Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Nucl Med ; 58(5): 723-729, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27738011

RESUMEN

Adequate prediction of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients is important in a more personalized treatment. The current best clinical method to predict pathologic complete response is SUVmax in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging. To improve the prediction of response, we constructed a model to predict complete response to nCRT in EC based on pretreatment clinical parameters and 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived textural features. Methods: From a prospectively maintained single-institution database, we reviewed 97 consecutive patients with locally advanced EC and a pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT scan between 2009 and 2015. All patients were treated with nCRT (carboplatin/paclitaxel/41.4 Gy) followed by esophagectomy. We analyzed clinical, geometric, and pretreatment textural features extracted from both 18F-FDG PET and CT. The current most accurate prediction model with SUVmax as a predictor variable was compared with 6 different response prediction models constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regularized logistic regression. Internal validation was performed to estimate the model's performances. Pathologic response was defined as complete versus incomplete response (Mandard tumor regression grade system 1 vs. 2-5). Results: Pathologic examination revealed 19 (19.6%) complete and 78 (80.4%) incomplete responders. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regularization selected the clinical parameters: histologic type and clinical T stage, the 18F-FDG PET-derived textural feature long run low gray level emphasis, and the CT-derived textural feature run percentage. Introducing these variables to a logistic regression analysis showed areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.78 compared with 0.58 in the SUVmax model. The discrimination slopes were 0.17 compared with 0.01, respectively. After internal validation, the AUCs decreased to 0.74 and 0.54, respectively. Conclusion: The predictive values of the constructed models were superior to the standard method (SUVmax). These results can be considered as an initial step in predicting tumor response to nCRT in locally advanced EC. Further research in refining the predictive value of these models is needed to justify omission of surgery.


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Modelos Estadísticos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Simulación por Computador , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/métodos , Pronóstico , Radiofármacos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Am J Surg ; 208(1): 73-9, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24476969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risk of tumor progression during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer (EC) is around 8% to 17%. We assessed the efficacy of computed tomography (CT) to identify these patients before esophagectomy. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with locally advanced EC treated with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel and 41.4 Gy neoadjuvantly were restaged with CT. Two radiologists reviewed pre- and post-CRT CT images. The primary outcome was detection of clinically relevant progressive disease. Missed metastases were defined as metastatic disease found during surgery or within 3 months after post-CRT CT. RESULTS: Progressive disease was detected in 9 patients (9%). Both radiologists detected 5 patients with distant metastases (liver, n = 4; lung metastasis, n = 1), but missed progressive disease in 4 cases. One radiologist falsely assessed 2 metastatic lesions, but after agreement progressive disease was detected with sensitivity and specificity of 56% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CT is effective in detecting clinically relevant progressive disease in EC patients, after neoadjuvant treatment.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Esofagectomía , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma/patología , Carcinoma/secundario , Carcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patología , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/secundario , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA