Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 37(1): 209-218, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35918550

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most of the studies published to date which assess the role of antibacterial sutures in surgical site infection (SSI) prevention include heterogeneous groups of patients, and it is therefore difficult to draw conclusions. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether the use of Triclosan-coated barbed sutures (TCBS) was associated with a lower incidence of incisional SSI and lower duration of hospital stay compared to standard sutures, in elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. METHOD: Observational including patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer laparoscopic surgery between January 2015 and December 2020. The patients were divided into two groups according to the suture used for fascial closure of the extraction incision, TCBS vs conventional non-coated sutures (CNCS), and the rate of SSI was analysed. The TCBS cases were matched to CNCS cases by propensity score matching to obtain comparable groups of patients. RESULTS: 488 patients met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting the patients with the propensity score, two new groups of patients were generated: 143 TCBS cases versus 143 CNCS cases. Overall incisional SSI appeared in 16 (5.6%) of the patients with a significant difference between groups depending on the type of suture used, 9.8% in the group of CNCS and 1.4% in the group of TCBS (OR 0.239 (CI 95%: 0.065-0.880)). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in TCBS group than in CNCS, 5 vs 6 days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TCBS was associated with a lower incidence of incisional SSI compared to standard sutures in a cohort of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Suturas , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Puntaje de Propensión , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Suturas/efectos adversos , Triclosán
2.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 419, 2023 Oct 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37882968

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The main aim of this study was to identify a possible association between month of birth of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: This observational study included all consecutive adult patients diagnosed with CRC undergoing oncological surgery from January 2005 to December 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The outcome variables were locoregional recurrence, death due to cancer progression, OS and DFS. Non-supervised learning techniques (K-means) were conducted to identify groups of months with similar oncologic outcomes. Finally, OS and DFS were analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression tests. The model was calibrated with resampling techniques and subsequently a cross-validation was performed. RESULTS: A total of 2520 patients were included. Three birth month groups with different oncologic outcomes were obtained. Survival analysis showed between-group differences in OS (p < 0.001) and DFS (p = 0.03). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model identified the clusters obtained as independent prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.001) and DFS (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: There is an association between month of birth and oncologic outcomes of CRC. Patients born in the months of January, February, June, July, October and December had better OS and DFS than those born in different months of the year.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Proyectos de Investigación , Adulto , Humanos , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía
3.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 407(3): 1161-1171, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35028738

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To analyze the treatment outcomes for sigmoid volvulus (SV) and identify risk factors of complications and mortality. METHODS: Observational study of all consecutive adult patients diagnosed with SV who were admitted from January 2000 to December 2020 in a tertiary university institution for conservative management, urgent or elective surgery. Primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative morbidity, mortality and 2-year overall survival (OS), including analysis of risk factors for postoperative morbidity or mortality and prognostic factors for 2-year OS. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were included. Conservative management was performed in 43 cases (46.7%), 27 patients (29.4%) underwent emergent surgery and 22 (23.9%) were scheduled for elective surgery. Successful decompression was achieved in 87.8% of cases, but the recurrence rate was 47.2%. Mortality rates following episodes were higher for conservative treatment than for urgent or elective surgery (37.2%, 22.2%, 9.1%, respectively; p = 0.044). ASA score > III was an independent risk factor for complications (OR = 5.570, 95% CI = 1.740-17.829, p < 0.001) and mortality (OR = 6.139, 95% CI = 2.629-14.335, p < 0.001) in the 30 days after admission. Patients who underwent elective surgery showed higher 2-year OS than those with conservative treatment (p = 0.011). Elective surgery (HR = 2.604, 95% CI = 1.185-5.714, p = 0.017) and ASA score > III (HR = 0.351, 95% CI = 0.192-0.641, p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for 2-year OS. CONCLUSION: Successful endoscopic decompression can be achieved in most SV patients, but with the drawbacks of high recurrence, morbidity and mortality rates. Concurrent severe comorbidities and conservative treatment were independent prognostic factors for morbidity and survival in SV.


Asunto(s)
Vólvulo Intestinal , Enfermedades del Sigmoide , Adulto , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Humanos , Vólvulo Intestinal/diagnóstico , Vólvulo Intestinal/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Morbilidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Minerva Chir ; 74(3): 226-236, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30600965

RESUMEN

"Artery-first approach" encompasses different aspects for the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. It is a surgical technique or set of techniques which share in common the dissection of the main arterial vasculature involved in pancreatic cancer, before any irreversible surgical step is performed. On the other hand it represents the need for a meticulous dissection of the arterial planes and clearing of the retropancreatic tissue between the superior mesenteric artery, the common hepatic artery and portal vein in an attempt to achieve R0 resections. The recent expansion of this approach is based mainly on three factors: venous involvement should not be considered a contraindication for resection, most of the pancreatic resections performed with a standard procedure may be in fact non-oncological (R1) resections and the postero-medial or vascular margin is the most frequently invaded by the tumor. This review aimed to summarize and update the artery-first approach in pancreaticoduodenectomy.


Asunto(s)
Páncreas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Contraindicaciones de los Procedimientos , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Invasividad Neoplásica , Páncreas/anatomía & histología , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/tendencias , Vena Porta , Pronóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA