Cytokines in New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus Predict Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate inflammation using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum cytokines/chemokines in patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) to better understand the pathophysiology of NORSE and its consequences. METHODS: Patients with NORSE (n = 61, including n = 51 cryptogenic), including its subtype with prior fever known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), were compared with patients with other refractory status epilepticus (RSE; n = 37), and control patients without SE (n = 52). We measured 12 cytokines/chemokines in serum or CSF samples using multiplexed fluorescent bead-based immunoassay detection. Cytokine levels were compared between patients with and without SE, and between the 51 patients with cryptogenic NORSE (cNORSE) and the 47 patients with a known-etiology RSE (NORSE n = 10, other RSE n = 37), and correlated with outcomes. RESULTS: A significant increase of IL-6, TNF-α, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL2, MIP-1α, and IL-12p70 pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines was observed in patients with SE compared with patients without SE, in serum and CSF. Serum innate immunity pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines (CXCL8, CCL2, and MIP-1α) were significantly higher in patients with cNORSE compared to non-cryptogenic RSE. Patients with NORSE with elevated innate immunity serum and CSF cytokine/chemokine levels had worse outcomes at discharge and at several months after the SE ended. INTERPRETATION: We identified significant differences in innate immunity serum and CSF cytokine/chemokine profiles between patients with cNORSE and non-cryptogenic RSE. The elevation of innate immunity pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients with NORSE correlated with worse short- and long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the involvement of innate immunity-related inflammation, including peripherally, and possibly of neutrophil-related immunity in cNORSE pathogenesis and suggest the importance of utilizing specific anti-inflammatory interventions. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:75-90.

Second-line immunotherapy in new onset refractory status epilepticus.

Several pieces of evidence suggest immune dysregulation could trigger the onset and modulate sequelae of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with prior fever known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Consensus-driven recommendations have been established to guide the initiation of first- and second-line immunotherapies in these patients. Here, we review the literature to date on second-line immunotherapy for NORSE/FIRES, presenting results from 28 case reports and series describing the use of anakinra, tocilizumab, or intrathecal dexamethasone in 75 patients with NORSE. Among them, 52 patients were managed with anakinra, 21 with tocilizumab, and eight with intrathecal dexamethasone. Most had elevated serum or cerebrospinal fluid cytokine levels at treatment initiation. Treatments were predominantly initiated during the acute phase of the disease (92%) and resulted, within the first 2 weeks, in seizure control for up to 73% of patients with anakinra, 70% with tocilizumab, and 50% with intrathecal dexamethasone. Cytokine levels decreased after treatment for most patients. Anakinra and intrathecal dexamethasone were mainly initiated in children with FIRES, whereas tocilizumab was more frequently prescribed for adults, with or without a prior febrile infection. There was no clear correlation between the response to treatment and the time to initiate the treatment. Most patients experienced long-term disability and drug-resistant post-NORSE epilepsy. Initiation of second-line immunotherapies during status epilepticus (SE) had no clear effect on the emergence of post-NORSE epilepsy or long-term functional outcomes. In a small number of cases, the initiation of anakinra or tocilizumab several years after SE onset resulted in a reduction of seizure frequency for 67% of patients. These data highlight the potential utility of anakinra, tocilizumab, and intrathecal dexamethasone in patients with NORSE. There continues to be interest in the utilization of early cytokine measurements to guide treatment selection and response. Prospective studies are necessary to understand the role of early immunomodulation and its associations with epilepsy and functional outcomes.

Immediate and long-term management practices of acute symptomatic seizures and epileptiform abnormalities: A cross-sectional international survey.

OBJECTIVES: Acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) and epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) on electroencephalography (EEG) are commonly encountered following acute brain injury. Their immediate and long-term management remains poorly investigated. We conducted an international survey to understand their current management. METHODS: The cross-sectional web-based survey of 21 fixed-response questions was based on a common clinical encounter: convulsive or suspected ASyS following an acute brain injury. Respondents selected the option that best matched their real-world practice. Respondents completing the survey were compared with those who accessed but did not complete it. RESULTS: A total of 783 individuals (44 countries) accessed the survey; 502 completed it. Almost everyone used anti-seizure medications (ASMs) for secondary prophylaxis after convulsive or electrographic ASyS (95.4% and 97.2%, respectively). ASM dose escalation after convulsive ASyS depends on continuous EEG (cEEG) findings: most often increased after electrographic seizures (78% of respondents), followed by lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs; 41%) and sporadic epileptiform discharges (sEDs; 17.5%). If cEEG is unrevealing, one in five respondents discontinue ASMs after a week. In the absence of convulsive and electrographic ASyS, a large proportion of respondents start ASMs due to LPD (66.7%) and sED (44%) on cEEG. At hospital discharge, most respondents (85%) continue ASM without dose change. The recommended duration of outpatient ASM use is as follows: 1-3 months (36%), 3-6 months (30%), 6-12 months (13%), >12 months (11%). Nearly one-third of respondents utilized ancillary testing before outpatient ASM taper, most commonly (79%) a <2 h EEG. Approximately half of respondents had driving restrictions recommended for 6 months after discharge. SIGNIFICANCE: ASM use for secondary prophylaxis after convulsive and electrographic ASyS is a universal practice and is continued upon discharge. Outpatient care, particularly the ASM duration, varies significantly. Wide practice heterogeneity in managing acute EAs reflects uncertainty about their significance and management. These results highlight the need for a structured outpatient follow-up and optimized care pathway for patients with ASyS.

Trends in management of patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) from 2016 to 2023: An interim analysis.

In response to the evolving treatment landscape for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second-line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second-line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3-2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second-line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.9)-particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3-21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5-20.1)-than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second-line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.

Comparative analysis of patients with new onset refractory status epilepticus preceded by fever (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome) versus without prior fever: An interim analysis.

Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a subset of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) that involves a febrile infection prior to the onset of the refractory status epilepticus. It is unclear whether FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are distinct conditions. Here, we compare 34 patients with FIRES to 30 patients with non-FIRES NORSE for demographics, clinical features, neuroimaging, and outcomes. Because patients with FIRES were younger than patients with non-FIRES NORSE (median = 28 vs. 48 years old, p = .048) and more likely cryptogenic (odds ratio = 6.89), we next ran a regression analysis using age or etiology as a covariate. Respiratory and gastrointestinal prodromes occurred more frequently in FIRES patients, but no difference was found for non-infection-related prodromes. Status epilepticus subtype, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging findings, and outcomes were similar. However, FIRES cases were more frequently cryptogenic; had higher CSF interleukin 6, CSF macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1a), and serum chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) levels; and received more antiseizure medications and immunotherapy. After controlling for age or etiology, no differences were observed in presenting symptoms and signs or inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting that FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are very similar conditions.

Evaluating the Impact of Point-of-Care Electroencephalography on Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit: Subanalysis of the SAFER-EEG Trial.

BACKGROUND: Electroencephalography (EEG) is needed to diagnose nonconvulsive seizures. Prolonged nonconvulsive seizures are associated with neuronal injuries and deleterious clinical outcomes. However, it is uncertain whether the rapid identification of these seizures using point-of-care EEG (POC-EEG) can have a positive impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a retrospective subanalysis of the recently completed multicenter Seizure Assessment and Forecasting with Efficient Rapid-EEG (SAFER-EEG) trial, we compared intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≥ 4), and time to EEG between adult patients receiving a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared POC-EEG (Ceribell, Inc.) and those receiving conventional EEG (conv-EEG). Patient records from January 2018 to June 2022 at three different academic centers were reviewed, focusing on EEG timing and clinical outcomes. Propensity score matching was applied using key clinical covariates to control for confounders. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were calculated for descriptive statistics. Nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U-test) were used for the continuous variables, and the χ2 test was used for the proportions. RESULTS: A total of 283 ICU patients (62 conv-EEG, 221 POC-EEG) were included. The two populations were matched using demographic and clinical characteristics. We found that the ICU LOS was significantly shorter in the POC-EEG cohort compared to the conv-EEG cohort (3.9 [IQR 1.9-8.8] vs. 8.0 [IQR 3.0-16.0] days, p = 0.003). Moreover, modified Rankin Scale functional outcomes were also different between the two EEG cohorts (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a significant association between early POC-EEG detection of nonconvulsive seizures and decreased ICU LOS. The POC-EEG differed from conv-EEG, demonstrating better functional outcomes compared with the latter in a matched analysis. These findings corroborate previous research advocating the benefit of early diagnosis of nonconvulsive seizure. The causal relationship between the type of EEG and metrics of interest, such as ICU LOS and functional/clinical outcomes, needs to be confirmed in future prospective randomized studies.

Clinical and Electroencephalographic Predictors of Seizures and Status Epilepticus in 12,450 Critically Ill Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Status epilepticus (SE) is associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality than isolated seizures. Our objective was to identify clinical diagnoses and rhythmic and periodic electroencephalogram patterns (RPPs) associated with SE and seizures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care hospitals. SUBJECTS: Twelve thousand four hundred fifty adult hospitalized patients undergoing continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring in selected participating sites in the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium database (February 2013 to June 2021). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We defined an ordinal outcome in the first 72 hours of cEEG: no seizures, isolated seizures without SE, or SE (with or without isolated seizures). Composite groups included isolated seizures or SE (AnySz) and no seizure or isolated seizures. In this cohort (mean age: 60 ± 17 yr), 1,226 patients (9.8%) had AnySz and 439 patients (3.5%) had SE. In a multivariate model, factors independently associated with SE were cardiac arrest (9.2% with SE; adjusted odds ratio, 8.8 [6.3-12.1]), clinical seizures before cEEG (5.7%; 3.3 [2.5-4.3]), brain neoplasms (3.2%; 1.6 [1.0-2.6]), lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) (15.4%; 7.3 [5.7-9.4]), brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges (BIRDs) (22.5%; 3.8 [2.6-5.5]), and generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) (7.2%; 2.4 [1.7-3.3]). All above variables and lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA) were also associated with AnySz. Factors disproportionately increasing odds of SE over isolated seizures were cardiac arrest (7.3 [4.4-12.1]), clinical seizures (1.7 [1.3-2.4]), GPDs (2.3 [1.4-3.5]), and LPDs (1.4 [1.0-1.9]). LRDA had lower odds of SE compared with isolated seizures (0.5 [0.3-0.9]). RPP modifiers did not improve SE prediction beyond RPPs presence/absence ( p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Using the largest existing cEEG database, we identified specific predictors of SE (cardiac arrest, clinical seizures prior to cEEG, brain neoplasms, LPDs, GPDs, and BIRDs) and seizures (all previous and LRDA). These findings could be used to tailor cEEG monitoring for critically ill patients.

Quantitative epileptiform burden and electroencephalography background features predict post-traumatic epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a severe complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Electroencephalography aids early post-traumatic seizure diagnosis, but its optimal utility for PTE prediction remains unknown. We aim to evaluate the contribution of quantitative electroencephalograms to predict first-year PTE (PTE1). METHODS: We performed a multicentre, retrospective case-control study of patients with TBI. 63 PTE1 patients were matched with 63 non-PTE1 patients by admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, age and sex. We evaluated the association of quantitative electroencephalography features with PTE1 using logistic regressions and examined their predictive value relative to TBI mechanism and CT abnormalities. RESULTS: In the matched cohort (n=126), greater epileptiform burden, suppression burden and beta variability were associated with 4.6 times higher PTE1 risk based on multivariable logistic regression analysis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC (95% CI) 0.69 (0.60 to 0.78)). Among 116 (92%) patients with available CT reports, adding quantitative electroencephalography features to a combined mechanism and CT model improved performance (AUC (95% CI), 0.71 (0.61 to 0.80) vs 0.61 (0.51 to 0.72)). CONCLUSIONS: Epileptiform and spectral characteristics enhance covariates identified on TBI admission and CT abnormalities in PTE1 prediction. Future trials should incorporate quantitative electroencephalography features to validate this enhancement of PTE risk stratification models.

Diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Defining electroencephalographic and clinical response to diagnostic intravenous antiseizure medication trials.

OBJECTIVE: The Salzburg criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology 2021 include a diagnostic trial with intravenous (IV) antiseizure medications (ASMs) to assess electroencephalographic (EEG) and clinical response as a diagnostic criterion for definite NCSE and possible NCSE. However, how to perform this diagnostic test and assessing the EEG and clinical responses have not been operationally defined. METHODS: We performed a Delphi process involving six experts to standardize the diagnostic administration of IV ASM and propose operational criteria for EEG and clinical response. RESULTS: Either benzodiazepines (BZDs) or non-BZD ASMs can be used as first choice for a diagnostic IV ASM trial. However, non-BZDs should be considered in patients who already have impaired alertness or are at risk of respiratory depression. Levetiracetam, valproate, lacosamide, brivaracetam, or (if the only feasible drug) fosphenytoin or phenobarbital were deemed appropriate for a diagnostic IV trial. The starting dose should be approximately two thirds to three quarters of the full loading dose recommended for treatment of status epilepticus, with an additional smaller dose if needed. ASMs should be administered during EEG recording under supervision. A monitoring time of at least 15 min is recommended. If there is no response, a second trial with another non-BDZ or BDZs may be considered. A positive EEG response is defined as the resolution of the ictal-interictal continuum pattern for at least three times the longest previously observed spontaneous interval of resolution (if any), but minimum of one continuous minute. For a clinical response, physicians should use a standardized examination before and after IV ASM administration. We suggest a definite time-locked improvement in a focal deficit or at least one-step improvement on a new dedicated one-domain 10-level NCSE response scale. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed standardized approach of a diagnostic IV ASM trial further refines the ACNS and Salzburg diagnostic criteria for NCSE.

The seasonality of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE).

The etiology of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with prior fever known as FIRES (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome), remains uncertain. Several arguments suggest that NORSE is a disorder of immunity, likely post-infectious. Consequently, seasonal occurrence might be anticipated. Herein we investigated if seasonality is a notable factor regarding NORSE presentation. We combined four different data sets with a total of 342 cases, all from the northern hemisphere, and 62% adults. The incidence of NORSE cases differed between seasons (p = .0068) and was highest in the summer (32.2%) (p = .0022) and lowest in the spring (19.0%, p = .010). Although both FIRES and non-FIRES cases occurred most commonly during the summer, there was a trend toward FIRES cases being more likely to occur in the winter than non-FIRES cases (OR 1.62, p = .071). The seasonality of NORSE cases differed according to the etiology (p = .024). NORSE cases eventually associated with autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis occurred most frequently in the summer (p = .032) and least frequently in the winter (p = .047), whereas there was no seasonality for cryptogenic cases. This study suggests that NORSE overall and NORSE related to autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis are more common in the summer, but that there is no definite seasonality in cryptogenic cases.

Review and standard operating procedures for collection of biospecimens and analysis of biomarkers in new onset refractory status epilepticus.

New onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with a preceding febrile illness known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), is one of the most severe forms of status epilepticus. The exact causes of NORSE are currently unknown, and there is so far no disease-specific therapy. Identifying the underlying pathophysiology and discovering specific biomarkers, whether immunologic, infectious, genetic, or other, may help physicians in the management of patients with NORSE. A broad spectrum of biomarkers has been proposed for status epilepticus patients, some of which were evaluated for patients with NORSE. Nonetheless, none has been validated, due to significant variabilities in study cohorts, collected biospecimens, applied analytical methods, and defined outcome endpoints, and to small sample sizes. The NORSE Institute established an open NORSE/FIRES biorepository for health-related data and biological samples allowing the collection of biospecimens worldwide, promoting multicenter research and sharing of data and specimens. Here, we suggest standard operating procedures for biospecimen collection and biobanking in this rare condition. We also propose criteria for the appropriate use of previously collected biospecimens. We predict that the widespread use of standardized procedures will reduce heterogeneity, facilitate the future identification of validated biomarkers for NORSE, and provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology and best clinical management for these patients.

Do acute EEG findings add to clinical features in predicting outcomes after status epilepticus and acute symptomatic seizures?

Status epilepticus is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency associated with poor functional outcomes. Improving our ability to accurately predict functional outcomes is beneficial to optimizing treatment strategies. Currently, there are four published status epilepticus scores in adults: STESS (Status Epilepticus Severity Score), EMSE (Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus), END-IT (Encephalitis-Nonconvulsive-Diazepam resistance-Imaging-Tracheal intubation), and recently published ACD (Age-level of Consciousness-Duration of status epilepticus) score. The only available scale in the pediatric population is PEDSS (Pediatric CPC scale-EEG (normal vs abnormal)-Drug refractoriness-critical Sickness-Semiology). While these scores are useful research tools, currently there is little evidence to suggest their utility during real-time clinical care. Except for EMSE, none of the scores incorporate EEG findings for prognostication. Adding EEG features improves prognostic accuracy, as has been shown with the EMSE scale with and without the EEG component. Acute symptomatic seizures (AsyS) and early epileptiform abnormalities, especially nonconvulsive seizures, and periodic discharges, markedly increase the risk for subsequent unprovoked seizures. However, many of these patients may not need lifelong anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Continuous EEG monitoring shows that the majority of ASyS are nonconvulsive and can identify epileptic patterns. Dedicated specialty clinics for these patients, known as Post Acute Symptomatic Seizure (PASS) clinics, already exist in the United States. Post Acute Symptomatic Seizure clinics are ideal for both long-term clinical care and answering important research questions related to epileptogenesis, duration of ASM treatment required, and evolution of EEG findings. This topic was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Association of Serum Pyridoxal Phosphate Levels with Established Status Epilepticus.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of pyridoxine deficiency, measured by pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) levels, in patients admitted to the hospital with established (benzodiazepine-resistant) status epilepticus (SE) (eSE) and to compare to three control groups: intensive care unit (ICU) patients without SE (ICU-noSE), non-ICU inpatients without SE (non-ICU), and outpatients with or without a history of epilepsy (outpatient). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University of North Carolina Hospitals and Yale New Haven Hospital. Participants included inpatients and outpatients who had serum PLP levels measured during clinical care between January 2018 and March 2021. The first PLP level obtained was categorized as normal (> 30 nmol/L), marginal (≤ 30 nmol/L), deficient (≤ 20 nmol/L), and severely deficient (≤ 5 nmol/L). RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were included (52 eSE, 40 ICU-noSE, 44 non-ICU, and 157 outpatient). The median age was 55 (range 19-99) years. The median PLP level of the eSE group (12 nmol/L) was lower than that of the ICU-noSE (22 nmol/L, p = 0.003), non-ICU (16 nmol/L, p = 0.05), and outpatient groups (36 nmol/L, p < 0.001). Patients with eSE had a significantly higher prevalence of marginal and deficient PLP levels (90 and 80%, respectively) than patients in each of the other three groups (ICU-noSE: 70, 50%; non-ICU: 63, 54%; outpatient: 38, 21%). This significantly higher prevalence persisted after correcting for critical illness severity and timing of PLP level collection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms previous findings indicating a high prevalence of pyridoxine deficiency (as measured by serum PLP levels) in patients with eSE, including when using a more restricted definition of pyridoxine deficiency. Prevalence is higher in patients with eSE than in patients in all three control groups (ICU-noSE, non-ICU, and outpatient). Considering the role of pyridoxine, thus PLP, in the synthesis of γ-aminobutyric acid and its easy and safe administration, prospective studies on pyridoxine supplementation in patients with eSE are needed.

Electroencephalographic Abnormalities are Common in COVID-19 and are Associated with Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for electrographic seizures and other electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) undergoing clinically indicated continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring and to assess whether EEG findings are associated with outcomes. METHODS: We identified 197 patients with COVID-19 referred for cEEG at 9 participating centers. Medical records and EEG reports were reviewed retrospectively to determine the incidence of and clinical risk factors for seizures and other epileptiform patterns. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis assessed the relationship between EEG patterns and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Electrographic seizures were detected in 19 (9.6%) patients, including nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in 11 (5.6%). Epileptiform abnormalities (either ictal or interictal) were present in 96 (48.7%). Preceding clinical seizures during hospitalization were associated with both electrographic seizures (36.4% in those with vs 8.1% in those without prior clinical seizures, odds ratio [OR] 6.51, p = 0.01) and NCSE (27.3% vs 4.3%, OR 8.34, p = 0.01). A pre-existing intracranial lesion on neuroimaging was associated with NCSE (14.3% vs 3.7%; OR 4.33, p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis of outcomes, electrographic seizures were an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 4.07 [1.44-11.51], p < 0.01). In competing risks analysis, hospital length of stay increased in the presence of NCSE (30 day proportion discharged with vs without NCSE: HR 0.21 [0.03-0.33] vs 0.43 [0.36-0.49]). INTERPRETATION: This multicenter retrospective cohort study demonstrates that seizures and other epileptiform abnormalities are common in patients with COVID-19 undergoing clinically indicated cEEG and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:872-883.

International consensus recommendations for management of New Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE) incl. Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES): Statements and Supporting Evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus-based recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric patients with NORSE/FIRES based on best evidence and experience. METHODS: The Delphi methodology was followed. A facilitator group of 9 experts was established, who defined the scope, users and suggestions for recommendations. Following a review of the current literature, recommendation statements concerning diagnosis, treatment and research directions were generated which were then voted on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree) by a panel of 48 experts in the field. Consensus that a statement was appropriate was reached if the median score was greater or equal to 7, and inappropriate if the median score was less than or equal to 3. The analysis of evidence was mapped to the results of each statement included in the Delphi survey. RESULTS: Overall, 85 recommendation statements achieved consensus. The recommendations are divided into five sections: 1) disease characteristics, 2) diagnostic testing and sampling, 3) acute treatment, 4) treatment in the post-acute phase, and 5) research, registries and future directions in NORSE/FIRES. The detailed results and discussion of all 85 statements are outlined herein. A corresponding summary of findings and practical flowsheets are presented in a companion article. SIGNIFICANCE: This detailed analysis offers insight into the supporting evidence and the current gaps in the literature that are associated with expert consensus statements related to NORSE/FIRES. The recommendations generated by this consensus can be used as a guide for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with NORSE/FIRES, and for planning of future research.

International consensus recommendations for management of New Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE) including Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES): Summary and Clinical Tools.

OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus-based recommendations for the management of adult and pediatric patients with NORSE/FIRES based on best available evidence and expert opinion. METHODS: The Delphi methodology was followed. A facilitator group of 9 experts was established, who defined the scope, users and suggestions for recommendations. Following a review of the current literature, recommendation statements concerning diagnosis, treatment and research directions were generated which were then voted on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree) by a panel of 48 experts in the field. Consensus that a statement was appropriate was reached if the median score was greater than or equal to 7, and inappropriate if the median score was less than or equal to 3. RESULTS: Overall, 85 recommendation statements achieved consensus. The recommendations are divided into five sections: 1) disease characteristics, 2) diagnostic testing and sampling, 3) acute treatment, 4) treatment in the post-acute phase, and 5) research, registries and future directions in NORSE/FIRES. These are summarized in this article along with two practical clinical flowsheets: one for diagnosis and evaluation and one for acute treatment. A corresponding evidence-based analysis of all 85 recommendations alongside responses by the Delphi panel is presented in a companion article. SIGNIFICANCE: The recommendations generated by this consensus can be used as a guide for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with NORSE/FIRES, and for planning of future research.

Simulated driving in the epilepsy monitoring unit: Effects of seizure type, consciousness, and motor impairment.

People with epilepsy face serious driving restrictions, determined using retrospective studies. To relate seizure characteristics to driving impairment, we aimed to study driving behavior during seizures with a simulator. Patients in the Yale New Haven Hospital undergoing video-electroencephalographic monitoring used a laptop-based driving simulator during ictal events. Driving function was evaluated by video review and analyzed in relation to seizure type, impairment of consciousness/responsiveness, or motor impairment during seizures. Fifty-one seizures in 30 patients were studied. In terms of seizure type, we found that focal to bilateral tonic-clonic or myoclonic seizures (5/5) and focal seizures with impaired consciousness/responsiveness (11/11) always led to driving impairment; focal seizures with spared consciousness/responsiveness (0/10) and generalized nonmotor (generalized spike-wave bursts; 1/19) usually did not lead to driving impairment. Regardless of seizure type, we found that seizures with impaired consciousness (15/15) or with motor involvement (13/13) always led to impaired driving, but those with spared consciousness (0/20) or spared motor function (5/38) usually did not. These results suggest that seizure types with impaired consciousness/responsiveness and abnormal motor function contribute to impaired driving. Expanding this work in a larger cohort could further determine how results with a driving simulator may translate into real world driving safety.

Hippocampal recording via the RNS system reveals marked ipsilateral activation of epileptiform activity during Wada testing.

Wada testing remains an important component of pre-surgical testing to assess the feasibility of temporal lobectomy for patients with intractable epilepsy. In this procedure, an anesthetic is injected into either internal carotid artery while memory and language testing is performed, simulating the effect of temporal lobe resection. The mechanism remains poorly understood because the hippocampal vasculature is predominantly via the posterior circulation. We recorded hippocampal EEG during bilateral methohexital Wada testing in three patients who had previously been implanted with a responsive neurostimulation system (RNS) to determine the effect of the injections on hippocampal activity. In all six injections from three patients, methohexital caused immediate, transient increases in hippocampal spikes. With at least two of these injections, the electrographic changes were consistent with electrographic seizures. In all cases, the epileptiform activity was not apparent on scalp EEG and was without obvious clinical correlate other than the negative findings expected from the anesthetic. The results demonstrate the utility of intracranial EEG during Wada testing and suggest that the elicitation of seizures or continuous spiking might contribute to dysfunction of the hippocampus during the Wada test. We hypothesize that this effect is due to disconnection and disinhibition of medial temporal structures.

Pregabalin for Recurrent Seizures in Critical Illness: A Promising Adjunctive Therapy, Especially for cyclic Seizures.

BACKGROUND: Pregabalin (PGB) is an effective adjunctive treatment for focal epilepsy and acts by binding to the alpha2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels to reduce excitatory neurotransmitter release. Limited data exist on its use in the neurocritical care setting, including cyclic seizures-a pattern of recurrent seizures occurring at nearly regular intervals. Although the mechanism underpinning cyclic seizures remains elusive, spreading excitation linked to spreading depolarizations may play a role in seizure recurrence and periodicity. PGB has been shown to increase spreading depolarization threshold; hence, we hypothesized that the magnitude of antiseizure effect from PGB is more pronounced in patients with cyclic versus noncyclic seizures in a critically ill cohort with recurrent seizures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series of adults admitted to two academic neurointensive care units between January 2017 and March 2019 who received PGB for treatment of seizures. Data collected included demographics, etiology of brain injury, antiseizure medications, and outcome. Continuous electroencephalogram recordings 48 hours before and after PGB administration were reviewed by electroencephalographers blinded to the administration of antiseizure medications to obtain granular data on electrographic seizure burden. Cyclic seizures were determined quantitatively (i.e., < 50% variation of interseizure intervals for at least 50% of consecutive seizures). Coprimary outcomes were decrease in hourly seizure burden in minutes and decrease in seizure frequency in the 48 hours after PGB initiation. We used nonparametric tests for comparison of seizure frequency and burden and segmented linear regression to assess PGB effect. RESULTS: We included 16 patients; the median age was 69 years, 11 (68.7%) were women, three (18.8%) had undergone a neurosurgical procedure, and five (31%) had underlying epilepsy. All seizures had focal onset; ten patients (62.5%) had cyclic seizures. The median hourly seizure burden over the 48 hours prior to PGB initiation was 1.87 min/hour (interquartile range 1.49-8.53), and the median seizure frequency was 1.96 seizures/hour (interquartile range 1.06-3.41). In the 48 hours following PGB (median daily dose 300 mg, range 75-300 mg), the median number of seizures per hour was reduced by 0.80 seizures/hour (95% confidence interval 0.19-1.40), whereas the median hourly seizure burden decreased by 1.71 min/hour (95% confidence interval 0.38-3.04). When we compared patients with cyclic versus noncyclic seizures, there was a relative decrease in hourly seizure frequency (- 86.7% versus - 2%, p = 0.04) and hourly seizure burden (- 89% versus - 7.8%, p = 0.03) at 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: PGB was associated with a relative reduction in seizure burden in neurocritically ill patients with recurrent seizures, especially those with cyclic seizures, and may be considered in the therapeutic arsenal for refractory seizures. Whether this effect is mediated via modulation of spreading depolarization requires further study.

Hospital Revisits for Post-Ischemic Stroke Epilepsy after Acute Stroke Interventions.

OBJECTIVES: Improvements in acute stroke care have led to an increase in ischemic stroke survivors, who are at risk for development of post-ischemic stroke epilepsy (PISE). The impact of therapies such as thrombectomy and thrombolysis on risk of hospital revisits for PISE is unclear. We utilized administrative data to investigate the association between stroke treatment and PISE-related visits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using claims data from California, New York, and Florida, we performed a retrospective analysis of adult survivors of acute ischemic strokes. Patients with history of epilepsy, trauma, infections, or tumors were excluded. Included patients were followed for a primary outcome of revisits for seizures or epilepsy. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify covariates associated with PISE. RESULTS: In 595,545 included patients (median age 74 [IQR 21], 52% female), the 6-year cumulative rate of PISE-related revisit was 2.20% (95% CI 2.16-2.24). In multivariable models adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and indicators of stroke severity, IV-tPA (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.31-1.54, p<0.001) but not MT (HR 1.62, 95% CI 0.90-1.50, p=0.2) was associated with PISE-related revisit. Patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy experienced a 2-fold increase in odds for returning with PISE (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.69-3.26, p<0.001). In-hospital seizures (HR 4.06, 95% CI 3.76-4.39, p<0.001) also elevated risk for PISE. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrate that ischemic stroke survivors who received IV-tPA, underwent decompressive craniectomy, or experienced acute seizures were at increased risk PISE-related revisit. Close attention should be paid to these patients with increased potential for long-term development of and re-hospitalization for PISE.