RESUMEN
AIMS: Concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequent in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates. Despite societal recommendations of performing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for coronary assessment in the pre-TAVI diagnostic workup, the prognostic value of ICA and beneficial effect of revascularization in these patients remains unclear. We aimed to determine feasibility and outcomes following a strategy of cardiac CTâ¯+â¯coronary CT angiography (cCTA) rather than cardiac CTâ¯+â¯ICA before TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a single-center, observational cohort study including all patients, without previous coronary intervention, referred to TAVI between April 2020 and November 2021. CAD was assessed by cCTA, and only patients with proximal stenosis >70â¯%, or left main stenosis >50â¯%, or cCTA was non-evaluable regarding proximal segments were subsequently referred to ICA. 240 patients were included in the study. No adverse effects to pre-cCTA-scan nitroglycerin administration were observed. On cCTA, 92â¯% of the patients had atheroscerosis. 191 (80â¯%) patients had cCTA only performed, while 49 (20â¯%) patients underwent subsequent ICA. During a median (range) follow-up of 15 (Abdel-Wahab et al., 2012; Rapp et al., 2001; Sabbah et al., 2021; Gautier et al., 2011; Sankaramangalam et al., 2017; Otto et al., 2021; Tarantini et al., 2023; Vahanian et al., 2021; Faroux et al., 2019; Ferraro et al., 2020; Patterson et al., 2021; Blanke et al., 2019; Bleakley and Monaghan, 2018; Knuuti et al., 2020; Moss et al., 2017; van den Boogert et al., 2018; Collet et al., 2018; Linde et al., 2020; Schmidt et al., 2018; Hansson et al., 2013 [6-25]) months, no difference in procedural complication rates, mortality rates, or number of unplanned ICA was observed between patients evaluated with only cCTA vs cCTA+ICA. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront cCTA instead of ICA for assessment of obstructive CAD in the diagnostic workup of patients with severe aortic stenosis referred to TAVI is feasible, safe, and with similar procedural and clinical outcomes. Randomized studies are warranted to further validate the safety of using CTA rather than ICA for coronary assessment in TAVI candidates.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) enables detailed quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques, offering diagnostic and prognostic value. Interscan reproducibility studies on plaque volume measurements are limited. This study aims to assess the interscan reproducibility of coronary plaque quantification and the implications of clinical and technical characteristics on interscan reproducibility. METHODS: CCTA was performed twice in 101 patients with known coronary artery disease at a 1-h interval. The scans were conducted using identical CCTA acquisition protocols. Coronary plaque volumes were quantified using a semi-automated software and performed on a per-lesion, per-vessel, and per-patient level. RESULTS: Median plaque volumes were comparable between the first and second CCTA scan. Interscan correlation was high for total plaque (TP), non-calcified plaque (NCP), and calcified plaque (CP) across all analyses (Pearson's coefficient 0.93-0.99), but lower for low-density non-calcified plaque (LD-NCP) volume measurements (Pearson's coefficient 0.74-0.77). Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated higher interscan agreement on a per-patient level compared to on per-vessel and per-lesion level. Interscan reproducibility on CP volumes was affected by CT image quality with narrower LoA in scans with the highest image quality score (p â= â0.003), or lowest image reconstructive iteration level (p â< â0.001). Limits of agreement were significantly narrower for TP, NCP, and CP volumes in LAD-lesions and vessels compared to non-LAD lesions and vessels (p â≤ â0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall reproducibility of repeated CCTA derived plaque measurements by a semi-automated software was modest, and was influenced by image quality, image reconstruction settings, and lesion location.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of complete coronary revascularization relative to non-invasive testing methods is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between completeness of revascularization defined by CTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable angina. METHODS: Multicenter 3-year follow-up study of patients with new onset stable angina and ≥ 30% stenosis by CTA. The lesion-specific FFRCT value (two cm-distal-to-stenosis) was registered in all vessels with stenosis and considered abnormal when ≤ 0.80. Patients with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 were categorized as: Completely revascularized (CR-FFRCT), all vessels with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 revascularized; incompletely revascularized (IR-FFRCT), ≥ 1 vessels with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 non-revascularized. Early revascularization (< 90 days from index CTA) categorized vessels as revascularized. The primary endpoint comprised cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction; the secondary endpoint vessel-specific late revascularization and non-fatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Amongst 900 patients and 1759 vessels, FFRCT was ≤ 0.80 in 377 (42%) patients, 536 (30%) vessels; revascularization was performed in 244 (27%) patients, 340 (19%) vessels. Risk of the primary endpoint was higher for IR-FFRCT (15/210 [7.1%]) compared to CR-FFRCT (4/167 [2.4%]), RR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.01-8.8, p â= â0.036, and to normal FFRCT (3/523 [0.6%]), RR: 12.45; 95% CI: 3.6-42.6, p â< â0.001. Incidence of the secondary endpoint was higher in non-revascularized vessels with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 (29/250 [12%]) compared to revascularized vessels with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 (5/286 [1.7%]), p â= â0.001, and to vessels with FFRCT > 0.80 (10/1223 [0.8%]), p â< â0.001. CONCLUSION: Incomplete revascularization of patients with lesion-specific FFRCT ≤ 0.80 is associated to unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes compared to those with complete revascularization or FFRCT > 0.80.
Asunto(s)
Angina Estable , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Angina Estable/fisiopatología , Angina Estable/mortalidad , Angina Estable/diagnóstico por imagen , Angina Estable/cirugía , Angina Estable/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estenosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Estenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Revascularización Miocárdica , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Tomografía Computarizada MultidetectorRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT ) shows high diagnostic performance when compared to invasively measured FFR. Presence and extent of low attenuation plaque density have been shown to be associated with abnormal physiology by measured FFR. Moreover, it is well established that statin therapy reduces the rate of plaque progression and results in morphology alterations underlying atherosclerosis. However, the interplay between lipid lowering treatment, plaque regression, and the coronary physiology has not previously been investigated. AIM: To test whether lipid lowering therapy is associated with significant improvement in FFRCT , and whether there is a dose-response relationship between lipid lowering intensity, plaque regression, and coronary flow recovery. METHODS: Investigator driven, prospective, multicenter, randomized study of patients with stable angina, coronary stenosis ≥50% determined by clinically indicated first-line CTA, and FFRCT ≤ 0.80 in whom coronary revascularization was deferred. Patients are randomized to standard (atorvastatin 40 mg daily) or intensive (rosuvastatin 40 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg daily) lipid lowering therapy for 18 months. Coronary CTA scans with blinded coronary plaque and FFRCT analyses will be repeated after 9 and 18 months. The primary endpoint is the 18-month difference in FFRCT using (1) the FFRCT value 2 cm distal to stenosis and (2) the lowest distal value in the vessel of interest. A total of 104 patients will be included in the study. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will provide novel insights into the interplay between lipid lowering, and the pathophysiology in coronary artery disease.