Treatment outcomes of mild to moderate Clostridioides difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: an Australian experience.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising and associated with adverse outcomes. Optimal treatment for CDI in IBD remains unknown, with various organisations suggesting vancomycin as first-line therapy. AIM: To compare treatment outcomes for metronidazole versus vancomycin in mild to moderate CDI in IBD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of IBD patients with CDI between January 2015 and December 2019 was conducted. Laboratory data and clinical outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Forty-seven discrete episodes of CDI in 34 patients occurred during the study period. Fifty-three per cent (18) had Crohn's disease, 44% (15) ulcerative colitis and 3% (1) IBD unclassified. Six per cent (3/47) of CDI cases were severe and excluded. In 68% (30/44) of mild to moderate CDI, metronidazole was prescribed, with treatment failure in 20% (6/30), CDI recurrence in 13% (4/30) and 20% (6/30) experiencing a further CDI episode. Comparatively, vancomycin was prescribed in 23% (10/44) without any treatment failures; however, 10% (1/10) had CDI recurrence and 40% (4/10) experienced another CDI episode. No statistically significant difference was noted between metronidazole and vancomycin therapy for treatment failure (P = 0.31), CDI recurrence (P = 1.0) or further CDI episodes (P = 0.23). Proton-pump inhibitor therapy was the only risk factor associated with a higher rate of the composite outcome and remained significant on multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio 12.99 (95% confidence interval = 1.21-139.97), P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Metronidazole compared to vancomycin for treatment of mild to moderate CDI in IBD is effective however may be associated with higher rates of treatment failure.

Empiric Esophageal Dilatation for Solid-Food Dysphagia: Presence of Mucosal Tear on Relook Endoscopy Predicts Symptomatic Response.

We hypothesized that a mucosal tear on relook endoscopy after empiric dilatation predicts symptomatic response. We evaluated symptomatic response (modified Ogilvie dysphagia score) after 161 consecutive esophageal dilatations. Comparing visible strictures, empiric dilatations with mucosal tear, and empiric dilatations without tear, baseline dysphagia scores were similar ( P = 0.34). Successful symptomatic response to dilatation occurred in 82% of visible strictures, 80% of those with tear, compared to only 37% of those with no tear ( P < 0.001). Patients with a mucosal tear after empiric dilatation have a superior symptomatic response to those without, and comparable to patients with visible strictures. We infer the tear represents disruption of an endoscopically inapparent stricture.

Routine screening of emergency admissions at risk of chronic hepatitis (SEARCH) identifies and links hepatitis B cases to care.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Significant barriers exist with hepatitis B (HBV) case detection and effective linkage to care (LTC). The emergency department (ED) is a unique healthcare interaction where hepatitis screening and LTC could be achieved. We examined the efficacy and utility of automated ED HBV screening for Overseas Born (OB) patients. METHODS: A novel-automated hepatitis screening service "SEARCH" (Screening Emergency Admissions at Risk of Chronic Hepatitis) was piloted at a metropolitan hospital. A retrospective and comparative analysis of hepatitis testing during the SEARCH pilot compared to a period of routine testing was conducted. RESULTS: During the SEARCH pilot, 4778 OB patients were tested for HBV (86% of eligible patient presentations), compared with 1.9% of eligible patients during a control period of clinician-initiated testing. SEARCH detected 108 (2.3%) hepatitis B surface antigen positive patients including 20 (19%) in whom the diagnosis was new. Among 88 patients with known HBV, 57% were receiving medical care, 33% had become lost to follow-up and 10% had never received HBV care. Overall, 30/88 (34%) patients with known HBV were receiving complete guideline-based care prior to re-engagement via SEARCH. Following SEARCH, LTC was successful achieved in 48/58 (83%) unlinked patients and 19 patients were commenced on anti-viral therapy. New diagnoses of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma were made in five and one patient(s) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Automated ED screening of OB patients is effective in HBV diagnosis, re-diagnosis and LTC. Prior to SEARCH, the majority of patients were not receiving guideline-based care.

Alcohol and its associated liver carcinogenesis.

Alcohol consumption is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The prevalence of alcohol-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) varies worldwide but is highest in Eastern Europe. Alcohol is the second fastest-growing cause of age-standardized liver cancer mortality with tumors more often diagnosed outside surveillance protocols and at a more advanced stage. Risk factors for aHCC include greater amounts of alcohol consumption, sex, and certain genetic polymorphisms. Smoking, concomitant liver disease, obesity, and diabetes act synergistically in increasing the risk of HCC in alcohol-associated liver disease. Alcohol-related hepatocarcinogenesis results from the complex interactions of several mechanistic pathways. Although not completely understood, underlying mechanisms include acetaldehyde-related hepatotoxicity, oxidative stress, activation of the innate immune system, and alterations of the host microbiome.

Successful liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related acute liver failure in a patient with active COVID-19.

The emergence of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has significantly disrupted liver transplantation worldwide. Despite significant, collective experience in treating liver transplant recipients with COVID-19, there remains a paucity of data to guide the management of transplant candidates with acute COVID-19 who require urgent transplantation. We present the case of an otherwise well, 39-year-old female presenting for urgent liver transplantation for acute liver failure secondary to hepatitis B, with concomitant acute, mild COVID-19 due to Omicron BA.2. COVID-19 antivirals were not administered pre-transplant as the potential risk of hepatotoxicity precipitating further deterioration of liver function was not felt to outweigh the small, potential benefit of antiviral therapy. No effective SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies were available; however, the patient was previously vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 with evidence of anti-spike antibodies at the time of COVID-19. Transplantation surgery and recovery were uncomplicated with no progression of COVID-19 post-transplant, hospital discharge was at day 14. At 30 days post-transplant the patient had recovered, with normal liver function and SARS-CoV-2 was not detectable on nasopharyngeal PCR. While the safety of transplantation of patients with acute COVID-19 cannot be assured by a single case, ours highlights the complex decision-making process undertaken and competing priorities that need to be balanced when assessing patients with acute COVID-19 who require urgent transplantation.

Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for hepatitis B and hepatitis C coinfection.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B (HBV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) infection place a significant burden on the global health system, with chronic carriage leading to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HBV/HCV coinfection can be seen in highly endemic areas and present a heterogenous group given varying virologic profiles. Coinfected patients have a greater risk of advanced liver disease; hence, diagnosis and early antiviral therapy (AVT) should be a priority. Optimal treatment regimens for coinfected patients remain unknown with differing recommendations, particularly relating to the risk of HBV reactivation whilst on AVT for HCV. AREAS COVERED: This article summarizes the available data on HBV/HCV coinfection with regards to epidemiology, virologic interactions, and risk of HBV reactivation. The authors also provide a framework for the assessment and treatment of coinfected patients. EXPERT OPINION: There is a moderate risk of HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients undergoing HCV direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment; however, clinically significant events are rare. The risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg negative patients undergoing HCV DAA treatment is negligible. Thus, prophylactic HBV treatment in both groups is not required. The authors recommend close monitoring with HBV treatment if there is evidence of HBV reactivation or elevated alanine aminotransferase levels.