Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for screening congenital cytomegalovirus infection in newborns.

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common cause of sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental impairment in newborns. However, congenital CMV infection cannot be diagnosed using samples collected more than 3 weeks after birth because testing after this time cannot distinguish between congenital infection and postnatal infection. Herein, we developed a robust loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the large-scale screening of newborns for congenital CMV infection. In contrast to conventional quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), which detects CMV within a dynamic range of 1.0 × 106 to 1.0 × 102 copies/µL, our quantitative LAMP assay (qLAMP) detects CMV within a dynamic range of 1.1 × 108 to 1.1 × 103 copies/µL. Moreover, the turnaround time for obtaining results following DNA extraction is 90 min in qPCR but only 15 min in qLamp. The colorimetric LAMP assay can also detect CMV down to 1.1 × 103 copies/µL within 30 min, irrespective of the type of heat source. Our LAMP assay can be utilized in central laboratories as an alternative to conventional qPCR for quantitative CMV detection, or for point-of-care testing in low-resource environments, such as developing countries, via colorimetric naked-eye detection. KEY POINTS: • LAMP assay enables large-scale screening of newborns for congenital CMV infection. • LAMP allows colorimetric or quantitative detection of congenital CMV infection. • LAMP assay can be used as a point-of-care testing tool in low-resource environments.

Evaluation of the AdvanSure One-Stop COVID-19 Plus Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection Using a Streamlined RNA Extraction Method.

Real-time reverse transcription (rRT)-PCR, which is the reference standard for the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, generally involves a time-consuming and costly RNA extraction step prior to amplification. We evaluated the performance of the AdvanSure One-Stop COVID-19 Plus Kit (LG Chem, Seoul, Korea), a novel rRT-PCR assay that can detect SARS-CoV-2 within 90 minutes using a streamlined RNA extraction method. In total, 509 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens (SARS-CoV-2 positive: N=205; SARS-CoV-2 negative: N=304) previously tested using the PowerChek SARS-CoV-2 Real-time PCR Kit (Kogene Biotech, Seoul, Korea) were tested using the AdvanSure assay. The limit of detection (LOD) of the AdvanSure assay was determined using serially diluted inactivated SARS-CoV-2. The positive and negative percent agreements between the AdvanSure and PowerChek assays were 99.5% (204/205) and 99.3% (302/304), respectively. The LODs of the AdvanSure assay for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike/RNA-dependent RNA polymerase genes were 672 and 846 copies/mL, respectively. The results show that the performance of the AdvanSure assay is comparable to that of the PowerChek assay used for routine SARS-CoV-2 testing, suggesting that the AdvanSure assay is a useful diagnostic tool for rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Optimization of extraction-free protocols for SARS-CoV-2 detection using a commercial rRT-PCR assay.

In the ongoing global fight against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the sample preparation process for real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) faces challenges due to time-consuming steps, labor-intensive procedures, contamination risks, resource demands, and environmental implications. However, optimized strategies for sample preparation have been poorly investigated, and the combination of RNase inhibitors and Proteinase K has been rarely considered. Hence, we investigated combinations of several extraction-free protocols incorporating heat treatment, sample dilution, and Proteinase K and RNase inhibitors, and validated the effectiveness using 120 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 62 negative clinical samples. Combining sample dilution and heat treatment with Proteinase K and RNase inhibitors addition exhibited the highest sensitivity (84.26%) with a mean increase in cycle threshold (Ct) value of + 3.8. Meanwhile, combined sample dilution and heat treatment exhibited a sensitivity of 79.63%, accounting for a 38% increase compared to heat treatment alone. Our findings highlight that the incorporation of Proteinase K and RNase inhibitors with sample dilution and heat treatment contributed only marginally to the improvement without yielding statistically significant differences. Sample dilution significantly impacts SARS-CoV-2 detection, and sample conditions play a crucial role in the efficiency of extraction-free methods. Our findings may provide insights for streamlining diagnostic testing, enhancing its accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability.

Comparison of Learning Curves for Major and Minor Laparoscopic Liver Resection.

BACKGROUND: Because laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has a steep learning curve, analyzing experience is important for trainees. Several authors have described the learning curve of LLR, without comparing the learning curves between major and minor LLR. METHODS: Perioperative data were retrieved from the medical records of 170 consecutive patients who underwent LLR by a single surgeon at a tertiary hospital. Learning curves were generated and compared between major and minor LLR using cumulative sum control charts and the moving average. RESULTS: Major and minor LLR was performed in 96 and 74 patients, respectively. The learning curves showed a steady state after case 50 for major LLR. Because of discordant results in minor LLR, subgroup analyses were performed, showing competency in LLR after cases 25 and 35 for left lateral sectionectomy and tumorectomy, respectively. Transfused red blood cell volume (0.6 versus 2.2 packs, P < .001) decreased after achievement of competence in major LLR. Blood loss exceeding 500 mL (odds ratio 2.395, 95% confidence interval 1.096-5.233, P = .028) was independently associated with LLR failure. CONCLUSIONS: The number of cases required to accomplish LLR differed according to the extent of resection. Extensive blood loss was independently associated with LLR failure.