Interaction of Orexin A and Vasopressin in the Brain Plays a Role in Blood Pressure Regulation in WKY and SHR Rats.

BACKGROUND Orexin A (OXA) and vasopressin (AVP) exert a central hypertensive effect due to an increase in sympathetic nerve activity. To date, little is known about the interaction of these 2 neuropeptides in the central regulation of blood pressure. The present study compared the consequences of infusion into the left cerebral ventricle (ICV) of OXA on mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) in normotensive (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats, and explored whether the central pressor action of OXA in these 2 strains depends on activation of brain AVP V1a receptors (V1aR). MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten groups of experiments were performed on 12-week-old WKY and SHR rats implanted with ICV cannulas for infusion of OXA (3 nmol) and V1aR antagonist (V1aRANT, 500 ng), administered separately and together. Levels of V1aR and OXR in the medulla oblongata of WKY and SHR rats were compared in separate series. RESULTS We found that: 1) OXA significantly increased MABP only in WKY rats, 2) V1aRANT prevented an increase in MABP induced by OXA in WKY rats and decreased MABP in SHR rats, 3) OXA abolished the hypotensive action of V1aRANT in SHR rats, and 4) SHR rats had significantly higher levels of OX1R and V1aR proteins and OX1R mRNA in the brain medulla. CONCLUSIONS The present study shows that OXA and AVP can interact in the brain to affect blood pressure regulation, and that this interaction differs in normotension and hypertension.

Central oxytocin modulation of acute stress-induced cardiovascular responses after myocardial infarction in the rat.

The present study was aimed at determining the role of centrally released oxytocin in regulation of blood pressure and heart rate (HR) under resting conditions and during an acute air-jet stress in rats with a myocardial infarction and controls infarcted. Four weeks after ligation of a coronary artery or sham surgery, conscious Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to one of the following intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusions: (1) 0.9% NaCl (control), (2) oxytocin, (3) oxytocin receptor antagonist {desGly-NH(2)-d(CH(2))(5)[D-Tyr(2)Thr(4)]OVT}(OXYANT). Resting arterial blood pressure and HR were not affected by any of the ICV infusions either in the infarcted or sham-operated rats. In the control experiments, the pressor and tachycardic responses to the air jet of infarcted rats were significantly greater than in the sham-operated rats. OXYANT significantly enhanced the cardiovascular responses to stress only in the sham-operated rats whereas oxytocin significantly attenuated both responses in the infarcted but not in the sham-operated rats. The results suggest that centrally released endogenous oxytocin significantly reduces the cardiovascular responses to the acute stressor in control rats. This buffering function of the brain-oxytocin system is not efficient during the post-myocardial infarction state, however it may be restored by central administration of exogenous oxytocin.

Differential sensitisation to central cardiovascular effects of angiotensin II in rats with a myocardial infarct: relevance to stress and interaction with vasopressin.

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate if rats with myocardial infarction manifest altered responsiveness to central cardiovascular effects of low doses of angiotensin II (ANG II), and if ANG II and vasopressin (VP) cooperate in the central regulation of cardiovascular functions at rest and during stress. Conscious Sprague-Dawley rats with myocardial infarction induced by left coronary artery ligation, or sham-ligated (SL) controls were infused intracerebroventricularly with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), ANG II, ANG II + VP or ANG II + V1a receptor antagonist (V1ANT) 4 weeks after cardiac surgery. In the infarcted but not in the SL rats, the resting mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was significantly elevated by infusions of ANG II and ANG II + VP, while infusion of ANG II + V1ANT was not effective. During administration of aCSF, the pressor, and tachycardic responses to an air-jet stressor were significantly greater in the infarcted than in the SL rats. In the SL rats, the pressor responses to the stressor were significantly greater during infusions of ANG II, ANG II + VP and ANG II + V1ANT than during infusion of aCSF. The tachycardic response in the SL rats was enhanced only by the combined infusion of ANG II + VP. In the infarcted rats, the pressor and the tachycardic responses to the stressor were similar in all groups. It is concluded that: (1) under resting conditions the infarcted rats manifest sensitisation to the central pressor effect of ANG II and that this effect depends on concomitant stimulation of V1a VP receptors, (2) central ANG II may enhance the pressor response to an alarming stressor in the SL rats through an action which does not depend on the concomitant stimulation of V1a receptors, (3) the cooperative action of ANG II and VP is required for intensification of the tachycardic response to the alarming stressor in the SL rats and (4) exaggeration of the cardiovascular responses to the alarming stressor in the infarcted rats cannot be further augmented by an additional stimulation of central ANG II receptors or combined stimulation of ANG II and VP receptors.