RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate 24 hours blood pressure (BP) and heart rate changes as well as 24-hour circadian BP rhythm of cardiac transplant recipients. METHODS: Twenty-five transplant recipients and twenty-five healthy volunteers underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Parameters of 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (24-h/daytime/nightime systolic, diastolic BP, pulse pressure, and heart rate) were determined in all patients. RESULTS: Clinic systolic/diastolic BP, mean 24-h systolic/diastolic BP, mean daytime systolic/diastolic BP, mean nighttime systolic/diastolic BP, and mean 24-h/daytime/nighttime heart rate were significantly higher in transplant recipients than in control group subjects. Standard deviations of 24-h/daytime/nighttime heart rates were significantly lower in transplant recipients. Dippers were 48% of the control and only 12% of the transplantation group. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac transplant recipients had increased ambulatory BP. They also had increased 24-h/daytime/nighttime heart rate and decreased heart rate variability. Also, diminished nocturnal decrease of BP was found in transplant recipients.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial/métodos , Presión Sanguínea , Ritmo Circadiano , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón/fisiología , Diástole , Humanos , Monitoreo Ambulatorio/métodos , Valores de Referencia , SístoleRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data on the reproducibility of serial measurements of ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients are lacking. The purpose of this study was to examine (1) the reproducibility of four consecutive ambulatory blood pressure measurements, and (2) the reproducibility of nocturnal falls in blood pressure in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Twenty patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension underwent four separate ambulatory blood pressure monitorings, on the same day of the week, at 30-day intervals. Antihypertensive therapy was discontinued for 2 weeks before each recording. Comparing the mean values of blood pressure over 24h, as well as diurnal, nocturnal and hourly periods, among the four recordings determined the reproducibility of blood pressure measurements. A day/night difference in mean systolic and in mean diastolic blood pressure defined the nocturnal fall in blood pressure. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in either hourly, 24-h, diurnal or nocturnal systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, or in the nocturnal fall in systolic and diastolic blood pressure among the four recordings. CONCLUSIONS: Hourly systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and nocturnal fall in blood pressure were reproducible in four ambulatory blood pressure monitorings recorded over 4 months. These findings suggest that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a reliable tool to monitor blood pressure changes.