Development of a 90-Minute Integrated Noninvasive Urinary Assay for Bladder Cancer Detection.

PURPOSE: Despite suboptimal sensitivity urine cytology is often performed as an adjunct to cystoscopy for bladder cancer diagnosis. We aimed to develop a noninvasive, fast molecular diagnostic test for bladder cancer detection with better sensitivity than urine cytology while maintaining adequate specificity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine specimens were collected at 18 multinational sites from subjects prior to cystoscopy or tumor resection, and from healthy and other control subjects without evidence of bladder cancer. The levels of 10 urinary mRNAs were measured in a training cohort of 483 subjects and regression analysis was used to identify a 5-mRNA model to predict cancer status. The performance of the GeneXpert® Bladder Cancer Assay, an assay labeled for investigational use only to detect the 5 mRNAs ABL1, CRH, IGF2, ANXA10 and UPK1B, was evaluated in an independent test cohort of 450 participants. RESULTS: In the independent test cohort the assay ROC curve AUC was 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.92). At an example cutoff point of 0.4 overall sensitivity was 73% while specificity was 90% and 77% in the hematuria and surveillance patient populations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a 90-minute, urine based test that is simple to perform for the detection of bladder cancer. The test can help guide physician decision making in the management of bladder cancer. Additional evaluation in a prospective study is needed to establish the clinical usefulness of this assay.

Effect of crossover from placebo to darolutamide on overall survival in men with non-metastatic prostate cancer: sensitivity analyses from the randomised phase 3 ARAMIS study.

BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 ARAMIS study (NCT02200614), darolutamide significantly improved metastasis-free survival in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Following the primary analysis, the study was unblinded, and placebo recipients were permitted to cross over to open-label darolutamide. Despite crossover, darolutamide significantly improved overall survival (OS). We conducted sensitivity analyses to estimate the effect of placebo-darolutamide crossover on OS. METHODS: Patients with nmCRPC were randomised to oral darolutamide 600 mg twice daily (n = 955) or placebo (n = 554). Prespecified (rank-preserving structural failure time [RPSFT] and iterative parameter estimation [IPE]) and post hoc (OS-adjusted censoring and inverse probability of censoring weighting [IPCW], with weightings for baseline testosterone and prostate-specific antigen) sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: After unblinding, 170 of 554 placebo recipients (30.7%) crossed over to darolutamide. At the final OS intention-to-treat analysis (median 11.2 months after unblinding), darolutamide significantly improved OS by 31% versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.88; P = 0.003). The benefit increased in the analyses adjusting for crossover is as follows: RPSFT HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90; P = 0.007; IPE HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.84; P < 0.001; OS-adjusted censoring HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.76; IPCW HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.81. The favourable safety profile of darolutamide was maintained, including in crossover patients. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for crossover, darolutamide reduced the risk of death by up to 41% in patients with nmCRPC. The effect of darolutamide on OS may have been underestimated in the original intention-to-treat analysis.