Drug-resistant tuberculosis care and treatment outcomes over the last 15 years in Ethiopia: Results from a mixed-method review of trends.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Drug resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) remains a global challenge with about a third of the cases are not detected. With the recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment follow-up of DR-TB, there have been improvements with treatment success rates. However, there is limited evidence on the successful models of care that have consistently registered good outcomes. Our aim was to assess Ethiopia's experience in scaling up an ambulatory, decentralized model of care while managing multiple regimen transition processes and external shocks. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, mixed-method study. For the quantitative data, we reviewed routine surveillance data for the period 2009-2022 and collected additional data from publicly available reports. We then analyzed the data descriptively. Qualitative data were collected from program reports, quarterly presentations, minutes of technical working group meetings, and clinical review committee reports and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: The number of DR-TB treatment initiating centers increased from 1 to 67, and enrollment increased from 88 in 2010 to 741 in 2019, but declined to 518 in 2022. A treatment success rate (TSR) of over 70% was sustained. The decentralized and ambulatory service delivery remained the core service delivery model. The country successfully navigated multiple regimen transitions, including the recently introduced six-month short oral regimen. Several challenges remain, including the lack of strong and sustainable specimen transportation system, lack of established systems for timely tracing and linking of missed DR-TB cases, and data quality issues. CONCLUSIONS: Ethiopia scaled up a decentralized ambulatory model of care, kept up to date with recent developments in treatment regimens, and maintained a high TSR, despite the influence of multiple external challenges. The recent decline in case notification requires a deeper look into the underlying reasons. The feasibility of fully integrating DR-TB treatment and follow up at community level should be explored further.

Setting up pharmacovigilance based on available endTB Project data for bedaquiline.

SETTING: Active pharmacovigilance (PV) is recommended for TB programmes, notably for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) patients treated with new drugs. Launched with the support of UNITAID in April 2015, endTB (Expand New Drug markets for TB) facilitated treatment with bedaquiline (BDQ) and/or delamanid of >2600 patients in 17 countries, and contributed to the creation of a central PV unit (PVU).OBJECTIVE: To explain the endTB PVU process by describing the serious adverse events (SAEs) experienced by patients who received BDQ-containing regimens.DESIGN: The overall PV strategy was in line with the 'advanced´ WHO active TB drug safety monitoring and management (aDSM) system. All adverse events (AEs) of clinical significance were followed up; the PVU focused on signal detection from SAEs.RESULTS and CONCLUSION: Between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2019, the PVU received and assessed 626 SAEs experienced by 417 BDQ patients. A board of MDR-TB/PV experts reviewed unexpected and possibly drug-related SAEs to detect safety signals. The experts communicated on clusters of risks factors, notably polypharmacy and off-label drug use, encouraging a patient-centred approach of care. Organising advanced PV in routine care is possible but demanding. It is reasonable to expect local/national programmes to focus on clinical management, and to limit reporting to aDSM systems to key data, such as the SAEs.