RESUMEN
AIMS: Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and sigma-1 receptor agonist, has so far shown promise in the prevention of COVID-19 progression as an early treatment option in three trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fluvoxamine in COVID-19 patients if administered later in the course of the disease. METHODS: The study was designed as an open-label, prospective cohort trial with matched controls. In April and May 2021, 51 ICU COVID-19 patients hospitalised in the University Hospital Dubrava and University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia, were treated with fluvoxamine 100 mg three times daily for 15 days in addition to standard therapy and they were prospectively matched for age, gender, vaccination against COVID-19, disease severity and comorbidities with 51 ICU controls. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between groups were observed regarding the number of days on ventilator support, duration of ICU or total hospital stay. However, overall mortality was lower in the fluvoxamine group, 58.8% (n = 30/51), than in the control group, 76.5% (n = 39/51), HR 0.58, 95% CI (0.36-0.94, P = .027). CONCLUSION: Fluvoxamine treatment in addition to the standard therapy in hospitalised ICU COVID-19 patients could have a positive impact on patient survival. Further studies on the effects of fluvoxamine in COVID-19 patients are urgently required.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Fluvoxamina , Fluvoxamina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with high PEEP levels application in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with data collected from 95 patients who were administered NIV as part of their treatment in the COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) at University Hospital Centre Zagreb between October 2021 and February 2022. The definite outcome was NIV failure. RESULTS: High PEEP NIV was applied in all 95 patients; 54 (56.84%) patients could be kept solely on NIV, while 41 (43.16%) patients required intubation. ICU mortality of patients solely on NIV was 3.70%, while total ICU mortality was 35.79%. The most significant difference in the dynamic of respiratory parameters between 2 patient groups was visible on Day 3 of ICU stay: By that day, patients kept solely on NIV required significantly lower PEEP levels and had better improvement in PaO2, P/F ratio, and HACOR score. CONCLUSION: High PEEP applied by NIV was a safe option for the initial respiratory treatment of all patients, despite the severity of ARDS. For some patients, it was also shown to be the only necessary form of oxygen supplementation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Ventilación no Invasiva , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , Masculino , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Femenino , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , SARS-CoV-2 , Croacia , Resultado del Tratamiento , AdultoRESUMEN
In synchronous surgery specimens (right-sided nephrectomy and left-sided partial nephrectomy), a unique combination of a papillary (chromophil) renal cell carcinoma (4 x 3.7 x 3.5 cm) and a renal oncocytoma (11 x 10 x 9 mm) in the right kidney and a renal carcinoid (2.5 x 2.3 x 1.1 cm) in the resected part of the left kidney has been found. This multiplicity and bilaterality, based on the findings of three distinct histogenetic types of kidney tumors, was accompanied by a metachronous rectal adenocarcinoma discovered 14 months later. After surgery, no radiation or other oncologic therapy was given. At present, our patient is well without any evidence of neoplastic disease three years after primary diagnosis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a combination of three distinct histogenetic types of synchronous renal tumors associated with a metachronous rectal adenocarcinoma treated with simple surgery. In the absence of cytogenetic studies, the possibility of a the presence of a hereditary renal cancer syndrome must be considered.