Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Digestion ; 85(1): 47-54, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22179489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We analyzed iron deficiency and the therapeutic response following intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in a large single-center inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cohort. METHODS: 250 IBD patients were retrospectively analyzed for iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia. A subgroup was analyzed regarding efficacy and side effects of iron supplementation with ferric carboxymaltose. RESULTS: In the cohort (n = 250), 54.4% of the patients had serum iron levels ≤60 µg/dl, 81.2% had ferritin ≤100 ng/ml, and 25.6% had hemoglobin (Hb) of ≤12 g/dl (females) or ≤13 g/dl (males). In the treatment subcohort (n = 80), 83.1% of the patients had iron ≤60 µg/dl, 90.4% had ferritin ≤100 ng/ml, and 66.7% had Hb ≤12/13 g/dl before ferric carboxymaltose treatment. After a median dose of 500 mg ferric carboxymaltose, 74.7% of the patients reached iron >60 µg/dl, 61.6% had ferritin >100 ng/ml, and 90.7% reached Hb >12/13 g/dl at follow-up (p < 0.0001 for all parameters vs. pretreatment values). The most frequent adverse event was a transient increase of liver enzymes with male gender as risk factor (p = 0.008, OR 8.62, 95% CI 1.74-41.66). CONCLUSIONS: Iron deficiency and anemia are frequent in IBD patients. Treatment with ferric carboxymaltose is efficious, safe and well tolerated in iron-deficient IBD patients.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Férricos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Maltosa/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anemia Ferropénica/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Compuestos Férricos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Férricos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Férricos/sangre , Ferritinas/sangre , Hemoglobinas , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/sangre , Infusiones Intravenosas , Hierro/sangre , Masculino , Maltosa/administración & dosificación , Maltosa/efectos adversos , Maltosa/sangre , Maltosa/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Parasitol Res ; 111(4): 1793-8, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22782476

RESUMEN

The nematode Capillaria aerophila (Trichuroidea, Trichuridae) affects the respiratory system of cats and other animals and occasionally of human beings. Infected cats may show bronchovesicular sounds, inflammation, sneezing, wheezing and, chronic cough and, sometimes, bronchopneumonia and respiratory failure. The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the antiparasitic spot-on formulation containing imidacloprid 10%/moxidectin 1 % (Advocate®, Bayer Animal Health) in the treatment of natural feline infection with the lungworm C. aerophila. The efficacy of Advocate® administered once was tested on days 7 ± 1 and 11 ± 1 following treatment at day 0 and compared to faecal egg counts on days -6 ± 1 and -2 ± 1. Overall, 36 cats treated either with Advocate® (treatment group, n = 17 cats) or left untreated (control group, n = 19 cats) were included in the study. Geometric means of faecal egg counts values in eggs per gram of faeces were 124.03 prior to treatment and 0.26 posttreatment in treatment group, while 107.03 and 123.94 pre- and posttreatment in the untreated cats. Post-baseline egg counts showed a 99.79 % reduction in Advocate®-treated animals in comparison with cats which were left untreated. Also, treated cats showed no adverse events. This trial demonstrated that Advocate® spot-on formulation is safe and effective in the treatment of feline lung capillariosis caused by C. aerophila.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enoplida/veterinaria , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Macrólidos/administración & dosificación , Macrólidos/efectos adversos , Nitrocompuestos/administración & dosificación , Nitrocompuestos/efectos adversos , Animales , Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Antihelmínticos/efectos adversos , Capillaria/efectos de los fármacos , Capillaria/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de los Gatos/parasitología , Gatos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Infecciones por Enoplida/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enoplida/parasitología , Heces/parasitología , Neonicotinoides , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos
3.
Parasitol Res ; 105 Suppl 1: S55-62, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19575226

RESUMEN

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the antiparasitic spot-on formulation containing imidacloprid 10%/moxidectin 1% (Advocate, Bayer) in the treatment of natural feline infection with the lungworm Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Nematoda, Strongylida). The efficacy of Advocate administered once was tested in comparison to a control oral formulation containing fenbendazole 18.75% (Panacur Intervet) administered over three consecutive days based on larvae per gramme of faeces (LPG), measured on days 28 +/- 2 following treatment and compared to counts on days -6 to -2. In total 24 cats treated either with Advocate (n = 12) or with Panacur (n = 12) were included. Mean LPG postbaseline (days 28 +/- 2) were low in both treatment groups, i.e., 0 LPG for Advocate and 1.3 LPG for Panacur. Reduction of post-baseline larval counts showed Advocate (100% reduction) to be superior in efficacy compared to the control product (99.29% reduction). No treated animals showed adverse events. This trial demonstrated that both Advocate spot-on formulation and Panacur oral paste are safe and effective in the treatment of aelurostrongylosis in cats. Future practical perspectives in feline medicine and the major advantages of the spot-on product compared to the oral paste are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Metastrongyloidea/efectos de los fármacos , Nitrocompuestos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Strongylida/veterinaria , Animales , Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Antihelmínticos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Gatos/parasitología , Gatos , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Heces/parasitología , Fenbendazol/efectos adversos , Fenbendazol/uso terapéutico , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Larva/efectos de los fármacos , Macrólidos/administración & dosificación , Macrólidos/efectos adversos , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Neonicotinoides , Nitrocompuestos/administración & dosificación , Nitrocompuestos/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Strongylida/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Strongylida/parasitología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Parasitol Res ; 105 Suppl 1: S83-9, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19575229

RESUMEN

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the antiparasitic spot-on formulation containing emodepside 2.1%/praziquantel 8.6% (Profender, Bayer) in the treatment of natural feline infection with the lungworm Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Nematoda, Strongylida). Efficacy of Profender given once at the licensed dose was tested in comparison to a control oral formulation containing fenbendazole 18.75% (Panacur, Intervet) given over three consecutive days at the licensed dose. Efficacy assessment was based on larvae per gramme of faeces (LPG) counts, measured on days 28 +/- 2 following treatment and compared to counts on days -6 to -2. In total 24 cats treated either with Profender (n = 12) or with Panacur (n = 12) were included in the assessment of efficacy and safety. Mean LPG post-baseline counts (days 28 +/- 2) were 1.3 LPG for both Profender and Panacur, demonstrating similar efficacy of 99.38% for Profender and 99.29% for the control product. No treated animals showed adverse events. This trial demonstrated that both Profender spot-on formulation and oral paste Panacur are safe and effective in the treatment of aelurotrongylosis in cats. Future practical perspectives in feline medicine and the major advantages of the spot-on product compared to the oral paste are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Depsipéptidos/uso terapéutico , Praziquantel/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Strongylida/veterinaria , Animales , Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Antihelmínticos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Gatos/parasitología , Gatos , Depsipéptidos/administración & dosificación , Depsipéptidos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Heces/parasitología , Fenbendazol/administración & dosificación , Fenbendazol/efectos adversos , Fenbendazol/uso terapéutico , Larva/efectos de los fármacos , Metastrongyloidea/efectos de los fármacos , Metastrongyloidea/aislamiento & purificación , Praziquantel/administración & dosificación , Praziquantel/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Strongylida/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Strongylida/parasitología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA