RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple trials have compared reconstruction techniques used following the resection of distal rectal cancers, including straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA), colonic J pouch (CJP), side-to-end anastomosis (SEA), and transverse coloplasty (TCP). The latest meta-analysis on the subject concluded that all the reservoir techniques produce equally good surgical and functional outcomes compared with SCA. Numerous trials have been published in this regard subsequently. Hence, a network analysis (NMA) was performed to rank these techniques. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception until April 2021 was conducted to identify randomized trials. Functional and surgical outcome data were pooled. ORs and standardized mean differences (MDs) were used as pooled effect size measures. A frequentist NMA model was used. RESULTS: Thirty-two trials met the eligibility criteria comprising 3072 patients. CJP showed better functional outcomes, such as low stool frequency and better incontinence score, both in the short term (stool frequency, MD -2.06, P < 0.001; incontinence, MD -1.17, P = 0.007) and intermediate term (stool frequency, MD -0.81, P = 0.021; incontinence MD -0.56, P = 0.083). Patients with an SEA (long-term OR 4.37; P = 0.030) or TCP (long-term OR 5.79; P < 0.001) used more antidiarrheal medications constantly. The urgency and sensation of incomplete evacuation favoured CJP in the short term. TCP was associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage (OR 12.85; P < 0.001) and stricture (OR 3.21; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Because of its better functional outcomes, CJP should be the reconstruction technique of choice. TCP showed increased anastomotic leak and stricture rates, warranting judicious use.
Asunto(s)
Reservorios Cólicos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Colon/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Canal Anal/cirugía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis are vulnerable to contracting COVID-19 infection, with mortality as high as 31 % in this group. Population demographics in the UAE are dissimilar to many other countries and data on antibody responses to COVID-19 is also limited. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients who developed COVID-19, the impact of the screening strategy, and to assess the antibody response to a subset of dialysis patients. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the outcomes of COVID19 infection in all our haemodialysis patients, who were tested regularly for COVID 19, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic. In addition, IgG antibody serology was also performed to assess response to COVID-19 in a subset of patients. RESULTS: 152 (13 %) of 1180 dialysis patients developed COVID-19 during the study period from 1st of March to the 1st of July 2020. Of these 81 % were male, average age of 52â years and 95 % were on in-centre haemodialysis. Family and community contact was most likely source of infection in most patients. Fever (49 %) and cough (48 %) were the most common presenting symptoms, when present. Comorbidities in infected individuals included hypertension (93 %), diabetes (49 %), ischaemic heart disease (30 %). The majority (68 %) developed mild disease, whilst 13 % required critical care. Combinations of drugs including hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, lopinavir, ritonavir, camostat, tocilizumab and steroids were used based on local guidelines. The median time to viral clearance defined by two negative PCR tests was 15 days [IQR 6-25]. Overall mortality in our cohort was 9.2 %, but ICU mortality was 65 %. COVID-19 IgG antibody serology was performed in a subset (n = 87) but 26 % of PCR positive patients (n = 23) did not develop a significant antibody response. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reports a lower mortality in this patient group compared with many published series. Asymptomatic PCR positivity was present in 40 %. Rapid isolation of positive patients may have contributed to the relative lack of spread of COVID-19 within our dialysis units. The lack of antibody response in a few patients is concerning.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , COVID-19/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Pandemias , Diálisis Renal , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/biosíntesis , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Asintomáticas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Trazado de Contacto , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aislamiento de Pacientes , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , Evaluación de Síntomas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Emiratos Árabes Unidos/epidemiología , Viremia/diagnóstico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Multiple reconstructive techniques have been described for reconstruction after a low anterior resection for carcinoma rectum. Colonic J pouch (CJP), Side to end anastomosis (SEA), transverse coloplasty pouch (TCP) and Straight Colo-rectal/anal anastomosis were the most widely studied. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane data base were searched for randomized, non-randomized studies and systematic reviews from inception of the databases till July 31st, 2023. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Considerable heterogeneity existed among different study findings. Reservoir techniques, including CJP, SEA, and TCP, exhibited reduced stool frequency, decreased urgency, and improved continence status compared to SCA, particularly in the short term. CJP maintained this advantage into the intermediate term. Other functional outcomes were similar among the techniques. However, these functional improvements did not translate into enhanced Quality of Life (QoL). TCP was associated with an elevated risk of anastomotic leaks. Other surgical outcomes remained comparable across all four techniques. Sexual outcomes also exhibited no significant variation. Some studies suggested that the size of the side limb in CJP or SEA may not significantly impact functional outcomes, implying that neorectum capacity may not be the primary determinant of improved function. The precise physiological mechanism underlying these findings remains unknown. CONCLUSIONS: In the short and intermediate terms, reservoir techniques demonstrated superior functional outcomes, but long-term performance was comparable among all techniques. Notably, enhanced functional outcomes did not translate to improved Quality of Life. TCP, while effective, is linked to an increased risk of anastomotic complications, necessitating cautious utilization.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Proctectomía , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The RIFLE criteria demonstrate clinical relevance for diagnosing AKI and classifying its severity. OBJECTIVES: To systematically define the incidence, clinical course and outcome of AKI using the pediatric pRIFLE criteria. DESIGN: Retrospective, medical records review. SETTINGS: Pediatric cardiac surgical intensive care units at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all pediatric patients that underwent cardiac surgery and required ECMO postoperatively between 1 January 2011 and 1 January 2016. AKI was classified according to the pRIFLE criteria 48 hours after ECMO initiation. Demographics and concomitant therapies for all patients were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Outcome was assessed by recovery from AKI at time of discharge, ICU stay and mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients needed ECMO after cardiac surgery during the study period. Their mean (SD) age and weight was 11.0 (16.5) month and 5.5 (3.6) kg, respectively. All patients had a central venoarterial ECMO inserted. Fifty-three patients (90%) developed AKI after ECMO initiation. The majority of patients (57%) were categorized as pRIFLE-Failure, having a higher mortality rate (28/34 patients, 82%) in comparison to the pRIFLE-Injury and pRIFLE-Risk groups. Twenty-nine patients (49%) required either peritoneal dialysis (PD), or renal replacement therapy (RRT) or both. For AKI vs non-AKI patients, there was a statistically significant difference between mean (SD) ECMO duration (9.0 [8.00] vs 6.0 [2.0] days; P=.02) and ICU stay (37.0 [41.0] vs 21.0 [5.0] days; P=.03), respectively. The overall mortality rate was 58%, with a significant difference (P=.03) between AKI and non-AKI groups. All the patients who survived had normal creatinine clearance at hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of AKI in pediatric patients requiring ECMO after cardiac surgery, and it is associated with higher mortality, increased ECMO duration, and increased ventilator days. LIMITATIONS: Single-center retrospective analysis and the small sample size limited the precision of our estimates in sub-populations.