RESUMEN
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are used to assess the functional status of somatosensory pathways during surgical procedures and can help protect patients' neurological integrity intraoperatively. This is a position statement on intraoperative SEP monitoring from the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) and updates prior ASNM position statements on SEPs from the years 2005 and 2010. This position statement is endorsed by ASNM and serves as an educational service to the neurophysiological community on the recommended use of SEPs as a neurophysiological monitoring tool. It presents the rationale for SEP utilization and its clinical applications. It also covers the relevant anatomy, technical methodology for setup and signal acquisition, signal interpretation, anesthesia and physiological considerations, and documentation and credentialing requirements to optimize SEP monitoring to aid in protecting the nervous system during surgery.
RESUMEN
The American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) was founded in 1989 as the American Society of Evoked Potential Monitoring. From the beginning, the Society has been made up of physicians, doctoral degree holders, Technologists, and all those interested in furthering the profession. The Society changed its name to the ASNM and held its first Annual Meeting in 1990. It remains the largest worldwide organization dedicated solely to the scientifically-based advancement of intraoperative neurophysiology. The primary goal of the ASNM is to assure the quality of patient care during procedures monitoring the nervous system. This goal is accomplished primarily through programs in education, advocacy of basic and clinical research, and publication of guidelines, among other endeavors. The ASNM is committed to the development of medically sound and clinically relevant guidelines for the performance of intraoperative neurophysiology. Guidelines are formulated based on exhaustive literature review, recruitment of expert opinion, and broad consensus among ASNM membership. Input is likewise sought from sister societies and related constituencies. Adherence to a literature-based, formalized process characterizes the construction of all ASNM guidelines. The guidelines covering the Professional Practice of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring were initially published January 24th, 2013, and subsequently that document has undergone review and revision to accommodate broad inter- and intra-societal feedback. This current version of the ASNM Professional Practice Guideline was fully approved for publication according to ASNM bylaws on February 22nd, 2018, and thus overwrites and supersedes the initial guideline.
Asunto(s)
Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria/normas , Monitorización Neurofisiológica/normas , Neurofisiología/normas , Humanos , Organización y Administración , Médicos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Intracranial lesions, particularly in the language-eloquent areas of the brain, can affect one's speaking ability. Despite advances in surgery, the excision of these lesions can be challenging. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during awake craniotomies can help identify language-eloquent areas and minimize postoperative impairments. Preoperative language testing is performed to establish a baseline before intraoperative language testing. This involves subjecting patients to predetermined tasks in the operating room to evaluate their phonological, semantic, and syntactic capabilities. The current state and future directions of intraoperative language testing procedures are discussed in this paper. The most common intraoperative tasks are counting and picture naming. However, some experts recommend utilizing more nuanced tasks that involve regions affected by infrequently occurring tumor patterns. Low-frequency bipolar Penfield stimulation is optimal for language mapping. Exception cases are discussed where awake craniotomies are not feasible. When dealing with multilingual patients, the patient's age of learning and skill level can be accounted for in terms of making informed task choices and mapping techniques to avoid any damage to language areas.
RESUMEN
Today, it seems prudent to reconsider how ultrasound technology can be used for providing intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring that will result in better patient outcomes and decreased length and cost of hospitalization. An extensive and rapidly growing literature suggests that the essential hemodynamic information provided by transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography neuromonitoring (TCDNM) would provide effective monitoring modality for improving outcomes after different types of vascular, neurosurgical, orthopedic, cardiovascular, and cardiothoracic surgeries and some endovascular interventional or diagnostic procedures, like cardiac catheterization or cerebral angiography. Understanding, avoiding, and preventing peri- or postoperative complications, including neurological deficits following abovementioned surgeries, endovascular intervention, or diagnostic procedures, represents an area of great public and economic benefit for society, especially considering the aging population. The American Society of Neurophysiologic Monitoring and American Society of Neuroimaging Guidelines Committees formed a joint task force and developed updated guidelines to assist in the use of TCDNM in the surgical and intensive care settings. Specifically, these guidelines define (1) the objectives of TCD monitoring; (2) the responsibilities and behaviors of the neurosonographer during monitoring; (3) instrumentation and acquisition parameters; (4) safety considerations; (5) contemporary rationale for TCDNM; (6) TCDNM perspectives; and (7) major recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Ultrasonido , Ultrasonografía Doppler Transcraneal , Anciano , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Neuroimagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Ultrasonografía Doppler Transcraneal/métodosRESUMEN
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological disorder in which nigrostriatal pathways involving the basal ganglia experience a decrease in neural activity regarding dopaminergic neurons. PD symptoms, such as muscle stiffness and involuntary tremors, have an adverse impact on the daily lives of those affected. Current medical treatments seek to decrease the severity of these symptoms. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become the preferred safe, and reliable treatment approach. DBS involves implanting microelectrodes into subcortical areas that produce electrical impulses directly to high populations of dopaminergic neurons. The most common targets are the subthalamic nucleus (STN), and the basal ganglia's globus pallidus pars interna (GPi). Research studies suggest that DBS of the STN may cause a significant reduction in the daily dose of L-DOPA compared to DBS of the GPi. DBS of the STN has suggested that there may be sweet spots within the STN that provide hyper-direct cortical connectivity pathways to the primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area (SMA), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). In addition, the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) may be a new target for DBS that helps treat locomotion problems associated with gait and posture. Both microelectrode recording (MER) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used to ensure electrode placement accuracy. Using MER, stimulation of the STN at high frequencies (140<) decreased oscillatory neuronal firing by 67%. This paper investigates methods of intraoperative neuromonitoring during DBS as a form of PD treatment.
RESUMEN
Patients with untreated carotid artery stenosis remain at high risk for stroke. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgical procedure for the treatment of symptomatic and severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis. A small percentage of patients who do not have good collateral circulation are at high risk of cerebral ischemia during the cross-clamping of the carotid artery. Aspects of CEA, such as cross-clamping and routine shunting, can also carry the risk of perioperative stroke through dislodgement of emboli causing thrombosis, therefore, selective shunting is highly recommended during the CEA procedure. A multimodality approach of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) techniques such as somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to monitor cerebral perfusion throughout the duration of the surgery and to predict the need for a selective shunt after cross-clamping. Additional use of transcranial Doppler (TCD) in the multimodality approach can aid in visualizing the cerebral blood flow and detecting any microemboli that may also cause a stroke. A multimodality IONM approach has been reported as more sensitive and specific for predicting and minimizing any postoperative neurological deficits.
RESUMEN
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) techniques continue to prove useful as an adjunct in select surgeries for reducing the incidence of various postoperative deficits in motor function through the monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The Penfield and Taniguchi methods of direct electrical cortical stimulation (DECS) stand in contrast to each other. Penfield's method uses lower-frequency stimulation over a longer duration, while Taniguchi's method uses a relatively higher frequency over a short duration. DECS motor mapping is considered suitable for tumor resections, aneurysm surgeries, arteriovenous malformation, and epilepsy surgeries. While subcortical motor mapping works efficiently with both methods, it aligns with Taniguchi's method more effectively. Taniguchi's method has a lower risk of seizures relative to Penfield's method. While only cortical neurons are excited in Penfield's stimulation technique, Taniguchi's technique excites the whole corticospinal tract (CST), so it can be used for mapping in a stand-alone fashion. The Penfield technique remains the method of choice for language mapping. In all motor mapping, Train-of-Four (TOF) stimulation during the surgical procedure ensures that the patient's muscles are not unduly relaxed.
RESUMEN
Scoliosis is a spine deformity that presents as Cobb's angle greater than 10 degrees. Pedicle screw placement can be employed in scoliosis corrective procedures but poses a danger of disrupting the motor and sensory pathways by injuries to the nerves, spinal cord, and vasculature. Occasionally traction weight is applied before the instrumentation for correction. This correction weight may cause spinal cord functional compromise and may result in postoperative paresis or paralysis. A 10-year-old female patient with Cobb's angle of 120 degrees was scheduled for scoliosis correction surgery. A multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) approach was designed with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs), spontaneous electromyography (s-EMG), triggered electromyography (t-EMG) and train of four (TOF). In this patient, after placing the pedicle screw, TCeMEP changes were immediately identified and reported to the surgeon in the left lower extremity followed by both lower extremities. The surgeon immediately asked the anesthesiologist to remove 25 pounds of traction weight from the head and increase the mean arterial pressure. TCeMEP responses returned to the baselines immediately. Later during the surgery, left arm SSEP changes were also identified, which returned to normal on the repositioning of the arm. Multimodal IONM has the benefit of monitoring the sensory and motor functions of the spinal cord and nerve function at risk of damage during the procedure. The utilization of IONM in this spinal cord correction surgery helped to detect and timely reverse nerve injuries. We strongly recommend utilizing multimodality IONM during scoliosis correction procedures as a standard of care to minimize postoperative neurological deficits.
RESUMEN
The use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to monitor upper extremity nerves during surgery is becoming more accepted as a valid and useful technique to minimize intraoperative nerve injuries. We present a case illustrating the benefit of utilizing both SSEPs and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) for preventing position-related injury during surgery. The patient was a 43-year-old male with a history of neck pain, along with numbness and tingling of the upper extremities. While the patient was being draped, upper extremity SSEPs diminished significantly TCeMEP responses in the hands (abductor pollicus brevis-abductor digiti minimi; APB-ADM) vanished shortly after that, followed by the biceps and left deltoid. The surgeons were notified, and the tape on the shoulders was loosened. No improvements were noted in SSEPs nor TCeMEPs due to this intervention, so all tape was removed and the patient's arms were allowed to rest naturally upon the arm boards. Upper extremity TCeMEP responses could then be elicited and SSEPs improved shortly afterward. Surgery was completed with the arms on the arm boards. All signals remained stable for the remaining three hours of the procedure. At two months follow-up, the patient was well with total pain relief and normal upper extremity function when neurological examination was performed. This report demonstrates a case in which intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring was useful in identifying and reversing impending nerve injury during cervical spine surgery. Significant changes were seen in SSEPs as well as TCeMEPs, so we recommend that TCeMEP monitoring be considered as an adjunct to SSEPs for prevention of injury to the brachial plexus.
Asunto(s)
Neuropatías del Plexo Braquial/prevención & control , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Potenciales Evocados Motores/fisiología , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales/fisiología , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Traumatismos del Sistema Nervioso/prevención & control , Adulto , Brazo/inervación , Brazo/fisiología , Brazo/fisiopatología , Plexo Braquial/fisiopatología , Neuropatías del Plexo Braquial/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Posicionamiento del Paciente/efectos adversos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Traumatismos del Sistema Nervioso/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is becoming the standard of care for many spinal surgeries, especially those with deformity correction and instrumentation. We reviewed 2069 spine cases with multimodality IONM including somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEP), and spontaneous and triggered electromyography (s-EMG and t-EMG) in a University setting over a period of four years to examine perioperative clinical findings when an IONM event was noted and to ascertain how IONM has affected our ability to avoid potential neurological injury during spine surgery. We performed a retrospective analysis of cases from 2006 to 2010 to study the frequency and cause of intraoperative events detected via IONM and the clinical outcome of the patient. There were 32 cases (1.5%) with possible intraoperative events. There were 17 (53%) cases where IONM changes affected the course of the surgery and prevented possible postoperative neurological deficits. Seven cases (41%) were due to deformity correction, five (29%) due to hypotension, four (24%) due to patient positioning, and one (6%) due to a screw requiring repositioning. None of the 17 patients had postoperative motor or sensory deficits. There were four cases with false-positive IONM findings due to correctible technical issues. Three cases required surgical revision due to pedicle screw malposition. In each case, s-EMGs failed to exhibit intraoperative changes but the patient presented with postoperative radiculopathy. We believe that the use of t-EMGs may have prevented these complications. This review reinforces the importance of multimodality IONM for spinal surgery. The incidence of possible events in our series was 1.5%, and several likely postoperative neurologic deficits were avoided by intraoperative intervention.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Neurológico , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Electromiografía , Potenciales Evocados Motores , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurofisiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Traumatismos del Sistema Nervioso/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures are performed with multimodality neuromonitoring of the femoral nerve to prevent lumbosacral plexus and peripheral nerve injury from positioning, dilation, retraction, and hardware implantation. The integrity of the femoral nerve can be continuously assessed during these procedures by Somatosensory Evoked Potentials of the Saphenous nerve (Sn-SSEPs). Sn-SSEPs are technically challenging to acquire and necessitate advanced troubleshooting skills with a more rigid anesthetic regimen and physiological parameters. We performed a retrospective analysis of Sn-SSEP data for 100 consecutive lateral lumbar surgeries where the stimulation electrodes were placed distally below the knee and medial to the tibia bone (i.e., DSn-SSEPs). Monitorable baseline responses were present in 87% of patients after the exclusion of fourteen cases where the tibial nerve SSEP was absent, quadriceps transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) were absent or not utilized. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, mean arterial pressure (MAP), inhalational anesthetic levels, reliability of ulnar and posterior tibial nerve SSEPs, and the reliability of femoral nerve innervated quadriceps TCeMEPs were evaluated but were not of statistically significant consequence between cases where the DSn-SSEP was present or absent in this study. We found the utilization of DSn-SSEPs to be a valuable adjunct to femoral nerve monitoring. Stimulation electrode placement is easy to palpate with clear anatomical borders. Significant muscle artifact and patient movement from stimulation do not affect waveform morphology, allowing for continuous and reliable monitoring. We recommend including DSn-SSEPs to optimize recordings during lateral lumbar procedures.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Tibia , Potenciales Evocados Motores , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Awake craniotomy with intraoperative neurophysiological language mapping (INLM) is an established procedure for patients undergoing surgery to resection tumors in the language cortex area. INLM and continuous neurophysiological monitoring allow assessment of the language function, which is not possible under general anesthesia. INLM of the brain areas provides a helpful tool to the operating surgeon in reducing the risks associated with tumor resection in the motor and language cortex. We present a literature review and the technical method used for INLM by utilizing direct electrical cortical stimulation. We also report the usefulness of INLM for evaluation of the language function during resection of cortical tumors, epilepsy foci, and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) located near language areas. First, the central sulcus is identified by sensory mapping, followed by the motor cortex's identification by direct electrical cortical stimulation (DECS). Neurological assessment of the patient is done by auditory and visual feedback. The patient is asked to repeat numbers, days, words, sentences, read words, and name pictures during cortical stimulation. DECS may cause a slurring or speech arrest. Electrocorticography (ECoG) is also performed during cortical stimulation to identify any after-discharges. Examination of the patient occurs immediately after surgery, and then 24 hours, one week, six months, and 12 months postoperatively. Bipolar DECS for motor mapping with ECoG can safely and reliably be utilized to identify essential language areas with minimizing permanent language deficits and maximizing the extent of tumor resection.
RESUMEN
Introduction Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) helps in better patient outcomes by minimizing risks related to the functional status of the nervous system during surgical procedures. An IONM alert to the surgical team during the surgery can help them identify the cause and take immediate corrective action. IONM confers possible benefits, including improved surgical morbidity and mortality, better patient care, minimal neurological deficits, reduced hospital stay, medical costs, and litigation risk. In addition, a highly skilled IONM team will make a better patient outcome. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 62 consecutive patients who underwent intracranial and spinal neurosurgical procedures. Multimodality IONM was utilized, including somatosensory evoked potentials, transcranial electrical motor evoked potential, spontaneous and triggered electromyography, electroencephalography, electrocorticography, cortical sensory mapping, and direct electrical cortical stimulation. Of a total of 62 patients, two patients revealed neurotonic EMG discharges during IONM, and most patients woke up without any new neurological deficit. Results Sixty-two patients were included, ranging from age 5 to 77 years (mean 43.5 years), with 54.8% men and 45.2% female. Multimodality IONM was used in all patients. Two EMG alerts were recorded during IONM, during a brain tumor resection, and right acetabular hip surgery with postoperative right foot drop. Conclusion Multimodality IONM is the gold standard of care for any surgical services and is used as real-time monitoring of functional integrity of neural structures at risk. If utilized by trained and expert teams, numerous surgeries may benefit from multimodality intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.
RESUMEN
A 77-year-old male presented with a history of severe lower back pain for 10 years with radiculopathy, positive claudication type symptoms in his calf with walking, and severe "burning" in his legs bilaterally with walking. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed lumbar stenosis at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels. During the direct or extreme lateral interbody fusion (DLIF/XLIF) procedure, bilateral posterior tibial, femoral, and ulnar nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were recorded with good morphology of waveforms observed. Spontaneous electromyography (S-EMG) and triggered electromyography (T-EMG) were recorded from cremaster and ipsilateral leg muscles. A left lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach was used to access the anterior disc space for complete discectomy, distraction, and interbody fusion. T-EMG ranging from 0.05 to 55.0 mA with duration of 200 microsec was used for identification of the genitofemoral nerve using a monopolar stimulator during the approach. The genitofemoral nerve (L1-L2) was identified, and the guidewire was redirected away from the nerve. Post-operatively, the patient reported complete pain relief and displayed no complications from the procedure. Intraoperative SSEPs, S-EMG, and T-EMG were utilized effectively to guide the surgeon's approach in this DLIF thereby preventing any post-operative neurological deficits such as damage to the genitofemoral nerve that could lead to groin pain.
Asunto(s)
Electromiografía/métodos , Nervio Femoral/fisiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Traumatismos del Sistema Nervioso/prevención & control , Anciano , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales/fisiología , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Plexo Lumbosacro/fisiología , Masculino , Fusión Vertebral/normas , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Cirugía Asistida por ComputadorRESUMEN
A T10 to L2 spinal cord tumor exploration and biopsy was performed with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on a 75-year-old male diagnosed with an intradural intramedullary appearing spinal cord lesion with no other lesions in the central nervous system, chest, abdomen or pelvis. Intraoperative neurophysiology consisted of transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), triggered and spontaneous electromyography (S-EMG, T-EMG), bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) and train of four (TOF) monitoring. Loss of BCR responses during conus exposure and identification were resolved with multiple small pauses in manipulation throughout the procedure. T-EMG mapping aided in identification and avoiding the removal of nervous tissue. Postoperatively the patient experienced some mild weakness in his left foot and leg that correlated with a significant amplitude drop in the left abductor hallucis TCeMEP. By the following day, the patient was almost back to preoperative baseline. The patient's bowel and bladder function were preserved, consistent with final BCR recordings. The patient was discharged to rehabilitation postoperatively. Pathology results indicated glioblastoma. This case study demonstrates the utility of a multimodality approach with bulbocavernosus reflex and urethral sphincter monitoring to optimize intraoperative data to the surgeon during conus tumor surgeries.
RESUMEN
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to identify the advancing role of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) in detecting and preventing nerve injuries during shoulder surgery procedures. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of IONM data from ten shoulder procedures. The patients consisted of nine females and one male with ages ranging from 67 to 81 years (median: 74 years). IONM modalities utilized were bilateral Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP), Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (TCeMEP), ipsilateral Electromyogram (EMG) from upper extremity muscles and Train of four (TOF) recordings. Results: A decrease in signals was noted in three patients (30%). Only upper SSEP amplitude decreased in one patient; both upper extremity SSEP and TCeMEP decreased in two patients. Only one patient had poor baseline radial nerve SSEP that improved during the surgery. We performed spontaneous EMG (s-EMG) in all ten patients and successfully recorded triggered (t-EMG) in seven patients (71.4%). In one patient, SSEP and TCeMEP did not improve, and the patient woke up with deficits. Conclusions: In this small series, we were able to identify real-time impending nerve injury. The use of IONM alerted and may have prevented intraoperative nerve injury in 30% of the patients in this series. In one patient, SSEP and TCeMEP did not recover even after the intervention due to severe blood loss. The patient woke up with sensory and motor deficits. The utilization of multimodality IONM can be helpful due to signal changes, therefore minimizing the frequency of nerve injury and deficits.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria/métodos , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Lesiones del Hombro/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Plexo Braquial/lesiones , Neuropatías del Plexo Braquial/prevención & control , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Electromiografía/métodos , Potenciales Evocados Motores , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Monitoreo Neuromuscular/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Reoperación/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Surgical manipulation during skull base surgeries places various cranial nerves (CN) at risk, including the nerves innervating the extraocular muscles. It could be very challenging for the surgeon to identify these cranial nerves due to the distortion of the normal anatomy by the tumors. Despite the recent advancement in technology, surgeries involving the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth cranial nerves still carry a risk of temporary or permanent paralysis of the muscles supplied by these cranial nerves. Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) with spontaneous and triggered electromyography (EMG) can help in guiding the surgeon in locating the nerves and avoiding any injury to them during the resection. IONM for extraocular cranial nerves requires highly skilled personnel with knowledge of anatomy and expertise in the placement of the electrodes. Benign tumors of the nerve sheath that arise from the perineural Schwann cells are known as schwannomas. Various cranial nerves might be involved in schwannomas of the head and neck. Trigeminal schwannomas are rare tumors. In this report, we describe the setup and stimulation technique and parameters as well as the benefits of utilizing IONM during the aggressive resection of a trigeminal schwannoma. The main purpose of utilizing IONM during these high-risk surgical procedures is to minimize any intraoperative damage to the neural structures involved.
RESUMEN
Intraoperative sensory cortical mapping is a reliable and safe method for the functional localization of the central sulcus (CS). It is utilized during neurosurgical procedures performed near eloquent brain tissue. It helps in identifying the somatosensory cortex and CS, hence preventing any postoperative neurological deficits. When executed properly, this method can identify the somatosensory cortex for both the upper and lower limbs by locating the CS. This technical report outlines the benefits of cortical sensory mapping (CsM) and detailed methodology. With the help of a properly trained intraoperative neuromonitoring staff who can accurately interpret the signals being monitored, CsM can help in injury prevention during brain surgeries.
RESUMEN
The resection of brain tumors located within or near the eloquent tissue has a higher risk of postoperative neurological deficits. The primary concerns include loss of sensory and motor functions in the contralateral face, upper and lower extremities, as well as speech deficits. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) techniques are performed routinely for the identification and preservation of the functional integrity of the eloquent brain areas during neurosurgical procedures. The IONM modalities involve sensory, motor, and language mapping, which helps in the identification of the boundaries of these areas during surgical resection. Cortical motor Mapping (CmM) technique is considered as a gold-standard technique for mapping of the brain. We present the intraoperative CmM technique, including anesthesia recommendations, types of electrodes, as well as stimulation and recording parameters for successful monitoring.