Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Plant Signal Behav ; 16(11): 1958129, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34429013

RESUMEN

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is one of the major oilseed crops cultivated world over for its high-quality oil rich in linoleic acid. It also has established applications in pharmaceutical and biotechnological industries, mainly through recombinant production of unique oil body (OB) membrane proteins-oleosins, which are used for producing a wide variety of vaccines, food products, cosmetics and nutraceuticals. The present review provides a critical analysis of the progress made in advancing our knowledge in sunflower biology, ranging from mechanisms of pollen-stigma interaction, seed development, physiology of seed germination and seedling growth under salt stress, and finally understanding the signaling routes associated with various biochemical pathways regulating seedling growth. Role of nitric oxide (NO) triggered post-translational modifications (PTMs), discovered in the recent past, have paved way for future research directions leading to further understanding of sunflower developmental physiology. Novel protocols recently developed to monitor temporal and spatial distributions of various biochemicals involved in above-stated developmental events in sunflower, will go a long way for similar applications in plant biology in future.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación Celular/fisiología , Flores/metabolismo , Helianthus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Helianthus/metabolismo , Polen/metabolismo , Tolerancia a la Sal/fisiología , Plantones/crecimiento & desarrollo , Semillas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Comunicación Celular/genética , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Productos Agrícolas/metabolismo , Flores/genética , Regulación de la Expresión Génica de las Plantas , Genes de Plantas , Variación Genética , Genotipo , Helianthus/genética , Polen/genética , Estrés Salino/genética , Estrés Salino/fisiología , Tolerancia a la Sal/genética , Plantones/genética , Plantones/metabolismo , Semillas/genética , Semillas/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/genética , Transducción de Señal/fisiología
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 35(1 Suppl): S56-66, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18541188

RESUMEN

Most major medical organizations recommend routine screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Screening can lead to early detection of these cancers, resulting in reduced mortality. Yet not all people who should be screened are screened, either regularly or, in some cases, ever. This report presents the results of systematic reviews of effectiveness, applicability, economic efficiency, barriers to implementation, and other harms or benefits of interventions designed to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by increasing community access to these services. Evidence from these reviews indicates that screening for breast cancer (by mammography) has been increased effectively by reducing structural barriers and by reducing out-of pocket client costs, and that screening for colorectal cancer (by fecal occult blood test) has been increased effectively by reducing structural barriers. Additional research is needed to determine whether screening for cervical cancer (by Pap test) can be increased by reducing structural barriers and by reducing out-of-pocket costs, whether screening for colorectal cancer (fecal occult blood test) can be increased by reducing out-of-pocket costs, and whether these interventions are effective in increasing the use of other colorectal cancer screening procedures (i.e., flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, double contrast barium enema). Specific areas for further research are also suggested in this report.


Asunto(s)
Participación de la Comunidad , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/economía , Estados Unidos
3.
Am J Prev Med ; 35(1 Suppl): S67-74, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18541190

RESUMEN

Most major medical organizations recommend routine screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Screening can lead to early detection of these cancers, resulting in reduced mortality. Yet not all people who should be screened are screened, either regularly or, in some cases, ever. This report presents results of systematic reviews of effectiveness, applicability, economic efficiency, barriers to implementation, and other harms or benefits of two provider-directed intervention approaches to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. These approaches, provider assessment and feedback, and provider incentives encourage providers to deliver screening services at appropriate intervals. Evidence in these reviews indicates that provider assessment and feedback interventions can effectively increase screening by mammography, Pap test, and fecal occult blood test. Health plans, healthcare systems, and cancer control coalitions should consider such evidence-based findings when implementing interventions to increase screening use. Evidence was insufficient to determine the effectiveness of provider incentives in increasing use of any of these tests. Specific areas for further research are suggested in this report, including the need for additional research to determine whether provider incentives are effective in increasing use of any of these screening tests, and whether assessment and feedback interventions are effective in increasing other tests for colorectal cancer (i.e., flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or double-contrast barium enema).


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Cooperación del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estados Unidos
4.
Am J Prev Med ; 35(3): 287-313, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18692745

RESUMEN

Children and adolescents in the U.S. and worldwide are commonly exposed to traumatic events, yet practitioners treating these young people to reduce subsequent psychological harm may not be aware of-or use-interventions based on the best available evidence. This systematic review evaluated interventions commonly used to reduce psychological harm among children and adolescents exposed to traumatic events. Guide to Community Preventive Services (Community Guide) criteria were used to assess study design and execution. Meta-analyses were conducted, stratifying by traumatic exposures. Evaluated interventions were conducted in high-income economies, published up to March 2007. Subjects in studies were

Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Arteterapia , Terapia Conductista , Niño , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ludoterapia , Desarrollo de Programa , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Heridas y Lesiones/psicología
5.
Am J Prev Med ; 35(1 Suppl): S34-55, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18541187

RESUMEN

Most major medical organizations recommend routine screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Screening can lead to early detection of these cancers, resulting in reduced mortality. Yet not all people who should be screened are screened, either regularly or, in some cases, ever. This report presents the results of systematic reviews of effectiveness, applicability, economic efficiency, barriers to implementation, and other harms or benefits of interventions designed to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by increasing community demand for these services. Evidence from these reviews indicates that screening for breast cancer (mammography) and cervical cancer (Pap test) has been effectively increased by use of client reminders, small media, and one-on-one education. Screening for colorectal cancer by fecal occult blood test has been increased effectively by use of client reminders and small media. Additional research is needed to determine whether client incentives, group education, and mass media are effective in increasing use of any of the three screening tests; whether one-on-one education increases screening for colorectal cancer; and whether any demand-enhancing interventions are effective in increasing the use of other colorectal cancer screening procedures (i.e., flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, double contrast barium enema). Specific areas for further research are also suggested in this report.


Asunto(s)
Participación de la Comunidad , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos
6.
Am J Prev Med ; 38(2 Suppl): S275-89, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20117612

RESUMEN

In 2001, a systematic review for the Guide to Community Preventive Services identified strong evidence of effectiveness of smoking bans and restrictions in reducing exposure to environmental (secondhand) tobacco smoke. As follow-up to that earlier review, the focus here was on the evidence on effectiveness of smokefree policies in reducing tobacco use. Smokefree policies implemented by worksites or communities prohibit smoking in workplaces and designated public areas. The conceptual approach was modified for this review; an updated search for evidence was conducted; and the available evidence was evaluated. Published articles that met quality criteria and evaluated changes in tobacco-use prevalence or cessation were included in the review. A total of 57 studies were identified in the period 1976 through June 2005 that met criteria to be candidates for review; of these, 37 met study design and quality of execution criteria to qualify for final assessment. Twenty-one studies measured absolute differences in tobacco-use prevalence with a median effect of -3.4 percentage points (interquartile interval: -6.3 to -1.4 percentage points). Eleven studies measured differences in tobacco-use cessation among tobacco users exposed to a smokefree policy compared with tobacco users not exposed to a smokefree policy. The median absolute change was an increase in cessation of 6.4 percentage points (interquartile interval: 1.3 to 7.9 percentage points). The qualifying studies provided sufficient evidence that smokefree policies reduce tobacco use among workers when implemented in worksites or by communities. Finally, a systematic economic review identified four studies that, overall, demonstrated economic benefits from a smokefree workplace policy. Additional research is needed to more fully evaluate the total economic effects of these policies.


Asunto(s)
Política Organizacional , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Humanos , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Lugar de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudencia
7.
Am J Prev Med ; 37(4): 340-57, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19765507

RESUMEN

This report presents the results of a systematic review of the effectiveness of worksite nutrition and physical activity programs to promote healthy weight among employees. These results form the basis for the recommendation by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services on the use of these interventions. Weight-related outcomes, including weight in pounds or kilograms, BMI, and percentage body fat were used to assess effectiveness of these programs. This review found that worksite nutrition and physical activity programs achieve modest improvements in employee weight status at the 6-12-month follow-up. A pooled effect estimate of -2.8 pounds (95% CI=-4.6, -1.0) was found based on nine RCTs, and a decrease in BMI of -0.5 (95% CI=-0.8, -0.2) was found based on six RCTs. The findings appear to be applicable to both male and female employees, across a range of worksite settings. Most of the studies combined informational and behavioral strategies to influence diet and physical activity; fewer studies modified the work environment (e.g., cafeteria, exercise facilities) to promote healthy choices. Information about other effects, barriers to implementation, cost and cost effectiveness of interventions, and research gaps are also presented in this article. The findings of this systematic review can help inform decisions of employers, planners, researchers, and other public health decision makers.


Asunto(s)
Ciencias de la Nutrición/educación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Sobrepeso/prevención & control , Educación y Entrenamiento Físico , Pérdida de Peso , Lugar de Trabajo , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/prevención & control , Obesidad/terapia , Sobrepeso/terapia , Educación y Entrenamiento Físico/métodos , Educación y Entrenamiento Físico/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA