5-year follow-up results of a JCOG1104 (OPAS-1) phase III non-inferiority trial to compare 4 courses and 8 courses of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological stage II gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year (corresponding to eight courses) is the standard treatment for pathological stage II gastric cancer. The phase III trial (JCOG1104) investigating the non-inferiority of four courses of S-1 to eight courses was terminated due to futility at the first interim analysis. To confirm the primary results, we reported the results after a 5-years follow-up in JCOG1104. METHODS: Patients histologically diagnosed with stage II gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy were randomly assigned to receive S-1 for eight or four courses. In detail, 80 mg/m2/day S-1 was administered for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest as a single course. RESULTS: Between February 16, 2012, and March 19, 2017, 590 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to 8-course (295 patients) and 4-course (295 patients) regimens. After a 5-years follow-up, the relapse-free survival at 3 years was 92.2% for the 8-course arm and 90.1% for the 4-course arm, and that at 5 years was 87.7% for the 8-course arm and 85.6% for the 4-course arm (hazard ratio 1.265, 95% CI 0.846-1.892). The overall survival at 3 years was 94.9% for the 8-course arm, 93.2% for the 4-course arm, and that at 5 years was 89.7% for the 8-course arm, and 88.6% for the 4-course arm (HR 1.121, 95% CI 0.719-1.749). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of the four-course arm was slightly but consistently inferior to that of the eight-course arm. Eight-course S-1 should thus remain the standard adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological stage II gastric cancer.

[Results of Surgical Treatment for Gastric Cancer in the Elderly Over 85 Years Old].

Although the number of gastric cancers in elderly is increasing with the aging population, the indications of surgical treatment depend on the individual cases and the decisions of doctors. We investigated the outcomes of gastrectomy in elderly patients aged 85 years and older who underwent surgery at our hospital. From 2014 to 2022, 72 cases of gastrectomy were performed in the elderly. The approaches were laparotomy in 28 cases, laparoscopic in 42, and robot-assisted in 2. There were 57 cases of distal gastrectomy, 7 cases of proximal gastrectomy, and 8 cases of total gastrectomy. The median operation time was 200 minutes, and the postoperative hospital stay was 14 days. There were 14 cases of complications of Grade Ⅱ or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Although intra-abdominal complications were not many, respiratory and circulatory complications were occasionally observed. The median follow-up period was 14.6 months, there were 10 deaths from other diseases. Risk factors for death from other diseases were laparotomy, postoperative complications, and outcomes other than discharging home. Although gastrectomy may be performed safely even in the elderly, it is important to pay attention to the patients' conditions particular to the elderly and to plan the surgery accordingly.

[A Case of Primary Somatostatin-Producing Tumor of the Duodenum with Liver Metastases with Long-Term Survival of More than 20 Years].

A 52-year-old woman underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy after an abnormal medical examination, which revealed a mass lesion over half the circumference of the superior duodenal angulus. Immunostaining was diffusely positive for somatostatin, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A. A 3 cm-sized mass in the pancreaticoduodenal region and multiple nodular lesions of a few mm in both lobes of the liver were revealed by CT. The diagnosis is primary somatostatin-producing tumor of the duodenum with multiple liver metastases. She underwent gastric jejunal bypass for impaired transit. Afterwards hepatic infusion and systemic chemotherapy were continued, and 5 years passed without progression. When she stopped chemotherapy for 6 months, she started somatostatin analogue therapy because of the increase of the tumors. The tumors did not increase, and 20 years have passed since the start of treatment. We report a case of primary somatostatin-producing tumor of the duodenum with liver metastases that is still alive for a long period of time, with a review of the literature.

Five-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing bursectomy and omentectomy alone for resectable gastric cancer (JCOG1001).

BACKGROUND: Bursectomy, the total resection of the bursa omentalis, is a standard procedure in gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer. A phase III trial (JCOG1001) comparing bursectomy and omentectomy alone was terminated early at the interim analysis. The final results of the updated analysis after a minimum follow-up of 5 years are reported here. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach (cT3-T4a) were randomized (1 : 1) during surgery to bursectomy or omentectomy-alone groups and then underwent D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 1204 patients (602 bursectomy and 602 omentectomy alone) were enrolled between June 2010 and March 2015. The bursectomy group had a significantly higher incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV intra-abdominal abscess than the omentectomy-alone group (5.5 versus 2.5 per cent respectively; P = 0.008). The updated 5-year overall survival rates were 74.9 (95 per cent c.i. 71.2 to 78.2) per cent in the bursectomy group and 76.5 (72.8 to 79.7) per cent in the omentectomy-alone group; the adjusted HR for death in the bursectomy group was 1.03 (95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.27) (1-sided P = 0.598). Bursectomy did not decrease peritoneal recurrence (12.1 versus 12.3 per cent respectively; P = 1.000). In a multivariable analysis, old age (above 65 years), tumour located in the lower third or posterior wall of the stomach, macroscopic type 3/5, total gastrectomy, and cT4a were independent predictors of poor overall survival, but omentectomy alone was not. CONCLUSION: In D2 gastrectomy, bursectomy is not recommended as a standard procedure for cT3-T4a gastric cancer. Registration number: UMIN000003688 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).

The evaluation of the postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45: a nationwide multi-institutional study.

PURPOSE: This retrospective nationwide survey investigated the quality of life (QOL) of patients with esophagogastric junction cancer after gastrectomy using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45. METHODS: The Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 comprises 45 questions classified into symptoms, living status, and QOL domains. A total of 1950 gastrectomized patients with upper-third gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer returned the completed forms. Among them, 224 eligible patients with esophagogastric junction cancer were selected, including 86, 120, and 18 patients who underwent total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy (reconstruction-esophagogastrostomy: 56; double-tract method: 51), and other procedures, respectively. RESULTS: The postoperative period was significantly shorter (47 ± 30 vs. 34 ± 30 months, p = 0.002), and the rates of early-stage disease and minimally invasive approaches significantly higher (both p < 0.001) in the proximal gastrectomy group than in the total gastrectomy group. Despite advantageous background factors for proximal gastrectomy, the postoperative QOL did not differ markedly between the groups. Compared to patients who underwent reconstruction with the double-tract method, patients who underwent esophagogastrostomy had significantly larger remnant stomachs but a similar QOL. CONCLUSION: Even with total gastrectomy, a postoperative QOL comparable to that with proximal gastrectomy can be maintained. Clarifying the optimal reconstruction methods for proximal gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR; registration number: 000032221).

[Surgical Resection of Pulmonary Oligometastases of Ampullary Cancer-A Case Report and Review of Seven Cases].

A 62-year-old woman underwent a subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma (T3bN0M0, Stage Ⅱb). Histopathologically, the tumor was a tubular adenocarcinoma with mixed features, predominantly the intestinal type, following which adjuvant chemotherapy was not performed. Computed tomography performed 32 months after surgery showed a tumor measuring 6.7 mm in diameter at the apex of the right lung. The tumor had gradually increased in size and measured 10 mm in diameter, 47 months postoperatively. Since other metastatic lesions were absent, partial resection of the right lung under video-assisted thoracic surgery was performed 48 months postoperatively. Histopathological testing confirmed a diagnosis of lung metastasis from the resected specimen of ampullary carcinoma without mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not performed, and recurrence was not observed even after 53 months following the partial lung resection. Previously, 7 resected cases of solitary lung metastasis from ampullary cancer have been reported. The histopathological sub-type of these 7 cases were intestinal type in 5 and pancreatobiliary type in 2 cases, respectively. No mortality or recurrence was observed for 8-119 months in any of the 7 cases(median, 19 months). In conclusion, owing to the good prognosis, solitary lung metastasis from an ampullary cancer can be classified as an oligometastatic disease, based on the concept proposed by Hellman and Weichselbaum.

Gastrectomy with or without neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin for type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer (JCOG0501): an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Specific treatment strategies are sorely needed for scirrhous-type gastric cancer still, which has poor prognosis. Based on the promising results of our previous phase II study (JCOG0210), we initiated a phase III study to confirm the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients aged 20-75 years without a macroscopic unresectable factor as confirmed via staging laparoscopy were randomly assigned to surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm A) or NAC (S-1plus cisplatin) followed by D2 gastrectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between October 2005 and July 2013, 316 patients were enrolled, allocating 158 patients to each arm. In Arm B, in which NAC was completed in 88% of patients. Significant downstaging based on tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, and peritoneal cytology was observed using NAC. Excluding the initial 16 patients randomized before the first revision of the protocol, 149 and 151 patients in arms A and B, respectively, were included in the primary analysis. The 3-year OS rates were 62.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.1-69.6] in Arm A and 60.9% (95% CI 52.7-68.2) in Arm B. The hazard ratio of Arm B against Arm A was 0.916 (95% CI 0.679-1.236). CONCLUSIONS: For type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer, NAC with S-1 plus cisplatin failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. D2 surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard treatment.

Survival analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study on surgical palliation among patients receiving treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction caused by incurable advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: We had previously reported that surgical palliation could maintain quality of life (QOL) while improving solid food intake among patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by advanced gastric cancer. The present study aimed to perform a survival analysis according to the patients' QOL to elucidate its impact on survival. METHODS: Patients with GOO who underwent either palliative gastrectomy or gastrojejunostomy were included in this study. A validated QOL instrument (EQ-5D) was used to assess QOL at baseline and 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months following surgical palliation. Postoperative improvement in oral intake was also evaluated using the GOO scoring system (GOOSS). Thereafter, univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to determine independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median survival time of the 104 patients included herein was 11.30 months. Patients who received postoperative chemotherapy, PS 0/1, baseline EQ-5D ≥ 0.75, improved or stable EQ-5D, and improved oral intake expressed as GOOSS = 3 had significantly better survival. Multivariate analysis identified postoperative chemotherapy, a better baseline PS, a better baseline EQ5D, improved or stable EQ5D scores, and improved oral intake 3 months after surgical palliation as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Apart from preoperative PS and postoperative chemotherapy, the present study identified better baseline QOL, improvement in postoperative QOL, and improvement in oral intake as prognostic factors among patients who underwent palliative surgery for advanced gastric cancer with GOO.

[Laparoscopy Assisted Subtotal Gastrectomy(Billrothâ Reconstruction)for Gastric Cancer in the Upper Stomach-A Report of Three Cases].

We experienced 3 cases of upper gastric cancer who underwent BillrothⅠ reconstruction in laparoscopy assisted subtotal gastrectomy. Two cases were female and 1 was male. The postoperative course was uneventful in all cases without heartburn, and the surgical margin was negative. The body weight loss rate was 5.8-12.6%, and the short-term results were relatively acceptable. Although the number of cases in this study was small, reconstruction with BillrothⅠ/delta-shaped anastomosis after laparoscopy assisted subtotal gastrectomy were considered to be useful.

[A Case of a Huge Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Extraluminal Growth Arising in the Small Intestine Diagnosed as an Ovarian Tumor].

We report a case of a gastrointenstinal stromal tumor(GIST)of the small intestine with extraluminal growth that was difficult to distinguish from an ovarian tumor. A 73-year-old woman presented to a nearby hospital for lower abdominal pain. A computed tomography(CT)scan showed a 17 cm ovarian tumor in the pelvis, and she was referred to the gynecology department of our hospital. Following examinations(enhanced CT and magnetic resonance imaging), she was referred to our department in suspicion of a small intestinal GIST in which the superior mesenteric artery/vein was the feeding blood vessel, and intraperitoneal tumor resection was performed. A large cystic tumor occupied the abdominal cavity and was in contact with the small intestinal wall. As the tumor was not in contact with the uterus or bilateral adnexa, only partial resection of the small intestine was performed. Histopathological examination showed c-kit positivity and she was diagnosed with small intestinal GIST; as a result, a course of imatinib was started.

A randomized controlled trial of postoperative intravenous acetaminophen plus thoracic epidural analgesia vs. thoracic epidural analgesia alone after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen is used in multimodal therapy for postoperative pain management. However, the additional effects of acetaminophen in combination with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) are not well understood. This prospective, multicenter randomized study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of routine intravenous (i.v.) acetaminophen in combination with TEA for the management of postoperative pain in gastric cancer surgery. METHODS: A total of 120 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive i.v. acetaminophen every 6 h and TEA during the first 3 postoperative days (acetaminophen group) or TEA alone (control group). The primary endpoint was the sum of TEA rescue doses during the first 2 postoperative days. RESULTS: Final analysis included 58 patients in the acetaminophen group and 56 patients in the control group. The median number of TEA rescue doses was significantly lower in the acetaminophen group compared with the control group (3.0 vs. 8.0, p = 0.013). The median area under the curve (AUC) of the pain scores at coughing was significantly less in the acetaminophen group compared with the control group (285 vs. 342, p = 0.046) without an increase in postoperative complications. TEA rescue doses and pain score AUCs were significantly reduced by acetaminophen in patients who underwent open gastrectomy (p = 0.037 and 0.045), whereas there was no significant difference between patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In gastric cancer surgery patients, routine i.v. acetaminophen in combination with TEA provides superior postoperative pain management compared with TEA alone.

Single-arm confirmatory trial of laparoscopy-assisted total or proximal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1401.

BACKGROUNDS: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer is safe and feasible. In contrast, no prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) or laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) has been completed. We conducted a single-arm confirmatory trial to evaluate the safety of LATG/LAPG for clinical stage I (T1N0/T1N1/T2N0) proximal gastric cancer. METHODS: The extent of lymphadenectomy was selected based on the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines. The mini-laparotomy incision was required to be ≤ 6 cm. The primary endpoint was the proportion of grade 2-4 (CTCAE ver. 4.0) esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage. The planned sample size was 245 considering a threshold of 8% and one-sided alpha of 2.5%. RESULTS: Between April 2015 and February 2017, 244 eligible patients were enrolled. LATG/LAPG was performed in 195/49. The proportion of conversions was 1.7%. Clinical T1N0/T1N1/T2N0 was 212/9/23. The extents of lymphadenectomy were as follows: D1+: 229; D2: 15. The median operation time was 309 min (IQR 265-353). The median blood loss was 30 ml (IQR 10-86). Grade 2-4 esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage was 2.5% (6/244; 95% CI 0.9-5.3). The overall proportion of in-hospital grade 3-4 adverse events was 29% (71/244). The proportions of intraabdominal abscess and pancreatic fistula were 3.7% and 2.0%, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirmed the safety of LATG/LAPG. After the non-inferiority of LADG is confirmed in our phase III trial (JCOG0912), LATG/LAPG is expected to be established as one of the standard treatments for clinical stage I gastric cancer.

Randomized phase III trial of gastrectomy with or without neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin for type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer, the short-term safety and surgical results: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG0501).

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with linitis plastica (type 4) and large (≥ 8 cm) ulcero-invasive-type (type 3) gastric cancer is extremely poor, even after extended surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Given the promising results of our previous phase II study evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with S-1 plus cisplatin (JCOG0210), we performed a phase III study to confirm the efficacy of NAC in these patients, with the safety and surgical results are presented here. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to gastrectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm A) or NAC followed by gastrectomy + adjuvant chemotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS). This trial is registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as C000000279. RESULTS: From February 2007 to July 2013, 300 patients were randomized (Arm A 149, Arm B 151). NAC was completed in 133 patients (88%). Major grade 3/4 adverse events during NAC were neutropenia (29.3%), nausea (5.4%), diarrhea (4.8%), and fatigue (2.7%). Gastrectomy was performed in 147 patients (99%) in Arm A and 139 patients (92%) in Arm B. The operation time was significantly shorter in Arm B than in Arm A (median 255 vs. 240 min, respectively; p = 0.024). There were no significant differences in Grade 2-4 morbidity and mortality (25.2% and 1.3% in Arm A and 15.8% and 0.7% in Arm B, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: NAC for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer followed by D2 gastrectomy can be safely performed without increasing the morbidity or mortality.

[A Case of Synchronous and Solitary Gallbladder Metastasis from Gastric Cancer].

A 60s woman was found to have wall thickening of the gastric body and gallbladder in the follow-up CT scan after surgery for cervical carcinoma. An endoscopic examination revealed a type 3 tumor, located in the lesser curvature of the middle stomach. Abdominal CT showed lymphadenopathy at the lesser curvature. An enhanced thickened wall was also noted in the fundus of the gallbladder. FDG-PET/CT showed negative uptake in the gallbladder lesion. Distal gastrectomy and cholecystectomy were performed under the preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer and adenomyomatosis. Histopathologically, the gastric lesion was a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, SE, ly1c, v1b. Moreover, the gallbladder lesion was a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma proliferating mainly in the muscularis propria and subserosa, which had similar histological features as those in the adenocarcinoma part of gastric cancer. From these findings, the patient was diagnosed with gallbladder metastasis from gastric cancer. Gastric cancer rarely metastasizes to the gallbladder, and only 16 cases have been reported in Japan. We present the clinicopathological features with a review of the literature.

[A Resected Case of Retroperitoneal Metastasis and Small Bowel Metastasis from HCC].

A 71-year-old man underwent right hemi-hepatectomyfor a hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)measuring 18 cm in diameter. The pathological diagnosis was poorlydifferentiated HCC. Ten months after the surgery, computed tomographyrevealed a nodule 12mm in diameter in the right lung as well as 2 nodules measuring 19 and 11mm in diameter in the retroperitoneum at the cranial aspect of the left kidney. Four months later, the nodule in the right lung had enlarged to 44 mm, while the 2 nodules in the retroperitoneum had enlarged to 68mm and 34 mm. These nodules were resected and histopathologicallydiagnosed as metastasis from HCC. Twenty-one months after liver resection, computed tomographyrevealed nodules 16 and 25mm in diameter in the retroperitoneum around the urinarybladder and jejunum, respectively. One month later, intussusception resulted from the jejunal tumor. Laparoscopic surgerywas performed for both tumors, which were diagnosed as metastases from HCC. Twenty-five months after liver resection, metastasis from the HCC appeared in the left adrenal grand, at the site of the jejunal anastomosis, and in the fattytissue around the right scapula. Twenty-nine months after liver resection, the patient died of respiratoryfailure from multiple metastases in the left lung.

Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the role of splenectomy in total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. BACKGROUNDS: Splenectomy in total gastrectomy is associated with increased operative morbidity and mortality, but its survival benefit is unclear. Previous randomized controlled trials were underpowered and inconclusive. METHODS: We conducted a multiinstitutional randomized controlled trial. Proximal gastric adenocarcinoma of T2-4/N0-2/M0 not invading the greater curvature was eligible. During the operation, surgeons confirmed that R0 resection was possible with negative lavage cytology, and patients were randomly assigned to either splenectomy or spleen preservation. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival, operative morbidity, operation time, and blood loss. The trial was designed to confirm noninferiority of spleen preservation to splenectomy in OS with a noninferiority margin of the hazard ratio as 1.21 and 1-sided alpha of 5%. RESULTS: Between June 2002 and March 2009, 505 patients (254 splenectomy, 251 spleen preservation) were enrolled from 36 institutions. Splenectomy was associated with higher morbidity and larger blood loss, but the operation time was similar. The 5-year survivals were 75.1% and 76.4% in the splenectomy and spleen preservation groups, respectively. The hazard ratio was 0.88 (90.7%, confidence interval 0.67-1.16) (<1.21); thus, the noninferiority of spleen preservation was confirmed (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer that does not invade the greater curvature, splenectomy should be avoided as it increases operative morbidity without improving survival.

Sclerosing mesenteritis mimicking metachronous peritoneal metastases from descending colon adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sclerosing mesenteritis is a non-neoplastic inflammatory disease that occurs in the bowel mesentery. Distinguishing sclerosing mesenteritis from neoplasms may be difficult because of the clinical and radiographic similarities between the two disease entities. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of sclerosing mesenteritis mimicking peritoneal metastases of colorectal carcinoma. A 73-year-old man with stage II descending colon adenocarcinoma with poor prognostic features was found to have developed left lower abdominal quadrant masses on computed tomography (CT) 9 months after undergoing radical surgery. These masses were diagnosed as peritoneal metastases because they grew in size and displayed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake 3 months later; thus, a laparotomy was performed. The masses, which were localized in the jejunal mesentery, were excised completely via segmental jejunal resection. Histopathological analysis confirmed that the masses were sclerosing mesenteritis. The patient showed no signs of sclerosing mesenteritis or colorectal carcinoma recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients suspected of having localized peritoneal metastasis from malignancies, any masses must be sampled by surgical excisional biopsy and subsequently examined to rule out alternative diagnoses, such as sclerosing mesenteritis.

[Laparoscopic Surgery for an Intussusception Caused by Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer after Pre-Operative Reduction by Transanal Insertion of a Circular Sizer - A Case Report].

An octogenarian man complaining of bloody stool was referred to our hospital. A digital examination, abdominal enhanced CT and endoscopy led to a diagnosis of intussusception due to rectosigmoid colon cancer, but he was not suffering from bowel obstruction. An elective laparoscopic Hartmann's operation was performed after reduction by transanal insertion of a circular sizer. It may be difficult to reduce an intussusception induced by rectal cancer. We report this case with a review of the relevant literature.

Evaluation of the efficacy of palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gastric cancer treated with S-1 plus cisplatin.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new combination antiemetic therapy consisting of palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone in gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin. METHODS: This prospective, multi-institutional observational study assessed patient-reported nausea, vomiting, use of rescue therapy, change of dietary intake, and Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire results. The percentages of patients showing complete response (CR; no emesis and non-use of any rescue antiemetics) and complete protection (CP; no significant nausea and non-use of any rescue antiemetics), change of dietary intake, and impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on daily life during the overall (0-120 h after cisplatin administration), acute (0-24 h), and delayed (24-120 h) phases were examined. These findings were compared with our previous study, which used granisetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone, to assess the relative effectiveness of palonosetron versus granisetron in combination antiemetic therapy. RESULTS: Of the 72 included patients, 66 (91.6 %), 70 (97.2 %), and 50 (69.1 %) achieved CR, and 48 (66.7 %), 61 (84.7 %) and 49 (68.1 %) achieved CP during in the overall, acute, and delayed phases of cisplatin administration, respectively. Approximately half of the patients had some degree of anorexia. FLIE results indicated that 78.6 % of patients maintained their quality of life. Palonosetron was not superior to granisetron in combination antiemetic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Three-drug combination antiemetic therapy with palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone was tolerable in gastric cancer patients undergoing treatment with S-1 plus cisplatin. The predominance of palonosetron to granisetron was not demonstrated in this study.

[An Analysis of Placement of a Self-Expanding Metallic Stent as Bridge to Surgery for Surgical Resection of Stageâ £ Obstructive Colorectal Cancers].

In our institution, placement of a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) for obstructive colorectal cancer to avoid emergency operations, namely as a bridge to surgery (BTS), was introduced in April 2012. Here, we assess the efficacy and safety of pre-operative SEMS placement for treatment of Stage Ⅳ obstructive colorectal cancer. We analyzed a total of 44 cases of Stage Ⅳ colorectal cancer, which consisted of 13 obstructive cases that were surgically resected following SEMS placement as BTS (BTS group), and 31 cases that were resected in elective operations without pre-operative SEMS placement (Ope group), from April 2012 to August 2014. None of the patients had any adverse events during the SEMS procedure or after SEMS placement, and all patients of BTS group could undergo the planned operations after sufficient decompression. In the postoperative period, 1 patient of BTS group (7.7%) had anastomosis bleeding, but no other complications, including anastomosis leakage, were observed in BTS group. However more progressive primary tumors were resected in BTS group (p=0.0115), there were no significant differences for post-operative course between the 2 groups; this indicated avoiding high-risk emergency operations contributed to adequate short-term outcomes in BTS group comparable to those in Ope group. SEMS placement as BTS could be performed safely for Stage Ⅳ obstructive colorectal cancer cases, and was 1 of the effective strategies for local treatment.