Predictive value of systematic immune-inflammation index combined with Ki-67 index on prognosis of prostate cancer patients after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) presents a wide spectrum. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and Ki-67 index are new biomarkers that can predict prognosis in different types of cancer. We explored the predictive value of their combination on the prognosis of PCa patients after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 290 patients who underwent LRP at Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital between January 2016 and February 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into the good prognosis group (N = 235) and poor prognosis group (N = 55) based on the follow-up results. Both the baseline data and postoperative pathological results were collected. The Ki-67 index was determined using immunohistochemical kits, and the patients were allocated to the SII/Ki-67 index high/low expression groups according to the cut-off values to further analyze their relationship with clinical/pathological data of PCa patients. Logistics multivariate regression analysis was utilized to analyze the independent factors affecting post-LRP prognosis of CPa patients. ROC curve was plotted to assess the predictive value for post-LRP prognosis, and Kaplan-Meier curve/Log-rank were used for analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in PSA/Gleason score/T stage/lymph node metastasis/seminal vesicle invasion/neutrophils/lymphocytes/platelets/preoperative SII/Ki-67 index between the good/poor prognosis groups. Preoperative SII/Ki-67 were related to PSA/lymphocytes/platelets in PCa. Seminal vesicle invasion and preoperative SII + Ki-67 index were independent factors affecting post-LRP prognosis. Preoperative SII + Ki-67 index had a better predictive value than preoperative SII or Ki-67 index alone. Patients with high preoperative SII and Ki-67 index levels had an increased risk of poor prognosis after LRP. CONCLUSION: Preoperative SII + Ki-67 index had a better predictive value for poor prognosis after LRP than SII or Ki-67 index alone.

The ferroptosis-related long non-coding RNAs signature predicts biochemical recurrence and immune cell infiltration in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Findings from numerous studies have revealed that ferroptosis is closely related to tumorigenesis and immune cell infiltration. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are reportedly involved in the progression of various cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa). This study was designed to establish a ferroptosis-related lncRNA (frlncRNA) signature to predict PCa prognosis. METHODS: The frlncRNAs were identified by studying their expression by Pearson's correlation analysis. Differentially expressed prognosis related frlncRNAs were identified by the Wilcoxon test and univariate Cox regression analysis. The LASSO Cox regression model was used to build a model to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) based on frlncRNAs. The GSEA software (version 4.1.0) was used to explore the enriched pathways in high- and low- risk groups. Patients with PCa were clustered into different subgroups by unsupervised clustering based on the frlncRNAs considered in the prognostic model. Real-time PCR and CCK8 assays were performed to verify the expression and function of frlncRNAs. RESULTS: We identified 35 differentially expressed prognosis related frlncRNAs based on data on PCa from TCGA. A risk signature based on five frlncRNAs (AP006284.1, AC132938.1, BCRP3, AL360181.4 and AL135999.1), was confirmed to perform well in predicting BCR. The high-risk group had higher disease grades and a greater number of infiltrating immune cells. Besides this, we found that the five frlncRNAs were connected with typical immune checkpoints. With respect to molecular mechanisms, several metabolic pathways were found to enriched in the low-risk group. Furthermore, patients could be classified into different subtypes with different PSA-free times using the five frlncRNAs. Notably, AP006284.1, AC132938.1, BCRP3 and AL135999.1 were upregulated in PCa cells and tissues, whereas AL360181.4 exhibited the opposite trend. The downregulation of BCRP3 and AP006284.1 impaired the proliferation of 22RV1 cells. CONCLUSION: We generated a prognostic model based on five frlncRNAs, with clinical usefulness, and thus provided a novel strategy for predicting the BCR of patients with PCa.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam alone or in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Nosocomial infection caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-A. baumannii) has become a challenge in clinical practice. Acting as the last resort antibacterial agents for the treatment of CR-A. baumannii infection, polymyxins have high risk of nephrotoxicity and poor clinical efficacy. Ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are three ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination complexes that newly approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infection. In this study, we analyzed the in vitro activity of those novel antibacterial agents alone or in combination with polymyxin B against the CR-A. baumannii obtained from a Chinese tertiary hospital. Our results suggest that those novel antibacterial agents should not be used alone for the treatment of CR-A. baumannii infection, as they cannot prevent the regrowth of bacteria at the clinical achievable blood concentration. Imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam should not be used as the substitutes of imipenem and meropenem for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, since they have no edge over imipenem and meropenem on antibacterial activity when in combination with polymyxin B. Ceftazidime/avibactam may be more suitable than ceftazidime for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, as it has a higher synergistic rate with polymyxin B, and the antibacterial activity of ceftazidime/avibactam is much higher than that of ceftazidime when tested in combination with polymyxin B. Ceftazidime/avibactam may also be the better choice than imipenem and meropenem for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, as it has a higher synergistic rate with polymyxin B.