1) self-reporting prior HBV vaccination. Overall, 526/804 (65.4%, 95% CI 62.0%-68.6%) students were seropositive to HBsAb, including 438/613 (71.5%, 95% CI 67.8-74.9) students self-reporting a prior HBV vaccine and 88/191 (46.1%, 95% CI 39.2-53.2) students self-reporting no prior HBV vaccine. Overall, 8/804 (1.0%, 95% CI 0.5%-2.0%) students were HBcAb positive, of whom 1/804 (0.1%, 95% CI 0.02%-0.7%) was currently infectious. The prevalence of chronic HBV infection was low. However, more than one in four students were susceptible to HBV and over-estimated their immunity. Future vaccination efforts should focus on domestic students born before the introduction of the infant program and all international students. Screening and vaccination of students, including through campus-based health services, are an opportunity to catch-up young adults prior to undertaking at-risk activities, including international travel.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B , Virus de la Hepatitis B , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Estudiantes , Universidades , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
9.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 60(11): 5042-5051, 2021 11 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34508560

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between DMARD use and subsequent risk of herpes zoster in a large, heterogeneous and prospective population-based cohort. METHODS: Using data from a cohort of adults (45 and Up Study) recruited between 2006 and 2009 and linked to pharmaceutical, hospital and death data (2004-2015), the effect of DMARD use on zoster risk was analysed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities and corticosteroid use. RESULTS: Among 254 065 eligible participants, over 1 826 311 person-years follow-up, there were 6295 new DMARD users and 17 024 incident herpes zoster events. Compared with non-users, the risk of zoster was higher in those who used biologic (b)DMARDs, either alone or in combination with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs than in those who only used csDMARDs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.53 [95% CI: 2.03, 3.16]) for bDMARDs vs 1.48 [95% CI: 1.33, 1.66] for csDMARDs, P-heterogeneity < 0.001; reference: non-users). Among users of csDMARDs, compared with non-users, zoster risks were highest in those using exclusively cyclophosphamide (aHR 2.69 [95% CI: 1.89, 3.83]), more moderate in those using azathioprine (aHR 1.57 [95% CI: 1.07, 2.30]) and hydroxychloroquine (aHR 1.43 [95%CI: 1.11, 1.83]) and not elevated in users of methotrexate (aHR 1.24 [95% CI: 0.98, 1.57]), sulfasalazine (aHR 1.00 [95% CI: 0.71, 1.42]) and leflunomide (aHR 0.41 [95% CI: 0.06, 2.88]). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of zoster was high among bDMARD and cyclophosphamide users. Also, the risk was increased in those using hydroxychloroquine alone and in combination with methotrexate but not methotrexate alone. Preventative strategies such as zoster vaccination or antiviral therapies should be considered in these populations if not contraindicated.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Herpes Zóster/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 120, 2021 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509104

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As immunisation program launches have previously demonstrated, it is essential that careful planning occurs now to ensure the readiness of the public for a COVID-19 vaccine. As part of that process, this study aimed to understand the public perceptions regarding a future COVID-19 vaccine in Australia. METHODS: A national cross-sectional online survey of 1420 Australian adults (18 years and older) was undertaken between 18 and 24 March 2020. The statistical analysis of the data included univariate and multivariable logistic regression model analysis. RESULTS: Respondents generally held positive views towards vaccination. Eighty percent (n = 1143) agreed with the statement that getting myself vaccinated for COVID-19 would be a good way to protect myself against infection. Females (n = 614, 83%) were more likely to agree with the statement than males (n = 529, 78%) (aOR = 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.8); P = 0.03), while 91% of those aged 70 years and above agreed compared to 76% of 18-29-year-olds (aOR = 2.3 (95% CI:1.2-4.1); P = 0.008). Agreement was also higher for those with a self-reported chronic disease (aOR = 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-2.0); P = 0.04) and among those who held private health insurance (aOR = 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3-2.3); P < 0.001). Beyond individual perceptions, 78% stated that their decision to vaccinate would be supported by family and friends. CONCLUSION: This study presents an early indication of public perceptions towards a future COVID-19 vaccine and represents a starting point for mapping vaccine perceptions. To support an effective launch of these new vaccines, governments need to use this time to understand the communities concerns and to identify the strategies that will support engagement.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunación/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
11.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 85(3): 611-618, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32622890

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on zoster recurrence. OBJECTIVE: To examine in detail zoster recurrence in a population-based cohort. METHODS: Using data from a large cohort (The 45 and Up Study) with linked medical data (2004-2015), the incidences of first and recurrent zoster were examined by using survival analysis methods. RESULTS: Over 1,846,572 person-years of follow-up, of 17,413 participants who had a first zoster episode (incidence, 9.43 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval, 9.29-9.57), 675 (3.9%) experienced a recurrence. The mean time between first and recurrent zoster was 2 years for those aged 45-54 years and 3 years for those aged 55 years and older. Among those with a first zoster, the incidence of recurrence was 11.05 (95% confidence interval, 10.24-11.91) per 1000 person-years, and higher recurrence incidence occurred in women compared to men, in younger compared to older participants, and in immunosuppressed compared to nonimmunosuppressed participants. Recurrence appeared lower in the 12 months after zoster onset but then remained consistent at approximately 12.00 per 1000 person-years in the following 8 years. LIMITATIONS: Recurrence may be underestimated because of the use of administrative data for case ascertainment. Potential misclassification of nonimmunosuppressed participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the vaccination of people who have already experienced zoster and underpin the need for additional studies on immunogenicity and vaccine efficacy in these populations.


Asunto(s)
Herpes Zóster , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Eficacia de las Vacunas
12.
J Infect Dis ; 220(1): 3-11, 2019 06 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30544213

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Information on the risks of herpes zoster (zoster) preceding a cancer diagnosis and the role of cancer treatment on risk is limited. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort of 241497 adults, with mean age 62.0 years at recruitment (2006-2009), linked to health datasets from 2006 to 2015. The relation between cancer diagnosis, treatment, and zoster risk was analyzed using time-varying proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Over 1760 481 person-years of follow-up, 20286 new cancer diagnoses and 16350 zoster events occurred. Participants with hematological and solid cancer had higher relative risks of zoster than those without cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.74 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.11-4.51] and 1.30 [95% CI, 1.21-1.40], respectively). Compared to those without cancer, zoster risk was also elevated prior to a hematological cancer diagnosis (aHR for 1-2 years prior, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.31-3.09]), but this was not the case for solid cancers (aHR for 1-2 years prior, 0.90 [95% CI, .75-1.07]). Compared to those without cancer, zoster risk among participants with solid cancers receiving chemotherapy was greater than in those without a chemotherapy record (aHR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.60-2.09] and 1.16 [95% CI, 1.06-1.26], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: For hematological cancer, increases in zoster risk are apparent in the 2 years preceding diagnosis and treatment; for solid organ cancers, the increased risk appears to be largely associated with receipt of chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Herpes Zóster , Neoplasias , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Herpes Zóster/complicaciones , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
13.
J Viral Hepat ; 26(1): 199-207, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30315680

RESUMEN

Hepatitis A incidence has declined in most countries through a combination of prevention measures, augmented through the use of a highly effective vaccine. In Australia, the proportion of the population susceptible to hepatitis A infection has declined over time due to high rates of opportunistic vaccination as well as the sustained inflow of seropositive immigrants from high-endemicity countries. These factors have contributed to a rapid decline in incidence. An age-structured hepatitis A transmission model incorporating demographic changes was fitted to seroprevalence and disease notification data and used to project incidence trends and transmission potential for hepatitis A in the general population. Robustness of findings was assessed through worst-case scenarios regarding vaccine uptake, migration and the duration of immunity. The decline in age-specific seroprevalence until the introduction of hepatitis A vaccine in 1994 was well explained through a declining basic reproduction number (R0 ) that remained >1. Accounting for existing immunity, we estimated that the effective reproduction number (Reff ) <1 in the general population of Australia since the early 1990s, declining more rapidly after the introduction of the hepatitis A vaccine. Future projections under a variety of scenarios support Reff remaining <1 with continued low incidence in the general population. In conclusion, our results suggest that sustained endemic transmission in the general Australian population is no longer possible although risks of sporadic outbreaks remain. This suggests potential for local elimination of hepatitis A infection in Australia, provided that elimination criteria can be defined and satisfied in risk groups. The methodology used here to investigate elimination potential can easily be replicated in settings such as in the USA where sequential seroprevalence studies are supported by routine notification data.


Asunto(s)
Notificación de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Hepatitis A/transmisión , Modelos Teóricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Australia/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/métodos , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/tendencias , Brotes de Enfermedades , Hepatitis A/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/inmunología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
14.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 368, 2019 Apr 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30943929

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Indonesia, oral rotavirus vaccines are available but not funded on the National Immunization Program (NIP). New immunization program introduction requires an assessment of community acceptance. For religiously observant Muslims in Indonesia, vaccine acceptance is further complicated by the use of porcine trypsin during manufacturing and the absence of halal labeling. In Indonesia, religious and community leaders and the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) are important resources for many religiously observant Muslims in decisions regarding the use of medicines, including vaccines. This study aimed to explore the views of religious and community leaders regarding the rotavirus vaccine to inform future communication strategies. METHODS: Twenty semi-structured in-depth interviews were undertaken with religious leaders and community representatives from two districts of Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. Thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Although there was recognition childhood diarrhoea can be severe and a vaccine was needed, few were aware of the vaccine. Participants believed a halal label was required for community acceptance, and maintenance of trust in their government and leaders. Participants considered themselves to be key players in promoting the vaccine to the community post-labeling. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for better stakeholder engagement prior to vaccine availability and the potentially important role of religious and community leaders in rotavirus vaccine acceptability in the majority Muslim community of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. These findings will assist with the development of strategies for new vaccine introduction in Indonesia.


Asunto(s)
Actitud , Participación de la Comunidad , Diarrea/prevención & control , Programas de Inmunización , Islamismo , Liderazgo , Vacunas contra Rotavirus , Adulto , Preescolar , Toma de Decisiones , Diarrea/etiología , Diarrea/virología , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Indonesia , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Padres , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Religión y Medicina , Características de la Residencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación
15.
BMC Infect Dis ; 18(1): 637, 2018 Dec 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30526505

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of pneumonia and secondary bacterial infections during the pandemic of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant literature in which clinical outcomes of pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection were described. Published studies (between 01/01/2009 and 05/07/2012) describing cases of fatal or hospitalised A(H1N1)pdm09 and including data on bacterial testing or co-infection. RESULTS: Seventy five studies met the inclusion criteria. Fatal cases with autopsy specimen testing were reported in 11 studies, in which any co-infection was identified in 23% of cases (Streptococcus pneumoniae 29%). Eleven studies reported bacterial co-infection among hospitalised cases of A(H1N1)2009pdm with confirmed pneumonia, with a mean of 19% positive for bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae 54%). Of 16 studies of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, bacterial co-infection identified in a mean of 19% of cases (Streptococcus pneumoniae 26%). The mean prevalence of bacterial co-infection was 12% in studies of hospitalised patients not requiring ICU (Streptococcus pneumoniae 33%) and 16% in studies of paediatric patients hospitalised in general or pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) wards (Streptococcus pneumoniae 16%). CONCLUSION: We found that few studies of the 2009 influenza pandemic reported on bacterial complications and testing. Of studies which did report on this, secondary bacterial infection was identified in almost one in four patients, with Streptococcus pneumoniae the most common bacteria identified. Bacterial complications were associated with serious outcomes such as death and admission to intensive care. Prevention and treatment of bacterial secondary infection should be an integral part of pandemic planning, and improved uptake of routine pneumococcal vaccination in adults with an indication may reduce the impact of a pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Coinfección/epidemiología , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Adulto , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/virología , Niño , Coinfección/complicaciones , Coinfección/virología , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Gripe Humana/microbiología , Gripe Humana/virología , Mortalidad , Pandemias/historia , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía/complicaciones , Neumonía/microbiología , Neumonía/virología , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 65(5): 719-728, 2017 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28475770

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Universal childhood vaccination is a potential solution to reduce seasonal influenza burden. METHODS: We reviewed systematically the literature on "herd"/indirect protection from vaccinating children aged 6 months to 17 years against influenza. RESULTS: Of 30 studies included, 14 (including 1 cluster randomized controlled trial [cRCT]) used live attenuated influenza vaccine, 11 (7 cRCTs) used inactivated influenza vaccine, and 5 (1 cRCT) compared both vaccine types. Twenty of 30 studies reported statistically significant indirect protection effectiveness (IPE) with point estimates ranging from 4% to 66%. Meta-regression suggests that studies with high quality and/or sufficiently large sample size are more likely to report significant IPE. In meta-analyses of 6 cRCTs with full randomization (rated as moderate quality overall), significant IPE was found in 1 cRCT in closely connected communities where school-aged children were vaccinated: 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-72%; I2 = 0%; N = 2326) against laboratory-confirmed influenza, and 3 household cRCTs in which preschool-aged children were vaccinated: 22% (95% CI, 1%-38%; I2 = 0%; N = 1903) against acute respiratory infections or influenza-like illness. Significant IPE was also reported in a large-scale cRCT (N = 8510) that was not fully randomized, and 3 ecological studies (N > 10000) of moderate quality including 36% reduction in influenza-related mortality among the elderly in a Japanese school-based program. Data on IPE in other settings are heterogeneous and lacked power to draw a firm conclusion. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests that influenza vaccination of children confers indirect protection in some but not all settings. Robust, large-scaled studies are required to better quantify the indirect protection from vaccinating children for different settings/endpoints.


Asunto(s)
Inmunidad Colectiva , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante
17.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(5)2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28418309

RESUMEN

Infectious disease dynamic modeling can support outbreak emergency responses. We conducted a workshop to canvas the needs of stakeholders in Australia for practical, real-time modeling tools for infectious disease emergencies. The workshop was attended by 29 participants who represented government, defense, general practice, and academia stakeholders. We found that modeling is underused in Australia and its potential is poorly understood by practitioners involved in epidemic responses. The development of better modeling tools is desired. Ideal modeling tools for operational use would be easy to use, clearly indicate underlying parameterization and assumptions, and assist with policy and decision making.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Modelos Teóricos , Práctica de Salud Pública , Vigilancia en Salud Pública/métodos , Australia , Simulación por Computador , Toma de Decisiones , Planificación en Desastres , Brotes de Enfermedades , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos
18.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(1): 573, 2017 08 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28821243

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traditional gender roles result in women lagging behind men in the use of modern technologies, especially in developing countries. Although there is rapid uptake of mobile phone use in Bangladesh, investigation of gender differences in the ownership, access and use of mobile phones in general and mHealth in particular has been limited. This paper presents gender differentials in the ownership of mobile phones and knowledge of available mHealth services in a rural area of Bangladesh. METHODS: We interviewed 4915 randomly selected respondents aged 18 years and above. Associations between gender and knowledge of available mHealth services, use of existing mHealth services and intentions to use mHealth services in the future were examined by multivariate logistic regression analysis, controlling for the effect of categorised covariates. RESULTS: Of the 4915 respondents to the survey, 61.8% of men (1213/1964) and 34.4% of women (1015/2951) owned a mobile phone. For men, mobile phone ownership was highest among those aged 18-29 years (n = 663, 76.3%), and for women among those aged 30-39 years (n = 825, 44.7%). A higher proportion of men owned phones compared to women, irrespective of socioeconomic status (SES) as indicated by asset index (p < 0.001). Although mobile phone ownership on average was lower among women, they were more likely to share their mobile phone with their family members (19.7%) compared to men (11.6%, p < 0.001). Greater number of men were more likely to be aware of the use of mobile phones for healthcare compared to women (38.5% vs 26.5%, p < 0.001). Knowledge about available mHealth services was lower among women than men; however, intention to use mHealth services in the future was high for both genders, irrespective of age, education and socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to men, women are less likely to own a mobile phone and less aware of available mHealth services, despite high intention to use mHealth among both genders. To optimise the use of mHealth services and to achieve equity of use, uptake strategies should target women, with a focus on the poorer and less educated groups.


Asunto(s)
Teléfono Celular/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Bangladesh , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Clase Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 213, 2016 05 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27193512

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Migrant travellers who return to their country of origin to visit family and friends (VFR) are less likely to seek travel-related medical care and are less likely to adhere to recommended medications and travel precautions. Through this study, we aimed to get an understanding of the views of stakeholders from community migrant centres and primary care providers on barriers for migrants, particularly from non-English speaking backgrounds, in accessing travel health advice and the strategies that could be used to engage them. METHODS: A qualitative study involving 20 semi-structured interviews was undertaken in Sydney, Australia between January 2013 and September 2014. Thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Language barriers, a lower perceived risk of travel-related infections and the financial costs of seeking pre-travel health care were nominated as being the key barriers impacting on the uptake of pre-travel health advice and precautions. To overcome pre-existing language barriers, participants advocated for the use of bilingual community educators, community radio, ethnic newspapers and posters in the dissemination of pre-travel health information. CONCLUSIONS: Travel is a major vector of importation of infectious diseases into Australia, and VFR travellers are at high risk of infection. Collaboration between the Government, primary care physicians, migrant community groups and migrants themselves is crucial if we are to be successful in reducing travel-related risks among this subgroup of travellers.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Médicos de Atención Primaria/psicología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Migrantes/psicología , Viaje/psicología , Adulto , Australia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos Humanos , Adulto Joven
20.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 15: 528, 2015 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26621140

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus has been identified as the most common pathogen associated with severe diarrhoea. Two effective vaccines against the pathogen have been licensed. However, many countries including Indonesia have yet to introduce the vaccine into their national immunisation programs. This study aimed to examine the attitudes of healthcare providers (HCPs) and other health stakeholders towards the pathogen and the vaccine. METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were undertaken in two districts of Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia with nurses, midwives, primary care providers, pediatricians and other health stakeholders. Thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Fourteen interviews were conducted between August and October 2013. We identified that while participants do not consider diarrhea to be an important problem in Indonesia, they do acknowledge that it can be serious if not properly treated. While the majority had some level of knowledge about rotavirus, not all participants knew that a vaccine was available. There were mixed feelings towards the need for the vaccine. Some felt that the vaccine is not ranked as a priority as it is not listed on the national program. However, others agreed there is a rationale for its use in Indonesia. The cost of the vaccine (when sold in the private sector) was perceived to be the primary barrier impacting on its use. CONCLUSIONS: The high cost and the low priority given to this vaccine by the public health authorities are the biggest obstacles impacting on the acceptance of this vaccine in Indonesia. HCPs need to be reminded of the burden of disease associated with rotavirus. In addition, reminding providers about the costs associated with treating severe cases versus the costs associated with prevention may assist with improving the acceptance of HCPs towards the vaccine. Promotion campaigns need to target the range of HCPs involved in the provision of care to infants and pregnant women.


Asunto(s)
Diarrea/prevención & control , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Infecciones por Rotavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Diarrea/economía , Diarrea/virología , Costos de los Medicamentos , Personal de Salud/economía , Promoción de la Salud/economía , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Indonesia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Salud Pública/economía , Rotavirus , Infecciones por Rotavirus/economía , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA