Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 255
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 147: 105568, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38228280

RESUMEN

Asthma in the workplace is an important occupational health issue. It comprises various subtypes: occupational asthma (OA; both allergic asthma and irritant-induced asthma) and work-exacerbated asthma (WEA). Current regulatory paradigms for the management of OA are not fit for purpose. There is therefore an important unmet need, for the purposes of both effective human health protection and appropriate and proportionate regulation, that sub-types of work-related asthma can be accurately identified and classified, and that chemical respiratory allergens that drive allergic asthma can be differentiated according to potency. In this article presently available strategies for the diagnosis and characterisation of asthma in the workplace are described and critically evaluated. These include human health studies, clinical investigations and experimental approaches (structure-activity relationships, assessments of chemical reactivity, experimental animal studies and in vitro methods). Each of these approaches has limitations with respect to providing a clear discrimination between OA and WEA, and between allergen-induced and irritant-induced asthma. Against this background the needs for improved characterisation of work-related asthma, in the context of more appropriate regulation is discussed.


Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Animales , Irritantes/toxicidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/inducido químicamente , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Alérgenos/toxicidad
2.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 138: 105341, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36702195

RESUMEN

Propylene glycol (PG) has widespread use in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, fragrances and personal care products. PG is not classified as hazardous under the Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) but poses an intriguing scientific and regulatory conundrum with respect to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), the uncertainty being whether and to what extent PG has the potential to induce skin sensitisation. In this article we review the results of predictive tests for skin sensitisation with PG, and clinical evidence for ACD. Patch testing in humans points to PG having the potential to be a weak allergen under certain conditions, and an uncommon cause of ACD in subjects without underlying/pre-disposing skin conditions. In clear contrast PG is negative in predictive toxicology tests for skin sensitisation, including guinea pig and mouse models (e.g. local lymph node assay), validated in vitro test methods that measure various key events in the pathway leading to skin sensitisation, and predictive methods in humans (Human Repeat Insult Patch and Human Maximisation Tests). We here explore the possible scientific basis for this intriguing inconsistency, recognising there are arguably no known contact allergens that are universally negative in, in vitro, animal and human predictive tests methods.


Asunto(s)
Cosméticos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Ratones , Humanos , Animales , Cobayas , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Piel , Alérgenos/toxicidad , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Pruebas del Parche , Propilenglicol/toxicidad , Cosméticos/toxicidad
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 141: 105402, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37116738

RESUMEN

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) has provided a large dataset against which performance of non-animal approaches for prediction of skin sensitisation potential and potency can be assessed. However, a recent comparison of LLNA results with human data has argued that LLNA specificity is low, with many human non-sensitisers, particularly hydrophobic chemicals, being false positives. It has been suggested that such putative false positives result from hydrophobic chemicals causing cytotoxicity, which induces irritancy, in turn driving non-specific lymphocyte proliferation. This paper finds that the apparent reduced specificity of the LLNA largely reflects differences in definitions of the boundaries between weak skin sensitisers and non-sensitisers. A small number of LLNA false positives may be due to lymphocyte proliferation without skin sensitisation, but most alleged 'false' positives are in fact very weak sensitisers predictable from structure-activity considerations. The evidence does not support the hypothesis for hydrophobicity-induced false positives. Moreover, the mechanistic basis is untenable. Sound LLNA data, appropriately interpreted, remain a good measure of sensitisation potency, applicable across a wide hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity range. The standard data interpretation protocol enables detection of very low levels of sensitisation, irrespective of regulatory significance, but there is scope to interpret the data to give focus on regulatory significance.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Ensayo del Nódulo Linfático Local , Humanos , Piel , Irritantes/química , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/patología , Alérgenos/toxicidad , Ganglios Linfáticos
4.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 141: 105404, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37105297

RESUMEN

Occupational asthma resulting from workplace exposure to chemical respiratory allergens is an important disease. No widely accepted or formally validated tests for the identification of chemical respiratory sensitizers. Consequently, there is a heavy reliance on human data from clinical examinations. Unfortunately, however, although such investigations are critical for the diagnosis of occupational asthma, and in guiding remedial actions, they do not reliably identify specific chemicals within the workplace that are the causative agents. There are several reasons for this, including the fact that specific inhalation tests conducted as part of clinical investigations are frequently performed with complex mixtures rather than single substances, that sometimes inhalation challenges are conducted at concentrations above the OEL and STEL, where effects may be confounded by irritation, and that involvement of immune mechanisms cannot be assumed from the observation of late asthmatic reactions. Further, caution should be taken when implicating substances on lists of "recognised" asthmagens unless they have undergone a formal weight of evidence assessment. Here the limitations of clinical investigations as currently performed for the purposes of regulatory classification and decision making are explored by reference to previously published case studies that implicate 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) and/or 2-hydroxypropylmethacrylate (HPMA) as respiratory allergens.


Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Alérgenos/toxicidad , Metacrilatos/toxicidad , Inflamación , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos
5.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 52(2): 139-166, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35607993

RESUMEN

Methyl methacrylate (MMA) is classified under GHS as a weak skin sensitiser and a skin and respiratory irritant. It has recently been proposed that MMA be classified as a respiratory sensitiser (a designation that in a regulatory context embraces both true respiratory allergens, as well as chemicals that cause asthma through non-immunological mechanisms). This proposal was based primarily upon the interpretation of human data. This review, and a detailed weight of evidence analysis, has led to another interpretation of these data. The conclusion drawn is that persuasive evidence consistent with the designation of MMA as a respiratory sensitiser is lacking. It is suggested that one reason for different interpretations of these data is that occupational asthma poses several challenges with respect to establishing causation. Among these is that it is difficult to distinguish between allergic asthma, non-allergic asthma, and work-related exacerbation of pre-existing asthma. Moreover, there is a lack of methods for the identification of true chemical respiratory allergens. The characterisation and causation of occupational asthma is consequently largely dependent upon interpretation of human data of various types. Recommendations are made that are designed to improve the utility and interpretation of human data for establishing causation in occupational asthma.


Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional , Alérgenos/toxicidad , Asma Ocupacional/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Metacrilatos , Metilmetacrilato/toxicidad , Sistema Respiratorio
6.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 129: 105112, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34973388

RESUMEN

Some proteins, including enzymes, can induce allergic sensitization of various types, including allergic sensitization of the respiratory tract. There is now an increased understanding of the role that the skin plays in the development of IgE-mediated allergy and this prompts the question whether topical exposure to enzymes used widely in consumer cleaning products could result in allergic sensitization. Here, the evidence that proteins can interact with the skin immune system and the way they do so is reviewed, together with a consideration of the experience gained over decades of the use of enzymes in laundry and cleaning products. The conclusion drawn is that although transcutaneous sensitization to proteins can occur (typically through compromised skin) resulting in IgE antibody-mediated allergy, in practice such skin contact with enzymes used in laundry and cleaning products does not appear to pose a significant risk of allergic disease. Further, the evidence summarized in this publication support the view that proteins do not pose a risk of allergic contact dermatitis.


Asunto(s)
Detergentes/farmacología , Enzimas/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Piel/inmunología , Alérgenos/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/etiología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Humanos , Peso Molecular , Sistema Respiratorio/inmunología
7.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 134: 105244, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35932886

RESUMEN

Considerable progress has been made in the design of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for the hazard identification of skin sensitising chemicals. However, effective risk assessment requires accurate measurement of sensitising potency, and this has proven more difficult to achieve without recourse to animal tests. One important requirement for the development and adoption of novel approaches for this purpose is the availability of reliable databases for determining the accuracy with which sensitising potency can be predicted. Some previous approaches have relied on comparisons with potency estimates based on either human or animal (local lymph node assay) data. In contrast, we here describe the development of a carefully curated Reference Chemical Potency List (RCPL) which is based on consideration of the best available human and animal data. The RCPL is comprised of 33 readily available chemicals that span a wide range of chemistry and sensitising potency, and contain examples of both direct and indirect (pre- and pro-) haptens. For each chemical a potency value (PV) was derived, and chemicals ranked according to PV without the use of potency categories. It is proposed that the RCPL provides an effective resource for assessment of the accuracy with which NAMs can measure skin sensitising potency.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales , Animales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/patología , Haptenos , Humanos , Ensayo del Nódulo Linfático Local , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Piel
8.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 51(10): 1322-1330, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34233055

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Food hypersensitivity (FHS), including food allergy, coeliac disease and food intolerance, is a major public health issue. The Food Standards Agency (FSA), an independent UK Government department working to protect public health and consumers' wider interests in food, sought to identify research priorities in the area of FHS. METHODS: A priority setting exercise was undertaken, using a methodology adapted from the James Lind Alliance-the first such exercise with respect to food hypersensitivity. A UK-wide public consultation was held to identify unanswered research questions. After excluding diagnostics, desensitization treatment and other questions which were out of scope for FSA or where FSA was already commissioning research, 15 indicative questions were identified and prioritized by a range of stakeholders, representing food businesses, patient groups, health care and academia, local authorities and the FSA. RESULTS: 295 responses were received during the public consultation, which were categorized into 70 sub-questions and used to define 15 key evidence uncertainties ('indicative questions') for prioritization. Using the JLA prioritization framework, this resulted in 10 priority uncertainties in evidence, from which 16 research questions were developed. These could be summarized under the following 5 themes: communication of allergens both within the food supply chain and then to the end consumer (ensuring trust in allergen communication); the impact of socio-economic factors on consumers with FHS; drivers of severe reactions; mechanism(s) underlying loss of tolerance in FHS; and the risks posed by novel allergens/processing. DISCUSSION: In this first research prioritization exercise for food allergy and FHS, key priorities identified to protect the food-allergic public were strategies to help allergic consumers to make confident food choices, prevention of FHS and increasing understanding of socio-economic impacts. Diagnosis and treatment of FHS was not considered in this prioritization.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/prevención & control , Humanos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
9.
Scand J Immunol ; 94(5): e13102, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34755902

RESUMEN

During COVID-19 infection, reduced function of natural killer (NK) cells can lead to both compromised viral clearance and dysregulation of the immune response. Such dysregulation leads to overproduction of cytokines, a raised neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and monocytosis. This in turn increases IL-6 expression, which promotes scar and thrombus formation. Excess IL-6 also leads to a further reduction in NK function through downregulation of perforin expression, therefore forming a pathogenic auto-inflammatory feedback loop. The perforin/granzyme system of cytotoxicity is the main mechanism through which NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes eliminate virally infected host cells, as well as being central to their role in regulating immune responses to microbial infection. Here, we present epidemiological evidence suggesting an association between perforin expression and resistance to COVID-19. In addition, we outline the manner in which a pathogenic auto-inflammatory feedback loop could operate and the relationship of this loop to genes associated with severe COVID-19. Such an auto-inflammatory loop may be amenable to synergistic multimodal therapy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/inmunología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/inmunología , Células Asesinas Naturales/inmunología , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/inmunología , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Perforina/metabolismo , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Animales , Autoinmunidad/genética , COVID-19/epidemiología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/epidemiología , Resistencia a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/epidemiología , Perforina/genética
10.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 119: 104821, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33186628

RESUMEN

Allergic contact dermatitis is an important occupational health issue, and there is a need to identify accurately those chemicals that have the potential to induce skin sensitisation. Hazard identification was performed initially using animal (guinea pig and mouse) models. More recently, as a result of the drive towards non-animal methods, alternative in vitro and in silico approaches have been developed. Some of these new in vitro methods have been formally validated and have been assigned OECD Test Guideline status. The performance of some of these recently developed in vitro methods, and of 2 quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) approaches, with a series of methacrylate esters has been reviewed and reported previously. In this article that first review has been extended further with additional data and complementary analyses. Results obtained using in vitro methods (Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay, DPRA; ARE-Nrf2 luciferase test methods, KeratinoSens and LuSens; Epidermal Sensitisation Assay, EpiSensA; human Cell Line Activation Test, h-CLAT, and the myeloid U937 Skin Sensitisation test, U-SENS), and 2 QSAR approaches (DEREK™-nexus and TIMES-SS), with 11 methacrylate esters and methacrylic acid are reported here, and compared with existing data from the guinea pig maximisation test and the local lymph node assay. With this series of chemicals it was found that some in vitro tests (DPRA and ARE-Nrf2 luciferase) performed well in comparison with animal test results and available human skin sensitisation data. Other in vitro tests (EpiSensA and h-CLAT) proved rather more problematic. Results with DEREK™-nexus and TIMES-SS failed to reflect accurately the skin sensitisation potential of the methacrylate esters. The implications for assessment of skin sensitising activity are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/toxicidad , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Ésteres/toxicidad , Metacrilatos/toxicidad , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Animales , Humanos
11.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 123: 104925, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33831493

RESUMEN

Occupational asthma is an important health problem that can include exacerbation of existing asthma, or induce new asthma either through allergic sensitisation, or non-immunological mechanisms. While allergic sensitisation of the respiratory tract can be acquired to proteins, or to low molecular weight chemicals (chemical respiratory allergens) this article is on the latter exclusively. Chemical respiratory allergy resulting in occupational asthma is associated with high levels of morbidity and there is a need, therefore, that chemicals which can cause sensitisation of the respiratory tract are identified accurately. However, there are available no validated, or even widely accepted, predictive test methods (in vivo, in vitro or in silico) that have achieved regulatory acceptance for identifying respiratory sensitising hazards. For this reason there is an important reliance on human data for the identification of chemical respiratory allergens, and for distinguishing these from chemicals that cause occupational asthma through non-immunological mechanisms. In this article the reasons why it is important that care is taken in designating chemicals as respiratory allergens are reviewed. The value and limitations of human data that can aid the accurate identification of chemical respiratory allergens are explored, including exposure conditions, response characteristics in specific inhalation challenge tests, and immunological investigations.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/toxicidad , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria , Administración por Inhalación , Animales , Asma Ocupacional , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad , Inmunoglobulina E , Peso Molecular , Exposición Profesional , Sistema Respiratorio , Medición de Riesgo
12.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 127: 105068, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34678328

RESUMEN

Agrochemical safety assessment has traditionally relied on the use of animals for toxicity testing, based on scientific understanding and test guidelines developed in the 1980s. However, since then, there have been significant advances in the toxicological sciences that have improved our understanding of mechanisms underpinning adverse human health effects. The time is ripe to 'rethink' approaches used for human safety assessments of agrochemicals to ensure they reflect current scientific understanding and increasingly embrace new opportunities to improve human relevance and predictivity, and to reduce the reliance on animals. Although the ultimate aim is to enable a paradigm shift and an overhaul of global regulatory data requirements, there is much that can be done now to ensure new opportunities and approaches are adopted and implemented within the current regulatory frameworks. This commentary reviews current initiatives and emerging opportunities to embrace new approaches to improve agrochemical safety assessment for humans, and considers various endpoints and initiatives (including acute toxicity, repeat dose toxicity studies, carcinogenicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, exposure-driven approaches, inhalation toxicity, and data modelling). Realistic aspirations to improve safety assessment, incorporate new technologies and reduce reliance on animal testing without compromising protection goals are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Agroquímicos/toxicidad , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/métodos , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/normas , Enfermedad Aguda , Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Guías como Asunto , Pruebas de Mutagenicidad , Proyectos de Investigación , Medición de Riesgo , Especificidad de la Especie , Factores de Tiempo
13.
J Biol Chem ; 294(51): 19616-19634, 2019 12 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31727737

RESUMEN

Therapeutic mAbs are used to manage a wide range of cancers and autoimmune disorders. However, mAb-based treatments are not always successful, highlighting the need for a better understanding of the factors influencing mAb efficacy. Increased levels of oxidative stress associated with several diseases are counteracted by the activities of various oxidoreductase enzymes, such as thioredoxin (Trx), which also reduces allosteric disulfide bonds in proteins, including mAbs. Here, using an array of in vitro assays, we explored the functional effects of Trx-mediated reduction on the mechanisms of action of six therapeutic mAbs. We found that Trx reduces the interchain disulfide bonds of the mAbs, after which they remain intact but have altered function. In general, this reduction increased antigen-binding capacity, resulting in, for example, enhanced tumor necrosis factor (TNF) neutralization by two anti-TNF mAbs. Conversely, Trx reduction decreased the antiproliferative activity of an anti-tyrosine kinase-type cell-surface receptor HER2 mAb. In all of the mAbs, Fc receptor binding was abrogated by Trx activity, with significant loss in both complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity of the mAbs tested. We also confirmed that without alkylation, Trx-reduced interchain disulfide bonds reoxidize, and ADCC activity is restored. In summary, Trx-mediated reduction has a substantial impact on the functional effects of an mAb, including variable effects on antigen binding and Fc function, with the potential to significantly impact mAb efficacy in vivo.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/química , Disulfuros/química , Tiorredoxinas/química , Sitio Alostérico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Citotoxicidad Celular Dependiente de Anticuerpos/inmunología , Antígenos/química , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/química , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/farmacología , Linfocitos B/citología , Línea Celular , Membrana Celular/metabolismo , Proliferación Celular , Proteínas del Sistema Complemento , Humanos , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/química , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/farmacología , Inmunoglobulina G/química , Inmunoglobulina G/farmacología , Cinética , Leucocitos Mononucleares/citología , Estrés Oxidativo , Oxígeno/química , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/química , Receptor ErbB-2/química , Trastuzumab/química , Trastuzumab/farmacología
14.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 50(6): 521-530, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32729356

RESUMEN

The use of proteins and protein-containing materials in a variety of industrial and commercial products is increasing, with applications in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals and consumer and personal care products. As a consequence there is a need to ensure potential and environmental risks are understood. One important requirement is an appreciation of the ability of proteins to induce allergic sensitization and allergic disease. However, there is currently no clear guidance for determination of whether or not to accept a new protein in a product based on potential allergenicity. A key requirement for effective risk assessment in this respect is an understanding of sensitizing potency. Here we describe issues and challenges associated with measurement of allergenic potency and explore emerging opportunities and possible ways forward. Effective assessment of the risk of allergy demands not only information about the likely conditions of exposure, but also an understanding of the sensitizing potency of protein allergens. For the purposes of this article sensitizing potency can be viewed as being the ease with which, and the concentration at which, proteins will induce sensitization in a previously non-sensitized subject. The immunological bases of protein allergy are summarized, and the properties that confer on proteins the ability to induce allergic sensitization are considered prior to a detailed exploration of the issues that have to be addressed for evaluation of sensitizing potency. Included among the important considerations are: the impact of route of exposure, identification of relevant dose metrics, and the requirement for reference standards. Finally, new and emerging opportunities to evaluate the sensitizing potency of allergenic proteins are reviewed, including the use of in silico modeling.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Hipersensibilidad , Proteínas , Humanos
15.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 113: 104624, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32126256

RESUMEN

An international expert working group representing 37 organisations (pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) collaborated in a data sharing exercise to evaluate the utility of two species within regulatory general toxicology studies. Anonymised data on 172 drug candidates (92 small molecules, 46 monoclonal antibodies, 15 recombinant proteins, 13 synthetic peptides and 6 antibody-drug conjugates) were submitted by 18 organisations. The use of one or two species across molecule types, the frequency for reduction to a single species within the package of general toxicology studies, and a comparison of target organ toxicities identified in each species in both short and longer-term studies were determined. Reduction to a single species for longer-term toxicity studies, as used for the development of biologicals (ICHS6(R1) guideline) was only applied for 8/133 drug candidates, but might have been possible for more, regardless of drug modality, as similar target organ toxicity profiles were identified in the short-term studies. However, definition and harmonisation around the criteria for similarity of toxicity profiles is needed to enable wider consideration of these principles. Analysis of a more robust dataset would be required to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations for expansion of these principles to small molecules or other modalities where two species toxicity testing is currently recommended.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Toxicidad , Animales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo
16.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(5): 432-435, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32880961

RESUMEN

Although the development of successful vaccines against coronaviruses may be achieved, for some individuals the immune response that they stimulate may prove to be insufficient for effective host defence. The principle that a relatively strong contact allergen will have an enhancing effect on sensitization compared with a less potent contact allergen if they are co-administered, may not, at first, appear relevant to this issue. However, this augmentation effect is thought to be due to the sharing of common or complementary pathways. Here, we briefly consider aspects of the shared and complementary pathways between skin sensitization induced by exposure to a contact allergen and the immune response to viruses, with particular reference to COVID-19. The relationship leads us to explore whether this principle, which we name here as "co-operative immune augmentation" may be extended to include viral vaccination. We consider evidence that even relatively weak contact allergens, used in vaccines for other purposes, can show enhanced sensitization, which is in keeping with a co-operative augmentation principle. Finally, we consider how the potent contact allergen diphenylcyclopropenone could be employed safely as an enhancer of vaccine responses.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Ciclopropanos/uso terapéutico , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Vacunas Virales/uso terapéutico , Alérgenos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2
17.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 144(6): 1584-1594.e2, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31319102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy causes severe and fatal reactions. Current food allergen labeling does not address these risks adequately against the burden of restricting food choice for allergic patients because of limited data on thresholds of reactivity and the influence of everyday factors. OBJECTIVE: We estimated peanut threshold doses for a United Kingdom population with peanut allergy and examined the effect of sleep deprivation and exercise. METHODS: In a crossover study, after blind challenge, participants with peanut allergy underwent 3 open peanut challenges in random order: with exercise after each dose, with sleep deprivation preceding challenge, and with no intervention. Primary outcome was the threshold dose triggering symptoms (in milligrams of protein). Primary analysis estimated the difference between the nonintervention challenge and each intervention in log threshold (as percentage change). Dose distributions were modeled, deriving eliciting doses in the population with peanut allergy. RESULTS: Baseline challenges were performed in 126 participants, 100 were randomized, and 81 (mean age, 25 years) completed at least 1 further challenge. The mean threshold was 214 mg (SD, 330 mg) for nonintervention challenges, and this was reduced by 45% (95% CI, 21% to 61%; P = .001) and 45% (95% CI, 22% to 62%; P = .001) for exercise and sleep deprivation, respectively. Mean estimated eliciting doses for 1% of the population were 1.5 mg (95% CI, 0.8-2.5 mg) during nonintervention challenge (n = 81), 0.5 mg (95% CI, 0.2-0.8 mg) after sleep, and 0.3 mg (95% CI, 0.1-0.6 mg) after exercise. CONCLUSION: Exercise and sleep deprivation each significantly reduce the threshold of reactivity in patients with peanut allergy, putting them at greater risk of a reaction. Adjusting reference doses using these data will improve allergen risk management and labeling to optimize protection of consumers with peanut allergy.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/fisiopatología , Privación de Sueño/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/patología , Privación de Sueño/patología , Reino Unido
18.
Pharm Res ; 36(4): 51, 2019 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30771015

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Anti-drug antibodies can impair the efficacy of therapeutic proteins and, in some circumstances, induce adverse health effects. Immunogenicity can be promoted by aggregation; here we examined the ability of recombinant mouse heat shock protein 70 (rmHSP70) - a common host cell impurity - to modulate the immune responses to aggregates of two therapeutic mAbs in mice. METHODS: Heat and shaking stress methods were used to generate aggregates in the sub-micron size range from two human mAbs, and immunogenicity assessed by intraperitoneal exposure in BALB/c mice. RESULTS: rmHSP70 was shown to bind preferentially to aggregates of both mAbs, but not to the native, monomeric proteins. Aggregates supplemented with 0.1% rmHSP70 induced significantly enhanced IgG2a antibody responses compared with aggregates alone but the effect was not observed for monomeric mAbs. Dendritic cells pulsed with mAb aggregate showed enhanced IFNγ production on co-culture with T cells in the presence of rmHSP70. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a Th1-skewing of the immune response by aggregates and show that murine rmHSP70 selectively modulates the immune response to mAb aggregates, but not monomer. These data suggest that heat shock protein impurities can selectively accumulate by binding to mAb aggregates and thus influence immunogenic responses to therapeutic proteins.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Proteínas HSP70 de Choque Térmico/farmacología , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/metabolismo , Formación de Anticuerpos , Femenino , Proteínas HSP70 de Choque Térmico/inmunología , Proteínas HSP70 de Choque Térmico/metabolismo , Respuesta al Choque Térmico/inmunología , Fenómenos Inmunogenéticos , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Agregado de Proteínas , Unión Proteica , Proteínas Recombinantes/metabolismo , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacología , Estrés Mecánico
19.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 104: 14-20, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30826317

RESUMEN

Skin sensitisation associated with allergic contact dermatitis is an important occupational and environmental disease. The identification of skin sensitisation hazards was traditionally performed using animal tests; originally guinea pig assays and subsequently the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA). More recently there has, for a variety of reasons, been an increased interest in, and requirement for, non-animal assays. There are now available both validated in vitro assays and a variety of approaches based on consideration of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). With the increased availability and use of non-animal alternatives for skin sensitisation testing there is a continuing need to monitor the performance of these approaches using series of chemicals that do not normally form part of validation exercises. Here we report studies conducted with 11 methacrylate esters and methacrylic acid in which results obtained with 3 validated in vitro tests for which there are OECD guidelines (the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay, DPRA; ARE-Nrf2 luciferase test methods, and - with some chemicals - a dendritic cell activation test, the myeloid U937 Skin Sensitisation test [U-SENS] assay) have been compared with QSAR approaches (DEREK and TIMES-SS), and with LLNA and guinea pig maximisation test (GPMT) data. The conclusions drawn from these data are that - with this series of chemicals at least - there is a strong correlation between the results of animal tests and the in vitro assays considered, but not with either DEREK or TIMES-SS.


Asunto(s)
Ésteres/efectos adversos , Metacrilatos/efectos adversos , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Humanos , Pruebas Cutáneas
20.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 104: 151-156, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30904429

RESUMEN

The toxicology of fragrance materials is largely well understood. Although most are benign, a minority have the potential to cause adverse health effects, notably allergic contact dermatitis resulting from skin sensitization. As a consequence, industry guidelines have banned certain materials and strictly limited the use of others. Recently, data have been published that have been interpreted to suggest that inhalation of fragrances is associated with the occurrence of a variety of health effects, ranging from headaches to asthma attacks. In this review, the evidence basis for these assertions is examined critically and the biological basis and mechanistic plausibility for causation by fragranced products of these health effects is explored. This review concludes that respiratory effects, including irritation and allergy appear highly unlikely to occur by this route. While some sensory/psychosomatic effects are possible, this does not explain the very high rates of adverse effects reported in the recently published questionnaire studies, which this review concludes are more likely to be attributed to methodological weaknesses. Ultimately, it is concluded that adverse health effects arising from fragrance inhalation are uncommon and remain to be identified and confirmed by methodologically rigorous epidemiological investigations supported by a convincing biological and mechanistic basis.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Respiratorias/inducido químicamente , Administración por Inhalación , Asma/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Perfumes/administración & dosificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA