Intravenous doripenem at 500 milligrams versus levofloxacin at 250 milligrams, with an option to switch to oral therapy, for treatment of complicated lower urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis.

The prospective, multicenter, double-blind study presented in this report evaluated whether or not intravenous (IV) administration of doripenem, a carbapenem with bactericidal activity against gram-negative and gram-positive uropathogens, is inferior to IV administration of levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). Patients (n = 753) with complicated lower UTI or pyelonephritis were randomly assigned to receive IV doripenem at 500 mg every 8 h (q8h) or IV levofloxacin at 250 mg q24h. Patients in both treatment arms were eligible to switch to oral levofloxacin after 3 days of IV therapy to complete a 10-day treatment course if they demonstrated significant clinical and microbiological improvements. The microbiological cure rate (primary end point) was determined at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit occurring 5 to 11 days after the last dose of antibiotic. For the microbiologically evaluable patients (n = 545), the microbiological cure rates were 82.1% and 83.4% for doripenem and levofloxacin, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -8.0 to 5.5%); in the microbiological modified intent-to-treat cohort (n = 648), the cure rates were 79.2% and 78.2%, respectively. Clinical cure rates at the TOC visit were 95.1% in the doripenem arm and 90.2% in the levofloxacin arm (95% CI around the difference in cure rates [doripenem cure rate minus levofloxacin cure rate], 0.2% to 9.6%). Both treatment regimens were generally well tolerated. Doripenem was found not to be inferior to levofloxacin in terms of therapeutics and is now approved for use in the United States and Europe for the treatment of adults with cUTI, including pyelonephritis. As fluoroquinolone resistance increases, doripenem may become a more important option for successful treatment of cUTIs, including treatment of pyelonephritis.

Rofecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rofecoxib is effective for treating primary dysmenorrhea and whether cyclooxygenase-2 is involved in the pathophysiology of primary dysmenorrhea. METHODS: A double-masked, randomized, placebo and active-comparator-controlled clinical trial including 127 subjects with histories of primary dysmenorrhea was conducted in an outpatient clinical research center. Subjects were randomly assigned to placebo, rofecoxib 25 or 50 mg followed by 25 mg every 24 hours as needed, or naproxen sodium 550 mg every 12 hours as needed for up to 3 days. Subjects took all four treatments in a balanced, complete-block, crossover design. Measurements included self-administered questionnaires of analgesic efficacy, spontaneous reports of adverse experiences, physical examinations, and laboratory safety tests. RESULTS: Rofecoxib 25 and 50 mg provided analgesic efficacy greater than placebo (P < or = .006) for the primary endpoint of total pain relief over the first 8 hours. For other efficacy endpoints (sum of the pain intensity difference over the first 8 hours, subject's global evaluation, peak pain relief, peak pain intensity difference, and time to remedication) both doses of rofecoxib were better than placebo (P < or = .006) and were not distinguishable from naproxen sodium for all efficacy endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Rofecoxib effectively treated primary dysmenorrhea, and cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostanoids play a role in the pathophysiology of primary dysmenorrhea.

Comparison of rofecoxib and celecoxib, two cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, in postoperative dental pain: a randomized, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled clinical trial.

Pain is a common complaint, often occurring in conjunction with inflammation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used analgesic agents in ambulatory patients. In recent studies, the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor rofecoxib demonstrated analgesic effects similar to those of NSAIDs in the treatment of acute pain and primary dysmenorrhea. The present randomized, single-dose, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the analgesic efficacy of the COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib 50 mg and celecoxib 200 mg with that of ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo in patients with postoperative dental pain. Two hundred and seventy-two patients experiencing pain after the removal of > or =2 third molars were randomized according to pain severity (moderate vs severe) to receive a single dose of placebo (n = 45), rofecoxib 50 mg (n = 90), celecoxib 200 mg (n = 91), or ibuprofen 400 mg (n = 46). Using a patient diary, patients recorded pain intensity, pain relief, and global evaluations throughout the 24-hour period after dosing. The overall analgesic effect, onset of action, peak effect, and duration of effect were evaluated, with the primary end point being total pain relief over 8 hours (TOPAR8). The safety profile was assessed on the basis of physical findings, laboratory results, and spontaneous reports of adverse experiences. The results showed that compared with celecoxib, rofecoxib had superior analgesic effects on all measures of analgesic efficacy, including overall analgesic effect (TOPAR8, 18.3 vs. 12.5; P<0.001), time to onset of effect (30 vs. 60 minutes; P = 0.003), peak pain relief (score, 2.8 vs 2.3; P<0.05), and duration of effect (>24 vs. 5.1 hours; P<0.001). In addition, rofecoxib's analgesic efficacy was similar to that of ibuprofen (TOPAR8, 18.3 vs. 17.0; P = 0.460), but the duration was longer (P<0.05); with ibuprofen, the time to on set was 24 minutes, peak pain relief score was 2.9, and duration of analgesic effect was 8.9 hours. The safety profile was similar across all treatment groups. Thus rofecoxib provided analgesic efficacy superior to that of celecoxib and comparable to that of ibuprofen in the treatment of patients with acute postoperative dental pain.

The optimal analgesic dose of rofecoxib: Overview of six randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Rofecoxib, which specifically inhibits cyclooxygenase-2, is indicated for relief of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis and for the management of acute pain in adults. The authors present an overview of six placebo-controlled trials designed to evaluate the single-dose analgesic efficacy of a range of doses of rofecoxib in the treatment of postoperative dental pain. METHODS: The six studies included doses of rofecoxib ranging from 7.5 to 500 milligrams. Maximal analgesic doses of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or NSAID, either naproxen sodium (550 mg) or ibuprofen (400 mg), were used as active comparators in each study. Analgesic efficacy was assessed with the use of validated self-administered questionnaires. The primary endpoint in each study was the total pain relief over the eight-hour postdose period. Additional endpoints were used to characterize the onset of analgesia and peak analgesic effect. RESULTS: The results of these studies demonstrated that the efficacy of rofecoxib was dose-related, with 50 mg being consistently more effective than placebo for all measures of analgesic efficacy. Moreover, 50 mg was the lowest dose that reproducibly demonstrated an analgesic effect comparable to the effect of maximum single analgesic doses of NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: The results of these studies support the recommended dose of 50 mg of rofecoxib once daily for the management of pain. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Rofecoxib, at a dose of 50 mg, is effective in the management of postoperative dental pain.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous doripenem for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis.

Doripenem was evaluated in adults with complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis in two phase 3 studies. DORI-05, a randomized, double-blind study compared doripenem 500 mg every 8 hours with levofloxacin 250 mg every 24 hours. DORI-06 was a single-arm study designed to confirm the doripenem response in DORI-05. 799 received doripenem, 372 levofloxacin. Microbiological eradication rates in microbiologically evaluable populations were 82.8% for doripenem, 83.4% for levofloxacin (Δ: -0.6%; 95% confidence interval: -6.4, 5.2), and 80.9% and 78.2%, respectively (Δ: 2.7%; 95% confidence interval: -3.0, 8.3) in the co-primary microbiologically modified intent-to-treat populations. Clinical cure rates in the clinically evaluable populations were 94.1% for doripenem, 90.2% for levofloxacin (Δ: 3.9%; 95% confidence interval: -0.5, 8.2). In subjects infected with levofloxacin- resistant Escherichia coli, outcomes were statistically significantly greater with doripenem. Genotyping data indicate persistent E. coli infections were often due to infection with new strains. Doripenem was generally found to be safe and well tolerated.ClinicalTrials.gov registration numbers: DORI-05 = NCT00229021, DORI-06 = NCT00210990.

Lack of efficacy of finasteride in postmenopausal women with androgenetic alopecia.

BACKGROUND: Finasteride, an inhibitor of type 2 5alpha-reductase, decreases serum and scalp dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by inhibiting conversion of testosterone to DHT and has been shown to be effective in men with androgenetic alopecia (AGA). The effects of finasteride in women with AGA have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of finasteride in postmenopausal women with AGA. METHODS: In this 1-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial, 137 postmenopausal women (41-60 years of age) with AGA received finasteride 1 mg/day or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated by scalp hair counts, patient and investigator assessments, assessment of global photographs by a blinded expert panel, and histologic analysis of scalp biopsy specimens. RESULTS: After 1 year of therapy, there was no significant difference in the change in hair count between the finasteride and placebo groups. Both treatment groups had significant decreases in hair count in the frontal/parietal (anterior/mid) scalp during the 1-year study period. Similarly, patient, investigator, and photographic assessments as well as scalp biopsy analysis did not demonstrate any improvement in slowing hair thinning, increasing hair growth, or improving the appearance of the hair in finasteride-treated subjects compared with the placebo group. Finasteride was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women with AGA, finasteride 1 mg/day taken for 12 months did not not increase hair growth or slow the progression of hair thinning.