Molecular Response Assessment with Immune Adaptive PERCIST in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Nivolumab: Is It Better Than iRECIST?

Aims We compared the immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (iRECIST) with immune adaptive positron emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors (imPERCIST) in lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. Materials and Methods Twenty lung cancer patients underwent fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) scan at baseline (PET-0), after four cycles (PET-1) and six to eight cycles (PET-2) of nivolumab were included. Kappa coefficient ( k ) was derived to see the level of agreement in two response criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) curves were computed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log Rank test. Univariate and multivariate regression for the percentage change in the sum of diameters (SoD), standard uptake value maximum (SUVmax), sum of metabolic tumor volume (SoMTV), and sum of total lesion glycolysis (SoTLG) was computed. A p -value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Kappa coefficient showed a substantial level of agreement (k 0.769) in two response criteria. Mean PFS in partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease (PD) patients in iRECIST and imPERCIST was 27.3, 17.7, 4.2, and 23.3, 18.8, 3.8 months, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log rank test showed a significant difference in PFS on intracomparison within both criteria; however, it was not significant on intercomparison. On univariate analysis, the percentage change in SoD, SoMTV, SoTLG was significant. However, on multivariate analysis, only percentage change in SoD was a significant predictor. Conclusions We concluded that imPERCIST was equally effective as currently recommended criteria iRECIST for response evaluation of nivolumab in lung cancer patients.

Reliability and Role of Mutation-specific H3F3A (Histone 3-3) G34W Immunohistochemistry to Differentiate Giant Cell Tumor of Bone From its Clinicoradiologic and Histologic Mimics: An Institutional Study.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a benign neoplasm, which can sometimes be a diagnostic challenge, especially in small biopsies, due to its histologic benign and malignant mimics. We evaluated the role of H3.3 G34W immunohistochemistry (IHC) antibody in diagnosing GCTB and its role in differentiating it from its close histologic mimics. A total of 120 cases (80 cases of GCTB and 40 cases of histologic mimics) were retrieved and subjected to IHC. Of 80 cases of GCTB, 72 cases showed a positive nuclear immunoexpression, while all 40 cases of histologic mimics of GCTB showed a negative staining for H3.3 G34W IHC. Sensitivity and specificity of this mutation-specific antibody for diagnosis of GCTB was 90% and 100%, respectively, while, the positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 100% and 83.3%, respectively. A positive expression of H3.3 G34W was seen in all 5 cases of GCTB, postdenosumab therapy, as well as, in all 3 cases of malignant giant cell tumor. The presented study showed that H3.3 G34W mutation-specific IHC is a reliable and specific marker for GCTB and can help distinguish it from the histologic mimics due to distinct therapeutic implications.

Early oral cavity cancer: The prognostic factors and impact of adjuvant radiation on survival.

BACKGROUND: Early oral cavity cancer has good prognosis but recurrence in them is still not uncommon. There is no general consensus on the prognostic factors and adjuvant therapy that would have a significant impact on survival. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of early oral cavity cancer patients during the time period 2009-2017. The data regarding demographics, histopathological features, and recurrence patterns were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Depth of invasion (DOI) was the most important prognostic factor among all the factors analyzed. Further analysis showed that addition of adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with DOI >5 mm did not show survival benefits (P = .73). Another subset analysis of patients with DOI >10 mm also did not show any survival advantage with adjuvant therapy P = .24. CONCLUSION: There is no benefit of adding adjuvant RT in patients with DOI > 5 mm or in patients who were upstaged to T3 based only on DOI.