Circulating miR-16-5p, miR-92a-3p and miR-451a are biomarkers of lung cancer in Tunisian patients.

Lung cancer is one of the most common type of cancer and, despite significant advances in screening and diagnosis approaches, a large proportion of patients at diagnosis still present advanced stages of the disease with distant metastasis and bad prognosis. Finding and validating biomarkers of lung cancer is therefore essential. Such studies are often conducted on European, American and Asian populations and the relevance of these biomarkers in other populations remains less clear. In that prospect, we investigated the expression level of seven microRNAs, chosen from the medical literature (miR-16-5p, miR-92a-3p, miR-103a-3p, miR-375-3p, miR-451a, miR-520-3p and miR-let-7e-5p), in the blood of Tunisian lung cancer patients, treated or not by chemotherapy, and healthy control individuals. We found that high expression levels of circulating miR-16-5p, miR-92a-3p and miR-451a in the plasma of untreated patients discriminate them from healthy control individuals. In addition, miR-16-5p and miR-451a expression levels are significantly reduced in the plasma of chemotherapy-treated patients compared to untreated patients. Our results confirmed previous work in other populations worldwide and provide further evidence that circulating miR-16-5p, miR-92a-3p and miR-451a potentially regulate key pathways involved in the initiation and progression of cancer.

Key Guidelines for Responding to Reviewers.

Background: The process of preparing a scientific manuscript is intricate, encompassing several critical stages, including pre-writing, research development, drafting, peer review, editing, publication, dissemination, and access. Among these, the peer review process (PRP) stands out as a pivotal component requiring seamless collaboration among editors, reviewers, and authors. Reviewers play a crucial role in assessing the manuscript's quality and providing constructive feedback, which authors must adeptly navigate to enhance their work and meet journal standards. This process can often appear daunting and time-consuming, as authors are required to address numerous comments and requested changes. Authors are encouraged to perceive reviewers as consultants rather than adversaries, viewing their critiques as opportunities for improvement rather than personal attacks. Methods: Opinion article. Aim: To equip authors with practical strategies for engaging effectively in the PRP and improving their publication acceptance rates. Results: Key guidelines include thoroughly understanding and prioritizing feedback, maintaining professionalism, and systematically addressing each comment. In cases of significant disagreement or misunderstanding, authors have the option to refer the issue to the editor. Crafting a well-organized and scientific "response to reviews" along with the revised manuscript can substantially increase the likelihood of acceptance. Best practices for writing an effective response to reviews include expressing gratitude, addressing major revisions first, seeking opinions from co-authors and colleagues, and adhering strictly to journal guidelines. Emphasizing the importance of planning responses, highlighting changes in the revised manuscript, and conducting a final review ensures all corrections are properly documented. Conclusion: By following these guidelines, authors can enhance their manuscripts' quality, foster positive relationships with reviewers, and ultimately contribute to scholarly advancement.

Risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a retrospective study.

Background: The objective of this study was to assess clinical and imaging features of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), (RA-ILD) group, in comparison to RA without ILD (RA-C) and to identify the associated factors to ILD. Methods: This was a retrospective comparative study (from June 2015 to March 2022) including RA patients aged ≥18 years. The RA-C control group was matched according to age (±2 years), gender, and RA duration (±2 years). General data, RA characteristics, ILD features, and treatment modalities were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the predictive factors of ILD. Results: A total of 104 patients were included (52 RA-ILD and 52 RA-C); sex ratio was 0.36. Mean age was 66.3±11 years (RA-ILD) versus 65.6±10.8 years (RA-C) (p=0.72). In comparison to RA-C, RA-ILD patients were significantly higher smokers (p=0.01) and physically inactive (p=0.01). Regarding RA features, RA-ILD patients have significantly increased positive anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) (p=0.01), ACPA rate (p<0.001), erosive disease (p<0.001), and disease activity score (p<0.001). Mean time to ILD diagnosis was 5.85±7.16 years. Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) patterns of disease were identified: nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (28.8%), usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (17.3%), organizing pneumonia (OP) (25%), acute interstitial pneumonia (13.5%), and respiratory bronchiolitis (3.8%). Multivariate analysis identified smoking, high baseline DAS28 (disease activity score 28) and ACPA positivity as predictive factors of ILD. Conclusion: Our results confirmed the reported associated factors of ILD in RA (smoking, higher disease activity, ACPA positivity). Thus, we need to target the modifiable factors by supporting and educating RA patients to quit smoking and intensify disease modifying anti-rheumatoid drugs (DMARD) to reach remission.

Postoperative recurrence of primary lung cancer: anatomo-clinical and therapeutic study.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Even after radical resection, the rate of recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer remains high. AIM: To identify the profile of patients operated for lung cancer and to study the prognostic factors of tumor recurrence. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including 67 cases of lung cancer with curative surgery, hospitalized between 2010 and 2016. RESULTS: The mean age was 61 years. The sex ratio was 21. The average time to diagnosis was 22 days. The average time to start treatment was 10 days. The most common histological type was adenocarcinoma (63%). Lobectomy was performed in 63% of the patients. Tumor recurrence was noted in 40% of the patients. The average time between recurrence and the surgical treatment was 12 months. The most common location of recurrence was the lung (70%). Recurrence was more common among adenocarcinoma and smokers older than 60 years. The majority of locally advanced and metastatic cancers have recurred. The average survival was 56 ± 4months. Better survival rates were observed in young patients, with less than 25 pack-years of early-stage, no lymph node involvement, and patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. The probability of survival was 5 years for all tumor stages. CONCLUSION: The prognostic factors for recurrence after radical resection for lung cancer were: the age of patients, smoking history, histological type, tumor stage, and surgical procedure.

Pulmonary Sarcomatoid carcinoma: a surgical diagnosis and prognostic factors.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma (PSC) is a rare group of tumors accounting for about 0.4% of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Five subtypes were described: pleomorphic carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, giant cell carcinoma and pulmonary blastoma. The diagnosis is pathological but requires a good quality sampling of the tumor. METHODS: On a series of 1582 patients operated on for lung cancer from 1992 to 2016, 43 patients were retrospectively identified as having been treated surgically for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. RESULTS: The population consisted of 33 males and 10 females with mean age of 55 years. Imaging findings showed a peripheral mass in the majority of cases (n=29). Careful investigation failed to discover a primitive lesion elsewhere. Six patients received induction therapy for wall involvement. Lobectomy or bilobectomy was performed in 30 patients and pneumonectomy in 11 patients. A wedge resection was performed in one patient and an exploratory thoracotomy in another. In macroscopy, the mean tumor's size was 5.2 cm (1-17.5cm). The histologic diagnoses were: pleomorphic carcinoma (n=30), carcinosarcoma (n=5), spindle cell carcinoma (n=1), giant cell carcinoma (n=3) and blastoma (n=4). Two patients died within 1 month of surgical complications and 5 died of disease within 17 months. Adjuvant therapy was performed in 6 patients. Recurrence happened in 4 patients within 12 months after operation. Median survival for all patients was 8months. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of primary pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma is associated with an acceptable survival rate if the resection is complete. The size of the tumor is the most important prognosis factor. Nevertheless, a carefully follow-up is essential.