The association of adverse childhood experiences with long-term outcomes of psychosis: a 21-year prospective cohort study after a first episode of psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests a possible relationship between exposure to childhood adversity (CA) and functional impairment in psychosis. However, the impact of CA on long-term outcomes of psychotic disorders remains poorly understood. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-three patients were assessed at their first episode of psychosis for CA and re-assessed after a mean of 21 years of follow-up for several outcome domains, including symptoms, functioning, quality of life, cognitive performance, neurological dysfunction, and comorbidity. The unique predictive ability of CA exposure for outcomes was examined using linear regression analysis controlling for relevant confounders, including socioeconomic status, family risk of schizophrenia, and obstetric complications. RESULTS: There were 54% of the patients with a documented history of CA at mild or higher levels. CA experiences were more prevalent and severe in schizophrenia than in other psychotic disorders (p < 0.001). Large to very large effect sizes were observed for CA predicting most role functioning variables and negative symptoms (ΔR2 between 0.105 and 0.181). Moderate effect sizes were observed for positive symptoms, personal functioning, impaired social cognition, impaired immediate verbal learning, poor global cognition, internalized stigma, poor personal recovery, and drug abuse severity (ΔR2 between 0.040 and 0.066). A dose-response relationship was observed between levels of CA and severity of outcome domains. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a strong and widespread link between early adversity exposure and outcomes of psychotic disorders. Awareness of the serious long-term consequences of CA should encourage better identification of those at risk and the development of effective interventions.

Social exclusion as a major outcome domain of psychotic disorders: early predictors, and associations with non-recovery and clinical staging 21 years after a first episode of psychosis.

PURPOSE: People with psychotic disorders have high levels of social exclusion; however, little is known about its early predictors. We present a long-term observational cohort study aimed at examining early risk factors for later social exclusion. METHODS: A total of 243 subjects were assessed at their first psychotic episode for early risk factors including sociodemographic variables, familial risk of major mental disorders, perinatal complications, childhood factors, and adolescent factors and re-assessed after a mean follow-up of 21 years for 12 social exclusion domains: leisure activities, housing, work, income, neighborhood deprivation, educational attainment, physical and mental health, family and social support, legal competence, and discrimination. The ability of risk factors to predict social exclusion was examined using hierarchical linear regression. RESULTS: Overall social exclusion was independently predicted by low parental socio-economic status, length of follow-up, familial risk of schizophrenia, obstetric complications, neurodevelopmental delay, poor childhood adjustment, childhood adversity, poor adolescent social networks, poor adolescent adjustment, and low premorbid IQ. The model explained 58.2% of the variance in total social exclusion score. Each social exclusion domain was predicted by a different set of variables, which explained between 17.8 and 57.0% of their variance, although low socio-economic status, familial risk of schizophrenia, obstetric complications, childhood adversity, and poor social networks predicted most of the social exclusion domains. CONCLUSION: Early risk factors strongly predicted later social exclusion. A multifaceted approach to preventing later social exclusion is crucial in people with a first episode of psychosis and early risk factors of social exclusion.

Neurocognitive and social cognitive correlates of social exclusion in psychotic disorders: a 20-year follow-up cohort study.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the relationship between social exclusion and cognitive impairment in psychosis. We conducted a long-term cohort study of first-episode psychosis to examine the association between comprehensive measures of cognitive impairment and social exclusion assessed at follow-up. METHODS: A total of 173 subjects with first-episode psychosis were assessed after a 20-year follow-up for 7 cognitive domains and 12 social exclusion indicators. Associations between sets of variables were modeled using multivariate regression, where social exclusion indicators were the dependent variables, cognitive domains were the independent variables, and age, gender, and duration of follow-up were covariates. RESULTS: The total scores on the measures of cognition and social exclusion were strongly associated (ß = - .469, ∆R2 = 0.215). Participants with high social exclusion were 4.24 times more likely to have cognitive impairment than those with low social exclusion. Verbal learning was the cognitive function most related to social exclusion domains, and legal capacity was the exclusion domain that showed the strongest relationships with individual cognitive tests. Neurocognition uniquely contributed to housing, work activity, income, and educational attainment, whereas social cognition uniquely contributed to neighborhood deprivation, family and social contacts, and discrimination/stigma. Neurocognition explained more unique variance (11.5%) in social exclusion than social cognition (5.5%). CONCLUSION: The domains of cognitive impairment were strongly and differentially related to those of social exclusion. Given that such an association pattern is likely bidirectional, a combined approach, both social and cognitive, is of paramount relevance in addressing the social exclusion experienced by individuals with psychotic disorders.

The effect of anticholinergic burden of psychiatric medications on major outcome domains of psychotic disorders: A 21-year prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Most medications used to treat psychotic disorders possess anticholinergic properties. This may result in a considerable anticholinergic burden (ACB), which may have deleterious effects on long-term outcomes. The extent to which cumulative ACB over years of treatment with psychotropic medications impacts different outcome domains remains unknown. METHODS: This was a naturalistic study of 243 subjects with first-episode psychosis aimed at examining the cumulative effect of ACB of psychotropic medications administered over the illness course (ACB-years exposure) on several outcome domains assessed after a mean 21-year follow-up. Associations between ACB and the outcomes were modelled accounting for relevant confounding factors by using hierarchical linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Over the study period, 81.9 % of the participants were dispensed at least one drug with strong anticholinergic effects for at least 1 year; at the follow-up visit, 60.5 % of the participants continued to take medications with strong ACB. ACB-years exposure was uniquely related to severity of negative symptoms (ß = 0.144, p = 0.004), poor psychosocial functioning (ß = 0.186, p < 0.001) and poor cognitive performance (ß = -0.273, p < 0.001). This association pattern was independent of a schizophrenia diagnosis. Most of the associations between ACB at the follow-up visit and the outcomes were accounted for ACB-years exposure. CONCLUSION: Lifetime ACB of psychotropic medications has deleterious effects on the outcome of psychotic disorders. Clinicians should avoid prescribing medications with strong ACB, since there are numerous alternatives within each psychotropic drug group for prescribing medications with low ACB.

Long-term trajectories of clinical staging in first-episode psychosis and their associated cognitive outcome: A 21-year follow-up study.

Cognitive deficits are already present before psychosis onset but are a key feature of first-episode psychosis (FEP). The objective of this study was to investigate the cognitive outcomes of a cohort of FEP patients who were diagnosed using the clinical staging approach and were followed for up to 21 years. We analyzed data from 173 participants with first-admission psychosis who were followed-up for a mean of 20.9 years. The clinical staging assessment was adapted from the clinical staging framework developed by McGorry et al.1 Cognitive assessment was performed using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MMCB) at the end of follow-up. FEP patients who were longitudinally diagnosed in the lowest clinical stages (stages 2A and 2B) showed better performance in attention, processing speed, and MCCB overall composite score than those in the highest clinical stages (stages 4A and 4B). There was a significant linear trend association between worsening of all MCCB cognitive functions and MCCB overall composite score and progression in clinical staging. Furthermore, the interval between two and five years of follow-up appears to be associated with deficits in processing speed as a cognitive marker. Our results support the validation of the clinical staging model over a long-term course of FEP based on neuropsychological performance. A decline in some cognitive functions, such as processing speed, may facilitate the transition of patients to an advanced stage during the critical period of first-episode psychosis.