RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early recurrence (ER) within a 90-day blanking period (BP) in catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for late recurrence (LR) after 90 days postoperatively. However, few reports have examined them in the second CA and compared them to the first CA. Moreover, in recent years, there have been reports suggesting that BP should be reduced from 90 to 30 days. Therefore, the association between ER and LR in the first and the second CA was examined, and the validity of a 30-day BP was evaluated. METHODS: A total of 511 consecutive patients undergoing the first CA and 116 of these patients undergoing the second CA for AF at a single institution from November 2016 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: When ER within a 90-day BP was divided into 0-30 days and 31-90 days according to the timing of the last ER episode, the hazard ratios on LR of them relative to no ER were 2.7 {95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-4.2} and 9.7 (95% CI 6.6-14.3), respectively, for the first CA and 15.3 (95% CI 4.7-50.1) and 44.1 (95% CI 14.0-139.4), respectively, for the second CA. CONCLUSIONS: ER was strongly associated with LR, especially in patients with the last episode of ER more than 30 days after CA. This was pronounced in cases after the second CA, when PVI appeared to be completed. With the current improvement in PVI durability, BP may be acceptable for 30 days.
RESUMEN
A 71-year-old man was transferred urgently to our hospital after collapsing near his home post the first shot of the BNT162b2 coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech, Comirnaty®). Immediately after arrival at our hospital, cardiac arrest due to complete atrioventricular block with no ventricular escaped beats was observed on electrocardiogram. Echocardiography showed preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, however, diffuse severe hypokinesia was revealed after 3â¯weeks, and he died 3â¯months after admission because of worsening heart failure. An autopsy examination revealed eosinophilic myocarditis or hypersensitivity myocarditis with extensive fibrosis and widespread myocardial dropout throughout the heart. Learning objective: 1. Severe myocarditis occurs extremely rarely after mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. 2. Myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination might cause complete atrioventricular block, followed by a course of decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. 3. Histologically, severe myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination seems to present as fulminant necrotizing eosinophilic myocarditis or hypersensitivity myocarditis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is widely performed. However, the indication for CA in patients with asymptomatic persistent AF is still controversial. METHODS: Among 259 consecutive patients who were hospitalized for initial CA of AF, a total of 45 patients who had asymptomatic persistent AF were retrospectively analyzed. Quality of life (QOL) before and 1 year after CA was evaluated, and changes in the cardiac function over 5 years after CA were also examined. QOL was assessed using the AF QOL questionnaire (AFQLQ) developed by the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. In addition, cardiac function was assessed by measuring the plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial diameter (LAD) with transthoracic echocardiogram, and left atrial (LA) volume with computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: The AFQLQ significantly improved after CA in terms of "symptom frequency" and "activity limits and mental anxiety." The plasma BNP level, LVEF, and LAD significantly improved in the first 3 months after the first CA, with no significant changes thereafter (from 149.0 pg/dL [95% confidence intervals {CI}, 114.5-183.5 pg/dL] to 49.8 pg/dL [95% CI, 26.5-70.1], P < .0001; from 60.8% [95% CI, 58.1%-63.6%] to 65.0% [95% CI, 62.6-67.4], P = .001; and from 41.3 mm [95% CI, 39.7-42.9] to 36.8 [95% CI, 34.5-39.1 mm], P < .0001, respectively). LA volume revealed LA reverse remodeling after CA. CONCLUSION: Improvement in the QOL and cardiac function after CA of asymptomatic persistent AF was revealed. Asymptomatic persistent AF should be appropriately treated by CA.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Air embolisms are serious complications during catheter ablation procedures. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study were to determine when air bubbles enter the left atrium (LA) during catheter ablation procedures and to identify techniques that reduce air bubble intrusion. METHODS: An ex vivo study was performed to monitor air bubbles using a silicone heart model and a high-resolution camera. In total, 280 radiofrequency catheter and cryoballoon ablation processes were tested. RESULTS: Small and large air bubbles were often observed during catheter ablation processes. Many small air bubbles arose during sheath flushing at fast speeds (15 mL/2 s) (median bubble number [quartiles]: 35 [20-53] for SL0, 35 [23-44] for Agilis, and 98 [91-100] for FlexCath) and during initial cryoballoon inflation/freezing/deflation (34 [22-47]). Large (≥1.5 mm) air bubbles were observed during Lasso catheter insertion (1 [0-1]), cryoballoon insertion (2 [1-2]), and initial inflation/freezing/deflation (1 [1-3]). Massive air bubbles were observed during Optima catheter insertion into the sheath using an inserter (10 [2-15]). Sheath flushing at slow speeds (15 mL/5 s) significantly reduced the number of air bubbles. Before cryoballoon insertion, temporary balloon inflation and air bubble removal from the inflated surface were most effective in reducing air bubble intrusions. Optima catheter insertion without an inserter significantly reduced large air bubble intrusion. CONCLUSION: Air bubbles entered the LA at specific times. Techniques such as sheath flushing at slow speeds, temporary cryoballoon inflation before insertion, inserting the Optima catheter without an inserter, and avoidance of negative pressure in the LA could reduce air bubble intrusion.