Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative, untreated, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ATTRACTION-4): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The additive or synergistic sustained antitumour effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has previously been reported. We investigated the efficacy of nivolumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy versus placebo plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. METHODS: We did a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2-3 trial (ATTRACTION-4) at 130 centres (hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres) across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. We enrolled patients aged 20 years and older with previously untreated (except for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy completed ≥180 days before recurrence), HER2-negative, unresectable, advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 expression), at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours guidelines (version 1.1), and a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to chemotherapy every 3 weeks (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 plus either oral S-1 40 mg/m2 [SOX] or oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 [CAPOX], twice daily on days 1-14), in addition to either 360 mg nivolumab intravenously every 3 weeks (nivolumab plus chemotherapy group) or placebo (placebo plus chemotherapy group). Randomisation was done using an interactive web response system with block sizes of four and stratified by intensity of PD-L1 expression, ECOG performance status score, disease status, and geographical region. Patients, investigators, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02746796. Trial recruitment is complete and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between March 23, 2017, and May 10, 2018, 724 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 362 patients to the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 362 to the placebo plus chemotherapy group. At the time of data cutoff on Oct 31, 2018, with a median follow-up of 11·6 months (IQR 8·7-14·1), median progression-free survival at a prespecified interim analysis was 10·45 months (95% CI 8·44-14·75) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 8·34 months (6·97-9·40) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·68; 98·51% CI 0·51-0·90; p=0·0007). At the time of data cutoff on Jan 31, 2020, with a median follow-up of 26·6 months (IQR 24·1-29·0), median overall survival at the final analysis was 17·45 months (95% CI 15·67-20·83) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 17·15 months (15·18-19·65) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·90; 95% CI 0·75-1·08; p=0·26). The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (71 [20%] of 359 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group vs 57 [16%] of 358 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group) and platelet count decreased (34 [9%] vs 33 [9%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events of any grade were observed in 88 (25%) patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and in 51 (14%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group, of which the most common was decreased appetite (18 [5%] vs ten [3%]). Six treatment-related deaths occurred: three in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group (one each of febrile neutropenia, hepatic failure, and sudden death) and three in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (one each of sepsis, haemolytic anaemia, and interstitial lung disease). INTERPRETATION: Nivolumab combined with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival, but not overall survival, in Asian patients with untreated, HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, and could potentially be a new first-line treatment option for these patients. FUNDING: Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

A phase II trial of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) for patients with advanced gastric cancer with early relapse after S-1 adjuvant therapy: XParTS-I trial.

BACKGROUNDS: In Japan, standard regimens for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) include S-1 chemotherapy. The standard treatment for early relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine alone is platinum-based chemotherapy, while the standard treatment for early relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine plus platinum is second-line chemotherapy. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) treatment for AGC patients who relapse within 6 months after S-1-based therapy, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial (NCT01412294). METHODS: HER2-negative gastric cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy including S-1 for more than 12 weeks and relapsed within 6 months were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid for 14 days plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were OS, time to treatment failure, overall response rate (ORR) and safety. RESULTS: Forty patients (median age 64) were enrolled; of those, 37 (92.5%) received adjuvant S-1 monotherapy. Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.6-5.1), which was longer than the 2-month protocol-specified threshold (p < 0.001). Median OS was 13.7 months (95% CI 9.0-17.7) and ORR was 8/30 (26.7%) (95% CI 14.2-44.4). Most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (23%), anemia (18%), elevated serum creatinine (18%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (7.5%), and anorexia (7.5%). CONCLUSIONS: XP was safe and effective in patients with early relapse after S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected gastric cancers. XP may be a good option for the treatment of patients after early failure after adjuvant S-1. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01412294.

A phase II study of 5-fluorouracil/L-leucovorin/oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) in Japanese patients with metastatic or unresectable small bowel adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that chemotherapy prolonged survival in patients with metastatic or recurrent small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA); however, there is still no standard chemotherapy regimen. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/L-leucovorin (l-LV)/oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) protocol as a first-line therapy for patients with SBA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, age 20-80 years, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0-2. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), overall PFS, and safety. RESULTS: Between April 2010 and November 2012, 24 patients were enrolled from 12 institutions. The median age of the patients was 63 years (range 31-79) and there was a male/female ratio of 18/6. The number of PS 0/1 patients was 17/7 and locally advanced/metastatic disease was seen in 2/22 patients, respectively. The primary tumor site was the duodenum in 14 patients (58%) and jejunum in 10 patients (42%). The median follow-up time was 14.7 months (3.7-40.3). The 1-year PFS was 23.3%. The ORR was 9/20 (45%). The median PFS and OS times were 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-10.2) and 17.3 months (95% CI 11.7-19.0), respectively. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (38%), anemia/peripheral neuropathy (25%), and stenosis (17%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary endpoint was not met, mFOLFOX6 showed effective and good tolerance as a first-line treatment for SBA.

A Phase 2 Study of Encorafenib in Combination with Binimetinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAF-Mutated Thyroid Cancer in Japan.

Background: Driver mutations at BRAF V600 are frequently identified in papillary thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), in which BRAF inhibitors have shown clinical effectiveness. This Japanese phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, combined with an MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, in patients with BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted at 10 institutions targeted patients with BRAF V600-mutated locally advanced or distant metastatic thyroid cancer not amenable to curative treatment who became refractory/intolerant to ≥1 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted regimen(s) or were considered ineligible for those. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We enrolled 22 patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer: 17 had differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and 5 had ATC. At data cutoff (October 26, 2022), the median follow-up was 11.5 (range = 3.4-19.0) months. The primary endpoint of centrally assessed ORR was 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.2-75.6; partial response in 12 patients and stable disease in 10). The ORRs in patients with DTC and ATC were 47.1% (8 of 17) and 80.0% (4 of 5), respectively. The medians for DOR and PFS by central assessment and for OS were not reached in the overall population, the DTC subgroup, or the ATC subgroup. At 12 months, the rate of ongoing response was 90.9%, and the PFS and OS rates were 78.8% and 81.8%, respectively. All patients developed ≥1 adverse events (AEs): grade 3 AEs in 6 patients (27.3%). No patients developed grade 4-5 AEs. The most common grade 3 AE was lipase increased (4 patients [18.2%]). Those toxicities were mostly manageable with appropriate monitoring and dose adjustment. Conclusions: Treatment with encorafenib plus binimetinib met the primary endpoint criteria and demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer regardless of its histological type, such as DTC or ATC, with no new safety concerns identified. Encorafenib plus binimetinib could thus be a new treatment option for BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Clinical Trial Registration number: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT2011200018.

Adjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for stage III gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer after gastrectomy with D2 or more extensive lymph-node dissection (ATTRACTION-5): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In Asia, adjuvant chemotherapy after gastrectomy with D2 or more extensive lymph-node dissection is standard treatment for people with pathological stage III gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy administered in this setting. METHODS: ATTRACTION-5 was a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted at 96 hospitals in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and China. Eligible patients were aged between 20 years and 80 years with histologically confirmed pathological stage IIIA-C gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma after gastrectomy with D2 or more extensive lymph-node dissection, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1 and available tumour tissue for PD-L1 expression analysis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either nivolumab plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy via an interactive web-response system with block sizes of four. Investigational treatment, either nivolumab 360 mg or placebo, was administered intravenously for 30 min once every 3 weeks. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered as either tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil (S-1) at an initial dose of 40 mg/m2 per dose orally twice per day for 28 consecutive days, followed by 14 days off per cycle, or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin consisting of an initial dose of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 for 2 h every 21 days and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 per dose orally twice per day for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7 days off treatment. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival by central assessment. The intention-to-treat population, consisting of all randomly assigned patients, was used for analysis of efficacy endpoints. The safety population, defined as patients who received at least one dose of trial drug, was used for analysis of safety endpoints. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03006705) and is closed. FINDINGS: Between Feb 1, 2017, and Aug 15, 2019, 755 patients were randomly assigned to receive either adjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy (n=377) or adjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy (n=378). 267 (71%) of 377 patients in the nivolumab group and 263 (70%) of 378 patients in the placebo group were male; 110 (29%) of 377 patients in the nivolumab group and 115 (31%) of 378 patients in the placebo group were female. 745 patients received assigned treatment (371 in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group; 374 in the placebo plus chemotherapy group), which was the safety population. Median time from first dose to data cutoff was 49·1 months (IQR 43·1-56·7). 3-year relapse-free survival was 68·4% (95% CI 63·0-73·2) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 65·3% (59·9-70·2) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group; the hazard ratio for relapse-free survival was 0·90 (95·72% CI 0·69-1·18; p=0·44). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 366 (99%) of 371 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 364 (98%) of 374 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Discontinuation due to adverse events was more frequent in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group (34 [9%] of 371 patients) than the placebo plus chemotherapy group (13 [4%] of 374 patients). The most common treatment-related adverse events were decreased appetite, nausea, diarrhoea, neutrophil count decreased, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. INTERPRETATION: The results of this trial do not support the addition of nivolumab to postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with untreated, locally advanced, resectable gastric or GEJ cancer. FUNDING: Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol Myers Squibb.

Pharmacokinetic parameters from 3-Tesla DCE-MRI as surrogate biomarkers of antitumor effects of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis.

Bevacizumab (BV) is an antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody. When administered with other chemotherapeutic drugs, BV-combined regimens prolong survival of colorectal cancer patients. We conducted a phase II trial to confirm the pharmacokinetic parameters from 3-Tesla dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as surrogate biomarkers of BV + FOLFIRI regimen efficacy in colorectal cancer with liver metastases. DCE-MRI was performed before treatment, on the seventh day after first treatment and every 8 weeks thereafter using a 3-Tesla MRI system. DCE-MRI parameters-area under the contrast concentration versus time curve at 90 and 180 s (AUC90 and AUC180, respectively) after contrast injection, and volume transfer constant of contrast agents (K(trans) and K(ep) ) were calculated from liver metastases. Fifty-eight liver metastases were analyzed. Univariate analysis revealed that a decrease in K(trans) ratios (ΔK(trans) ), K(ep) ratios (ΔK(ep) ), AUC90 ratios (ΔAUC90) and AUC180 ratios (ΔAUC180) correlated with higher response (all p < 0.0001) and longer time to progression (TTP) (ΔK(trans) : p = 0.001; ΔK(ep) : p = 0.004; ΔAUC90: p = 0.006; ΔAUC180: p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that ΔAUC180 was correlated with higher response (p = 0.009), and ΔK(trans) and ΔAUC180 were correlated with longer TTP (ΔK(trans) : p = 0.001; ΔAUC180: p = 0.024). ΔK(trans) and ΔAUC180 are pharmacodynamic biomarkers of the blood perfusion of BV + FOLFIRI. Our data suggest that ΔK(trans) and ΔK(ep) can predict response to chemotherapy at 1 week. Changes in 3-Tesla DCE-MRI parameters confirmed the potential of these biomarkers of blood perfusion as surrogate predictors of response and TTP.

Phase II clinical trial of second-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: AVASIRI trial.

OBJECTIVE: FOLFIRI is a standard chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Although some studies have shown its efficacy in combination with bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy, there are no data to support FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with this form of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI and bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were ≥20 years old, previously treated (except with irinotecan [CPT-11] and bevacizumab), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2, and adequate organ function. Twenty-five eligible patients received FOLFIRI with bevacizumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg given intravenously on day 1. All therapy was administered every 2 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the response rate. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled between February 2008 and March 2009. The median age was 62 (range 38-73) years, the male/female distribution was 20/5, 16 patients had performance status 0 and 9 had performance status 1, and the proportion of patients who were oxaliplatin pretreated/untreated was 16/9. The overall response rate was 32% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 17.0-50.4%), with 8 patients showing partial responses, 15 with stable disease, and 2 with disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (95% CI: 6.9-16.4). Median overall survival was 21.4 months (95% CI: 12.0-30.8). The grade 3/4 adverse events with treatment were neutropenia (64%), leukopenia (16%), diarrhea (8%), anorexia (8%), and febrile neutropenia (8%). The bevacizumab-related grade 3/4 adverse event was hypertension, which was observed in 12% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen is an active, well-tolerated second-line chemotherapy treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

[Predicting drug efficacy-fluorinated pyrimidines (fluorouracil, S-1 and capecitabine)].

The elucidation in recent years of intracellular signaling mechanisms related to cancer cell growth has been accompanied by increases in both drug development and biomarker research. While treatment strategies using biomarkers have been established and put to clinical use for various types of cancers and medications, most are limited to drugs targeting specific molecules, and none have been established for traditional cytotoxic drugs. For fluoropyrimidines, the standard drugs used in chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer, biomarker research has been conducted on targets such as thymidylate synthase(TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase(DPD), and thymidine phosphorylase(TP). The results of research on these targets have recently been reported, albeit retrospectively, in a number of additional studies and large-scale clinical trials. While some studies suggested that there is future potential for these targets, in general, it appears that there are insufficient data for their clinical application as biomarkers at present. Given the advances made toward the realization of personalized medicine, the discovery of biomarkers for fluoropyrimidines is of great importance and warrants further study.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach: chemotherapy with cisplatin plus irinotecan is effective for gastric poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) occur in various primary sites, but rarely in the stomach. NETs are classified into three types, carcinoids, malignant carcinoids and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (PNECs), whose clinical behavior is different. Currently, clinical outcomes and standard chemotherapy for NETs of the stomach remain unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of histopathologically confirmed NETs of the stomach at our hospital between January 2000 and August 2006. RESULTS: Thirty-seven NETs were identified. Fifteen patients had carcinoids while 22 had PNECs. Among the carcinoid patients, 7 underwent endoscopic mucosal resection and 5 had gastrectomy as first-line treatment. Three patients were observed without intervention. All patients were alive after an average follow-up period of 27 months. Among the 22 PNEC patients, 3 had no metastasis, 11 had regional lymph node metastasis, and 8 had distant metastasis. Eight of 14 patients relapsed at a median of 177 days (range 120-1459 days) after curative surgery. Twelve patients with metastatic or recurrent disease received palliative cisplatin plus irinotecan chemotherapy. The response rate was 75%, the median progression-free survival time was 212 days, and median survival time was 679 days. CONCLUSION: Gastric PNEC patients with distant metastasis had poor outcomes. Regimens containing cisplatin plus irinotecan produced a good response in gastric PNEC.

Vesicocutaneous fistula formation during treatment with sunitinib malate: Case report.

BACKGROUND: The oral multi-kinase inhibitor sunitinib malate improves the survival of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after the disease progresses or intolerance to imatinib mesylate develops. Urinary fistulae arising during treatment with sunitinib for GIST have not been described. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 62-year-old female patient diagnosed with unresectable GIST that involved the abdominal wall, urinary bladder wall, bowel, mesentery and peritoneum in the pelvic cavity. Intestinocutaneous fistulae developed on a surgical lesion after orally administered imatinib was supplemented by an arterial infusion of 5-flurouracil. Sunitinib was started after the patient developed resistance to imatinib. On day 4 of the fourth course of sunitinib, a widely dilated cutaneous fistula discharged large amounts of fluid accompanied by severe abdominal pain. Urinary communication was indicated based on the results of an intravenous injection of indigo carmine. Computed tomography findings suggested a small opening on the anterior urinary bladder wall and fistulous communication between the bladder and abdominal walls bridged by a subcutaneous cavity. The fistula closed and the amount of discharge decreased when sunitinib was discontinued. Therefore, sunitinib might have been associated with the development of the vesicocutaneous fistula in our patient. CONCLUSION: This is the first description of a vesicocutaneous fistula forming while under sunitinib treatment. Clinicians should be aware of the possible complication of vesicocutaneous fistula formation during treatment with molecular targeting agents in patients with extravesical invasion and peritoneal dissemination of GIST.

Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan plus cisplatin after the failure of S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: For advanced gastric cancer (AGC), second-line chemotherapy after the failure of S-1 has not yet been established. The present study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) therapy after the failure of S-1 in patients with AGC. METHODS: The subjects included 87 patients with AGC who received IP therapy as second-line chemotherapy. Irinotecan (70 mg/m(2)) was administered by intravenous infusion followed by an intravenous infusion of cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) on day 1. On day 15, irinotecan (70 mg/m(2)) alone was administered. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression, patient refusal, or severe adverse events. RESULTS: The median patient age was 62 years (range, 39-75 years), and the median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range, 1-9). Out of the 87 patients, 70 were assessable for clinical response. There were 2 complete responses and 18 partial responses. The overall response rate was 28.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.4%-40.6%) and the disease control ratio was 70.0%. The median time to progression and median survival time from the first day of IP therapy were 4.3 months and 9.4 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 34.6%. Severe (grade 3/4) leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 34%, 40%, 28%, and 8% of patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities included anorexia (17%), febrile neutropenia (10%), diarrhea (6%), fatigue (5%), nausea (2%), and elevated creatinine (1%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin as second-line chemotherapy for AGC appears to be an effective and feasible treatment option after S-1 failure.

[Impact of HER2, EGFR, IGF-1R, and VEGFR expressions on the outcome of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer].

We aimed to elucidate the clinical significance of the expressions of HER2, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, 2, 3 (VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2, and VEGF-R3) in gastric cancer. The study group comprised 57 patients who had undergone gastrectomy at the National Cancer Center Hospital and subsequently received first-line chemotherapy (S-1 monotherapy [n=29] or irinotecan+cisplatin [n=28]) for recurrent or residual tumors. We performed immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed paraffinembedded specimens of surgically removed primary tumors to determine the expressions of HER2, EGFR, IGF-1R, and VEGFR1 in tumor cells and the expressions of VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2, and VEGF-R3 in tumor stromal vessels. The expressions of HER2 (p=0.017) and IGF-1R (p=0.025) were significantly more common in intestinal type tumors than in diffuse type. The protein expressions did not correlate with tumor response in either chemotherapy-regimen group. Among the patients who underwent S-1 monotherapy, those with cytoplasmic VEGF-R1-positive tumors had significantly shorter progression-free survival (logrank, p=0.017). In the survival analysis of all the patients, coexpression of membranous IGF-1R and VEGF-R3 in stromal vessels was the most significant predictor of poor survival (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.31-2.63; p<0.001). The results of our study will facilitate more efficient use of molecular targeted agents in patients with gastric cancer.

Impact of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, 2, and 3 expression on the outcome of patients with gastric cancer.

Tumor angiogenesis is a multistep interactive process in which vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors have a major role. However, the clinical significance of these molecules in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. Our study group comprised 86 patients who underwent gastrectomy and subsequently received chemotherapy for recurrent or residual tumor. Using immunohistochemical techniques, we analyzed the expression of VEGF receptors (VEGF-R) 1, 2, and 3. VEGF-R1 expression (defined as >5% staining) was found in the tumor cells of 65 tumors (76%) and in the stromal vessels of 36 tumors (42%). VEGF-R2 expression was found in tumor cells and stromal vessels of 0 and 46 tumors (0 and 53%), respectively, and VEGF-R3 expression was found in tumor cells and stromal vessels of 0 and 75 tumors (0 and 87%), respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that VEGF-R expression correlated with shorter survival (VEGF-R1 in stromal vessels, P = 0.001; VEGF-R2 in stromal vessels, P = 0.009; VEGF-R3 in stromal vessels, P = 0.005) and lower response to S-1 (VEGF-R1 in stromal vessels, P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis of potential prognostic factors showed that VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 in stromal vessels were independent predictors of poor outcome. Our data suggest that VEGF-R expression can be a predictor of unfavorable clinical outcome in GC. VEGF-R are promising candidates as therapeutic targets.

Relationships of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor expression to clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated the prognostic implications of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Our subjects were 91 patients who underwent surgery and subsequently received fluoropyrimidines. Expressions of IGF-1R, EGFR and HER-2 in primary lesions were analyzed immunohistochemically to determine the prognostic significance of these biomarkers. RESULTS: Overexpression was found for IGF-1R in 48 tumors (53%), EGFR in 57 (63%) and HER-2 in 2 (2%). Overexpression of IGF-1R was significantly correlated with shorter survival from the start of first-line chemotherapy (p = 0.033). Overexpression of EGFR was a significant predictor of clinical response to fluoropyrimidines (p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis of potential prognostic factors showed that IGF-1R expression and worsened performance status were independent predictors of poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that anti-IGF-1R strategies may offer a useful approach in molecular therapy for CRC, which has the potential to improve outcomes.

Impact of insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and HER2 expressions on outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Expression levels of insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-IR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and HER2 expressions have been linked to clinical outcomes in several solid tumors. However, the clinical significance of these biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. This study was designed to delineate the clinical implications of these three biomarkers in GC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The study group comprised 87 patients who underwent gastrectomy at National Cancer Center Hospital and subsequently received chemotherapy for recurrent or residual tumors. Using immunohistochemical techniques, we analyzed the expressions of IGF-IR, EGFR, and HER2 on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of surgically removed primary tumors. RESULTS: IGF-IR expression (defined as >10% membranous staining) was found in 67 tumors (77%), EGFR expression in 55 (63%), and HER2 expression in 16 (18%). Positive coexpression of IGF-IR and EGFR was found in 48 tumors (55%), that of IGF-IR and HER2 in 16 (18%), and that of EGFR and HER2 in 13 (15%). Multivariate survival analysis showed that IGF-IR-positive expression [hazard ratio (HR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20-3.82; P = 0.01], performance status 1 or 2 (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.15-2.91; P = 0.01), and diffuse type tumors (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.08-2.70; P = 0.02) were significant predictors of poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: IGF-IR expression in surgical GC specimens, poor performance status, and diffuse type tumors are significant predictors of poor outcomes in patients with GC. Our data suggest that anti-IGF-IR strategies may prove valuable in such patients.

A phase i study of bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined with weekly paclitaxel (FLTAX) as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of combination chemotherapy with leucovorin-modulated weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically proven metastatic or recurrent GC were enrolled. Paclitaxel was administered as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by 5-FU as a bolus i.v. infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15. A 2-h i.v. infusion of l-leucovorin was started at the same time as the paclitaxel infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15. Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Patients were scheduled to receive 5-FU, l-leucovorin and paclitaxel at four dose levels (mg/m(2)/week): 500/250/60 (level 1), 500/250/80 (level 2), 600/250/80 (level 3) and 600/250/100 (level 4), respectively. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. During the first cycle of the highest dose level (level 4), two of the six patients had DLT involving Grade 3 diarrhea and Grade 3 skin rash. Furthermore, three of the four patients who received the second consecutive cycle of treatment at dose level 4 had Grade 4 neutropenia. Dose level 3 was thus determined to be the MTD. Eleven (61%) of the 18 patients had partial responses, and the median progression-free survival time was 6.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD and the recommended dose for phase II studies of this regimen were determined to be 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/week, l-leucovorin 250 mg/m(2)/week and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2)/week.

[Successful CPT-11 treatment in a patient with pancreatic cancer associated with multiple liver metastases and chronic renal failure].

A 56-year-old woman, who had been receiving treatment for chronic renal failure, was admitted to our Department because of a tumor of the pancreas head and multiple liver masses diagnosed by abdominal CT scans. Gastroduodenoscopy revealed a tumor which had invaded the Vater's papilla; the lesion was histopathologically pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Due to the presence of multiple metastases to the liver, we therefore performed general chemotherapy after obtaining the patient's informed consent (IC). CPT-11 was selected as the carcinostatic agent because the patient suffered from renal failure. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 80 mg, and we thereafter made minor adjustments in the dosage depending on the occurrence of side effects. After four courses of the treatment, a CT scan revealed both the tumor of the pancreas head and the multiple liver masses to have almost completely disappeared. Our clinical results indicate that CPT-11 may therefore be a strong candidate for first-line chemotherapy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, especially in patients with renal failure.

[Eosinophilic gastroenteritis in the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine in a patient with a choking feeling in the esophagus].

A 75-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with the chief complaint of a choking feeling around the esophagus. Laboratory examinations revealed eosinophilia, and high levels of serum immunoglobulin (Ig) E. A computed tomography scan (CT) showed wall thickening of the esophagus and terminal ileum, and ascites around the liver. An endoscopic examination revealed mild mucosal edema in the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine. Biopsy specimens showed diffuse eosinophilic infiltration in the mucosa. We therefore diagnosed eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Oral prednisolone relieved clinical conditions and the CT image improved. This case was considered valuable, because there have been few reports of eosinophilic esophagitis in Japan.

Alternative splicing in human transcriptome: functional and structural influence on proteins.

Alternative splicing is a molecular mechanism that produces multiple proteins from a single gene, and is thought to produce variety in proteins translated from a limited number of genes. Here we analyzed how alternative splicing produced variety in protein structure and function, by using human full-length cDNAs on the assumption that all of the alternatively spliced mRNAs were translated to proteins. We found that the length of alternatively spliced amino acid sequences, in most cases, fell into a size shorter than that of average protein domain. We evaluated comprehensively the presumptive three-dimensional structures of the alternatively spliced products to assess the impact of alternative splicing on gene function. We found that more than half of the products encoded proteins which were involved in signal transduction, transcription and translation, and more than half of alternatively spliced regions comprised interaction sites between proteins and their binding partners, including substrates, DNA/RNA, and other proteins. Intriguingly, 67% of the alternatively spliced isoforms showed significant alterations to regions of the protein structural core, which likely resulted in large conformational change. Based on those findings, we speculate that there are a large number of cases that alternative splicing modulates protein networks through significant alteration in protein conformation.

[Successful bi-weekly paclitaxel treatment of an AFP-producing gastric cancer patient with peritoneal dissemination and multiple liver metastasis].

The patient was a 71-year-old man. Chemotherapy was conducted in two courses combining TS-1 (120 mg) and CDDP (80 mg) under the diagnosis of AFP-producing gastric cancer with multiple liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination. Peritoneal dissemination disappeared, liver metastasis almost disappeared after completion of two courses, and the therapeutic efficacy was rated as PR. Then, the patient underwent distal gastrectomy and lymph node dissection. He received TS-1 monotherapy after surgery, but his condition gradually became worse. TS-1 and CDDP combination were given again, but an ileus resulted due to peritonitis carcinomatous. We therefore administered bi-weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) intravenously. The ileus disappeared after one week, liver metastatic lesions and ascites were improved after completion of one course, and therapeutic efficacy was rated as PR. Grade 3 neutropenia and grade 1 alopecia occurred, but no other adverse reaction occurred. This therapy made it possible to eat foods, conduct chemotherapy safely while ambulatory. Paclitaxel can be expected to show good therapeutic efficacy and improve QOL of a peritonitis carcinomatosa patient with TS-1 resistant advanced gastric cancer.