RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy is performed to prevent osteoarthritis caused by developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). To achieve sufficient acetabular coverage, understanding the characteristics of acetabular coverage in DDH is necessary. However, the features of acetabular coverage in males with DDH remain unclear. We thought that the differences in acetabular coverage between females and males might be associated with the differences in pelvic morphology between the sexes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are the differences in the acetabular coverage between females and males with DDH? (2) What are the differences in the rotations of the ilium and ischium between females and males with DDH? (3) What is the relationship between the rotation of the ilium and ischium and the acetabular coverage at each height in females and males with DDH? METHODS: Between 2016 and 2023, 114 patients (138 hips) underwent eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy at our hospital. We excluded patients with Tönnis Grade 2 or higher, a lateral center-edge angle of 25º or more, and deformities of the pelvis or femur, resulting in 100 patients (122 hips) being included. For female patients (98 hips), the median (range) age was 40 years (10 to 58), and for the male patients (24 hips), it was 31 years (14 to 53). We used all patients' preoperative AP radiographs and CT data. The crossover sign, posterior wall sign, and pelvic width index were evaluated in AP radiographs. The rotation of the innominate bone in the axial plane was evaluated at two different heights, specifically at the slice passing through the anterior superior iliac spine and the slice through the pubic symphysis and ischial spine in CT data. Furthermore, we evaluated the anterior and posterior acetabular sector angles. Comparisons of variables related to innominate bone measurements and acetabular coverage measurements between females and males in each patient were performed. The correlations between pelvic morphology measurements and acetabular coverage were evaluated separately for females and males, and the results were subsequently compared to identify any sex-specific differences. For continuous variables, we used the Student t-test; for binary variables, we used the Fisher exact test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the evaluation of AP radiographs, an indicator of acetabular retroversion-the crossover sign-showed no differences between the sexes, whereas the posterior wall sign (females 46% [45 of 98] hips versus males 75% [18 of 24] hips, OR 3.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 11.71]; p = 0.01) and pelvic width index less than 56% (females 1% [1 of 98] versus males 17% [4 of 24], OR 18.71 [95% CI 1.74 to 958.90]; p = 0.005) occurred more frequently in males than in females. There were no differences in the iliac rotation parameters, but the ischium showed more external rotation in males (females 30° ± 2° versus males 24° ± 1°; p < 0.001). Regarding acetabular coverage, no differences between females and males were observed in the anterior acetabular sector angles. In contrast, males showed smaller values than females for the posterior acetabular sector angles (85° ± 9° versus 91° ± 7°; p = 0.002). In females, a correlation was observed between iliac rotation and acetabular sector angles (anterior acetabular sector angles: r = -0.35 [95% CI -0.05 to 0.16]; p < 0.001, posterior acetabular sector angles: r = 0.42 [95% CI 0.24 to 0.57]; p < 0.001). Similarly, ischial rotation showed a correlation with both acetabular sector angles (anterior acetabular sector angles: r = -0.34 [95% CI -0.51 to -0.15]; p < 0.001 and posterior acetabular sector angles: r = 0.45 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.59]; p < 0.001). Thus, in females, we observed that external iliac rotation and ischial internal rotation correlated with increased anterior acetabular coverage and reduced posterior coverage. In contrast, although acetabular coverage in males showed a correlation with iliac rotation (anterior acetabular sector angles: r = -0.55 [95% CI -0.78 to -0.18]; p = 0.006 and posterior acetabular sector angles: r = 0.74 [95% CI 0.48 to 0.88]; p < 0.001), no correlation was observed with ischial rotation. CONCLUSION: In males, acetabular retroversion occurs more commonly than in females and is attributed to their reduced posterior acetabular coverage. In females, an increase in the posterior acetabular coverage was correlated with the external rotation angle of the ischium, whereas in males, no correlation was found between ischial rotation and posterior acetabular coverage. In treating males with DDH via eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy, it is essential to adjust bone fragments to prevent inadequate posterior acetabular coverage. Future studies might need to investigate the differences in acetabular coverage between males and females in various limb positions and consider the direction of bone fragment rotation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings suggest that males with DDH exhibit acetabular retroversion more frequently than females, which is attributed to the reduced posterior acetabular coverage observed in males. The smaller posterior acetabular coverage in males might be related to differences in ischial morphology between sexes. During eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy for males with DDH, adequately rotating acetabular bone fragments might be beneficial to compensate for deficient posterior acetabular coverage.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative femoral fractures are more common in cementless bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) for displaced femoral neck fractures than they are in cemented BHA and remain one of the major concerns. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for intraoperative femoral fractures in cementless BHA. METHODS: The study included 1,392 patients who underwent cementless BHA for displaced femoral neck fractures from January 2015 to December 2019 in 14 hospitals of the Trauma Research Group. They were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of intraoperative femoral fractures, and factors associated with intraoperative fractures were statistically examined. RESULTS: Forty (2.9 %) intraoperative and 28 (2.0 %) postoperative, totally 68 (4.9 %) femoral fractures occurred. The mean age of the patients, presence of opposite-side proximal femoral fracture, approach, and cementless stem design were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis model showed that a fully HA-coated stem (odds ratio, 4.12; 95 % confidence interval, 1.43-11.9) was an independent factor associated with intraoperative femoral fractures. CONCLUSION: This study investigated the risk factors associated with intraoperative fractures and showed that fully HA-coated stems were an independent factor associated with intraoperative femoral fractures. Surgeons should be cautious in the early stages of introducing fully HA-coated stems.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify factors related to collapse progression in Japanese Investigation Committee classification type B osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and to identify patients who would benefit from surgical treatment. METHODS: This study included 41 patients (56 hips) with type B ONFH with a minimum follow-up of three years. Based on a ≥ 3 mm collapse progression in ONFH, we categorised patients into two groups: collapse progression and no collapse progression. Sagittal and coronal computed tomography images were used to measure the necrotic region relative to the intact femoral head diameter. The ratios of the necrotic regions of transverse and vertical diameter in coronal and sagittal images are defined as mediolateral transverse and mediolateral vertical, anteroposterior transverse and anteroposterior vertical, respectively. Demographic data and these imaging findings were compared between the two groups. We established a cut-off value for predicting collapse progression through receiver operating characteristic analysis and determined survival rates. RESULTS: Type B ONFH had a 17.8% collapse progression rate. The mediolateral transverse, mediolateral vertical, anteroposterior transverse, and anteroposterior vertical were significantly higher in the collapse progression group (P < 0.01). Mediolateral transverse was an independent risk factor of collapse progression (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.57; P = 0.03), with an optimal cut-off of 45.6%. The 5-year survival rates with collapse progression as the endpoints were 57.0 and 94.9% in the mediolateral transverse of ≥ 45.6 and < 45.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A mediolateral transverse of ≥ 45.6% predicts collapse progression in patients with type B ONFH.
Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/clasificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Japón/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Cabeza Femoral/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Muscle quality is more important than muscle mass for assessing physical function. Computed tomography (CT) is used to evaluate intramuscular fatty infiltration. The mid-thigh quadriceps CT attenuation values (CTV) expressed in Hounsfield units (HU) negatively correlate with physical function. Patients with hip osteoarthritis (HOA) have lower extremity muscle atrophy, including decreased cross-sectional area (CSA), CTV, and muscle strength. Using preoperative CT images, we investigated the association between mid-thigh quadriceps CSA, CTV, and postoperative outcomes in patients with HOA. METHODS: This study included 62 patients who had unilateral HOA (62 hips) and underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated the association between preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip scores, 12-item Short Form survey (SF-12), mid-thigh quadriceps CSA, and CTV. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.7 ± 10.1 years, with 15 men (24.2%), and the mean body mass index was 24.3 ± 4.3 kg/m2. Secondary HOA was present in 79.0% of patients. The mean CSA and CTV of the mid-thigh quadriceps on the operative side were 38.8 ± 9.8 cm2 and 40.3 ± 7.8 HU, respectively. Multiple regression analyses adjusted for age and sex showed that preoperative mid-thigh quadriceps CSA was not associated with preoperative and postoperative JOA hip scores or SF-12. The preoperative mid-thigh quadriceps CTV was associated with the postoperative JOA hip score in the gait ability domain and SF-12 in the physical component summary domain. CONCLUSION: Preoperative muscle quality is associated with postoperative outcomes in patients who have HOA regardless of age and sex.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Osteoartritis de la Cadera , Músculo Cuádriceps , Humanos , Masculino , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Cuádriceps/diagnóstico por imagen , Músculo Cuádriceps/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Muslo , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Atrofia Muscular/etiología , Atrofia Muscular/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a progressive inflammatory disease that affects the axial skeleton, and often associated with hip involvement. However, the causative factors for radiological hip involvement in patients with AS are not well characterized. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with hip involvement in patients with AS. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients (134 hips) diagnosed with AS who qualified the modified New York criteria at our institution between January 2005 and June 2022 were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: the hip involvement group (BASRI-hip score ≥2 points) and the normal group (BASRI-hip score <2 points). Demographic, clinical and radiographic characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (38.8%) had radiological hip involvement, of which 23 (88.5%) patients were male. There were significant between-group differences with respect to sacroiliac joint fusion, crossover sign, high centre edge angle and low sharp angle (P < 0.05). On logistic regression analysis, older age, sacroiliac joint fusion and pincer type were identified as independent risk factors for hip involvement. CONCLUSION: AS with hip involvement was significantly more likely to involve sacroiliac joint fusion, which suggested that mechanical stress in adjacent joints and reduced spinopelvic range of motion may influence hip involvement.
RESUMEN
AIM: Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) are irreversibly and heterogeneously formed compounds during the non-enzymatic modification of macromolecules, such as proteins. Aging and lifestyle habits, such as high-fat and high-protein diets, and smoking, promote AGEs accumulation. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between fall risk and AGEs in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients from the 2022 Yakumo Study who were evaluated for fall risk index 5-items version, locomotive syndrome stage and AGEs. AGEs were evaluated using Skin autofluorescence (SAF) measured by the AGE reader (DiagnOptics Technologies BV, Groningen, the Netherlands). We divided the participants into two groups according to the presence or absence of fall risk (fall risk index 5-items version ≥6 or not), and investigated the factors associated with fall risk. RESULTS: The fall risk group had a higher age and SAF, and a higher proportion of locomotive syndrome stage >2 than the without fall risk group in patients aged ≥65 years (P < 0.01). The multivariate logistic regression analysis after adjustment of age, sex and body mass index showed that locomotive syndrome stage ≥2 and SAF were independent associators of fall risk in older adults (odds ratio 3.26, P < 0.01, odds ratio 2.96, P < 0.05, respectively). The optimal cutoff value of the SAF for fall risk was 2.4 (area under the curve 0.631; 95% CI 0.53-0.733; sensitivity 0.415; specificity 0.814; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The accumulation of AGEs in skin tissues can be used to screen for fall risk comprehensively. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 517-522.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas , Productos Finales de Glicación Avanzada , Vida Independiente , Humanos , Productos Finales de Glicación Avanzada/metabolismo , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Japón/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Piel/metabolismoRESUMEN
This study investigated the impact of osteoporosis treatment on the prognosis of patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) following femoral neck fracture (FNF). Our results suggested an association between osteoporosis treatment and potentially improved survival prognosis in patients who underwent surgery for PPF. These results imply that osteoporosis treatment may have a beneficial effect on patient outcomes. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of osteoporosis treatment on the prognosis of periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) patients after femoral neck fracture. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study named as TRON was conducted. The study population included 156 PPF patients who had undergone hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture between January 2010 and December 2019. Patients were divided based on whether they had received osteoporosis treatment before PPF injury. A log-rank test was used to compare survival rates. We conducted a Cox proportional hazards analysis to identify factors associated with the survival rate after PFF injury. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 156 patients had received osteoporosis treatment prior to PPF injury. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates after PPF were 80.9% and 75.3%, respectively. The log-rank test revealed that the 1-year survival rate with and without osteoporosis treatment was 89.5% and 78.1%, respectively (P=0.012). In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, age, BMI, presence or absence of surgery, and presence or absence of osteoporosis treatment showed independent associations with the survival rate after PFF injury. The hazard ratio for the presence of osteoporosis treatment was 0.22 (95% confidence interval 0.07-0.75, P=0.015). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest an association between osteoporosis treatment and potentially improved survival prognosis in patients who underwent surgery for PPF. These results imply that osteoporosis treatment may have a beneficial effect on patient outcomes. It is important to consider that osteoporosis treatment could be significant not only in preventing secondary fractures but also in potentially improving prognosis in the rare event of PPF.