Entropy in scalp EEG can be used as a preimplantation marker for VNS efficacy.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a therapeutic option in drug-resistant epilepsy. VNS leads to ≥ 50% seizure reduction in 50 to 60% of patients, termed "responders". The remaining 40 to 50% of patients, "non-responders", exhibit seizure reduction < 50%. Our work aims to differentiate between these two patient groups in preimplantation EEG analysis by employing several Entropy methods. We identified 59 drug-resistant epilepsy patients treated with VNS. We established their response to VNS in terms of responders and non-responders. A preimplantation EEG with eyes open/closed, photic stimulation, and hyperventilation was found for each patient. The EEG was segmented into eight time intervals within four standard frequency bands. In all, 32 EEG segments were obtained. Seven Entropy methods were calculated for all segments. Subsequently, VNS responders and non-responders were compared using individual Entropy methods. VNS responders and non-responders differed significantly in all Entropy methods except Approximate Entropy. Spectral Entropy revealed the highest number of EEG segments differentiating between responders and non-responders. The most useful frequency band distinguishing responders and non-responders was the alpha frequency, and the most helpful time interval was hyperventilation and rest 4 (the end of EEG recording).

Pre-implant Heart Activity Differs in Responders and Non-responders to Vagal Nerve Stimulation Therapy in Epileptic Patients.

Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS) is used to treat patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. However, generally accepted tools to predict VNS response do not exist. Here we examined two heart activity measures - mean RR and pNN50 and their complex behavior during activation in pre-implant measurements. The ECG recordings of 73 patients (38 responders, 36 non-responders) were examined in a 30-sec floating window before (120 sec), during (2x120 sec), and after (120 sec) the hyperventilation by nose and mouth. The VNS response differentiation by pNN50 was significant (min p=0.01) in the hyperventilation by a nose with a noticeable descendant trend in nominal values. The mean RR was significant (p=0.01) in the rest after the hyperventilation by mouth but after an approximately 40-sec delay.Clinical Relevance- Our study shows that pNN50 and mean RR can be used to distinguish between VNS responders and non-responders. However, details of dynamic behavior showed how this ability varies in tested measurement segments.