Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 866, 2023 Sep 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37710224

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxicity is among the most important adverse effects of childhood cancer treatment. Anthracyclines, mitoxantrone and radiotherapy involving the heart are its main causes. Subclinical cardiac dysfunction may over time progress to clinical heart failure. The majority of previous studies have focused on late-onset cardiotoxicity. In this systematic review, we discuss the prevalence and risk factors for acute and early-onset cardiotoxicity in children and adolescents with cancer treated with anthracyclines, mitoxantrone or radiotherapy involving the heart. METHODS: A literature search was performed within PubMed and reference lists of relevant studies. Studies were eligible if they reported on cardiotoxicity measured by clinical, echocardiographic and biochemical parameters routinely used in clinical practice during or within one year after the start of cancer treatment in ≥ 25 children and adolescents with cancer. Information about study population, treatment, outcomes of diagnostic tests used for cardiotoxicity assessment and risk factors was extracted and risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Our PubMed search yielded 3649 unique publications, 44 of which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One additional study was identified by scanning the reference lists of relevant studies. In these 45 studies, acute and early-onset cardiotoxicity was studied in 7797 children and adolescents. Definitions of acute and early-onset cardiotoxicity prove to be highly heterogeneous. Prevalence rates varied for different cardiotoxicity definitions: systolic dysfunction (0.0-56.4%), diastolic dysfunction (30.0-100%), combinations of echocardiography and/or clinical parameters (0.0-38.1%), clinical symptoms (0.0-25.5%) and biomarker levels (0.0-37.5%). Shortening fraction and ejection fraction significantly decreased during treatment. Cumulative anthracycline dose proves to be an important risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Various definitions have been used to describe acute and early-onset cardiotoxicity due to childhood cancer treatment, complicating the establishment of its exact prevalence. Our findings underscore the importance of uniform international guidelines for the monitoring of cardiac function during and shortly after childhood cancer treatment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Policétidos , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , Cardiotoxicidad/epidemiología , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Mitoxantrona , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Corazón , Antraciclinas/efectos adversos
2.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 42(2): e94-e97, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31895215

RESUMEN

6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) is the mainstay in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) maintenance treatment. Variants in genes coding for thiopurine S-methyl transferase (TPMT) and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) are known to influence 6-MP metabolism. We determined TPMT and ITPA genotype and enzyme activity and the mean 6-MP doses during maintenance treatment in 40 children treated for ALL according to the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG)-ALL11 protocol in the Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Patients with genetic variants in TPMT (N=3) had significantly lower TPMT enzyme activity (mean 0.46 vs. 0.72 µmol/mmol hemoglobin/h, P=0.005). Although the difference was not statistically significant, they were treated with lower mean 6-MP doses (28.1 mg/m [SD 25.5 mg/m] vs. 41.3 mg/m [SD 17.2 mg/m], P=0.375). In patients with genetic ITPA variants (N=21), ITPA enzyme activity was significantly lowered (mean 3.67 vs. 6.84 mmol/mmol hemoglobin/h, P<0.0005). The mean 6-MP doses did not differ between patients with and without variants in ITPA (40.0 mg/m [SD 20.3 mg/m] vs. 40.6 mg/m [SD 14.9 mg/m], P=0.663). The TPMT genotype, but not the ITPA genotype, should be considered as part of standard evaluation before starting ALL maintenance treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Mercaptopurina/administración & dosificación , Metiltransferasas/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Medicina de Precisión , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirofosfatasas/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Niño , Etnicidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/genética , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Front Pharmacol ; 11: 1184, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32848787

RESUMEN

In the past decades, new cancer treatments have been introduced in pediatric oncology leading to improvement in clinical outcomes and survival rates. However, due to inter-individual differences, some children experience severe chemotherapy-induced toxicities or a poor clinical outcome. An explanation for the diversity in response to chemotherapy is genetic variation, leading to differences in expression and activity of metabolizing and transport enzymes as well as drug targets. Pharmacogenetic testing has emerged as a promising tool to predict and limit acute and long-term adverse effects in patients. However, in pediatric oncology, limited number of patients and a considerable diversity in study results complicate the interpretation of test results and its clinical relevance. With this review, we provide an overview of new developments over the past four years regarding relevant polymorphisms related to toxicity in pediatric oncology. The following chemotherapeutics and associated toxicities are discussed: alkylating agents, anthracyclines, asparaginase, methotrexate, platinum compounds, steroids, thiopurines, topoisomerase inhibitors, and vinca alkaloids. Our review identifies several questions regarding the role of genetic variants in chemotherapy-induced toxicities. Ambiguities in the literature stem from small population sizes, differences in (statistical) interpretation and variations in sequencing technologies as well as different clinical outcome definitions. Standardization of clinical outcome data and toxicity definitions within electronic health records combined with the increased availability of genomic sequence techniques in clinical practice will help to validate these models in upcoming years.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA