Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postoperative Gastrointestinal Recovery in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to study the feasibility and acceptability of electroacupuncture (EA) for preventing postoperative gastrointestinal complications in patients undergoing thoracoscopic segmentectomy/lobectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) segmentectomy/lobectomy received either EA treatments plus usual care (EA group) or usual care alone (UC group). Patients in the EA group were given 30 minutes of bilateral electroacupuncture on 3 acupoints [Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), and Shangjuxu (ST37)] at 3 time points (24 hours before surgery, and 4 hours and 24 hours after surgery). The primary outcomes were recruitment, retention, acceptability of the EA intervention, incidence and severity of abdominal distension (AD), and time to first flatus and defecation. Secondary outcomes included postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain intensity, and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS We recruited 60 participants and 59 were randomized into 2 groups for this study: 30 in the EA group and 29 in the UC group. In total, 57 participants completed the study. With the exception of one participant in the EA group, all participants completed all three sessions of EA. The one exclusion was a case where a paravertebral block was not used during the surgery. Qualitative findings from the acceptability questionnaire indicated that participants viewed the EA treatment as acceptable. After EA treatment, there was a small but statistically significant improvement in participants' acceptance of EA for alleviating postoperative gastrointestinal discomfort (P=0.001). The EA group showed improved outcomes compared to the UC group in terms of time to first flatus (20.8±4.6 versus 24.1±6.2 hours, P=0.026) and defecation (53.9±6.0 versus 57.5±7.2 hours, P=0.046). No significant differences appeared regarding AD, rescue medication, or duration of hospitalization. PONV and pain intensity were similar in both groups at the recorded time periods. CONCLUSIONS EA is feasible and acceptable to patients undergoing VATS surgery. Our preliminary findings of EA promoting postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function warrants large randomized controlled trials.

Distal acupoint stimulation versus peri-incisional stimulation for postoperative pain in open abdominal surgery: a systematic review and implications for clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Acute postoperative pain remains a major clinical problem that affects patient recovery. Distal acupoint and peri-incisional stimulation are both used for relieving acute postoperative pain in hospital. Our objective was to assess and compare the effects of distal and peri-incisional stimulation on postoperative pain in open abdominal surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Chinese databases CNKI and Wanfangdata were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. Intensity of postoperative pain, opioid consumption and related data were extracted and analyzed using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed. Subgroup analyses were conducted when data were enough. RESULTS: Thirty-five trials were included, in which 17 trials studied distal stimulation, another 17 trials studied peri-incisional stimulation and one studied the combination of the two approaches. No studies that directly compared the two approaches were identified. Subgroup analysis showed that both distal and peri-incisional stimulation significantly alleviated postoperative resting and movement pain from 4 h to 48 h after surgery by 6 to 25 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Peri-incisional stimulation showed a better reduction in postoperative opioid consumption. No studies compared the effects of the combined peri-incisional and distal stimulation with either mode alone. Overall the quality of evidence was moderate due to a lack of blinding in some studies, and unclear risk of allocation concealment. CONCLUSION: Both distal and peri-incisional modes of stimulation were effective in reducing postoperative pain. Whether a combined peri-incisional stimulation and distal acupuncture has superior results requires further studies.

Effects of perioperative electroacupuncture on postoperative gastrointestinal recovery after thoracoscopic lung surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether perioperative electroacupuncture (EA) can improve postoperative gastrointestinal recovery in patients receiving thoracoscopic lung surgery. METHODS: This study was a single-center, prospective, randomized open-label trial. 180 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy or lobectomy were randomized to EA group (three sessions, 24 h prior to surgery, postoperative 4 h and 24 h) or usual care group (UC group). The primary outcomes were time to first flatus and defecation. Secondary outcomes included incidence and degree of abdominal distention, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain scores within 72 h after surgery, postoperative morphine use, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Time to first flatus (15.4 ± 3.2 h vs. 17.0 ± 3.7 h, P = 0.004) and time to first defecation (75.9 ± 7.9 vs. 79.7 ± 8.1 h, P = 0.002) in the EA group were significantly shorter than the UC group. The incidences of abdominal distension and PONV postoperative 24 h were significantly reduced in the EA group (P < 0.05). There was no difference in postoperative pain intensity, morphine use, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Electroacupuncture is a simple intervention for accelerating postoperative gastrointestinal recovery and may be considered as an adjunct strategy in enhanced recovery protocols in thoracoscopic lung surgery.

Electroacupuncture Before Gastrectomy Accelerates Recovery from Gastrointestinal Dysfunction: A Feasibility Study.

Objective: This study investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of preoperative electroacupuncture (EA), given within 30 minutes before surgery, on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGD) in patients undergoing open gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: Patients (N = 60) undergoing open gastrectomy were allocated randomly to a usual care (UC) group (n = 30) or an EA group (n = 30). Patients in the EA group were given bilateral EA on ST-36 (Zusanli), ST-37 (Shangjuxv), and ST-39 (Xiajuxv) within 30 minutes before the surgery. The UC group had no acupuncture treatment. Primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment, retention, acceptability, and patients' global satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included time to first flatus, defecation, liquid diet, incidence and severity of abdominal distension (AD), and incidence of postoperative nausea (PON) and postoperative vomiting (POV). EA-related adverse events were recorded. Results: Of the 61 recruited patients, 1 declined to participate and 60 were randomized into the 2 study groups. All participants completed the interventions. On the acceptability questionnaire, participants' acceptance of EA was statistically improved after the treatment (P < 0.001). Global satisfaction was higher in the EA group (P < 0.001) at 8 (range: 7-8) versus the UC group at 6 (range: 5-7), and the proportion of patients with at least good satisfaction (numerical scale of more than 7 of 10) reached 80% in the EA group. Compared to the UC group, the EA group had a shorter time to first flatus (EA: 57.67 ± 23.09 hours versus 71.27 ± 17.78 hours; P = 0.013). There were no significant differences in time to first defecation (P = 0.081) and liquid diet (P = 0.068), AD (P = 0.436), PON (P = 0.667), or POV (P = 1.000). EA-related adverse events were similar in the 2 groups (P = 1.000). Conclusions: EA is feasible, acceptable to patients, and associated with higher postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing open gastrectomy. A large multicentered trial is needed to test the effectiveness of EA on PGD.

Preoperative electroacupuncture for postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of preoperative electroacupuncture (EA) on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and severity of postoperative pain, in gynecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The effects of EA administered at different preoperative time points were compared. METHODS: A total of 413 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery were randomly allocated into 4 groups receiving EA the day before surgery (Group Pre, n = 103), 30 min before (Group 30, n = 104) or both (Group Comb, n = 103), or usual care alone (Group Usual, n = 103). All acupuncture groups had usual care. The incidence of PONV and pain at 24 h were primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the severity of postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain, requirement for antiemetic medication and quality of recovery (QoR)-15 scores after surgery. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the four groups in nausea and vomiting incidence (0-24 h), postoperative antiemetic use (0-48 h), and postoperative pain (0-6 h), with the EA groups recording the lowest levels. Regarding primary outcomes, incidence of nausea and vomiting at 6-24 h was 28/11/18/11% (p = 0.003) 23/5/8/9% (p < 0.001), respectively, for Groups Usual/Pre/30/Comb. Accordingly, EA reduced the incidence of nausea and vomiting at 6-24 h by 61/34/60% and 79/65/61% for Groups Pre/30/Comb, respectively. Regarding secondary outcomes, incidence of nausea and vomiting at 0-6 h was 20/9/11/7% (p = 0.013) and 17/7/9/6% (p = 0.021), respectively, for Groups Usual/Pre/30/Comb. Rescue antiemetics at 0-6 h were required by 18/4/11/4% (p = 0.001) in Groups Usual/Pre/30/Comb. The mean numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score (0-10) at 0-6 h was significantly different between groups (2.45/1.89/2.01/1.97 for Groups Usual/Pre/30/Comb, p = 0.024). There were no significant differences between the three EA-treated groups. CONCLUSION: In gynecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery and treated with multimodal antiemetic methods, one session of preoperative EA may be a safe adjunctive treatment for PONV prophylaxis. Optimal timing of EA requires further verification. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-INR-16010035 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry).