Revisiting the performance of cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen as a diagnostic marker for pancreatic mucinous cysts: a comprehensive 20-year institutional review.

OBJECTIVE: Elevated pancreatic cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been routinely used to classify mucinous cysts. This study incorporates original data that established the CEA ≥192 ng/mL threshold with over 20 years of additional data and reassesses the diagnostic performance of CEA for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts. DESIGN: 1169 pancreatic cysts (1999-2021) with CEA results were identified. 394 cases had histological confirmation as the diagnostic standard. Additionally, 237 cysts without histological confirmation demonstrated KRAS, GNAS, or RNF43 mutations by molecular testing and were combined with the histologically confirmed cysts for separate analysis on a total cohort of 631 cysts. RESULTS: Median CEA was significantly higher in mucinous cysts (323.9 ng/mL, n=314) versus non-mucinous cysts (204.6 ng/mL, n=80) (p<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated an optimal CEA cut-off of 20 ng/mL (area under the curve: 80%), though the specificity was lower than desired (sensitivity 89%, specificity 64%). At the previously established threshold of 192 ng/mL, sensitivity and specificity were 56% and 78%, respectively. To achieve a specificity of 85% as originally reported, a CEA threshold of 250 ng/mL was needed; the 13 false positive cases at this threshold included 4 benign simple cysts, 2 squamoid cysts, 1 serous cystadenoma, 1 lymphoepithelial cyst and 5 more uncommon entities. All results remained similar within the total cohort after including additional cases with KRAS/GNAS/RNF43 mutations only. CONCLUSION: Cyst fluid CEA continues to be a useful test in the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cysts but does not appear as specific as previously reported. Raising the CEA threshold to 250 ng/mL to maintain specificity for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts may be considered.

Grading Cytologic Epithelial Atypia in Pancreatic Mucinous Cysts Predicts Patient Survival: Correlation With Histologic, Molecular, and Clinical Follow-Up.

Cytologic examination of epithelial cells in cyst fluids from pancreatic mucinous cysts is the optimal method for identifying high-grade atypia (HGA), which may represent histologic high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive carcinoma and thereby classify the cyst as high risk, warranting surgical resection. Cytologic features of HGA were previously described at our institution in 2013 and implemented thereafter, but performance of grading with these criteria has not yet been reported. In total, 1322 pancreatic cyst fluid specimens (2014-2021) were identified; all pathology reports and relevant clinical data were reviewed in detail; and 230 unique cysts (217 patients) contained neoplastic mucinous epithelium. Of the 230 cysts, 178 had low-grade atypia (LGA), and 52 had HGA. Ninety-seven cysts had histologic follow-up: 77 (79%) were resections and 20 (21%) were diagnostic surgical biopsies only. Moreover, 92 (95%) were confirmed neoplastic mucinous cysts, 3 were adenocarcinomas, and 2 were benign entities. Among histologically confirmed neoplastic mucinous cysts, 58 had low-grade dysplasia (LGD); 34 had HGD, of which 14 also had invasive carcinoma. A significantly higher proportion of cysts with HGA (63%) demonstrated at least HGD on follow-up compared to those with LGA (26%, P < .001). The sensitivity and specificity of HGA for accurately classifying a high-risk cyst were 54% and 81%, respectively. Of the 230 cysts, 146 (64%) cysts had corresponding next-generation sequencing results; 31% of HGA cysts harbored a high-risk mutation (TP53, CDKN2A, and/or SMAD4) vs 7% of LGA cysts (P < .001). Among cysts without histologic confirmation, 25% of HGA cysts had high-risk mutation vs 7% of LGA cysts. The grade of cytologic atypia was predictive of overall survival and recurrence-free survival (P < .001 and P = .020, respectively). Implementation of cytologic criteria for HGA in pancreatic mucinous cysts has relatively low sensitivity but modest specificity for classifying a high-risk cyst. Although high-risk mutations were more commonly found in cysts with HGA, their frequency is overall low. Thus, evaluating the degree of cytologic atypia, which is predictive of patient survival, provides significant value and informs patient outcomes.

Interobserver agreement and diagnostic challenges of Congo red staining for amyloid detection on fat pad aspiration biopsies.

INTRODUCTION: Congo red staining of fat pad fine needle aspiration specimens is a method utilized for evaluation of amyloid deposition. However, these specimens can pose diagnostic challenges for cytopathologists. As part of ongoing internal quality improvement measures, the objective of this study was to evaluate the intradepartmental interobserver agreement of these specimens and to identify factors that affect the variability of the interpretations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 7 participants, which included 3 trainees, 3 cytopathologists, and 1 cytotechnologist. Each participant reviewed 50 Congo red stained fat pad fine needle aspiration slides. The interpretations were categorized into 3 groups: negative, indeterminate/suspicious, and positive. The participants also noted any interpretation challenges they encountered for each case. RESULTS: There was only slight interobserver agreement among all participants (κ = 0.133). Stratified by participant group, the interobserver agreement among the trainees was slight bordering on poor (κ = 0.028) and among cytopathologists was fair (κ = 0.249). The highest agreement between 2 observers was between 2 cytopathologists and the level of agreement was moderate bordering on fair (κ = 0.426). There were only 3 cases (6.0%) with full agreement among observers, while in 25 cases (50.0%), there were 2 category differences in interpretations. The primary diagnostic challenge reported by participants was when weak or focal birefringence was encountered as well as cases complicated by poor stain quality and overstaining. CONCLUSIONS: We found only slight interobserver agreement among all study participants. A major area of challenge was cases with weak birefringence resulting in high variance of interpretation among participants.