Thyroid Inflammation and Immunity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Review and Case Study.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to the development of various vaccines. Reports have emerged suggesting a possible association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the onset of thyroid diseases. This review explores the clinical aspects of thyroid disorders following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, including a case report of a patient with concomitant subacute thyroiditis (SAT) and Graves' disease (GD) with blocking thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TSH-R-Ab) following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. SAT, characterized by transient inflammation of the thyroid gland, has been reported after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. GD, an autoimmune hyperthyroidism, has also been observed post-vaccination, often with stimulating TSH-R-Ab. Graves' orbitopathy (GO) has been associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with a history of immune thyroid disease. The unique case underscores a very rare thyroid condition of functional hypothyroidism in possible relation to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the usefulness of functional analysis of TSH-R-Ab that can provide valuable insights into disease pathogenesis and help to guide treatment. This review highlights the need for continued monitoring and awareness of potential thyroid-related complications following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Teprotumumab for the Treatment of Active Thyroid Eye Disease.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid eye disease is a debilitating, disfiguring, and potentially blinding periocular condition for which no Food and Drug Administration-approved medical therapy is available. Strong evidence has implicated the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR) in the pathogenesis of this disease. METHODS: In a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 3 multicenter trial, we assigned patients with active thyroid eye disease in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous infusions of the IGF-IR inhibitor teprotumumab (10 mg per kilogram of body weight for the first infusion and 20 mg per kilogram for subsequent infusions) or placebo once every 3 weeks for 21 weeks; the last trial visit for this analysis was at week 24. The primary outcome was a proptosis response (a reduction in proptosis of ≥2 mm) at week 24. Prespecified secondary outcomes at week 24 were an overall response (a reduction of ≥2 points in the Clinical Activity Score plus a reduction in proptosis of ≥2 mm), a Clinical Activity Score of 0 or 1 (indicating no or minimal inflammation), the mean change in proptosis across trial visits (from baseline through week 24), a diplopia response (a reduction in diplopia of ≥1 grade), and the mean change in overall score on the Graves' ophthalmopathy-specific quality-of-life (GO-QOL) questionnaire across trial visits (from baseline through week 24; a mean change of ≥6 points is considered clinically meaningful). RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were assigned to the teprotumumab group and 42 to the placebo group. At week 24, the percentage of patients with a proptosis response was higher with teprotumumab than with placebo (83% [34 patients] vs. 10% [4 patients], P<0.001), with a number needed to treat of 1.36. All secondary outcomes were significantly better with teprotumumab than with placebo, including overall response (78% of patients [32] vs. 7% [3]), Clinical Activity Score of 0 or 1 (59% [24] vs. 21% [9]), the mean change in proptosis (-2.82 mm vs. -0.54 mm), diplopia response (68% [19 of 28] vs. 29% [8 of 28]), and the mean change in GO-QOL overall score (13.79 points vs. 4.43 points) (P≤0.001 for all). Reductions in extraocular muscle, orbital fat volume, or both were observed in 6 patients in the teprotumumab group who underwent orbital imaging. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity; two serious events occurred in the teprotumumab group, of which one (an infusion reaction) led to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with active thyroid eye disease, teprotumumab resulted in better outcomes with respect to proptosis, Clinical Activity Score, diplopia, and quality of life than placebo; serious adverse events were uncommon. (Funded by Horizon Therapeutics; OPTIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03298867, and EudraCT number, 2017-002763-18.).

A Novel Monoclonal Antibody Degrades the Thyrotropin Receptor Autoantibodies in Graves' Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Autoantibodies against the thyrotropin receptor (TSH-R-Ab) are key mediators for the pathogenesis of Graves' disease (GD). TSH-R-Ab degradation was evaluated using several immunoassays within an exploratory, controlled trial in patients with GD receiving a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the neonatal crystallizable fragment receptor (FcRn). METHODS: Serial measurements of TSH-R-Ab serum levels were performed using 3 different binding and cell-based assays in patients with GD either on medication or on placebo. RESULTS: In contrast to the placebo group, in which no changes were observed, a 12-week mAb therapy led to an early and significant decrease (>60%) in the serum TSH-R-Ab levels in patients with thyroidal and extrathyroidal GD, as unanimously shown in all 3 assays. These marked changes were noted already at week 7 post baseline (P <.0001 for the binding immunoassay and for the luciferase (readout) bioassay). The 3 TSH-R-Ab binding and bioassays were highly correlated in the samples of both study groups (binding immunoassay vs luciferase bioassay, r =.91, P <.001, binding vs cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) bioassay, r = 0.86, P <.001, and luciferase vs cAMP bioassay, r = 0.71, P =.006). The serological results correlated with the course of the extrathyroidal clinical parameters of GD, that is, clinical activity score and proptosis. CONCLUSION: Targeting the FcRn markedly reduces the disease-specific TSH-R-Ab in patients with GD. The novel and rapid TSH-R-Ab bioassay improves diagnosis and management of patients with GD.

Thyroid Eye Disease: Epidemiology, Natural History, and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune disorder of the orbit and the most frequent extrathyroidal manifestation of Graves' disease but it may rarely occur in euthyroid/hypothyroid patients with chronic autoimmune thyroiditis. EPIDEMIOLOGY: TED is a relatively infrequent disorder, particularly in its severe forms. Men tend to have more severe TED at an older age. The prevalence of TED is lower than in the past among patients with recent onset Graves' hyperthyroidism, and moderate-to-severe forms requiring aggressive treatments are no more than 5% to 6% of all cases. NATURAL HISTORY: After an initial inflammatory (active) phase and a plateau phase, TED stabilizes and eventually inactivates (inactive or burnt-out phase) after an estimated period of 18-24 months. Minimal-to-mild TED often remits spontaneously, but complete restitutio ad integrum almost never occurs when TED is more than mild. RISK FACTORS: Several risk factors contribute to its development on a yet undefined genetic background. Cigarette smoking is the most important of them, but thyroid dysfunction (both hyper- and hypothyroidism), radioactive iodine therapy (if not accompanied by low-dose steroid prophylaxis), elevated thyrotropin receptor antibodies, and, probably, hypercholesterolemia represent relevant modifiable risk factors. Early diagnosis, control and removal of modifiable risk factors, and early treatment of mild forms of GO (local treatment and selenium) may effectively limit the risk of progression to more severe forms.

Teprotumumab Efficacy, Safety, and Durability in Longer-Duration Thyroid Eye Disease and Re-treatment: OPTIC-X Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate teprotumumab safety/efficacy in patients with thyroid eye disease (TED) who were nonresponsive or who experienced a disease flare. DESIGN: The Treatment of Graves' Orbitopathy to Reduce Proptosis with Teprotumumab Infusions in an Open-Label Clinical Extension Study (OPTIC-X) is a teprotumumab treatment and re-treatment trial following the placebo-controlled teprotumumab Phase 3 Treatment of Graves' Orbitopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease) to Reduce Proptosis with Teprotumumab Infusions in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Study (OPTIC) trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who previously received placebo (n = 37) or teprotumumab (n = 14) in OPTIC. METHODS: OPTIC nonresponders or those who flared (≥2-mm increase in proptosis, ≥2-point increase in clinical activity score [CAS], or both) during follow-up were treated for the first time (previous placebo patients) or re-treated with teprotumumab in OPTIC-X with 8 infusions over 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proptosis response and safety. Secondary outcomes included proptosis, CAS, subjective diplopia, and quality-of-life. RESULTS: Thirty-three of 37 placebo-treated OPTIC patients (89.2%) became proptosis responders (mean ± standard deviation, -3.5 ± 1.7 mm) when treated with teprotumumab in OPTIC-X. The responses were equivalent to the OPTIC study. In these responders, proptosis, CAS of 0 or 1, and diplopia responses were maintained in 29 of 32 patients (90.6%), 20 of 21 patients (95.2%), and 12 of 14 patients (85.7%), respectively, at follow-up week 48. The median TED duration was 12.9 months versus 6.3 months in those treated with teprotumumab in the OPTIC study. Of the 5 OPTIC teprotumumab nonresponders re-treated in OPTIC-X, 2 responded, 1 showed a proptosis reduction of 1.5 mm from OPTIC baseline, and 2 discontinued treatment early. Of the OPTIC teprotumumab responders who experienced flare, 5 of 8 patients (62.5%) responded when re-treated (mean proptosis reduction, 1.9 ± 1.2 mm from OPTIC-X baseline and 3.3 ± 0.7 mm from OPTIC baseline). Compared with published double-masked trials and their integrated follow-up, no new safety signals were identified. Mild hearing impairment was reported; 4 events occurred during the first course of treatment, and 2 events reoccurred after re-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TED of longer disease duration responded similarly to those treated earlier in the disease course. Patients with an insufficient initial response or flare may benefit from additional teprotumumab therapy. No new safety risk was identified; however additional postmarketing pharmacovigilance is ongoing.

Effect of a Biofeedback Intervention on Heart Rate Variability in Individuals With Panic Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Some individuals with panic disorder (PD) display reduced heart rate variability (HRV), which may result in an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. Heart rate variability-biofeedback (HRV-BF) training has been shown to improve the modulation of the autonomic activity. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effect of a 4-week HRV-BF intervention in individuals with PD. HRV-BF training improved the modulation of the autonomic activity. Therefore, with this randomized controlled trial, we aimed to investigate the effect of a 4-week HRV-BF intervention in people with PD. METHODS: Thirty-six women and 16 men with PD (mean age = 35.85 [15.60] years) were randomly allocated either to HRV-BF with 0.1-Hz breathing as intervention group or to HRV-Sham-BF as active control group. HRV-BF was performed for 4 weeks, whereas HRV was measured both during a short-term resting condition and during a paced breathing condition before and after intervention. RESULTS: HRV-BF with 0.1-Hz breathing increased HRV and reduced panic symptoms in individuals with PD. HRV-BF with 0.1-Hz breathing demonstrated an increase in the time and frequency domain parameters of HRV during the short-term resting condition (ΔPost-Pre root mean square successive differences: 5.87 [14.03] milliseconds; ΔPost-Pre standard deviation of all NN intervals: 11.63 [17.06] milliseconds; ΔPost-Pre total power: 464.88 [1825.47] milliseconds2; ΔPost-Pre power in low-frequency range 0.04-0.15 Hz: 312.73 [592.71] milliseconds2), a decrease in the heart rate during the paced breathing condition (ΔPost-Pre: -5.87 [9.14] beats/min), and a decrease in the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (ΔPost-Pre: -3.64 [6.30]). There was no intervention effect in the HRV-Sham-BF group. CONCLUSIONS: HRV-BF as a noninvasive and nonpharmacological treatment seems to be an important intervention option to improve reduced HRV and decrease panic symptoms in individuals with PD. Future studies are needed to establish whether these effects translate to reductions in the risk of cardiovascular disease in PD.

A novel point-of-care device accurately measures thyrotropin in whole blood, capillary blood and serum.

OBJECTIVES: Point-of-care (POC) measurement of thyrotropin (TSH) may facilitate prompt diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction. We evaluated the analytical performance of a new POC TSH assay (Wondfo). METHODS: TSH measurements were made from 730 consecutive, unselected subjects in an outpatient setting, using Wondfo in whole blood, capillary blood and serum or automated reference equipment (serum only). RESULTS: TSH measurements were user-independent. Total intra-and inter-assay variation (CV%) was 12.1 and 16.2%, respectively. Total CV% was 10.6-22.6% and 14.5-21.6% in serum and whole blood, respectively. Linearity was very good. Recovery rate was 97-127%. Prolongation of incubation time increased TSH results of 12% (13%) and 33% (35%) after 2 and 5 additional minutes in serum (blood), respectively. When measured simultaneously in two Wondfo devices, the slope of the regression line was 1.03 (serum) and 1.02 (blood), with Spearman's correlation of 0.99 for both. TSH measurements between Wondfo and reference correlated strongly (r=0.93-0.96), though TSH measurements were lower with Wondfo (slopes of plots of measurements made using the two devices were 0.94 [serum vs. serum]; 0.83 [whole blood vs. serum] and 0.64 [capillary blood vs. serum]). Depending on sample material, TSH in capillary blood was lower vs. whole blood (slope: 0.82) and for whole blood vs. serum (Wondfo and reference method; slope: 0.69 and 0.83). Total haemolysis, but not elevated bilirubin or lipemia, disrupted TSH measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The Wondfo system was straightforward to use without need for specialist technicians and demonstrated analytic performance suitable for clinical use for the diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction.

A cyclic peptide significantly improves thyroid function, thyrotropin-receptor antibodies and orbital mucine /collagen content in a long-term Graves' disease mouse model.

BACKGROUND: BALB/c mice which received long-term immunizations of adenovirus (Ad) expressing thyrotropin receptor A-subunits (TSHR) developed stable Graves' disease (GD). TSHR-derived cyclic peptide 19 (P19) was identified as effective therapy in this model. METHODS: In Ad-TSHR mice, we investigated shorter disease intervals up to 4 months for histological alterations of the orbits, fine tuning of anti-TSHR antibodies (Ab) and free thyroxine (fT4) hormone levels by using novel detection methods in an independent laboratory. Therapy (0.3 mg/kg P19 or vehicle) was given intravenously after the fourth Ad-TSHR immunization (week 11) and continued until week 19. RESULTS: Thyrotropin binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (TBII, bridge immunoassay), blocking (TBAb) and stimulating (TSAb) TSHR-Ab (both cell-based bioassays) and serum levels of fT4 were significantly elevated at week 11 in Ad-TSHR-immunized mice versus none in control mice. For the first time, TSAb, TBAb, and thyroperoxidase-Ab were detected in 17 of 19, 12/19 and 6/19 Ad-TSHR immunized mice, respectively at week 21. Also, for the first time, this study showed that P19 treatment markedly reduced serum TBII (p < 0.0001), serum fT4 (p = 0.02), and acidic mucins and collagen content in the orbital tissue of Ad-TSHR-immunized mice. CONCLUSION: P19 significantly improved thyroid function, confirming previous results in an independent second laboratory. A relevant shift of anti-TSHR antibody subpopulations in response to P19 therapy may help explain its immunological effects. Moreover, P19 exerted a beneficial effect on mucine and collagen content of orbital tissue. Hence, P19 offers a potential novel therapeutic approach for GD and associated orbitopathy.

Natural Autoimmunity to Selenoprotein P Impairs Selenium Transport in Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.

The essential trace element selenium (Se) is needed for the biosynthesis of selenocysteine-containing selenoproteins, including the secreted enzyme glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3) and the Se-transporter selenoprotein P (SELENOP). Both are found in blood and thyroid colloid, where they serve protective functions. Serum SELENOP derives mainly from hepatocytes, whereas the kidney contributes most serum GPX3. Studies using transgenic mice indicated that renal GPX3 biosynthesis depends on Se supply by hepatic SELENOP, which is produced in protein variants with varying Se contents. Low Se status is an established risk factor for autoimmune thyroid disease, and thyroid autoimmunity generates novel autoantigens. We hypothesized that natural autoantibodies to SELENOP are prevalent in thyroid patients, impair Se transport, and negatively affect GPX3 biosynthesis. Using a newly established quantitative immunoassay, SELENOP autoantibodies were particularly prevalent in Hashimoto's thyroiditis as compared with healthy control subjects (6.6% versus 0.3%). Serum samples rich in SELENOP autoantibodies displayed relatively high total Se and SELENOP concentrations in comparison with autoantibody-negative samples ([Se]; 85.3 vs. 77.1 µg/L, p = 0.0178, and [SELENOP]; 5.1 vs. 3.5 mg/L, p = 0.001), while GPX3 activity was low and correlated inversely to SELENOP autoantibody concentrations. In renal cells in culture, antibodies to SELENOP inhibited Se uptake. Our results indicate an impairment of SELENOP-dependent Se transport by natural SELENOP autoantibodies, suggesting that the characterization of health risk from Se deficiency may need to include autoimmunity to SELENOP as additional biomarker of Se status.

Teprotumumab for Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, a condition commonly associated with Graves' disease, remains inadequately treated. Current medical therapies, which primarily consist of glucocorticoids, have limited efficacy and present safety concerns. Inhibition of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR) is a new therapeutic strategy to attenuate the underlying autoimmune pathogenesis of ophthalmopathy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine the efficacy and safety of teprotumumab, a human monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IGF-IR, in patients with active, moderate-to-severe ophthalmopathy. A total of 88 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or active drug administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for a total of eight infusions. The primary end point was the response in the study eye. This response was defined as a reduction of 2 points or more in the Clinical Activity Score (scores range from 0 to 7, with a score of ≥3 indicating active thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy) and a reduction of 2 mm or more in proptosis at week 24. Secondary end points, measured as continuous variables, included proptosis, the Clinical Activity Score, and results on the Graves' ophthalmopathy-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population, 29 of 42 patients who received teprotumumab (69%), as compared with 9 of 45 patients who received placebo (20%), had a response at week 24 (P<0.001). Therapeutic effects were rapid; at week 6, a total of 18 of 42 patients in the teprotumumab group (43%) and 2 of 45 patients in the placebo group (4%) had a response (P<0.001). Differences between the groups increased at subsequent time points. The only drug-related adverse event was hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes; this event was controlled by adjusting medication for diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active ophthalmopathy, teprotumumab was more effective than placebo in reducing proptosis and the Clinical Activity Score. (Funded by River Vision Development and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01868997 .).

Reply to Drs. Kiaei and Molinaro Regarding the Publication "Comparison of a Bridge Immunoassay with Two Bioassays for Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody Detection and Differentiation".

Dear Editor,Drs. Kiaei and Molinaro 1 put forth two criticisms of the manuscript published by us 2. They state that the experimental design of this study is flawed and that the authors falsely claim that negative Thyretain™ TSI Reporter BioAssay results for two Graves' diseases patients undergoing drug treatments means the absence of stimulating antibodies. To substantiate this claim Drs. Kiaei and Molinaro point out that the manufacturer of the Thyretain TSI Reporter BioAssay clearly states in the package insert that "[t]he effects of various drug therapies on the performance of this Kit have not been established" 1. Second, the package insert explicitly states that "[a] negative result does not exclude the possibility of the presence of TSI" and results of the test should be interpreted in conjunction with information available from other clinical information, such as physical symptoms and thyroid hormone testing, as recommended by the American Thyroid Association (ATA)". Furthermore they state that the "authors of the manuscript did not consider the manufacturer's warning regarding the intended patient population and the ATA guidelines regarding the interpretation of the test results in conjunction with other clinical information. Instead, the authors based their conclusions on the negative Thyretain TSI Reporter BioAssay results and ignored the patients' clinical history of Graves' disease."

TSH RECEPTOR ANTIBODIES: RELEVANCE & UTILITY.

Objective: Antibodies (Abs) to the thyrotropin (TSH) receptor (TSH-R) play an important role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). We define the complex terminology that has arisen to describe TSH-R-Abs, review the mechanisms of action of the various types of TSH-R-Abs, and discuss significant advances that have been made in the development of clinically useful TSH-RAb assays. Methods: Literature review and discussion. Results: TSH-R-Abs may mimic or block the action of TSH or be functionally neutral. Stimulating TSH-R-Abs are specific biomarkers for Graves disease (GD) and responsible for many of its clinical manifestations. TSH-R-Abs may also be found in patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis in whom they may contribute to the hypothyroidism of the disease. Measurement of TSH-R-Abs in general, and functional Abs in particular, is recommended for the rapid diagnosis of GD, differential diagnosis and management of patients with AITD, especially during pregnancy, and in AITD patients with extrathyroidal manifestations such as orbitopathy. Measurement of TSH-R-Abs can be done with either immunoassays that detect specific binding of Abs to the TSH-R or cell-based bioassays that also provide information on their functional activity and potency. Application of molecular cloning techniques has led to significant advances in methodology that have enabled the development of clinically useful bioassays. When ordering TSH-R-Ab, clinicians should be aware of the different tests available and how to interpret results based on which assay is performed. The availability of an international standard and continued improvement in bioassays will help promote their routine performance by clinical laboratories and provide the most clinically useful TSH-R-Ab results. Conclusion: Measurement of TSH-R-Abs in general, and functional (especially stimulating) Abs in particular, is recommended for the rapid diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and management of patients with Graves hyperthyroidism, related thyroid eye disease, during pregnancy, as well as in Hashimoto thyroiditis patients with extra-thyroidal manifestations and/or thyroid-binding inhibiting immunoglobulin positivity. Abbreviations: Ab = antibody; AITD = autoimmune thyroid disease; ATD = antithyroid drug; cAMP = cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GD = Graves disease; GO = Graves orbitopathy; HT = Hashimoto thyroiditis; MAb = monoclonal antibody; TBAb = thyrotropin receptor blocking antibody; TBII = thyroid-binding inhibiting immunoglobulin; TSAb = thyrotropin receptor-stimulating antibody; TSB-Ab or TRBAb = thyrotropin receptor-stimulating blocking antibody; TSH = thyrotropin; TSH-R = thyrotropin receptor.

Comparison of a Bridge Immunoassay with Two Bioassays for Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody Detection and Differentiation.

A rapid and fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for the detection of thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TSHR-Ab) based on a bridge technology was compared with two bioassays that measure either stimulating (TSAb) or blocking (TBAb) antibodies for the detection and differentiation of TSHR-Ab. A total of 229 patients with various thyroid disorders [151 with Graves' disease (GD), 35 with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), 32 with nodular goiter, and 11 with thyroid cancer] were included. The bridge immunoassay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (cut-off>0.55 IU/l). TSAb and TBAb were measured with reporter bioassays. Blocking activity was defined as percent inhibition of luciferase expression relative to induction with bovine TSH alone (cut-off>34% inhibition). TSAb was reported as percentage of specimen-to-reference ratio (> 140 SRR%). The 3 TSHR-Ab assays were negative in all patients with benign euthyroid nodular goiter and differentiated thyroid cancer. In contrast, in all patients with GD, irrespective of the disease duration, TSHR-Ab positivity was present in 127 of 151 (84%) and 140 (93%) for the bridge assay and TSAb bioassay, respectively (p<0.001). Fifteen of 151 (10%) GD samples were positive in the TSAb bioassay but negative in the bridge assay. The bridge assay and the TSAb bioassay correlated positively (r=0.39, p<0.0001) in patients with GD. Both assays detected TSHR-Ab in all ten untreated hyperthyroid patients with GD. In GD patients with a duration of less than six months, 27/29 (93%) and 28 (97%) were TSHR-Ab positive with the bridge and TSAb bioassay, respectively. In comparison, TSHR-Ab were present in two of 35 (6%) and five (14%) HT patients with the bridge and TSAb bio-assay, respectively. TSHR blocking antibodies were present in one (3%) patient with HT and in two (1%) patients with GD; these two GD patients were also bridge assay positive but TSAb bioassay negative. In conclusion, the bridge immunoassay and both bioassays are highly sensitive for the detection of TSHR-Ab. The bridge assay is, however, also positive in the presence of TSHR blocking antibodies detected in a TBAb bioassay.

Autoantibodies against the calcium-sensing receptor and cytokines in autoimmune polyglandular syndromes types 2, 3 and 4.

OBJECTIVE: The frequency of autoimmunity against the parathyroid glands in patients with polyglandular autoimmunity that is not due to autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS1) is unclear. To investigate this, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of autoantibodies against parathyroid autoantigens, calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) and NACHT leucine-rich-repeat protein 5 (NALP5), in a large group of patients with non-APS1 polyendocrine autoimmunity. Possible occult APS1 was investigated by cytokine autoantibody measurement and AIRE gene analysis. DESIGN, SUBJECTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were 178 patients with APS2, 3 or 4, and 80 healthy blood donors. Autoantibodies against the CaSR, NALP5 and cytokines were measured by immunoprecipitation, radioligand binding assays or ELISA, respectively. RESULTS: Four patient samples (2.2%), but none of the controls, were positive for CaSR autoantibodies. NALP5 autoantibodies were not detected in any participant. Eleven patients (6.2%) had cytokine autoantibodies, but none of the control samples was positive. None of the patients with cytokine autoantibodies had any known or novel mutations in the AIRE gene. CONCLUSIONS: The low prevalence of CaSR autoantibodies indicate a very low level of subclinical parathyroid autoimmunity in APS types 2, 3 and 4. In addition, autoantibodies against cytokines constitute an uncommon feature of non-APS1 polyglandular autoimmunity.

Thyrotropin Receptor Blocking Antibodies.

Autoantibodies (Ab) against the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) are frequently found in autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). Autoantibodies to the TSHR (anti-TSHR-Ab) may mimic or block the action of TSH or be functionally neutral. Measurement of anti-TSHR-Ab can be done either via competitive-binding immunoassays or with functional cell-based bioassays. Antibody-binding assays do not assess anti-TSHR-Ab functionality, but rather measure the concentration of total anti-TSHR binding activity. In contrast, functional cell-based bioassays indicate whether anti-TSHR-Ab have stimulatory or blocking activity. Historically bioassays for anti-TSHR-Ab were research tools and were used to study the pathophysiology of Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. In the past, bioassays for anti-TSHR-Abs were laborious and time-consuming and varied widely in performance from laboratory to laboratory. Recent advances in the development of cell-based assays, including the application of molecular engineering, have led to significant improvements that have enabled bioassays to be employed routinely in clinical laboratories. The prevalence and functional significance of TSHR blocking autoantibodies (TBAb) in autoimmune hypothyroidism has been less well investigated compared to TSHR stimulating Ab. There is an increasing body of data, however, that demonstrate the clinical utility and relevance of TBAb, and thus the importance of TBAb bioassays, in the diagnosis and management of patients with AITD. In the present review, we summarize the different methods used to measure TBAb, and discuss their prevalence and clinical relevance.

Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor Antibodies in Thyroid Eye Disease-Methodology and Clinical Applications.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibodies (TSHR-Ab) cause autoimmune hyperthyroidism and are prevalent in patients with related thyroid eye disease (TED). PURPOSE: To provide a historical perspective on TSHR-Ab and to present evidence-based recommendations for clinical contemporary use. METHODS: The authors review the recent literature pertaining to TSHR-Ab in patients with TED and describe the various immunoassays currently used for detecting TSHR-Ab and their clinical applications. RESULTS: We provide a historical summary and description of the various methods used to detect TSHR-Ab, foremost, the functional TSHR-Ab. Increasing experimental and clinical data demonstrate the clinical usefulness of cell-based bioassays for measurements of functional TSHR-Ab in the diagnosis and management of patients with autoimmune TED and in the characterization of patients with autoimmune-induced hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibodies, especially the functional stimulating antibodies, are sensitive, specific, and reproducible biomarkers for patients with autoimmune TED and correlate well with clinical disease activity and clinical severity. Unlike competitive-binding assays, bioassays have the advantage of indicating not only the presence of antibodies but also their functional activity and potency. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of TSHR-Ab (especially stimulating antibodies) is a clinically useful tool for the management of patients with TED.

United States and European Multicenter Prospective Study for the Analytical Performance and Clinical Validation of a Novel Sensitive Fully Automated Immunoassay for Calcitonin.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is the validation and proof of clinical relevance of a novel electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) for the determination of serum calcitonin (CT) in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and in different diseases of the thyroid and of calcium homeostasis. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective study on basal serum CT concentrations performed in 9 US and European referral institutions. In addition, stimulated CT concentrations were measured in 50 healthy volunteers after intravenous calcium administration (2.5 mg/kg bodyweight). RESULTS: In total, 1929 patients and healthy controls were included. Limits of blank, detection, and quantification for the ECLIA were 0.3, 0.5, and 1 ng/L, respectively. Highest intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 7.4% (CT concentration, 0.8 ng/L) and 7.0% (1.1 ng/L), respectively. Medians (interval) of serum CT concentrations in 783 healthy controls were 0.8 ng/L (<0.5-12.7) and 3 ng/L (<0.5-18) for females and males, respectively (97.5th percentile, 6.8 and 11.6 ng/L, respectively). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 100%/97.1% and 96.2%/96.4%, for female/males, respectively. Patients (male/female) with primary hyperparathyroidism, renal failure, and neuroendocrine tumors showed CT concentrations >97.5th percentile in 33%/4.7%, 18.5%/10%, and 8.3%/12%, females/males, respectively. Peak serum CT concentrations were reached 2 min after calcium administration (161.7 and 111.8 ng/L in males and females, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent analytical performance, low interindividual variability, and low impact of confounders for increased CT concentrations in non-MTC patients indicate that the investigated assay has appropriate clinical utility. Calcium-stimulated CT results suggest good test applicability owing to low interindividual variability.