Cost-effectiveness of Universal Hepatitis C Screening in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemiology has shifted from the baby-boomer generation to young women of childbearing age. The health benefits and cost-effectiveness (CE) of screening pregnant women remain controversial. AIM: To systematically review published studies evaluating the CE of screening pregnant women for HCV in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search of CE studies evaluating the costs and benefits of screening pregnant women for HCV. Pertinent information including antiviral agent, drug costs, incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER), and infant care was collected. The authors' definition of the threshold price at which screening was deemed CE was also recorded. The quality of studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reports Standards (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS: We identified 5 studies that evaluated the ICER of screening pregnant women for HCV. Of these, 2 utilized all oral DAAs, with universal screening CE. The ICER of these 2 studies was $3000 and $41,000 per quality of life-years gained. The remaining studies were interferon-based regimens. Most studies did not include screening of infants. CONCLUSIONS: Universally screening pregnant women for HCV was CE in studies that utilized oral DAAs. Most pharmacoeconomic studies failed to incorporate the impact of vertical transmission on infants.

Meeting the WHO hepatitis C virus elimination goal: Review of treatment in paediatrics.

Over 3 million paediatric patients globally and ~50 000 in the United States are estimated to be infected with HCV. Eradicating HCV in children helps prevent liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma; reduces extra-hepatic manifestations of HCV; improves quality of life; and increases survival. The 2019 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA) guidelines now recommend direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment with an approved regimen for all children and adolescents with HCV infection aged ≥3 years. We conducted a descriptive review of the new DAA treatments for HCV infection in the paediatric population. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and sofosbuvir with ribavirin (SOF/RBV) are now approved for those ≥3 years old under specific clinical scenarios; sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is the only pangenotypic agent approved for those ≥6 years or ≥17 kg, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) is approved for adolescents ≥12 years old or ≥45 kg. These DAA regimens are well-tolerated and have comparable sustained virologic response rates at 12 weeks post-treatment compared to those reported in adults (close to 100%). The introduction of DAAs has significantly changed the landscape of HCV treatment in adults and children with HCV infection and has increased confidence that the 2030 World Health Organization elimination goal may be attainable. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal treatment for children with HCV infection, including timing, regimen and duration. Additionally, with the recent paediatric approvals, long-term safety data are needed.

Lower FIB-4 threshold in patients with diabetes improves diagnostic accuracy of the test in a Hispanic population.

Background: Non-invasive tests (NITs) can be used to estimate the severity of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) but their diagnostic accuracy is variable. Hispanic patients are at increased risk of NAFLD and diabetes. We evaluate the diagnostic performance of the fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4) in a population of Hispanic patients who underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). Methods: A total of 1,524 patients underwent VCTE at University of California, Los Angeles from July 18, 2019 to June 7, 2022. Ultimately 110 patients were identified as Hispanic, with confirmed NAFLD. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FIB-4 threshold ≥1.3 were calculated. Logistic regression models were used to determine updated thresholds for patients with and without diabetes based on Youden's index. Results: Of the 110 patients, the majority (65%) were female. Prevalence of diabetes was higher in the group with clinically significant fibrosis (76% vs. 36%, P<0.001). Using a FIB-4 threshold ≥1.3 to predict clinically significant fibrosis (F2-F4 on VCTE), area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was 0.74. By incorporating diabetes status, AUROC was 0.81 when employing a FIB-4 threshold of ≥1.0 in patients with diabetes and ≥1.5 in patients without diabetes. Conclusions: Using a FIB-4 threshold of ≥1.0 in patients with diabetes and ≥1.5 in patients without diabetes improves the diagnostic performance of the test. The new FIB-4 including diabetes status will lead to improved screening in patients who are at risk of clinically significant fibrosis.