Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 44
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Care ; 56(10): 862-869, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30001253

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Routinely collected hospital data provide increasing opportunities to assess the performance of health care systems. Several factors may, however, influence performance measures and their interpretation between countries. OBJECTIVE: We compared the occurrence of in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip replacement across 5 countries and explored factors that could explain differences across these countries. METHODS: We performed cross-sectional studies independently in 5 countries: Canada; France; New Zealand; the state of California; and Switzerland. We first calculated the proportion of hospital inpatients with at least one deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism by using numerator codes from the corresponding Patient Safety Indicator. We then compared estimates from each country against a reference value (benchmark) that displayed the baseline risk of VTE in such patients. Finally, we explored length of stay, number of secondary diagnoses coded, and systematic use of ultrasound to detect DVT as potential factors that could explain between-country differences. RESULTS: The rates of VTE were 0.16% in Canada, 1.41% in France, 0.84% in New Zealand, 0.66% in California, and 0.37% in Switzerland, while the benchmark was 0.58% (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.81). Factors that could partially explain differences in VTE rates between countries were hospital length of stay, number of secondary diagnoses coded, and proportion of patients who received lower limb ultrasound to screen for DVT systematically before hospital discharge. An exploration of the French data showed that the systematic use of ultrasound may be associated with over detection of DVT but not pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital VTE rates after arthroplasty vary widely across countries, and a combination of clinical, data-related, and health system factors explain some of the variations in VTE rates across countries.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/normas , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/normas , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , California/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Suiza/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología
2.
Ann Surg ; 265(4): 670-676, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27631772

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic lavage and sigmoid resection in perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis. BACKGROUND: Peritonitis secondary to perforated diverticulitis has conventionally been managed by resection and stoma formation. Case series have suggested that patients can be safely managed with laparoscopic lavage, resulting in reduced mortality and stoma formation. Recently, 3 randomized controlled trials have published contradictory conclusions. METHODS: MEDLINE from 1946 to present, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane database of Registered clinical trials and EMBASE (all via OVID) were searched using the terms "laparoscopy" AND ("primary resection" OR "Hartmann procedure", OR "sigmoidectomy"), AND "Diverticulitis", AND "Peritonitis" AND "therapeutic irrigation" or "lavage" AND randomized controlled trial and any derivatives of those terms. We included all randomized controlled trials. Data were extracted from each study using a purpose-designed template. Statistical analysis was undertaken using Revman 5. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials were identified from 48 potential studies. The analysis included 307 patients of whom 159 underwent laparoscopic lavage. Overall, the rate of reintervention within 30 days postoperatively was 45/159 (28.3%) in the lavage group and 13/148 (8.8%) in the resection group (relative risk 3.01, 95% confidence interval 1.15-7.90). There was no significant difference in Intensive Care Unit admissions, 30 and 90-day mortality, or stoma rates at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lavage used in the management of Hinchey grade III diverticulitis leads to more reinterventions within 30 days postoperatively, but does not increase the 30 or 90-day mortality rates compared with sigmoid resection.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis/patología , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Lavado Peritoneal/métodos , Peritonitis/cirugía , Diverticulitis/etiología , Divertículo del Colon/complicaciones , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Masculino , Lavado Peritoneal/mortalidad , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/patología , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 39: 301-311, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27666804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The main determinants of survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair are preexisting risk factors rather than the method of repair chosen. The main aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect of modifiable risk factors on late survival following AAA repair. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant articles reporting the influence of modifiable risk factors on long-term survival (≥1 year) following elective open aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies which comprised 53,118 patients, published between 1989 and 2015, were included in the analysis. The use of statin, aspirin, beta-blockers, and a higher hemoglobin level was all significant predictors of improved survival following repair with a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.75 (0.70-0.80), 0.81 (0.73-0.89), 0.75 (0.61-0.93), and 0.84 (0.74-0.96), respectively. Smoking history and uncorrected coronary disease were associated with a worse long-term survival of HR 1.27 (95% CI 1.07-1.51) and HR 2.59 (95% CI 1.14-5.88), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing cardiovascular risk factors in patients preoperatively improves long-term survival following AAA repair. Global strategies to improve risk factor modifications in these patients are warranted to optimize long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores Protectores , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Lancet ; 385 Suppl 2: S25, 2015 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26313072

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgery is a crucial component of health systems, yet its actual contribution has been difficult to define. We aimed to link use of national hospital service with national epidemiological surveillance data to describe the use of surgical procedures in the management of a broad spectrum of conditions. METHODS: We compiled Australian Modification-International Classification of Diseases-10 codes from the New Zealand National Minimum Dataset, 2008-11. Using primary cause of admission, we aggregated admissions to 91 hospitals into 119 disease states and 22 disease subcategories of the WHO Global Health Estimate (GHE). We queried each admission for any surgical procedure in a binary manner to determine the frequency of admitted patients whose care required surgery. Surgical procedures were defined as requiring general or neuroaxial anaesthesia. We then divided the volume of surgical cases by counts of disease prevalence from the GBD 2010 to determine surgical incidence. This study was approved by the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (Health; Reference Number HD14/42). Raw data was only handled by coauthors with direct affiliation with the New Zealand Ministry of Health. FINDINGS: Between 2008 and 2011, there were 1 108 653 hospital admissions with 275 570 associated surgical procedures per year. Surgical procedures were associated with admissions for all 22 GHE disease subcategories and 116 of 119 GHE disease states (excluding intestinal nematode infections, iodine deficiency, and vitamin A deficiency). The subcategories with the largest surgical case volumes were unintentional injuries (48 073), musculoskeletal diseases (38 030), and digestive diseases (27 640), and the subcategories with the smallest surgical case volumes were nutritional deficiencies (13), neonatal conditions (204), and infectious and parasitic diseases (982). Surgical incidence ranged widely by individual disease states with the highest in other neurological conditions, abortion, appendicitis, obstructed labour, and maternal sepsis. INTERPRETATION: This study confirms previous research that surgical care is required across the entire spectrum of GHE disease subcategories, showing the crucial role of operative intervention in health systems. Surgical incidence might be useful as an index to estimate the need for surgical procedures in other populations. FUNDING: None.

5.
Lancet ; 385 Suppl 2: S27, 2015 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26313074

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Case volume per 100 000 population and perioperative mortality rate (POMR) are key indicators to monitor and strengthen surgical services. However, comparisons of POMR have been restricted by absence of standardised approaches to when it is measured, the ideal denominator, need for risk adjustment, and whether data are available. We aimed to address these issues and recommend a minimum dataset by analysing four large mixed surgical datasets, two from well-resourced settings with sophisticated electronic patient information systems and two from resource-limited settings where clinicians maintain locally developed databases. METHODS: We obtained data from the New Zealand (NZ) National Minimum Dataset, the Geelong Hospital patient management system in Australia, and purpose-built surgical databases in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (PMZ) and Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea (PNG). Information was sought on inclusion and exclusion criteria, coding criteria, and completeness of patient identifiers, admission, procedure, discharge and death dates, operation details, urgency of admission, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Date-related errors were defined as missing dates and impossible discrepancies. For every site, we then calculated the POMR, the effect of admission episodes or procedures as denominator, and the difference between in-hospital POMR and 30-day POMR. To determine the need for risk adjustment, we used univariate and multivariate logistic regression to assess the effect on relative POMR for each site of age, admission urgency, ASA score, and procedure type. FINDINGS: 1 365 773 patient admissions involving 1 514 242 procedures were included, among which 8655 deaths were recorded within 30 days. Database inclusion and exclusion criteria differed substantially. NZ and Geelong records had less than 0·1% date-related errors and greater than 99·9% completeness. PMZ databases had 99·9% or greater completeness of all data except date-related items (94·0%). PNG had 99·9% or greater completeness for date of birth or age and admission date and operative procedure, but 80-83% completeness of patient identifiers and date related items. Coding of procedures was not standardised, and only NZ recorded ASA status and complete post-discharge mortality. In-hospital POMR range was 0·38% in NZ to 3·44% in PMZ, and in NZ it underestimated 30-day POMR by roughly a third. The difference in POMR by procedures instead of admission episodes as denominator ranged from 10% to 70%. Age older than 65 years and emergency admission had large independent effects on POMR, but relatively little effect in multivariate analysis on the relative odds of in-hospital death at each site. INTERPRETATION: Hospitals can collect and provide data for case volume and POMR without sophisticated electronic information systems. POMR should initially be defined by in-hospital mortality because post-discharge deaths are not usually recorded, and with procedures as denominator because details allowing linkage of several operations within one patient's admission are not always present. Although age and admission urgency are independently associated with POMR, and ASA and case mix were not included, risk adjustment might not be essential because the relative odds between sites persisted. Standardisation of inclusion criteria and definitions is needed, as is attention to accuracy and completeness of dates of procedures, discharge and death. A one-page, paper-based form, or alternatively a simple electronic data collection form, containing a minimum dataset commenced in the operating theatre could facilitate this process. FUNDING: None.

6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 11: CD002200, 2016 11 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27884041

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is common clinical practice to follow patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for several years following their curative surgery or adjuvant therapy, or both. Despite this widespread practice, there is considerable controversy about how often patients should be seen, what tests should be performed, and whether these varying strategies have any significant impact on patient outcomes. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2002 and first updated in 2007. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of intensive follow-up for patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer treated with curative intent. SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched CENTRAL (2016, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1950 to May 20th, 2016), Embase (1974 to May 20th, 2016), CINAHL (1981 to May 20th, 2016), and Science Citation Index (1900 to May 20th, 2016). We also searched reference lists of articles, and handsearched the Proceedings of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (2011 to 2014). In addition, we searched the following trials registries (May 20th, 2016): ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We further contacted study authors. No language or publication restrictions were applied to the search strategies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised controlled trials comparing different follow-up strategies for participants with non-metastatic CRC treated with curative intent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently determined trial eligibility, performed data extraction, and assessed methodological quality. MAIN RESULTS: We studied 5403 participants enrolled in 15 studies. (We included two new studies in this second update.) Although the studies varied in setting (general practitioner (GP)-led, nurse-led, or surgeon-led) and "intensity" of follow-up, there was very little inconsistency in the results.Overall survival: we found no evidence of a statistical effect with intensive follow-up (hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.02; I² = 4%; P = 0.41; high-quality evidence). There were 1098 deaths among 4786 participants enrolled in 12 studies.Colorectal cancer-specific survival: this did not differ with intensive follow-up (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.12; I² = 0%; P = 0.45; moderate-quality evidence). There were 432 colorectal cancer deaths among 3769 participants enrolled in seven studies.Relapse-free survival: we found no statistical evidence of effect with intensive follow-up (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.18; I² = 5%; P = 0.39; moderate-quality evidence). There were 1416 relapses among 5253 participants enrolled in 14 studies.Salvage surgery with curative intent: this was more frequent with intensive follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 1.98, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.56; I² = 31%; P = 0.14; high-quality evidence). There were 457 episodes of salvage surgery in 5157 participants enrolled in 13 studies.Interval (symptomatic) recurrences: these were less frequent with intensive follow-up (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.86; I² = 66%; P = 0.007; moderate-quality evidence). Three hundred and seventy-six interval recurrences were reported in 3933 participants enrolled in seven studies.Intensive follow-up did not appear to affect quality of life, anxiety, nor depression (reported in three studies).Harms from colonoscopies did not differ with intensive follow-up (RR 2.08, 95% CI 0.11 to 40.17; moderate-quality evidence). In two studies, there were seven colonoscopic complications in 2112 colonoscopies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of our review suggest that there is no overall survival benefit for intensifying the follow-up of patients after curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Although more participants were treated with salvage surgery with curative intent in the intensive follow-up group, this was not associated with improved survival. Harms related to intensive follow-up and salvage therapy were not well reported.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Terapia Recuperativa
7.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 7: CD003860, 2016 Jul 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27425588

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shortening the duration of radiation therapy would benefit women with early breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery. It may also improve access to radiation therapy by improving efficiency in radiation oncology departments globally. This can only happen if the shorter treatment is as effective and safe as conventional radiation therapy. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2008 and updated in 2009. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of altered radiation fraction size for women with early breast cancer who have had breast conserving surgery. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Specialised Register (23 May 2015), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 4), MEDLINE (Jan 1996 to May 2015), EMBASE (Jan 1980 to May 2015), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal (June 2010 to May 2015) and ClinicalTrials.gov (16 April 2015), reference lists of articles and relevant conference proceedings. No language or publication constraints were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of altered fraction size versus conventional fractionation for radiation therapy in women with early breast cancer who had undergone breast conserving surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors performed data extraction independently, with disagreements resolved by discussion. We sought missing data from trial authors. MAIN RESULTS: We studied 8228 women in nine studies. Eight out of nine studies were at low or unclear risk of bias. Altered fraction size (delivering radiation therapy in larger amounts each day but over fewer days than with conventional fractionation) did not have a clinically meaningful effect on: local recurrence-free survival (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.15, 7095 women, four studies, high-quality evidence), cosmetic outcome (Risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.01, 2103 women, four studies, high-quality evidence) or overall survival (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03, 5685 women, three studies, high-quality evidence). Acute radiation skin toxicity (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.45, 357 women, two studies) was reduced with altered fraction size. Late radiation subcutaneous toxicity did not differ with altered fraction size (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.05, 5130 women, four studies, high-quality evidence). Breast cancer-specific survival (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06, 5685 women, three studies, high quality evidence) and relapse-free survival (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.05, 5685 women, three studies, moderate-quality evidence) did not differ with altered fraction size. We found no data for mastectomy rate. Altered fraction size was associated with less patient-reported (P < 0.001) and physician-reported (P = 0.009) fatigue at six months (287 women, one study). We found no difference in the issue of altered fractionation for patient-reported outcomes of: physical well-being (P = 0.46), functional well-being (P = 0.38), emotional well-being (P = 0.58), social well-being (P = 0.32), breast cancer concerns (P = 0.94; 287 women, one study). We found no data with respect to costs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found that using altered fraction size regimens (greater than 2 Gy per fraction) does not have a clinically meaningful effect on local recurrence, is associated with decreased acute toxicity and does not seem to affect breast appearance, late toxicity or patient-reported quality-of-life measures for selected women treated with breast conserving therapy. These are mostly women with node negative tumours smaller than 3 cm and negative pathological margins.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Traumatismos por Radiación/complicaciones , Traumatismos por Radiación/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
8.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 52(1): 18-24, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26303055

RESUMEN

AIM: Exposure to a large natural disaster can lead to behavioural disturbances, developmental delay and anxiety among young children. Although most children are resilient, some will develop mental health problems. Major earthquakes occurred in Canterbury, New Zealand, in September 2010 and February 2011. A community screening tool assessing behavioural and emotional problems in children, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, has been reported by parents (SDQ-P) and teachers (SDQ-T) of all 4-year-olds in the region since 2008. METHODS: Mean total and subtest scores for the SDQ-P and SDQ-T were compared across periods before, during and after the earthquakes in sequential population cohorts of children. Comparisons across the periods were made in relation to the proportions of children defined by New Zealand norms as 'abnormal'. Results were also compared between zones considered to have been exposed to higher or lower impact from the earthquakes. RESULTS: Parent mean total SDQ scores did not change between periods before, during and after the earthquakes. Teacher mean SDQ total scores significantly reduced (improved) when compared between baseline and post-earthquake periods. Mean SDQ pro-social scores from both teachers and parents increased (strengthened) when compared between baseline and post-earthquake periods. Results did not significantly vary according to a measure of impact from the earthquakes. CONCLUSION: The main finding that a population-based measure of behavioural and emotional problems among children was not deleteriously impacted by the earthquakes is surprising and is not consistent with other research findings. Further work is needed to explore the health needs of children in Canterbury based on methodological improvements.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Infantil/psicología , Desastres , Terremotos , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Nueva Zelanda , Padres , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
Vascular ; 24(6): 658-667, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27189809

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies reporting the influence of preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter on late survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair have not been consistent. AIM: To report the influence of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter on overall long-term survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: Embase, Medline and the Cochrane electronic databases were searched to identify articles reporting the influence of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter on late survival following open aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair published up to April 2015. Data were extracted from multivariate analysis; estimated risks were expressed as hazard ratio. RESULTS: A total of 2167 titles/abstracts were retrieved, of which 76 studies were fully assessed; 19 studies reporting on 22,104 patients were included. Preoperative larger abdominal aortic aneurysm size was associated with a worse survival compared to smaller aneurysms with a pooled hazard ratio of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.09-1.18), per 1 cm increase in abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter. Subgroup analysis of the different types of repair was performed and the hazard ratio (95% CI), for open aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair were 1.08 (1.03-1.12) and 1.20 (1.15-1.25), respectively, per 1 cm increase. There was a significant difference between the groups p < 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that preoperative large abdominal aortic aneurysm independently influences overall late survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and this association was greater in abdominal aortic aneurysm repaired with endovascular aneurysm repair.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Ann Surg ; 259(2): 263-72, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24169174

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the yield of colorectal cancer at routine colonic evaluation after radiologically proven acute diverticulitis. BACKGROUND: Acute diverticulitis accounts for 152,000 hospitalizations in the United States alone. Current guidelines recommend routine colonic evaluation after acute diverticulitis to confirm the diagnosis and exclude malignancy. However, research suggests that the yield of colorectal cancer after computed tomography-proven uncomplicated diverticulitis may be low. In the era of widespread computed tomographic scanning for diverticulitis, routine colonic evaluation after diverticulitis may represent a nonessential burden on health care resources. METHODS: The PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, BIREME, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. Original studies of colonic evaluation after proven acute diverticulitis were included. Meta-analysis of data from included studies was performed using a DerSimonian Laird random effect proportion analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies from 7 countries were included in the analysis. Out of a pooled population of 1970 patients, cancer was found in 22. The pooled proportional estimate of malignancy was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9%-2.8%). Of the 1497 patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis, cancer was found in 5 (proportional estimate of risk 0.7%; CI, 0.3%-1.4%). Of the 79 patients with complicated disease, cancer was found in 6 (proportion estimate of risk 10.8%; CI, 5.2%-21.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of malignancy after a radiologically proven episode of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis is low. In the absence of other indications, routine colonoscopy may not be necessary. Patients with complicated diverticulitis still have a significant risk of colorectal cancer at subsequent colonic evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Diverticulitis del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Pólipos Intestinales/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Enfermedad Aguda , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Diverticulitis del Colon/complicaciones , Humanos , Pólipos Intestinales/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo
11.
Med Care ; 51(5): 418-24, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23579352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rate of readmission is widely used as a measure of hospital quality of care, often with funding implications for outlying facilities. OBJECTIVES: This study explored the plausibility of readmission as a proxy for health care quality with quantitative bias analysis and the application of a structural Directed Acyclic Graph framework. It applies this paradigm to observed ethnic differences in the odds of readmission in a sample of New Zealand hospital patients. RESEARCH DESIGN: Ethnicity was defined as the exposure, readmission rate as the proxy outcome, and quality of care as a missing mediator. Using data from 89,090 surgical patients from New Zealand, and estimates from the literature of the prevalence of "poor quality" and the strength of the quality-of-care readmission association, a series of sensitivity analyses were performed to calculate an odds ratio of the ethnicity-readmission association corrected for the missing mediator "quality." RESULTS: Given the assumptions applied, potentially only 29% of the excess odds of readmission for Maori compared with Europeans were due to poor quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation finds substantial error when using readmission as a marker of quality, and suggests that differences in readmission between populations are more likely to be due to factors other than quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda/etnología , Proyectos de Investigación , Clase Social , Factores de Tiempo
12.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 25(3): 248-54, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23411833

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of hospital care for New Zealand (NZ) Maori and NZ European adult patients, using the rate of unplanned readmission or death within 30 days of discharge as an indicator of quality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: NZ public hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 89 658 patients who were admitted for one of a defined set of surgical procedures at NZ public hospitals 2002-8 were obtained from the NZ Ministry of Health. Outcome The odds of readmission for NZ Maori when compared with NZ European patients were calculated using logistic regression, incorporating variables for age, sex, comorbidity, index procedure, hospital volume and socioeconomic position. RESULTS: NZ Maori had 16% higher odds of readmission or death when compared with NZ European patients (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.08-1.24) after adjusting for all covariates. Readmission or death was also associated with being female (OR = 1.09; 1.03-1.15), older age (OR = 1.33; 1.19-1.48, for >79 years compared with 18-39 years), higher comorbidity (OR = 2.08; 1.89-2.31, for Charlson score 3+ compared with 0) and higher hospital volume (OR = 0.81; 0.76-0.86, for lowest volume compared with highest). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests ethnic disparities in the quality of hospital care in NZ using unplanned readmission rate as an indicator of quality. There are well-documented differences in health outcomes between Maori and NZ Europeans, and it is possible that differential treatment within the health system contributes to these health status inequalities.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36767153

RESUMEN

The prevalence of anemia is high among children and adolescents in low- and middle-income countries because of undernutrition resulting from their poor socioeconomic status and lack of knowledge on proper nutrition. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of anemia among children and adolescents aged between 6 months and 19 years in Bangladesh. Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched to identify the studies that reported the prevalence of anemia among children and adolescents. A total of 24 studies, including the data of 14,062 cases, were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis of the time period between 1997 and 2019. The random-effects model was used to calculate the summary estimates. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021246960). The pooled prevalence of anemia, iron deficiency anemia (IDA), and non-severe and severe anemia were 46.8% [95% CI: 36.0-57.6], 13.6% [95% CI: 8.0-19.2], 56.4% [95% CI: 39.6-73.1] and 0.7% [95% CI: 0.1-1.4], respectively. Prevalence of anemia exhibited the highest among the children aged ≤2 years. Briefly, 91.67% of the studies were of high quality. No significant publication bias was found; however, two outlier studies were detected. The prevalence of anemia among children and adolescents was estimated as high in Bangladesh.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica , Anemia , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Lactante , Prevalencia , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Anemia/epidemiología , Anemia/etiología , Anemia Ferropénica/epidemiología , Estado Nutricional
14.
Am J Epidemiol ; 173(6): 676-82, 2011 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21330339

RESUMEN

With advances in the effectiveness of treatment and disease management, the contribution of chronic comorbid diseases (comorbidities) found within the Charlson comorbidity index to mortality is likely to have changed since development of the index in 1984. The authors reevaluated the Charlson index and reassigned weights to each condition by identifying and following patients to observe mortality within 1 year after hospital discharge. They applied the updated index and weights to hospital discharge data from 6 countries and tested for their ability to predict in-hospital mortality. Compared with the original Charlson weights, weights generated from the Calgary, Alberta, Canada, data (2004) were 0 for 5 comorbidities, decreased for 3 comorbidities, increased for 4 comorbidities, and did not change for 5 comorbidities. The C statistics for discriminating in-hospital mortality between the new score generated from the 12 comorbidities and the Charlson score were 0.825 (new) and 0.808 (old), respectively, in Australian data (2008), 0.828 and 0.825 in Canadian data (2008), 0.878 and 0.882 in French data (2004), 0.727 and 0.723 in Japanese data (2008), 0.831 and 0.836 in New Zealand data (2008), and 0.869 and 0.876 in Swiss data (2008). The updated index of 12 comorbidities showed good-to-excellent discrimination in predicting in-hospital mortality in data from 6 countries and may be more appropriate for use with more recent administrative data.


Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Ajuste de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Suiza/epidemiología
15.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 26(11): 1365-74, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21766164

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to determine the effect of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) on female fertility in ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), the mechanisms of this effect, strategies for prevention and management of infertility post-IPAA. METHODS: This paper is a systematic literature review of all articles investigating IPAA and fertility from 1966 onwards that were found searching the Medline and Embase databases. Meta-analysis was performed on relevant studies. RESULTS: Seventeen relevant studies were identified. Six studies were excluded (duplicate data, one; predominantly not IPAA patients, one; no control group, four). The control groups of the remaining 11 studies were too varied for comparison, and so the meta-analysis was limited to six studies that provided data on infertility both pre- and post-IPAA. Five of these involved predominantly UC patients and one FAP. Average infertility rates were 20% pre-IPAA and 63% post-IPAA. The relative risk of infertility after IPAA is 3.91 ([2.06, 7.44] 95% CI). The possibility of publication bias suggests that the risk may be lower. Any increased risk is probably due to tubal dysfunction secondary to adhesions. Various methods have been proposed to reduce pelvic adhesions, but there is no evidence they have any effect in preventing infertility. Infertility treatment post-IPAA is associated with good success rates. CONCLUSIONS: Infertility is increased after IPAA in female patients in both UC and FAP. Both these disease processes affect patients during their reproductive years. This evidence emphasizes the need for careful consideration of fertility in the choice and timing of surgery.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/cirugía , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Fertilidad/fisiología , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo
16.
N Z Med J ; 134(1531): 36-54, 2021 03 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33767486

RESUMEN

AIM: A number of evidence-based medications are recommended following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including statins, antithrombotics (antiplatelet and/or anticoagulants), a beta-blocker and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE-I/ARB). This study aimed to describe the dispensing of the cardioprotective medications in the first year following an ACS hospitalisation in New Zealand and how this varies according to age, sex and type of coronary intervention. METHOD: National hospitalisation data was used to identify all New Zealand residents aged 35-79 years who were discharged from hospital in the years 2013/14 with a primary discharge diagnosis of ACS. Using anonymous linkage to national pharmaceutical dispensing and mortality datasets, the dispensing of each group of medications was examined in survivors of quarters one, two and four of the first year post discharge. RESULTS: There were 14,496 patients; mean age was 63.4 years and 68.8% were male. Dispensing of medications in survivors steadily fell across quarters one, two and four: 90.8%, 82.1% and 78.8% of patients were dispensed statins; 90.6%, 79.8% and 78.1% were dispensed aspirin; 82.7%, 72.6% and 70.0% were dispensed beta-blockers; 69.6%, 62.7% and 61.3% were dispensed ACE-I/ARB; 67.7%, 53.6% and 40.4% were dispensed a P2Y12 inhibitor; and 68.6%, 53.0% and 40.7% were dispensed a combination of two or more antithrombotics. CONCLUSION: Cardioprotective medication dispensing was lower than would have been the case if the current ACS guidelines were followed. The greatest decrease in dispensing occurred between quarter one and quarter two, which highlights a potentially important period for targeted interventions to improve adherence.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevención Secundaria , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Angiografía Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
17.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(12)2021 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34203097

RESUMEN

Multiple recurrent somatic mutations have recently been identified in association with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). This meta-analysis aims to assess the pooled prevalence of TET2 gene mutations among patients with MPN. Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Embase) were searched for relevant studies from inception till September 2020, without language restrictions. The eligibility criteria included BCR-ABL-negative MPN adults with TET2 gene mutations. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses explored results among different continents and countries, WHO diagnostic criteria, screening methods and types of MF. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020212223). Thirty-five studies were included (n = 5121, 47.1% female). Overall, the pooled prevalence of TET2 gene mutations in MPN patients was 15.5% (95% CI: 12.1-19.0%, I2 = 94%). Regional differences explained a substantial amount of heterogeneity. The prevalence of TET2 gene mutations among the three subtypes PV, ET and MF were 16.8%, 9.8% and 15.7%, respectively. The quality of the included studies was determined to be moderate-high among 83% of the included studies. Among patients with BCR-ABL-negative MPN, the overall prevalence of TET2 gene mutations was 15.5%.

18.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (11): CD003860, 2010 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21069678

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shortening the duration of radiation therapy would benefit women with early breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery. It may also improve access to radiation therapy by improving efficiency in radiation oncology departments globally. This can only happen if the shorter treatment is as effective and safe as conventional radiation therapy. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 3, 2008. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of altered radiation fraction size on outcomes for women with early breast cancer who have undergone breast conserving surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the WHO ICTRP search portal to June 2009, reference lists of articles and relevant conference proceedings. We applied no language constraints. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of unconventional versus conventional fractionation in women with early breast cancer who had undergone breast conserving surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The authors performed data extraction independently, with disagreements resolved by discussion. We sought missing data from trial authors. MAIN RESULTS: Four trials reported on 7095 women. The women were highly selected: tumours were node negative and 89.8% were smaller than 3 cm. Where the breast size was known, 87% had small or medium breasts. The studies were of low to medium quality. Unconventional fractionation (delivering radiation therapy in larger amounts each day but over fewer days than with conventional fractionation) did not affect: (1) local recurrence risk ratio (RR) 0.97 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.22, P = 0.78), (2) breast appearance RR 1.17 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.39, P = 0.09), (3) survival at five years RR 0.89 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.04, P = 0.16). Acute skin toxicity was decreased with unconventional fractionation: RR 0.21 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.64, P = 0.007). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Two new studies have been published since the last version of the review, altering our conclusions. We have evidence from four low to medium quality randomised trials that using unconventional fractionation regimens (greater than 2 Gy per fraction) does not affect local recurrence, is associated with decreased acute toxicity and does not seem to affect breast appearance or late toxicity for selected women treated with breast conserving therapy. These are mostly women with node negative tumours smaller than 3 cm and negative pathological margins. Long-term follow up (> 5 years) is available for a small proportion of the patients randomised. Longer follow up is required for a more complete assessment of the effect of altered fractionation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
19.
N Z Med J ; 133(1508): 72-84, 2020 01 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31945044

RESUMEN

AIM: Determine the impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on abnormal cervical cytology and histology rates in young New Zealand women. METHODS: Retrospective population-based cohort study of women born 1990-1994, with a cervical cytology or histology recorded when aged 20-24 between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. Data was obtained through linking the National Immunisation Register and National Cervical Screening Programme Register. RESULTS: N=104,313 women (376,402 person years of follow up) were included. The incidence of high-grade cytology was lower in vaccinated women (at least one dose prior to 18 years) than in unvaccinated women (8.5 vs 11.3 per 1,000 person years [p1000py], incidence rate ratio [IRR 0.75], 95% CI 0.70, 0.80, p<.001). The incidence of high-grade histology was lower in vaccinated women than in unvaccinated women (6.0 vs 8.7 p1000py, IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64, 0.75, p<.001). There was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of high-grade histology between European and Maori women overall or after taking vaccination status into account. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving at least one dose of quadrivalent HPV vaccine prior to 18 years was associated with a 25% lower incidence of high-grade cytology and 31% lower incidence of high-grade histology in women aged 20-24 years.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/inmunología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Frotis Vaginal/métodos , Adulto Joven , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/epidemiología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/virología
20.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (3): CD003860, 2008 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18646095

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shortening the duration of radiation therapy would benefit women with early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. It may also improve access to radiation therapy by improving efficiency in radiation oncology departments globally. This can only happen if the shorter treatment is as effective and safe as conventional radiation therapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of altered fraction size on women with early breast cancer who have undergone breast conserving surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register (June 2006), MEDLINE (November 2006), EMBASE (November 2006), reference lists for articles, and relevant conference proceedings. No language constraints were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of unconventional versus conventional fractionation in women with early breast cancer who had undergone breast conserving surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction was performed independently by the authors with disagreements resolved by discussion. Missing data was sought by contacting the authors concerned. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials were included and reported on 2644 women. The women were highly selected with node negative tumours smaller than 5 cm and negative pathological margins; 46% of the women had a cup separation size of less than 25 cm. The studies were of high quality. Data for local recurrence and breast appearance were not available in a form which could be combined. Unconventional fractionation (delivering radiation therapy in larger amounts each day but over fewer days than with conventional fractionation) did not appear to affect: (1) local-recurrence free survival (absolute difference 0.4%, 95% CI -1.5% to 2.4%), (2) breast appearance (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.17; P = 0.86), (3) survival at five years (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; P = 0.75), (4) late skin toxicity at five years (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.22; P = 0.98, or (5) late radiation toxicity in sub-cutaneous tissue (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.28; P = 0.99). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We have evidence from two high quality randomised trials that the use of unconventional fractionation regimes (greater than 2 Gy per fraction) does not affect breast appearance or toxicity and does not seem to affect local recurrence for selected women treated with breast conserving therapy. These are women with node negative tumours smaller than 5 cm and negative pathological margins. Two new trials have been published in March 2008. Their results are consistent with our findings. The results of these trials will be incorporated in the next update of this review.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA