[From face-to-face consultation to teleconsultation: Primary health care professionals' experiences in the Basque Country during the pandemic]. / De la consulta presencial a la teleconsulta: experiencias de profesionales de atención primaria del País Vasco durante la pandemia.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions of Primary Health Care (PHC) professionals on changes in consultation modalities and their impact on PHC fundamentals during the pandemic. DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory research conducted between October and November, 2021. LOCATION: Four urban and one rural primary health care centers with different socioeconomic profiles in the threeterritories of the Basque Country. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-six professionals from different categories of the PHC team and health centre directors. METHOD: Purposive sampling. Five focus groups and fourin-depth interviews. Thematic analysis with the support of the Atlas.ti programme. Triangulation of results among the research team. RESULTS: Experiences with the development of teleconsultation appear to be directly conditioned by the pandemic context in its different phases and by the PC situation. The professionals identified communication barriers, as well as potentialities of its use that require adequate training and evaluation. Risks of inequity were perceived in the use of teleconsultations that could be affecting the quality of care. Longitudinality was assessed as a facilitating factor and problems of coordination and communication through teleconsultation between care levels were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The replacement of face-to-face consultation by teleconsultation had an impact on fundamental aspects of PHC such as quality, accessibility, equity, coordination and longitudinality. Teleconsultation in PHC should always be evaluated considering the specific circumstances and contexts of its implementation.

[Gender inequality and mental health medicalization: Sociocultural determining factors from the analysis of expert perceptions]. / Desigualdad de género y medicalización de la salud mental: factores socioculturales determinantes desde el análisis de percepciones expertas.

To identify the sociocultural roots that explain the higher frequency of diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety and the prescription of psychotropic drugs in women, in order to propose a preliminary explanatory framework for the investigation of gender inequalities in mental health and its medicalization. Qualitative study with a descriptive-interpretive design, through in-depth interviews conducted in January and February 2021. Interviews were held in various cities of the Basque Country, Barcelona and Madrid. 12 experts in gender and mental health from the clinical (Primary Care and Mental Health), academic and associative fields. Intentional sampling, following the snowball technique, until covering the diversity of previously identified profiles and the saturation of the discourse. An analysis of thematic content was carried out starting from a critical-realistic epistemological perspective. The main dimensions to explain gender inequalities in diagnoses of depression or anxiety and prescription of psychoactive drugs were: 1) the material and symbolic subordination of women, 2) the role of «psi¼ sciences in the pathologization of the feminine identity, 3) the epistemological and androcentric biases of biomedicine, and 4) the active agency of women in medicalization processes. The reduction of gender inequalities in the diagnoses and prescription of psychotropic drugs will require joint intervention at the clinical, community and structural levels that, from a feminist perspective, manage to reverse the socioeconomic, symbolic and epistemic vulnerability of women.

[Population's perceptions and experiences of the changing pattern of primary care consultations during the pandemic]. / Percepciones y experiencias de la población ante la transformación de la modalidad de las consultas en atención primaria durante la pandemia.

AIM: To explore the perceptions and experiences of the general population regarding the impact of the implementation of teleconsultation in primary health care during the pandemic. DESIGN: methodology with a descriptive-interpretative approach, whose fieldwork was carried out between May and November 2020. PLACE: Study conducted in Navarra and Euskadi. Population groups with different profiles of associated and non-associated citizenship in both Autonomous Communities. A total of 62 primary health care users have participated and 10 focus groups were carried out. METHOD: The focus groups followed a semi-structured script based on the variables of analysis and dimensions of interest according to the different participant profiles and objectives. The sessions were recorded and transcribed. An inductive content analysis was performed. Data triangulation was realized in order to ensure validity. RESULTS: The perception of teleconsultation by the population has varied throughout the pandemic and has been heterogeneous. The participants consider that the non-face-to-face modality may have repercussions on the quality of care, as well as amplifying inequalities in access to primary health care. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to carry out analyses and evaluations from a health equity perspective in order to make decisions related to the use of technology in general and teleconsultation in particular, in the post-pandemic future of primary health care.

[Does the Electronic Health Record reflect the social determinants of health from Primary Health Care?] / ¿Refleja la historia clínica electrónica los determinantes sociales de la salud desde Atención Primaria?

OBJECTIVE: Analyze whether the use of Z codes in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) correlates with the socioeconomic reality of the population attended. DESIGN: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, ecological study. LOCATION: 90 health centres of two Primary Health Care (PHC) Departments of the Community of Madrid. PARTICIPANTS: The total number of patients treated during 2016: 1,920,124 (54.33% women, 45.67% men). The 7.15% received some Z code (67.29% women, 32.71% men). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: As a dependent variable, the proportion of patients with Z code records in their EHRs was established. As independent variable, two socioeconomic indicators were selected that objectively reflect the differences between Basic Health Areas: Average Income Available per capita and Proportion of Economic Immigrants. To evaluate the correlation between dependent and independent variables, a multivariate correlation-regression analysis was used. RESULTS: It was observed that the higher the disposable income, the lower the proportion of Z code records in the EHRs (Pearson correlation coefficient: -0.56). However, there is a great variability in the registration of Z codes and the coding fails to make visible the socio-economic realities of the populations covered (Diagnostic Odds Ratio: 0.12. CI: 0.05-0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The use of different tools that facilitate the visualization of the health impact of social inequalities, as well as their evaluation through various research methodologies, is relevant for a community orientation of the PHC. The Z codes do not make visible in the studied area the social determinants of health of the population attended.

Comprehensive primary health care and non-communicable diseases management: a case study of El Salvador.

BACKGROUND: One of today's greatest challenges in public health worldwide - and especially its key management from Primary Health Care (PHC) - is the growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). In El Salvador, since 2009 the Minister of Health (MoH) has scaled up a national public health system based on a comprehensive PHC approach. A national multi-sectorial strategic plan for a comprehensive approach to NCDs has also been developed. This analysis explores stakeholders' perceptions related to the management of NCDs in PHC and, in particular, the role of social participation. METHODS: A case-study was developed consisting of semi structured interviews and official document reviews. Semi-structured interviews were developed with chronic patients (14) and PHC professionals working in different levels within PHC (12). Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. A non-pure, deductive approach was implemented for coding. After grouping codes into potential themes, a thematic framework was elaborated through a reflexive approach and the triangulation of the data. The research was conducted between March and August of 2018 in three different departments of El Salvador. RESULTS: The structure and the functioning of the Salvadoran PHC system and its intersectoral approach is firstly described. The interdisciplinary PHC-team brings holistic health care closer to the communities in which health promoters play a key role. The findings reflect the generally positive perception of the PHC system in terms of accessibility, quality and continuity of care by chronic patients. Community engagement and the National Health Forum are ensuring accountability through social controllership mechanisms. However, certain challenges were also noted during the interviews related to the shortage of medication and workforce; coordination between the levels of care and the importance of prevention and health promotion programmes for NCDs. CONCLUSIONS: The Salvadoran PHC and its comprehensive approach to NCDs with an emphasis on intersectoral participation has been positively perceived by the range of stakeholders interviewed. Social engagement and the NHF works as a driving force to ensure accountability as well as in the promotion of a preventive culture. The challenges identified provide keys to amplify knowledge for addressing inequalities in health by strengthening PHC and its NCDs management.

[Gender invisibility in the COVID-19 management: who are the policy decision-makers during the pandemic?] / Invisibilidad de género en la gestión de la COVID-19: ¿quién toma las decisiones políticas durante la pandemia?

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the gender composition of the advisory boards created for the management and policy decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. METHOD: A peer review was carried out to identify the advisory boards involved in the management of COVID-19 in the autonomous regions and in Spain. Name, number of members, sex and sources of information were collected, and the percentage of women was calculated. RESULTS: At the regional level, the composition of eleven advisory boards was identified, with a mean representation of women of 39.2%; 42.9% at the national level. 75% of all boards represented women below the parity threshold. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant under-representation of women in the advisory boards for the COVID-19 management, which may limit a necessary feminist perspective for the crisis recovery.

[COVID-19 and gender: certainties and uncertainties in monitoring the pandemic.] / COVID-19 y género: certezas e incertidumbres en la monitori-zación de la pandemia.

OBJECTIVE: Highlighting gender inequalities during the pandemic and its relationship with other axes of social inequality will be decisive for its adequate monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the differences between men and women in the main measures of infection and mortality by COVID-19, considering its temporal evolution, raising awareness about the weaknesses and contradictions between sources of information. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis based on the microdata on COVID cases notified by the National Epidemiological Surveillance Network (RENAVE), the Death Statistics of the National Statistical Institute (INE) and the estimates of excess mortality from the INE and the Daily Mortality Monitoring System (MoMo) microdata. Standardized rates, prevalences and and ratios by sex were calculated for each indicator. The percentage of excess mortality without COVID-19 diagnosis in each sex was calculated. Male/female ratios for symptoms and risk factors of COVID-19 were also calculated. RESULTS: The rate of infection by COVID-19 was higher in women in the three waves of the pandemic, reaching 65% of infections during April and May 2020. Complications were between 1.5 and 2.5 times higher in men, especially in ICU admissions, which were 2.5 times more frequent than in women. Although mortality rates and excess mortality were also higher in men (around 1.8 times), the percentage of excess mortality without COVID-19 diagnosis was higher in women (44% in men vs. 52% in women the first wave). With regard to the symptoms of COVID-19, fever, cough, and dyspnoea were more frequent in men (20%, 10% and 19% more, respectively) compared to sore throat, vomiting or diarrhea that were more prevalent in women (90%, 40% and 10% more, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis disaggregated by sex has made it possible to identify differences between men and women in the diagnosis, presentation and severity of the COVID-19 that can help a better clinical and epidemiological approach to the disease. However, official sources present important gaps when presenting information disaggregated by sex. It is therefore necessary to advance in the inclusion of a gender perspective in the statistics on COVID-19, starting with a necessary but not sufficient condition such as the disaggregation by sex of the data.

OBJETIVO: Visibilizar las desigualdades de género durante la pandemia y su relación con otros ejes de desigualdad social resultará decisivo para su adecuada monitorización. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar las diferencias entre hombres y mujeres en las principales medidas de contagio, complicaciones y mortalidad por la COVID-19 teniendo en cuenta la evolución temporal de las mismas a lo largo de la pandemia en el estado español, visibilizando las aportaciones y carencias entre fuentes de información. METODOS: Análisis transversal en base a los casos COVID notificados por la Red Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica (RENAVE); las estimaciones de mortalidad del Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) y las estimaciones de exceso de mortalidad del INE y los microdatos del Sistema de Monitorización de la Mortalidad diaria (MoMo). Se calcularon tasas, prevalencias y ratios por sexo de cada indicador. Se calculó el porcentaje de exceso de mortalidad sin diagnóstico COVID-19 en cada sexo. Se calcularon, así mismo, las ratios hombres/mujeres para los síntomas y factores de riesgo de la COVID-19 recogidos. RESULTADOS: La tasa de infección por la COVID-19 fue superior en mujeres en las tres olas de la pandemia, llegando a constituir un 65% de las infecciones durante abril y mayo de 2020. Las complicaciones por coronavirus fueron entre 1,5 y 2,5 veces mayores en hombres de manera constante especialmente en las admisiones en UCI que llegaron a ser 2,5 veces más frecuentes que en mujeres. Si bien las tasas de mortalidad y el exceso de mortalidad fueron también superiores en hombres (en torno a 1,8 veces), el porcentaje de exceso de mortalidad sin diagnóstico COVID-19 fue superior en mujeres (44% en hombres frente a 52% en mujeres en la primera ola). Con respecto a los síntomas de la COVID-19, la fiebre, la tos y la disnea fueron más frecuentes en hombres (un 20%, 10% y 19% más, respectivamente) frente al dolor de garganta, vómitos o diarrea que se presentó más en mujeres (90%, 40% y 10% más, respectivamente). CONCLUSIONES: El análisis desagregado por sexo ha permitido identificar diferencias entre hombres y mujeres en el diagnóstico, presentación y gravedad de la COVID-19 que ayudarán a un mejor abordaje clínico y epidemiológico de la enfermedad. Sin embargo, las fuentes oficiales presentan importantes lagunas a la hora de presentar la información desagregada por sexo. Es por ello necesario avanzar en la inclusión de la perspectiva de género en la estadística sobre el COVID-19, empezando por una condición necesaria, pero no suficiente, como la desagregación por sexo de los datos.