RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Near-infrared autofluorescence imaging is an adjunct to parathyroid identification. As it does not show perfusion, it is important to study its impact during thyroidectomy by measuring quantifiable data on parathyroid detection rather than function. The aim of this study was to compare incidental parathyroidectomy rates in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy with or without near-infrared autofluorescence. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients who underwent total thyroidectomy between 2014 and 2022 at one center. Clinical parameters, including rates of incidental parathyroid tissue on pathology reports, were compared between near-infrared autofluorescence and non-near-infrared autofluorescence groups. Near-infrared autofluorescence was used to guide dissection (identification) and/or to confirm tissue as parathyroid (confirmation). Statistical analysis was done with Wilcoxon rank sum test and χ2 analysis. RESULTS: There were 300 patients in the near-infrared autofluorescence and 750 patients in the non-near-infrared autofluorescence group. The rate of incidental parathyroid tissue detection on final pathology was 13.3% (n = 40) in the near-infrared autofluorescence and 23.2% (n = 174) in the non-near-infrared autofluorescence group (P < .001). The rate of incidental parathyroid tissue detected on pathology with near-infrared autofluorescence decreased when used for identification and confirmation of parathyroid tissue (30.0% to 13.4%, P < .001), but not when used for confirmation only (19.6% to 18.5%, P = .89). Impact of near-infra red autofluorescence in decreasing the rate of incidental parathyroid tissue was more profound for early (38.5% to 17.1%) versus mid-late career surgeons (20% to 13%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the use of near-infrared autofluorescence may help decrease the rate of incidental parathyroid tissue detected on final pathology if used for both identification and confirmation of parathyroid glands during thyroidectomy.