RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The glutamate (Glu) and gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) hypotheses of schizophrenia were proposed in the 1980s. However, current findings on those metabolite levels in schizophrenia have been inconsistent, and the relationship between their abnormalities and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia remains unclear. To summarize the nature of the alterations of glutamatergic and GABAergic systems in schizophrenia, we conducted meta-analyses of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) studies examining these metabolite levels. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and PubMed. Original studies that compared four metabolite levels (Glu, glutamine [Gln], Glx [Glu+Gln], and GABA), as measured by 1H-MRS, between individuals at high risk for psychosis, patients with first-episode psychosis, or patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls (HC) were included. A random-effects model was used to calculate the effect sizes for group differences in these metabolite levels of 18 regions of interest between the whole group or schizophrenia group and HC. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed based on the status of antipsychotic treatment, illness stage, treatment resistance, and magnetic field strength. RESULTS: One-hundred-thirty-four studies met the eligibility criteria, totaling 7993 participants with SZ-spectrum disorders and 8744 HC. 14 out of 18 ROIs had enough numbers of studies to examine the group difference in the metabolite levels. In the whole group, Glx levels in the basal ganglia (g = 0.32; 95% CIs: 0.18-0.45) were elevated. Subgroup analyses showed elevated Glx levels in the hippocampus (g = 0.47; 95% CIs: 0.21-0.73) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (g = 0.25; 95% CIs: 0.05-0.44) in unmedicated patients than HC. GABA levels in the MCC were decreased in the first-episode psychosis group compared with HC (g = -0.40; 95% CIs: -0.62 to -0.17). Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) group had elevated Glx and Glu levels in the MCC (Glx: g = 0.7; 95% CIs: 0.38-1.01; Glu: g = 0.63; 95% CIs: 0.31-0.94) while MCC Glu levels were decreased in the patient group except TRS (g = -0.17; 95% CIs: -0.33 to -0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increased glutamatergic metabolite levels and reduced GABA levels indicate that the disruption of excitatory/inhibitory balance may be related to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.
Asunto(s)
Esquizofrenia , Ácido Glutámico/metabolismo , Glutamina/metabolismo , Humanos , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Espectroscopía de Protones por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Esquizofrenia/metabolismo , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/metabolismoRESUMEN
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mental illness with high socio-economic burden, but its pathophysiology has not been fully elucidated. Recently, the cortical excitatory and inhibitory imbalance hypothesis and neuroplasticity hypothesis have been proposed for MDD. Although several studies have examined the neurophysiological profiles in MDD using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a meta-analysis of TMS neurophysiology has not been performed. The objective of this study was to compare TMS-electromyogram (TMS-EMG) findings between patients with MDD and healthy controls (HCs). To this end, we examined whether patients with MDD have lower short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) which reflects gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor-mediated activity, lower cortical silent period (CSP) which represents GABAB receptor-mediated activity, higher intracortical facilitation (ICF) which reflects glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated activity, and the lower result of paired associative stimulation (PAS) paradigm which shows the level of neuroplasticity in comparison with HC. Further, we explored the effect of clinical and demographic factors that may influence TMS neurophysiological indices. We first searched and identified research articles that conducted single- or paired-pulse TMS-EMG on patients with MDD and HC. Subsequently, we extracted the data from the included studies and meta-analyzed the data with the comprehensive meta-analysis software. Patients with MDD were associated with lower SICI, lower CSP, potentially higher ICF, and lower PAS compared with HC. Our results confirmed the proposed hypotheses, suggesting the usefulness of TMS neurophysiology as potential diagnostic markers of MDD.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/fisiopatología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Humanos , NeurofisiologíaRESUMEN
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is an established treatment for medication-resistant depression. Several targeting methods for the left DLPFC have been proposed including identification with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) neuronavigation, stimulus coordinates based on structural MRI, or electroencephalography (EEG) F3 site by Beam F3 method. To date, neuroanatomical and neurofunctional differences among those approaches have not been investigated on healthy subjects, which are structurally and functionally unaffected by psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to compare the mean location, its dispersion, and its functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC), which is known to be associated with the therapeutic outcome in depression, of various approaches to target the DLPFC in healthy subjects. Fifty-seven healthy subjects underwent MRI scans to identify the stimulation site based on their resting-state functional connectivity and were measured their head size for targeting with Beam F3 method. In addition, we included two fixed stimulus coordinates over the DLPFC in the analysis, as recommended in previous studies. From the results, the rs-fMRI method had, as expected, more dispersed target sites across subjects and the greatest anticorrelation with the SGC, reflecting the known fact that personalized neuronavigation yields the greatest antidepressant effect. In contrast, the targets located by the other methods were relatively close together with less dispersion, and did not differ in anticorrelation with the SGC, implying their limitation of the therapeutic efficacy and possible interchangeability of them.