[Translation of the 2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis and linguistic validation in German-speaking countries with healthcare professionals]. / Übersetzung der 2018 EULAR Empfehlungen zu körperlicher Aktivität von Menschen mit entzündlich-rheumatischen und degenerativen Erkrankungen ins Deutsche und sprachliche Validierung im deutschsprachigen Raum mit medizinischen Fachpersonen.

BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity is beneficial for people with rheumatic diseases and one of the cornerstones in its management. Based on the international recommendations of the World Health Organization for the general population, the "2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis" provide evidence-based recommendations on the prescription, performance, and implementation of physical activity exercises in this population for the first time. AIM: Translation of the 2018 EULAR recommendations into German and linguistic validation in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. METHODS: A professional translation of the EULAR recommendations into the German language was performed and revised by German-speaking experts from all three countries. The translation was validated by healthcare professionals consisting of rheumatologists, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses, and medical assistants in a field test. In each of the three countries, eight structured interviews were conducted on comprehensibility, wording, completeness, and feasibility. The experts then discussed changes until consensus was reached and indicated the level of agreement with the final translation. RESULTS: The translation of the EULAR recommendations was substantially revised. Based on the results of the cognitive test, formulations were adapted in order to increase comprehensibility. The level of agreement between 10 (SD 0.0) and 8.9 (SD 1.5) was very high. DISCUSSION: The final German version of the EULAR recommendations is comprehensible and accepted across all three German-speaking countries. It can help to improve the structure and clarity of the handling of physical activity and promote physical activity for healthcare providers and patients.

Lower physical activity and altered body composition in patients with haemophilia compared with healthy controls.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with haemophilia (PWH) have traditionally been discouraged from engaging in sports and strenuous exercise activities, due to the perceived risk of bleeding complications. This puts PWH at an increased risk to become overweight or obese. However, the benefits of many forms of physical activity seem to outweigh their risks, although activities with significant trauma risk should be avoided. AIM: To evaluate physical activity patterns and body composition of adult PWH. METHODS: This cross-sectional study compared data on physical activity from tri-axial accelerometers and body composition of 18 male adult PWH (aged 18-49 years) on prophylactic replacement therapy and without acute joint bleedings to those of 24 healthy age-matched controls, by means of Mann-Whitney-U-Tests. RESULTS: Median moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was significantly (p = .000) lower in PWH (34.6 min/day) than in healthy controls (65.2 min/day). Body mass index was almost similar between PWH and controls (25.1 vs 24.2 kg/m2 , p = .431). Yet, we found a consistent trend towards less desirable outcomes across body composition parameters, such as median body fat rate (23.5 vs 17.0%, p = .055) in PWH, compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Although physical activity has been recommended for PWH since the mid-1970s, the physical activity engagement of adult PWH was still severely limited, possibly due to over-cautiousness but presumably also in consequence of chronic pain. Poor physical activity engagement may well be expected to contribute to the increased body fat and decreased leg muscle mass. Consequently, policies should focus on improving the knowledge and motivation of PWH to engage in health-enhancing physical activity.

3D gait analysis, haemophilia joint health score, leg muscle laterality and biomarkers of joint damage: A cross-sectional comparative assessment of haemophilic arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: 3D gait analysis has been proposed as a reproducible and valid method to assess abnormal gait patterns and to monitor disease progression in patients with haemophilia (PWH). AIM: This study aimed at comparing Gait Deviation Index (GDI) between adult PWH and healthy controls, and at assessing the agreement between outcome measures of haemophilic arthropathy. METHODS: Male PWH aged 18-49 years (prespecified subgroups: 18-25 vs 26-49 years) on prophylactic replacement therapy, and male healthy age-matched controls passed through a cross-sectional assessment panel. Besides the 3D gait analysis derived GDI, secondary outcomes included kinematic, kinetic and spatio-temporal gait parameters, the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), electric impedance derived leg muscle laterality and inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS: Patients with haemophilia (n = 18) walked slower, in shorter steps and accordingly with less functional range of motion in the hips and ankles, as compared to healthy controls (n = 24). Overall, PWH did not differ significantly in GDI and specific gait parameters. PWH had a higher mean HJHS (18.8 vs 2.6, P = .000) and leg muscle laterality (4.3% vs 1.5%, P = .004). A subgroup analysis revealed progressed gait pathology in PWH aged 26-49 years (not statistically significant). Leg muscle laterality was strongly correlated with HJHS (r = .76, P = .000), whereas GDI just moderately (r = -.39, P = .110). PWH had higher levels of the inflammatory markers CRP and IL-6. CONCLUSION: Progressed gait pathology was found in PWH, mainly those aged 26-49 years. Leg muscle laterality correlated strongly with HJHS and was identified as a promising tool for detecting progression and physiological consequences of haemophilic joint arthropathy.

Functional consultation and exercises improve grip strength in osteoarthritis of the hand - a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for non-pharmacological interventions in hand osteoarthritis is promising but still scarce. Combined interventions are most likely to best cover the clinical needs of patients with hand osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a combined, interdisciplinary intervention feasible in both primary and specialist care compared to routine care plus placebo in patients with hand OA. METHODS: This was a randomised, controlled 2-month trial with a blinded assessor. In the combined-intervention group, rheumatology-trained health professionals from different disciplines delivered a one-session individual intervention with detailed information on functioning, activities of daily living, physical activity, nutrition, assistive devices, instructions on pain management and exercises. Telephone follow up was performed after 4 weeks. The primary outcome was grip strength after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were self-reported pain, satisfaction with treatment, health status, two of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function subtests and the total score of the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN). Statistical significance was calculated by Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test depending on data distribution. Binominal logistic regression models were fitted, with the primary outcome being the dependent and the group allocation being the independent variable. RESULTS: There were 151 participating patients (74 in the combined-intervention and 77 in the routine-care-plus-placebo group) with 2-month follow-up attendance of 84% (n = 128). Grip strength significantly increased in the combined-intervention group and decreased in the routine-care group (dominant hand, mean 0.03 bar (SD 0.11) versus - 0.03 (SD 0.13), p value = 0.001, baseline corrected values) after 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: The combined one-session individual intervention significantly improved grip strength and self-reported satisfaction with treatment in patients with hand OA. It can be delivered by different rheumatology-trained health professionals and is thus also feasible in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN62513257 . Registered on 17 May 2012.