Examining the Awareness, Acceptability, and Adoption of Conventional and non-conventional Forms of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention Among jail-involved Black Sexual Minority men (BSMM) and Black Transgender Women (BTW) in Two Diverse US Cities.

Black sexual minority men (BSMM) and Black transgender women (BTW) are disproportionately impacted by HIV and incarceration in the United States. In-depth interviews (N=34) and ongoing thematic analysis guided by the Exploration Phase of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework were conducted to uncover key themes focused on the awareness, acceptability, and early adoption of conventional (i.e., daily oral pill) and non-conventional forms of PrEP (i.e., long-acting injectable, e-prescription for pick up post release) among jail-involved BSMM and BTW in Chicago, Illinois and Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The majority of participants were cisgender BSMM (88%) and were enrolled in Chicago (65%). There was greater awareness, availability, and adoption of conventional PrEP and non-conventional PrEP e-prescription for pick up post release among Chicago participants compared with Baton Rouge participants. Participants were largely receptive to all three forms of PrEP and stated a high need for HIV prevention in jails and immediately following release. PrEP stigma emerged as a major barrier to conventional daily PrEP adoption while incarcerated; potential misuse (e.g., pill selling) as a potential barrier to PrEP eprescription; and needle aversion and added clinic time as potential barriers to longacting injectable (LAI)-PrEP. Participants indicated that PrEP e-prescription could help support continuity of care post release and highlighted reduced stigma, convenience, and longer-term HIV protection as benefits for LAI-PrEP. Study findings provided context-specific information to inform the implementation of future PrEP interventions for jail-involved BSMM and BTW in two highly HIV-impacted jurisdictions.

In-Depth Interviews to Assess the Relevancy and Fit of a Peer-Mentored Intervention for Transition-Age Youth with Chronic Medical Conditions.

STUDY PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relevancy and fit of a proposed group-based, peer-mentored intervention, based on the principles of Self-Determination Theory (SDT), to facilitate the development of health self-management skills needed to transition from pediatric to adult-based healthcare. DESIGN AND METHODS: Individual in-depth interviews with 28 transition-age youth (TAY) ages 17-22 and 24 caregivers (parents) from Gastroenterology, Renal and Rheumatology clinical services assessed interests in and preferred content, timing of and format for an intervention to help youth build self-management skills. Descriptive statistics were used for short answer questions and rating scales. Thematic analysis was used to analyze transcripts. RESULTS: >90% of TAY and all caregivers thought the proposed group-based transition skills-building intervention was a good idea. TAY expressed wanting someone with lived experience to lead it and a desire to meet other youth with chronic conditions. All caregivers would want their TAY to participate if given the opportunity. Both TAY and caregivers voiced the importance of mental health topics as many TAY experienced anxiety or depression over managing their illness. Nearly 50% of TAY and caregivers thought parents should attend some or all group sessions, though TAY and caregivers within the same family did not always agree. CONCLUSIONS: Findings establish the relevancy and fit of a peer-mentored intervention focused on skill development to successfully transition to adult healthcare. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The group intervention designed using a SDT framework may be particularly relevant as autonomy, competence, and relatedness undergo major developmental changes during adolescence.