High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4 knee osteoarthritis in younger patients: comparable improvements in patient-reported outcomes, adjusted for osteoarthritis grade and sex.

PURPOSE: Previous studies comparing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have seldom accounted for differing patient characteristics between both groups. This study compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of HTO and UKA patients, adjusted for preoperative PROs, osteoarthritis grade and sex. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed analysing prospectively collected PROs, namely the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and pain/satisfaction scores, collected preoperatively and at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively. Consecutive medial opening-wedge HTOs and medial UKAs from 2016-2019, with a preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 3, aged 50-60 years, were included. Linear mixed model analyses, with the OKS over time as the primary outcome, were used. RESULTS: We included 84 HTO patients (mean age 55.0 ± 3.0, 79% male, mean BMI 27.8 ± 3.4, 75% Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3) and 130 UKA patients (mean age 55.7 ± 2.8, 47% male, mean BMI 28.7 ± 4.0, 36% Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3). Response rates were ≥ 87% at all time points. Corrected for preoperative PROs, Kellgren-Lawrence grade and sex, the HTO group had a 2.5 (95% CI 1.0-4.0) points lower OKS over time than the UKA group (p = 0.001). The Numeric Rating Scale scores (NRS; 0-10) for pain at rest and during activity were higher (p < 0.01) in the HTO group. The EQ-5D-descriptive system (p < 0.01), NRS satisfaction (p < 0.01), anchor function and pain scores (p < 0.01) were lower over time in the HTO group. CONCLUSION: UKA patients had better OKS scores, pain and satisfaction scores over time than HTO patients. However, the observed differences were below their established minimal clinically important differences. Therefore, from the patients' perspective, HTO did not appear to be inferior to UKA under the indications outlined in this study. Level of evidence Level IV.

Opening- and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy are comparable and early full weight bearing is safe with angular stable plate fixation: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish the gold standard for surgical technique, fixation, and rehabilitation for HTO in patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched up to April 2022. Included were (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing opening-wedge HTO (owHTO) and closing-wedge HTO (cwHTO), (2) biomechanical studies and prospective patient studies comparing biomechanical and clinical results for plate fixators, and (3) RCTs comparing an early versus delayed full-weight-bearing (FWB) protocol. RESULTS: The pooled results for the surgical technique showed no significant differences between owHTO and cwHTO for most PROMs on pain, activity, and risk for conversion to TKA. The cwHTO group showed a slightly better improvement in KOOS/WOMAC pain scores (4.51; 95% CI 1.18-7.85), and a significantly lower change in posterior tibial slope (p = 0.03). The pooled results for the fixation method showed the highest force at maximum failure for the Activmotion (Newclip Technics, France), Aescula (B. Braun Korea, Korea), 2nd generation Puddu (Arthrex Inc., USA), and TomoFix plate (Depuy Synthes, Switzerland). The pooled results for the rehabilitation protocol showed no significant differences between the early full-weight-bearing (FWB) group and the delayed FWB group for functional scores, complication rates, and delayed unions. CONCLUSION: Both owHTO and cwHTO reduced pain and improved knee function. Locking plate fixation should be used for owHTO. An early FWB protocol has proven to be safe in patients with small corrections, no hinge fractures, and non-smokers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.