Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 47(9): 1040-1047, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30824387

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tracer antibiotic algorithms using administrative data were investigated to estimate mortality attributable to extensively drug-resistant gram-negative infections (GNIs). METHODS: Among adult inpatients coded for GNIs, colistin cases and 2 comparator cohorts (non-carbapenem ß-lactams or carbapenems) treated for ≥4 consecutive days, or died while receiving the antibiotic, were separately propensity score-matched (1:2). Attributable mortality was the in-hospital mortality difference among propensity-matched groups. Infection characteristics and sepsis severity influences on attributable mortality were examined. Algorithm accuracy was assessed by chart review. RESULTS: Of 232,834 GNIs between 2010 and 2013 at 79 hospitals, 1,023 per 3,350 (30.5%) colistin and 9,188 per 105,641 (8.7%) ß-lactam (non-carbapenem) comparator cases died. Propensity-matched colistin and ß-lactam case mortality was 29.2% and 16.6%, respectively, for an attributable mortality of 12.6% (95% confidence interval 10.8-14.4%). Attributable mortality varied from 11.0% (7.5%-14.7%) for urinary to 15.5% (12.6%-18.4%) for respiratory (P < .0001), and 4.6% (2.1%-7.4%) for early (≤4 days) to 16.6% (14.3%-18.9%) for late-onset infections (P < .0001). Attributable mortality decreased to 7.5% (5.6%-9.4%) using a carbapenem comparator cohort but increased 9-fold in patients coded for severe sepsis or septic shock (P < .0001). Our colistin algorithm had a positive predictive value of 60.4% and sensitivity of 65.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality attributable to treatment-limiting resistance during GNIs varied considerably by site, onset, and severity of infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Sepsis/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/microbiología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
3.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 45(5): 181-186, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28835184

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In 2011, the AHA recommended risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Failure to risk stratify may cause under recognition of intermediate-risk PE and its attendant short- and long-term consequences. We sought to determine if patients hospitalized with acute PE were appropriately risk stratified according to the 2011 AHA Scientific Statement within our hospital system and whether differences exist in adherence to risk stratification by hospital or treating hospital service. We also wished to know the frequency of in-hospital consultations for acute PE which might assist in the risk stratification process. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart audit of all patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute PE between January 2011 and December 2013 at our 937-bed metropolitan, three hospital system comprised of academic University, neuroscience Specialty, and teaching Community hospitals. We evaluated the presence of imaging, laboratory tests, and specialty consultation within 72 h of PE diagnosis by hospital. RESULTS: 701 patients with acute PE were admitted to our hospital system during the study period. 308 patients (43.9%) met criteria for intermediate-risk PE. 347 patients (49.5%) were considered 'Low-Risk - At Risk', patients defined in a low-risk category not having undergone all recommended risk stratification testing and so truly may have been in a higher risk category. No specialty consultations were utilized for 265 patients (37.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our large metropolitan hospital system inadequately risk stratifies hospitalized patients with acute PE. Because nearly one-half of patients with acute PE did not have all recommended testing, clinicians may be under recognizing patients with intermediate-risk PE and their risk for long-term morbidity. Specialty consultations were underutilized and may help guide medical decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidad , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Hospitales Comunitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA