Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Respiration ; 89(6): 550-7, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25968471

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The best therapy for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are medically unfit for lobectomy or prefer not to undergo surgery has not yet been demonstrated. OBJECTIVES: We analyzed data from our prospective database to evaluate the recurrence and survival rates and assess the extent to which the type of treatment explains outcome differences. METHODS: This study included 116 patients with histologically proven clinical stage I NSCLC who were treated with sublobar resection (SLR; n = 42), radiofrequency ablation (RFA; n = 25) or radiotherapy (RT; n = 49) between 2009 and 2013. The primary end point was the time to primary tumor recurrence (PR). Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to compare the recurrence patterns and survivals after adjustments for potential confounders. RESULTS: The SLR patients were younger and exhibited better performance status. The RT patients had larger tumors. After adjusting for age and tumor size, there were differences between the different treatments in terms of the PR rate, but no differences were observed in overall (OS) or disease-free survival. The hazard ratio for PR comparing SLR versus RT adjusted for age and tumor size was 2.73 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.72-10.27) and that for SLR versus RFA was 7.57 (95% CI 1.94-29.47). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that SLR was associated with a higher primary tumor control rate compared to RFA or RT, although the OSs were not different. These results should be confirmed in prospective trials.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Ablación por Catéter , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neumonectomía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral
2.
Clin Imaging ; 39(1): 56-61, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25457543

RESUMEN

In lung cancer patients with single peripheral lesions, CT-guided needle biopsies (CTNBs) are common for histological sampling. Recently published studies showed conflicting results for the influence of CTNB on the onset of pleural carcinomatosis (PC). In order to estimate the influence of CTNB on pleural tumor spread, 146 histologically confirmed cases of lung cancer diagnosed by CTNB were retrospectively compared to 112 control lung cancer patients diagnosed by non-CTNB. CTNB was not associated with an earlier onset of PC, identifying CTNB as a safe procedure for minimally invasive lung cancer staging.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Pulmón/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , Carcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA