A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for people with intellectual disabilities and dementia.

OBJECTIVES: As the life expectancy of individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) continues to increase, there is an increased risk of developing dementia. While psychosocial interventions are gaining prominence, evidence is limited for people with both dementia and ID. This review discusses the effectiveness of direct psychosocial interventions and adaptations to facilitate delivery within this population. METHODS: The review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Five electronic databases, grey literature, and reference lists of included articles were searched for relevant studies. 10 eligible studies were appraised and analysed by narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Ten distinct interventions were identified and categorised based on their purpose and delivery. All interventions were beneficial in improving a range of outcomes, though some studies were of low quality and most had small samples. Common adaptations included simplification of tasks and material, higher staff-to-client ratio, and alternative communication methods. CONCLUSION: There is emerging evidence for several psychosocial interventions for people with ID and dementia, though further research is required on effectiveness and generalisability. The adaptations discussed may guide implementation into routine care and contribute to current policies and guidelines on improving ID and dementia care.

A systematic literature review of group-based training interventions for informal carers: impact on the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).

OBJECTIVES: Caring for a relative with dementia can be extremely challenging especially when someone presents with behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). The training provided to informal carers is varied and inconsistent. Group-based training programmes are often prescribed but their impact on care-recipient wellbeing and symptomology is yet to be well established. This review synthesises the literature on consensus, themes and effectiveness of informal-carer, group-based educational training programmes on BPSD symptoms. METHODS: Ten papers were included of which very few considered BPSD outcomes as their primary aim of investigation. RESULTS: Methodological and theoretical approaches across the empirical papers varied considerably. Generally, studies of higher quality and with some positive results on BPSD outcomes tended to incorporate teaching on structured problem-solving skills. Studies measuring for longer term changes also tended to conclude more beneficial outcomes. The length and duration of groups and the group-sizes appeared inconsequential to BPSD outcomes. CONCLUSION: The empirical evidence is weak for carer group interventions in the management of BPSD. Practice reasons for this are discussed. Future studies designed to measure BPSD as a primary outcome would be a welcome addition to the literature.

Virtual individual cognitive stimulation therapy in Hong Kong: A mixed methods feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to translate and culturally adapt Virtual Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (V-iCST) for the Hong Kong (HK) Chinese population, and to evaluate its feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: A mixed methods case series (N=8) was used to assess the feasibility of V-iCST and changes in cognition, quality of life (QoL), mood, and communication pre and post-test. Data were analyzed with the reliable change index. Thematic analysis of post-therapy interviews and content analysis of session rating forms were used to evaluate the acceptability. RESULTS: V-iCST was feasible with low attrition (0%) and high attendance (100%). Participants had reliable improvements in all outcomes. Six had improved and stable cognition; four had clinically significant changes in depression. There were no reliable changes in QoL. Qualitative analyses indicated V-iCST as acceptable but required assistance. CONCLUSIONS: V-iCST can be adapted for HK Chinese with dementia and potentially improve cognition, QoL, mood, and communication.

Systematic review of the current psychosocial interventions for people with moderate to severe dementia.

OBJECTIVE: Dementia, a global epidemic, currently affects 50 million individuals worldwide. There are currently limited effective treatments for moderate to severe dementia, and most treatments focus on reducing symptoms rather than improving positive factors. It is unclear if improvements are not possible due to disease severity. This review examines the efficacy of the current psychosocial interventions for people with moderate to severe dementia, focusing on improving cognition and quality of life (QoL) to evaluate what treatments are working and whether improvements are possible. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using six key databases to identify psychosocial interventions for people with moderate to severe dementia, measuring cognition or QoL in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published between 2000 and 2020. RESULTS: The search identified 4193 studies, and 74 articles were assessed for full-text review. Fourteen RCTs were included and appraised with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. The included RCTs were moderate in quality. CONCLUSIONS: Aromatherapy and reminiscence therapy showed the strongest evidence in improving QoL. There was some evidence that aerobic exercise enhanced cognition, and a multicomponent study improved QoL. However, a quality assessment, using pre-specified criteria, indicated many methodological weaknesses. While we found improvements in cognition and QoL for moderate to severe dementia, results must be interpreted with caution. Future interventions with rigorous study designs are a pressing need and required before we can recommend specific interventions.

The effects of sleep duration on the risk of dementia incidence in short and long follow-up studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sleep duration's association with future dementia could be a cause or consequence, or both. We searched electronic databases on 14th April 2023 for primary peer-reviewed, longitudinal studies examining the relationship between sleep duration and dementia with any follow-up duration. We meta-analysed studies examining brief (≤6 h/night) and extended sleep duration (≥9 h/night) separately and divided the studies into those with follow-up periods of less or more than 10 years. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. For brief sleep duration, a meta-analysis of short follow-up studies (≤10 years) found a 46 % increased risk of future dementia (relative risk [RR] - 1·46; 95 % Confidence Intervals [CIs] 1·48-1·77; I2 = 88·92 %, 6 studies). Studies with long follow-ups (>10 years) did not show a significantly increased risk (RR - 1·12; 0·95-1·29; I2 = 65·91 %; 5 studies). For extended sleep duration, a meta-analysis of short and long follow-up studies reported an increased risk of dementia (respectively RR - 2·20; 1·11-3·3; I2 = 94·17 %; 4 studies and RR - 1·74; 1·30-2·18; I2 = 86·56 %; 4 studies). Our findings suggest that brief sleep duration might be a prodromal symptom but not a risk factor of dementia. Extended sleep duration may be a risk factor. However, our results had high heterogeneity limiting external validity and generalisability.

Virtual Group Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Dementia: Mixed-Methods Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is an evidence-based group intervention for people with dementia, with benefits for cognition and quality of life when delivered face-to-face. Many people are unable to attend face-to-face groups for reasons including health and transport issues. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of online or "virtual" CST (vCST). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Single-blind, randomized controlled feasibility design with qualitative interviews. Forty-six people with mild-to-moderate dementia were randomly allocated to attend either 14 sessions of twice-weekly vCST (n = 24) or treatment as usual (TAU, defined as usual care; n = 22) over 7 weeks. Cognition, quality of life, and depression were assessed pre- and posttreatment. Qualitative interviews (n = 16) with participants and carers were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: High levels of attendance, adherence, fidelity to the manual, and completion of outcomes were recorded. Recruitment appeared feasible although randomization may not have been acceptable to some. There were no statistical differences noted between vCST and TAU in any of the outcomes evaluated, although both quantitative and qualitative data indicated acceptability, with qualitative reports of improved outcomes including cognition. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: vCST appeared feasible to deliver but did not result in any changes in outcomes, as expected from an underpowered feasibility trial. CST is the main psychosocial intervention delivered for dementia in UK memory services and globally, with many services moving towards virtual CST delivery. Therefore, a fully powered RCT of the effectiveness of vCST is feasible and justified.

Ophthalmic genetic counselling: emerging trends in practice perspectives in Asia.

Genetic counselling (GC) provides information to the patient and the family to make informed choices. Among the advanced Western countries and a few Asian countries, there are certified or trained professionals who perform GC. The Human Genome Project and next-generation sequencing diagnostics have provided an opportunity for increased genetic testing in the field of ophthalmology. The recent interventional therapeutic research strategies have also generated additional interest to seek GC globally, including in Asia. However, GC has several barriers to practise in the developing countries in Asia, namely, (a) shortage of qualified or trained genetic counsellors, (b) poor knowledge and reluctance in clinical adoption of genomics among the physicians in clinical practice, (c) overstretched public health services, and (d) negligible ophthalmic GC-related research and publications. The GC inadequacy in Asia is glaring in the most populous countries like China and India. Cultural differences, religious beliefs, misogyny, genetic discrimination, and a multitude of languages in Asia create unique challenges that counsellors in the West may only encounter with the immigrant minorities. Since there are currently 500 or more specific Mendelian genetic eye disorders, it is important for genetic counsellors to translate the genetic results at a level that the patient and family understand. There is therefore a need for governmental and healthcare organisations to train genetic counsellors in Asia and especially this practice must be included in the routine comprehensive ophthalmic care practice.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brief Cognitive Instruments to Evaluate Suspected Dementia in Chinese-Speaking Populations.

Background: Chinese is the most commonly spoken world language; however, most cognitive tests were developed and validated in the West. It is essential to find out which tests are valid and practical in Chinese speaking people with suspected dementia. Objective: We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of brief cognitive tests adapted for Chinese-speaking populations in people presenting for assessment of suspected dementia. Methods: We searched electronic databases for studies reporting brief (≤20 minutes) cognitive test's sensitivity and specificity as part of dementia diagnosis for Chinese-speaking populations in clinical settings. We assessed quality using Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) criteria and translation and cultural adaptation using the Manchester Translation Reporting Questionnaire (MTRQ), and Manchester Cultural Adaptation Reporting Questionnaire (MCAR). We assessed heterogeneity and combined sensitivity in meta-analyses. Results: 38 studies met inclusion criteria and 22 were included in meta-analyses. None met the highest CEBM criteria. Five studies met the highest criteria of MTRQ and MCAR. In meta-analyses of studies with acceptable heterogeneity (I2 <  75%), Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised &III (ACE-R & ACE-III) had the best sensitivity and specificity; specifically, for dementia (93.5% & 85.6%) and mild cognitive impairment (81.4% & 76.7%). Conclusions: Current evidence is that the ACE-R and ACE-III are the best brief cognitive assessments for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Chinese-speaking populations. They may improve time taken to diagnosis, allowing people to access interventions and future planning.