Unmet Need for Medical Care: The Role of Mental Health Status.

Mental health status is an important factor to consider when exploring correlates of unmet need for medical care and prescription drugs. This paper explores whether self-rated mental health status is associated with unmet need and delays in obtaining medical care and prescription drugs. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression with 27,305 non-institutionalized adults aged 18 and older from the 2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey explore factors associated with self-reported unmet need for medical care and prescriptions, as well as access delays. Patients with lower physical and mental health status had the highest odds of experiencing unmet need for medical care and prescriptions, as well as access delays. These findings highlight the importance of increasing access to a usual source of care among individuals with lower self-rated mental health status as a strategy for addressing unmet need.

Practice characteristics of nurse practitioners in mental health and psychiatric settings.

To explore the practice characteristics of nurse practitioners in mental health and psychiatric settings, descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed with weighted data from the 2012 National Sample Survey of Nurse Practitioners. The 5.6% of nurse practitioners in mental health and psychiatric settings were less likely to have hospital admitting privileges and more likely to practice without a physician on-site, to have their own billing number, and to have a DEA number. These findings highlight the critical role that nurse practitioners play in the behavioral health workforce.

Homeless Caseload is Associated with Behavioral Health and Case Management Staffing in Health Centers.

Community health centers provide co-located medical, behavioral, and case management services to meet the unique and complex needs of the underserved, including homeless individuals. Multivariate analysis of staffing patterns in health centers serving high homeless caseloads highlights above-average behavioral and case management staffing, regardless of Health Care for the Homeless funding status. Rural health centers and those in the South had lower behavioral health and enabling services staffing. Implications include the need to monitor disparities, link health centers with available technical assistance, and emphasize integrating co-located behavioral health, enabling, and medical services through grant oversight mechanisms.

Sharing a Playbook: Integrated Care in Community Health Centers in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated basic measures used to assess collaboration between colocated providers and to gauge the extent to which health centers practice integrated care. METHODS: We used the Assessment of Behavioral Health Services survey and the 2010 Uniform Data System to explore the elements of integrated care for behavioral health conditions. We used multivariable regression models to examine the correlates of integrated care. RESULTS: More than 85% of health centers provided mental health services in 2010, and almost half offered substance use treatment. Health centers commonly reported shared access to information among behavioral health and medical providers and joint care planning. A higher degree of integrated care involving joint case conferences was less common. Health centers without electronic health records and those with lower percentages of total staff composed of behavioral health workers were less likely to provide integrated care. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-pronged strategy involving financial incentives and technical assistance to spread best practices might increase integrated care, particularly among health centers that are not maximizing the potential of electronic health records and health centers with low behavioral health staffing levels.

The Integrated Care for Kids Model: Addressing Fragmented Care for Pediatric Medicaid Enrollees in Seven Communities.

Children with complex health and behavioral health conditions face challenges accessing coordinated health and community-based services. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), social determinants of health, and care delivery silos can lead to negative long-term outcomes. This paper provides an update on the Integrated Care for Kids (InCK) model from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Innovation Center and discusses barriers and facilitators to program implementation in the seven communities. The three core InCK activities-supported by flexible alternative payment models-are early identification, risk stratification, and service integration. Challenges include obtaining the appropriate Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) authorities, sharing data across non-traditional partners, assessing impact in non-clinical domains, and evaluating the program's impact on child health. InCK enables innovation in value-based purchasing by creating a guiding framework that allows states to design and implement a service delivery and payment model that accounts for the heterogeneity of Medicaid programs.

Addiction Treatment Capacity in Health Centers: The Role of Medicaid Reimbursement and Targeted Grant Funding.

OBJECTIVE: Expanding access to addiction screening and treatment in primary care, particularly in underserved communities, is a key part of the fight against the opioid epidemic. This study explored correlates of addiction treatment capacity in federally qualified health centers participating in the Midwest Clinicians' Network (MWCN). METHODS: Two surveys were fielded to 132 MWCN health centers: the Health Center Survey and the Behavioral Health and Diabetes Provider Survey. A total of 77 centers and 515 primary care clinicians, respectively, responded to the surveys. Data were combined with data from the 2016 Uniform Data System and information about receipt of targeted Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) grant funding for addiction treatment capacity. Multivariable models examined associations between Medicaid reimbursement for addiction services, HRSA targeted grant funding, and different types of on-site addiction treatment capacity: psychiatrist and certified addiction counselor staffing, addiction counseling services, and medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid addiction. RESULTS: Health centers that received Medicaid behavioral health reimbursement were five times as likely as those that did not to offer addiction counseling and to employ certified addiction counselors. Health centers that received targeted HRSA funding for addiction services were more than 20 times as likely as those that did not to provide MAT and more than three times as likely to employ psychiatrists. Training needs and privacy protections on data related to addiction treatment were cited as barriers to building addiction treatment capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid funding and targeted grant funding were associated with addiction treatment capacity in health centers.

Prevention and Treatment of Opioid Misuse and Addiction: A Review.

Importance: More than 42 000 Americans died of opioid overdoses in 2016, and the fatalities continue to increase. This review analyzes the factors that triggered the opioid crisis and its further evolution, along with the interventions to manage and prevent opioid use disorder (OUD), which are fundamental for curtailing the opioid crisis. Observations: Opioid drugs are among the most powerful analgesics but also among the most addictive. The current opioid crisis, initially triggered by overprescription of opioid analgesics, which facilitated their diversion and misuse, has now expanded to heroin and illicit synthetic opioids (fentanyl and its analogues), the potency of which further increases their addictiveness and lethality. Although there are effective medications to treat OUD (methadone hydrochloride, buprenorphine, and naltrexone hydrochloride), these medications are underused, and the risk of relapse is still high. Strategies to expand medication use and treatment retention include greater involvement of health care professionals (including psychiatrists) and approaches to address comorbidities. In particular, the high prevalence of depression and suicidality among patients with OUD, if untreated, contributes to relapse and increases the risk of overdose fatalities. Prevention interventions include screening and early detection of psychiatric disorders, which increase the risk of substance use disorders, including OUD. Conclusions and Relevance: Although overprescription of opioid medications triggered the opioid crisis, improving opioid prescription practices for pain management, although important for addressing the opioid crisis, is no longer sufficient. In parallel, strategies to expand access to medication for OUD and improve treatment retention, including a more active involvement of psychiatrists who are optimally trained to address psychiatric comorbidities, are fundamental to preventing fatalities and achieving recovery. Research into new treatments for OUD, models of care for OUD management that include health care, and interventions to prevent OUD may further help resolve the opioid crisis and prevent it from happening again.

Medication-Assisted Opioid Treatment Prescribers in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Capacity Lags in Rural Areas.

PURPOSE: This study explores correlates of on-site availability of substance use disorder treatment services in federally qualified health centers, including buprenorphine treatment that is critical to addressing the opioid epidemic. METHODS: We employed descriptive and multivariable analyses with weighted 2010 Assessment of Behavioral Health Services survey data and the 2010 Uniform Data System. FINDINGS: In 2010, 47.6% of health centers provided on-site substance use disorder treatment, 12.3% provided buprenorphine treatment for opioids, and 38.8% were interested in expanding buprenorphine availability. Urban health centers, those in the West, and health centers with electronic health records had higher odds of offering on-site substance use disorder treatment. Compared with on-site mental health treatment, substance use disorder treatment was available in fewer clinic sites within each organization. Health centers in rural areas had lower odds of providing on-site buprenorphine treatment (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.94), and those in the South had lower odds of providing on-site buprenorphine treatment compared with health centers in other regions. Rural health centers had lower odds of expressing interest in expanding the availability of buprenorphine treatment (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Improving access to substance use disorder treatment in primary care is a critical part of the strategy to combat the opioid use disorder epidemic. These findings highlight the important role of health centers as portals of access to substance use disorder treatment services in underserved communities. Recent investments to expand treatment capacity in health centers will expand the availability of substance use disorder services, but urban/rural and regional disparities should be monitored.

Factors Associated With Electronic Health Record Use Among Nurse Practitioners in the United States.

Widespread use of electronic health records (EHRs) among all provider types is foundational to delivery system transformation. Three in 4 nurse practitioners used EHRs in 2012 (76.0%), and 60.3% of nonusers planned to adopt within 18 months. Practice setting, younger age, and colocation with physicians were associated with EHR use. In hospitals and in settings without on-site physicians, EHR use lagged in rural areas. Implementation assistance should be targeted to nonadopters, particularly those who never or infrequently work alongside physicians and those in rural hospitals. Sustained technical assistance with using EHRs for performance improvement and care coordination is also needed.

Laying the Foundation: Factors Associated With Medical Home Recognition Among Health Centers.

INTRODUCTION: The characteristics associated with medical home recognition among federally qualified health centers were explored. The results will help guide the transformation of health centers and other providers to the medical home model of practice. METHODS: This study included the universe of 1,198 federally qualified health centers in calendar year 2012; the data were collected in 2013 and analyzed in 2014-2015. Using the 2012 Uniform Data System, descriptive statistics were calculated and differences in means of health center characteristics by third-party medical home recognition status were tested. Multivariable logistic regression models examined correlates of recognition. RESULTS: In 2012, 17.3% of health centers had third-party medical home recognition. Health centers in the Northeast had more than three times the odds of being recognized as medical homes, compared with health centers located in the South (OR=3.3, p<0.001). Health centers with medical home recognition were larger and had higher odds of having electronic health records in all sites (OR=3.08, p<0.001). Recognized health centers had a higher percentage of total staffing composed of behavioral health specialists, compared with health centers that had not attained medical home recognition in 2012 (OR=1.06, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of monitoring which types of health centers are falling behind, encouraging the adoption of health information technology, and enabling the recruitment of onsite behavioral health staffing.

Adoption and use of electronic health records among federally qualified health centers grew substantially during 2010-12.

Federally qualified health centers play an important role in providing health care to underserved populations. Recent substantial federal investments in health information technology have enabled health centers to expand their use of electronic health record (EHR) systems, but factors associated with adoption are not clear. We examined 2010-12 administrative data from the Health Resources and Services Administration's Uniform Data System for more than 1,100 health centers. We found that in 2012 nine out of ten health centers had adopted a EHR system, and half had adopted EHRs with basic capabilities. Seven in ten health centers reported that their providers were receiving meaningful-use incentive payments from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Only one-third of health centers had EHR systems that could meet CMS's stage 1 meaningful-use core requirements. Health centers that met the stage 1 requirements had more than twice the odds of receiving quality recognition, compared with centers with less than basic EHRs. Policy initiatives should focus assistance on EHR capabilities with slower uptake; connect providers with technical assistance to support implementation; and leverage the connection between meaningful use and quality recognition programs.

Progress and challenges: implementation and use of health information technology among critical-access hospitals.

Despite major national investments to support the adoption of health information technology (IT), concerns persist that barriers are inhibiting that adoption and the use of advanced health IT capabilities in rural areas in particular. Using a survey of Medicare-certified critical-access hospitals, we examined electronic health record (EHR) adoption, key EHR functionalities, telehealth, and teleradiology, as well as challenges to EHR adoption. In 2013, 89 percent of critical-access hospitals had implemented a full or partial EHR. Adoption of key EHR capabilities varied. Critical-access hospitals that had certain types of technical assistance and resources available to support health IT were more likely to have adopted health IT capabilities and less likely to report significant challenges to EHR implementation and use, compared to other hospitals in the survey. It is important to ensure that the necessary resources and support are available to critical-access hospitals, especially those that operate independently, to assist them in adopting health IT and becoming able to electronically link to the broader health care system.

Supporting HITECH implementation and assessing lessons for the future: The role of program evaluation.

In addition to supporting the adoption and use of health IT, HITECH also included funds to support independent national program evaluation activities. The main challenges of evaluating health IT programs of the breadth and scale of the HITECH programs are the importance of context in the implementation and impact of the programs, the complexity and heterogeneity of the interventions, and the unpredictable nature of the innovative practices spurred by HITECH. The lessons learned include the importance of tailoring evaluation activities to each phase of implementation, flexible mixed methods, and continuous formative evaluation.

Critical appraisal of quality of clinical practice guidelines for treatment of psoriasis vulgaris, 2006-2009.

Numerous international clinical guidelines for management of psoriasis have recently been published. We evaluated the quality of guidelines published between 2006 and December 2009 using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Eight guidelines from five separate working groups fulfilled inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Four used the standards established by the AGREE instrument in the process of development of their guidelines. Each of the guidelines uniformly received high domain scores (i.e., > 90%) for scope and purpose (range of 94-100%), and clarity and presentation (range of 92-100%). Nevertheless, each of the eight guidelines had important shortcomings (item scores < or = 2/4, in which 4 indicates strongly agree and 1 indicates strongly disagree that specific items have been adequately addressed) in at least one item including: stakeholder involvement (by lack of piloting and inadequate determination of patient views), development rigor (inadequate procedure for updating), applicability (by lack of discussion on organizational barriers), and editorial independence (from funding body). Despite the use of predefined standards in their development, important deficiencies exist in the most recent clinical treatment guidelines for psoriasis.