Paradoxical and bimodal immune-mediated dermatological side effects of TNF-α inhibitors: A comprehensive review.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing prevalence of immune-mediated diseases such as psoriasis, lichen planus, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologists have turned to new biologic drugs known as DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) in recent years. AREAS COVERED: In this study, we evaluate the immune-mediated dermatological side effects of DMARDS by reviewing and analyzing previous peer-reviewed research on the effects of TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of skin diseases, as well as adverse effects of these drugs and some of the main causes of these effects. EXPERT OPINION: DMARDs are very effective in improving control of the above diseases. TNF-α inhibitors are an important group of DMARDs that are widely used. The paradoxical adverse events (PAEs) associated with the use of TNF-α inhibitors are divided into three categories: true paradoxical, borderline paradoxical, and non-paradoxical. True PAEs include conditions for which TNF-α inhibitors are approved for treatment. Borderline PAEs are considered to occur with this class of drugs for which there is no definite approval but for which there is sufficient evidence. Although these events are rare, early recognition of the accused drug and appropriate decision-making may prevent progression of complications and irreversible side effects.

A systematic review of case series and clinical trials investigating systemic oral or injectable therapies for the treatment of vitiligo.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of oral and injectable systemic treatments, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tofacitinib, baricitinib, corticosteroids, statins, zinc, apremilast, etc., for treating vitiligo lesions. METHOD: Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were meticulously searched for studies spanning from 2010 to August 2023, focusing on systemic oral and injectable therapies for vitiligo, using comprehensive keywords and search syntaxes tailored to each database. Key data extracted included study design, treatment efficacy, patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and safety profiles. RESULTS: In a total of 42 included studies, oral mini-pulse corticosteroid therapy (OMP) was the subject of six studies (14.2%). Minocycline was the focus of five studies (11.9%), while methotrexate, apremilast, and tofacitinib each were examined in four studies (9.5%). Antioxidants and Afamelanotide were the subjects of three studies each (7.1%). Cyclosporine, simvastatin, oral zinc, oral corticosteroids (excluding OMP) and injections, and baricitinib were each explored in two studies (4.8%). Azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and Alefacept were the subjects of one study each (2.4%). CONCLUSION: Systemic treatments for vitiligo have been successful in controlling lesions without notable side effects. OMP, Methotrexate, Azathioprine, Cyclosporine, Mycophenolate mofetil, Simvastatin, Apremilast, Minocycline, Afamelanotide, Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Antioxidants, and oral/injectable corticosteroids are effective treatment methods. However, oral zinc and alefacept did not show effectiveness.

The efficacy, satisfaction, and safety of carbon dioxide (CO2) fractional laser in combination with pulsed dye laser (PDL) versus each one alone in the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

The tendency to use less-invasive laser-based methods with far more obvious effectiveness has been taken into consideration today for improvement of burning scars. The present study thus aimed to assess the efficacy of two laser-based techniques including pulsed dye laser (PDL) and ablative fractional CO2 laser (AFCL) and its combination on improving different aspects of burning scars regardless of the types of scar as hypertrophic or keloid scars. This randomized single-blinded clinical trial was performed on patients suffering hypertrophic or keloid burning scars. The patients were randomly assigned into three groups scheduling for treatment with PDL alone, AFCL alone, or its combination. All patients were visited before and 40 days after the last treatment session, and their scars were assessed. In all groups, significant improvement was revealed in the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score, the color of scar, vascular bed in the scar, the and height of scar and its pliability; however, the improvement in each item was more highlighted in the group receiving a combination therapy with PDL and AFCL techniques. In this regard, the highest improvement was found in vascular bed and pliability in the combination therapy group as compared to other groups. Although the superiority of the combined group was not statistically significant, due to the high percentage of improvement in total VSS and most of its indicators, it can be clinically significant. The efficacy of the treatment protocols was different considering subgroups of mature and immature scars (less than 1 year), so that more improvement in pliability of scar, vascularity, and color of scar was found in the group scheduling for PDL + AFCL as compared to those who were treated with PDL alone in immature scar group but not in mature scar group. Combined treatment can be much more effective in improving the appearance and pathological characteristics of scars than each individual treatment. This effectiveness can be seen mainly in immature scars.

A systematic review of the efficacy, safety and satisfaction of regenerative medicine treatments, including platelet-rich plasma, stromal vascular fraction and stem cell-conditioned medium for hypertrophic scars and keloids.

The primary objective of this study is to examine the efficiency of various regenerative medicine approaches, such as platelet-rich plasma, cell therapy, stromal vascular fraction, exosomes and stem cell-conditioned medium, in the process of healing hypertrophic and keloid scars. Major databases including PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were systematically searched, and based on the content of the articles and the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight articles were selected. Out of these eight articles, there were two non-randomized clinical trial studies (25%), one randomized, single-blinded comparative study (12.5%), one retrospective clinical observational study (12.5%) and four randomized clinical trial studies (50%). We employed EndNote X8 and Google Sheets to conduct article reviews and extract relevant data. Following the review phase, the studies underwent analysis and categorization. In all eight reviewed studies, the effectiveness of regenerative medicine in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids has been proven. Out of these studies, five (62.5%) focused on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma, two study (25%) examined the effectiveness of stromal vascular fraction and one study (12.5%) explored the efficacy of stem cell-conditioned medium. In two studies (25%), the treatment methods were added to standard treatment, while in six studies (75%), regenerative medicine was used as the sole treatment method and compared with standard treatment. The use of these treatment methods did not result in any serious side effects for the patients. Regenerative medicine is an effective method with minimal side effects for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. It can be used as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatment methods. However, further studies are needed to thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness of all sub-branches of this method.

Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and satisfaction rates of platelet-rich plasma, non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid and the combination of platelet-rich plasma and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid in patients with burn scars treated with fractional CO2 laser: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Skin scarring can result from burns, injuries, stretch marks and acne, leading to cosmetic and functional difficulties. Treatments for burn scars encompass a range of options, such as lasers, corticosteroid injections, surgery and regenerative techniques such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Hyaluronic acid-based products offer skin hydration and shield against aging effects. A study is being conducted to evaluate how effective PRP injection, hyaluronic acid and their combination improve burn scars and their effects on quality of life and potential disabilities. In our study, PRP and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid treatments were compared in 10 individuals with burn scars between 2022 and 2023. Patients received CO2 fractional laser treatment followed by injections in scar areas. Evaluations included the Vancouver scar scale (VSS), biometric assessments, ultrasounds and satisfaction ratings. Two therapy sessions were conducted at 1-month interval, and assessments were done before treatment, 1 month after the first session, and 3 months after the first session. Biometric assessments showed significant improvements in various parameters (tewametry, corneometry, erythema index, melanin index, cutometry, thickness and density) in the intervention groups compared to the placebo group (p <0.05). PRP-non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid, PRP and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid treatments exhibited the best clinical responses with significant differences between groups (p <0.05). Dermal thickness did not show significant improvement during treatment sessions, and changes among subjects were not significantly different. The colorimetry parameter improved in all groups except the placebo group, with no significant difference between intervention groups. The VSS significantly decreased in all treatment groups except the placebo group. PRP, non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid and especially the combination of these two treatment options are very effective in treating burn scars.

A systematic review of procedural treatments for burn scars in children: Evaluating efficacy, safety, standard protocols, average sessions and tolerability based on clinical studies.

Managing burn scars in children presents significant challenges. This study investigates effective treatment methods for burn scars, focusing on efficacy, safety, standard protocols and tolerability. Major databases such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were thoroughly searched up to August 2024, emphasizing procedural treatments for burn scars in children. Key data collected included participant demographics, sample sizes, intervention methods, follow-up protocols, treatment effectiveness and reported adverse events. A total of 256 children were assessed, with all procedural treatments yielding satisfactory outcomes. Among the various methods, trapeze-flap plasty and percutaneous collagen induction showed improvements in all patients. In the laser treatment group, which included 161 children, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score reduction ranged from 55.55% to 76.31%, with outcomes rated as good (24.61%) to excellent (60%). Laser treatment using local anaesthesia proved to be well tolerated by children. Our findings indicate that various methods-including trapeze-flap plasty, percutaneous collagen induction, phototherapy and fractional CO2 laser-demonstrate a relatively good response and an acceptable safety profile. Notably, light-based therapies/lasers may serve as safe, effective and tolerable options for scar treatment in this age group, often eliminating the need for general anaesthesia.

Evaluation of the effect of botulinum toxin injection in aggravating or improving seborrheic dermatitis symptoms: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Considering the proven therapeutic effect of botulinum toxin and the pathophysiology of seborrheic dermatitis, conflicting hypotheses have been put forward regarding the effect of injection of this toxin on the improvement or exacerbation of seborrheic dermatitis. Because of the lack of consistent studies investigating this relationship, we decided to conduct this study to investigate the effect of local botulinum toxin injection on sebum production and improvement or worsening of seborrheic dermatitis lesions. METHOD: This study was a prospective, single-arm clinical trial that involved the injection of botulinum toxin into 20 patients with complaints of skin wrinkles and simultaneous symptoms of seborrheic dermatitis. The trial was conducted at a dermatology clinic between March 2019 and March 2021. Two important characteristics of these patients were seborrheic dermatitis on the face or scalp and a referral for botulinum toxin injection to remove facial wrinkles. The Seborrheic Dermatitis Area and Severity Index (SDASI) was used to determine the severity of symptoms. RESULTS: In study of 20 patients with an average age of 40 years, despite the decrease in the average scores of all examined criteria of seborrheic dermatitis symptoms in study, 1 month after botulinum toxin injection, no significant effect of using this toxin was seen on the improvement of patients' symptoms (p value >0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite the emphasis of many studies on the effectiveness of botulinum toxin in reducing the activity of sebaceous glands, the use of botulinum toxin as a therapeutic modality for control the symptoms of seborrheic dermatitis is not suggested by this study. Conducting studies in which the location and technique of injection and the follow-up intervals of patients in them are based on the standard of other studies, are the suggestions made by comparing the results and method of the current study with other studies.

Investigating metabolic syndrome markers and body mass index changes in patients with acne vulgaris treated with isotretinoin: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory skin disease that occurs during puberty, affecting approximately 85% of young adults and may persist into adulthood. The pathophysiology of acne is multifactorial, involving hormonal, inflammatory, and immune mechanisms. Isotretinoin is widely used for treating severe cystic acne or recurrent acne. This medication is considered a pharmacological option that significantly reduces sebum secretion, leading to a reduction in the size of sebaceous glands. It also induces a lack of differentiation in sebaceous cysts, resulting in a decrease in lipid accumulation. METHOD: This research is a prospective study. Patient contact details were obtained directly from those visiting the dermatology clinic, and they were monitored for a duration of 3 months. Essential data was gathered through patient examinations and inquiries at the clinic, including the prescription of tests prior to initiating isotretinoin treatment. Furthermore, follow-up tests and examinations were performed within the initial and third months post-treatment commencement. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients participated in the study, selected through non-probability (convenience) sampling. The therapeutic dose taken by patients was 20 mg of isotretinoin daily (n = 49) or every other day (n = 13). Among the participants, six patients experienced a decrease of 3 units or more in HDL levels, while 16 patients saw an increase of 3 units or more in LDL levels, 3 months after beginning the treatment. Additionally, the triglyceride (TG) levels increased by 9 units or more in six individuals, and the blood sugar (BS) levels increased by 5 units or more in nine individuals, 3 months after treatment initiation. Moreover, one person's waist circumference increased by 1.5 cm 3 months after treatment began. The average weight of the individuals at the end of the treatment rose from 60.74 kg to 61.12 kg. However, this weight increase was not statistically significant. (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In general, the results of our study show that the use of oral isotretinoin as a treatment option for the management of acne vulgaris can be effective when administered at the correct dosage, offering a safe and low-complication option.

Development of bullous systemic lupus erythematosus in patient treated with NB-UVB: A case report and comprehensive review of the literature.

Key Clinical Message: The use of phototherapy is highly effective in treating various skin diseases. In this study, the aim is to present vesicular and blister lesions in patients treated with UVB for psoriasis. It is advisable to consider the possibility of BSLE in cases of vesiculobullous lesions following phototherapy, along with other potential diagnoses. Abstract: Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (BSLE) is a rare form of cutaneous lupus erythematosus that presents as vesicles and blisters on various parts of the body. The pathological appearance of these lesions often shows subepidermal vesicles with deposits of IgG, IgM, IgA, and complement C3 in granular or linear forms under direct immunofluorescence (DIF) examination. Clinical studies demonstrate the effectiveness of phototherapy in treating various skin conditions. While several studies suggest a correlation between phototherapy and the development of vesiculobullous lesions, most of these reports are related to bullous pemphigoid, with limited research on the occurrence of BSLE following phototherapy. In this case report, vesicular and blistering lesions in a 70-year-old man undergoing UVB treatment for psoriasis are described. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of bullous systemic lupus erythematosus, and the patient experienced significant improvement after treatment with dapsone tablets. A literature review was conducted on the development of vesiculobullous lesions after phototherapy, comparing different approaches presented in previous studies. Our conclusion highlights the importance of considering BSLE as a possible diagnosis in cases of vesiculobullous lesions post-phototherapy, alongside other potential conditions.

The efficacy of the combination of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone compared with the combination of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with androgenic alopecia, female and male hair loss patterns: A blinded randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in women, affecting their quality of life. The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone with the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with AGA, female and male hair loss patterns. METHOD: This clinical study was performed on 60 women suffering from AGA. The patients were divided into two groups receiving spironolactone 100 mg/day and finasteride 5 mg/day. In addition, a 2% minoxidil solution was used in all patients in addition to treatment with finasteride or spironolactone. At 2 months after initiation and at the end of treatment, patients were evaluated using the Ludwig/Norwood-Hamilton scale and the degree of physician and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: After 2 months, hair density, hair thickness, and hair loss had improved in both groups; however, statistically, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to these parameters (p > 0.05). After 4 months, a significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of treatment response (physician satisfaction), hair density, and hair loss severity. So that, the drugs used were ineffective in 6.7% of cases in the minoxidil-spironolactone group and in 16.7% of cases in the minoxidil-finasteride group. In addition, 43.3% of cases in the minoxidil-spironolactone group and 53% in the minoxidil-finasteride group responded well to treatment. The treatment effect was excellent in 56.7% and 0% of the mentioned groups, respectively, and the mentioned difference was statistically significant (p: 0.01). The response to treatment in female pattern hair loss (FPHL) was not statistically significant (p: 0.52), but there was a significant difference in the response to both treatments in male pattern hair loss (MPHL; p: 0.007). In terms of patient satisfaction, minoxidil-spironolactone treatment was significantly better than minoxidil-finasteride regarding hair density and severity of hair loss (p: 0.01). Finally, in terms of treatment complications, the patients in two groups did not have any serious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The combination of minoxidil and spironolactone could be considered a more effective treatment than the combination of minoxidil and finasteride in women with AGA, FPHL, and MPHL.

Assessing the Concordance of Clinical and Pathological Diagnoses in Basal Cell Carcinoma Among the Iranian Population: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 229 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most prevalent malignancy globally, with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) being the most common type. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the concordance between clinical and pathological diagnoses of BCC, emphasizing the importance of early detection. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study, we conducted a retrospective review of clinical and pathological records for 229 patients diagnosed with BCC between 2020 and 2024. The analysis focused on gender, age, lesion location, and diagnostic accuracy. Among the 229 patients, 193 were men (84.3%), and 131 (57.2%) had recorded clinical diagnoses. The mean age of diagnosed patients was 67.72 years. Lesions were primarily located on the scalp (29.5%), face (26.4%), and nose (13.9%). Of the pathological evaluations, 184 cases (80.3%) confirmed BCC, while 45 cases had alternative diagnoses. Notably, 94.6% of clinically diagnosed patients were suspected to have BCC by their physicians. A significant portion of cases (42%) lacked prior clinical diagnoses, reflecting a potential gap in education among nondermatologists regarding BCC recognition. CONCLUSION: The study found high concordance between clinical and pathological diagnoses of BCC, underscoring the need for improved clinical assessment skills among healthcare providers. Collaboration with dermatologists is essential for accurate diagnosis and improved patient outcomes. Enhanced training in recognizing BCC symptoms is recommended to address the identified gaps in clinical suspicion.

Regenerative medicine in the treatment of specific dermatologic disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to systematically review randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) studying various types of regenerative medicine methods (such as platelet-rich plasma, stromal vascular fraction, cell therapy, conditioned media, etc.) in treating specific dermatologic diseases. Rejuvenation, scarring, wound healing, and other secondary conditions of skin damage were not investigated in this study. METHOD: Major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were meticulously searched for RCTs up to January 2024, focusing on regenerative medicine interventions for specific dermatologic disorders (such as androgenetic alopecia, vitiligo, alopecia areata, etc.). Key data extracted encompassed participant characteristics and sample sizes, types of regenerative therapy, treatment efficacy, and adverse events. RESULTS: In this systematic review, 64 studies involving a total of 2888 patients were examined. Women constituted 44.8% of the study population, while men made up 55.2% of the participants, with an average age of 27.64 years. The most frequently studied skin diseases were androgenetic alopecia (AGA) (45.3%) and vitiligo (31.2%). The most common regenerative methods investigated for these diseases were PRP and the transplantation of autologous epidermal melanocyte/keratinocyte cells, respectively. Studies reported up to 68.4% improvement in AGA and up to 71% improvement in vitiligo. Other diseases included in the review were alopecia areata, melasma, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LSA), inflammatory acne vulgaris, chronic telogen effluvium, erosive oral lichen planus, and dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Regenerative medicine was found to be an effective treatment option in all of these studies, along with other methods. The regenerative medicine techniques investigated in this study comprised the transplantation of autologous epidermal melanocyte/keratinocyte cells, isolated melanocyte transplantation, cell transplantation from hair follicle origins, melanocyte-keratinocyte suspension in PRP, conditioned media injection, a combination of PRP and basic fibroblast growth factor, intravenous injection of mesenchymal stem cells, concentrated growth factor, stromal vascular fraction (SVF), a combination of PRP and SVF, and preserving hair grafts in PRP. CONCLUSION: Regenerative medicine holds promise as a treatment for specific dermatologic disorders. To validate our findings, it is recommended to conduct numerous clinical trials focusing on various skin conditions. In our study, we did not explore secondary skin lesions like scars or ulcers. Therefore, assessing the effectiveness of this treatment method for addressing these conditions would necessitate a separate study.

From drug therapy failures to laser therapy victory: A case report and literature review of lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei resolution.

Key Clinical Message: Pulsed dye laser (PDL) has proven effective in resolving lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei (LMDF) where drug therapies have failed with a lack of treatment consensus for LMDF, considering early PDL intervention is crucial to achieve resolution without scarring, prevent relapse, and enhance overall treatment outcomes. Abstract: Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei (LMDF) is a rare inflammatory and granulomatous dermatologic disease that primarily affects the face. The optimal treatment for LMDF remains controversial, and there is a lack of consensus on the most effective therapy. This case report highlights the successful use of a 595 nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) in the treatment of LMDF following unsuccessful drug therapy. A 28-year-old male presented with reddish-brown eruptions on his face that had persisted for several months. Clinical examination revealed discrete dome-shaped eruptions in clusters on the central area of the face. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of LMDF, based on the presence of epithelioid granulomas with central caseous necrosis. Previous treatment with an oral isotretinoin and methotrexate combination also failed to yield satisfactory results. After discontinuing drug therapy, the patient underwent five sessions of PDL treatment. Ten days after the first session, the eruptions began to regress without scarring. Subsequent PDL sessions led to the complete resolution of the eruptions. The patient experienced no relapse during the follow-up period. This case report suggests that PDL treatment may be an effective option for LMDF, particularly in cases where drug therapy has failed. Early initiation of laser treatment may prevent scarring, minimize the adverse effects associated with drug therapy, and reduce the risk of disease relapse. Further research and controlled trials are needed to establish the efficacy of laser therapy in the treatment of LMDF.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Probiotic Supplementation in Combination With Doxycycline for the Treatment of Moderate Acne: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Acne is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that negatively affects patients' quality of life. Increasing antibiotic resistance is making acne less responsive to treatment. Probiotics are live microorganisms that can provide health benefits by fighting pathogens and maintaining intestinal homeostasis and skin microbiome balance. This study investigates the effects of probiotics in the treatment of acne vulgaris. METHODS: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 80 patients with moderate acne were divided into two groups of 40. All patients received the same topical treatment, which consisted of a daily antibacterial face wash and Adapalene gel every other night. The control group received one capsule of doxycycline (100 mg) daily, whereas the intervention group received one probiotic capsule daily in addition to doxycycline. Patients underwent photography of facial acne lesions, and treatment response was assessed using the global acne grading system (GAGS) and acne grading method at baseline, as well as during follow-up visits at 1, 2, and 3 months. RESULTS: The global acne grading system indicated that both groups showed improvement. However, analyses revealed that outcomes were significantly better in the doxycycline plus probiotics group for the forehead (p = 0.018), chin (p = 0.021), and nose (p = 0.021). No significant differences were observed for the left and right cheeks, back, and chest areas, with the mean GAGS score reduction between the two groups differing by only 2%. Treatment with probiotics significantly reduced the severity of lesions compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The acne grading method also indicated that the intervention group had a significantly better treatment response than the control group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, treatment with probiotics did not result in any side effects. CONCLUSION: Probiotics can serve as an effective and safe treatment option, enhancing the outcomes of routine acne treatments, particularly for patients with acne on the forehead, chin, and nose.

Successful treatment of resistant plantar ulcerative lichen planus with tofacitinib: A case report and comprehensive review of the literature.

Key Clinical Message: Ulcerative lichen planus, a challenging variant of lichen planus, has limited response to traditional treatments. Tofacitinib, a JAK-STAT pathway inhibitor, shows promise in effectively treating these lesions. Abstract: Lichen planus is a mucocutaneous disease that can cause various manifestations, such as itchy erythematous papules, cicatricial alopecia, erosion, and mucocutaneous ulcers. One uncommon manifestation of this disease is the occurrence of erosion and skin ulcers in the soles of the feet, which can cause many problems for patients. Tofacitinib, a Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor drug, has found a special place in the field of inflammatory diseases, especially inflammatory skin diseases. In this regard, studies on the effective role of this drug in the treatment of certain forms of lichen planus, including lichen planopilaris, and erosive lichen planus have been performed. In upcoming study, we introduce a 52-year-old woman with lichen planus who complained of ulcerative lesions on the sole of her foot, for whom a diagnosis of plantar ulcerative lichen planus was proposed. After the patient did not respond therapeutically to intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection, as well as methotrexate and cyclosporine tablets, significant improvement was finally achieved with a 5 mg twice daily dose of tofacitinib. In the following, we will comprehensively review previous articles on the role of tofacitinib in the treatment of lichen planus lesions, as well as the proposed treatment options for erosive and ulcerative lichen planus lesions specifically located on the sole of the foot. Despite limited reports of the successful treatment of mucosal erosive lesions in the oral, esophageal, genital, and ocular mucosa areas with tofacitinib, no previous study has reported the successful treatment of ulcerative lichen planus lesions of the plantar area with tofacitinib. While reporting this case, we recommend considering tofacitinib as a treatment option for plantar ulcerative lichen planus. To confirm its effectiveness, it is necessary to conduct more extensive studies with a larger sample size.

Unusual presentation of pilomatricoma: A case report and comprehensive review of the literature.

Pilomatricoma is a benign proliferative lesion of skin appendages that often affects the head, upper limbs, and lower limbs. The clinical appearance of the lesions is that of asymptomatic nodules measuring less than 3 cm. pathologically, these skin lesions show the presence of basaloid cell islands, eosinophilic cytoplasmic cells without nuclei, as well as hemorrhage and calcification. In this study, we present the case of an 8-year-old girl with a 5 × 5 cm skin lesion on the forearm, which lacked the typical firmness associated with pilomatricoma lesions during examination. After biopsy, the lesion was confirmed to be pilomatricoma. Furthermore, we have reviewed studies documenting pilomatricoma lesions with atypical clinical features. Based on reports of different clinical manifestations of pilomatricoma in these studies, we suggest that the clinical diagnosis of pilomatricoma should not be limited to the typical presentation of these lesions. In cases where the lesions exceed 3 cm in size, display cystic characteristics, are painful, or resemble keloids, consideration should also be given to the possibility of pilomatricoma.

Prevalence of positive findings of brain computed tomography scans in pediatric population.

Objectives: Computed tomography (CT) scans are used more frequently in medical centers, increasing unnecessary requests for it as a first-line evaluation. This study aimed to investigate the rate and prevalence of abnormal findings in a brain CT scan in children at the Children's Hospital of Tabriz, Iran. Materials &Methods: This study was a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study that included all children under 15 years old undergoing a brain CT scan at the Children's Hospital of Tabriz, Iran. All patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were referred to the Children's Hospital of Tabriz during the spring of 2018 entered the study. Age, gender, patient history, and clinical findings were examined. In the next step, the results of each patient's CT scan were evaluated. Results: In this study, 108 patients were studied with a median age of 18.0 months. CT scan results were normal in seventy-four cases (68.5%), hydrocephalus was seen in 15 (13.9%), and benign infantile hydrocephalus was seen in eight (7.4%). The study revealed a statistically significant relationship between patient history and CT scan results (p=0.017). A statistically significant relationship was observed between the clinical findings and CT scan results (p=0.042). Conclusion: Brain CT scans have more abnormal findings in patients with positive clinical findings. Although a CT scan is a highly sensitive and specificmodality in diagnosing central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities, its value depends on the underlying medical history and physical exam.

Efficacy of fractional CO2 laser in combination with stromal vascular fraction (SVF) compared with fractional CO2 laser alone in the treatment of burn scars: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The appearance of skin scars is known as one of the main side effects of skin burns. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF), as a rich source of cell populations with tissue regeneration properties, plays an important role in the healing of skin lesions. Fractional CO2 lasers have occupied a special place in treating skin lesions, particularly skin scars, since their introduction. Our study aimed to compare the combination of SVF and fractional CO2 laser with fractional CO2 laser alone in the treatment of burn scars. METHOD: This double-blind clinical trial study was conducted on ten patients with burn scars that were treated three times with a fractional CO2 laser at site of burn lesions, and one of the two areas studied was randomly injected with SVF. Two months after completion of the procedure, patients' scars were assessed using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS), biometric criteria, and physician and patient satisfaction ratings. RESULTS: The results confirmed a significant improvement in VSS, cutometry, R7 criteria, complete density sonography, and skin density sonography in the fractional CO2 laser-treated group. The VSS criteria, epidermal thickness sonography, complete density sonography, and skin density sonography in the group treated with the combination of fractional CO2 laser and SVF also showed significant improvement. The VSS criteria and melanin index of Mexameter in the group treated with SVF in combination with fractional CO2 laser were significantly better than the group treated with fractional CO2 laser alone. Also, physician and patient satisfaction in the group treated with SVF injection in combination with fractional CO2 laser was significantly higher than the other group. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the efficacy of SVF injection in combination with fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of burn scars and can be considered as a treatment option for better management of these lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was retrospectively registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials with code: IRCT20210515051307N1, Registration date: 2021-11-14, URL: https://www.irct.ir/trial/56337 .