Causes for increased myelosuppression with increasing age in patients with oesophageal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy.

The aim of this study was to identify why increasing myelosuppression accompanies increasing age in patients treated for oesophageal cancer by chemoradiation. Weekly neutrophil and platelet counts were obtained throughout treatment in 86 patients undergoing chemoradiation without surgery for oesophageal cancer. One or two cycles of cisplatin 80 mg/m2/day followed by 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/day for 4-5 days were administered during the first and fourth or fifth week of radiotherapy using 2 Gy daily fractions. 44 of the patients underwent 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetic studies. Multiple regression procedures were used to determine the strength of factors that contribute to initial and nadir neutrophil and platelet counts. The kinetics of myeloid response were evaluated from the rates of disappearance and re-appearance of neutrophils and platelets during treatment. Age, fluorouracil dose (or AUC), baseline body weight and neutrophil (or platelet) count were found to be powerfully and independently predictive of both first neutrophil and platelet nadir count. Baseline neutrophil and platelet counts were also found to correlate negatively with advancing age independently of other factors. The rate of descent of both indices, however, was independent of age, baseline count and fluorouracil dose suggesting that variations in the size of the myeloproliferative compartment prior to treatment were responsible for interpatient variations. In addition, the rate of recovery of both indices was not influenced by age amongst patients in whom data was assessable suggesting that proliferation of surviving marrow elements is not compromised by age. These data are compatible with the hypothesis that a progressive depletion of the myeloid stem cell compartment accompanies advancing age, and that this is responsible for increasing myelotoxicity.

Simultaneous adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer--toxicity and dose modification: a Transtasman Radiation Oncology Group Multi-Institution study.

PURPOSE: To establish the toxicity profile of simultaneously administered postoperative radiation therapy and CMF chemotherapy as a prelude to a randomized controlled study addressing the sequencing of the two modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and thirty eight breast cancer patients at high risk of locoregional, as well as systemic relapse, who were referred to three centers in Australia and New Zealand were treated with postoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy simultaneously. Acute toxicity and dose modifications in these patients were compared with 83 patients treated over the same time frame with chemotherapy alone. In a separate study the long-term radiation and surgical effects in 24 patients treated simultaneously with radiation therapy and chemotherapy at Newcastle (Australia) following conservative surgery were compared with 23 matched patients treated at Newcastle with radiation therapy alone. RESULTS: Myelotoxicity was increased in patients treated simultaneously with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The effect was not great, but may have contributed to chemotherapy dose reductions. Lymphopenia was observed to be the largest factor in total white cell depressions caused by the simultaneous administration of radiation therapy. Postsurgical appearances were found to so dominate long-term treatment effects on the treated breast that the effect of radiation therapy dose and additional chemotherapy was difficult to detect. CONCLUSION: Studies addressing the sequencing of radiation therapy and chemotherapy will necessarily be large because adverse effects from administering the two modalities simultaneously are not great. The present study has endorsed the importance in future studies of stratification according to the extent and type of surgery and adherence to a single strict policy of chemotherapy dose modification.

Combined modality therapy for esophageal carcinoma: preliminary results from a large Australasian multicenter study.

PURPOSE: This report updates local control and survival experience and focuses on treatment toxicity in 294 patients with esophageal cancer who have been treated at six Australasian centers using three prospective unrandomized protocols that used concurrent radiation, cisplatin, and modest dose infusional fluorouracil. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Protocol 1--"definitive" chemoradiation. One hundred and thirty-seven patients have been treated with "definitive" radiation to 60 Gy in 6 weeks plus two courses of cisplatin (80 mg/m2) and infusional fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day over 4 days) during the first and fourth weeks of radiation. Protocol 2--"preoperative" chemoradiation and surgery. Seventy-eight patients received chemoradiation using the same chemotherapy, but 30-35 Gy in 3-4 weeks prior to surgery. Protocol 3--"palliative" chemoradiation. Seventy-nine patients deemed incurable were treated "palliatively" with the same chemoradiation protocol without surgery. Follow-up ranges from 6 months to 7 years (mean 22 months) in live patients. RESULTS: Durable palliation of dysphagia in all three treatment groups has been reflected by encouraging 3-year survival expectations of 43.2 +/- 5% in definitively treated patients, 40.3 +/- 7.65% in surgically treated patients, and 8.5% +/- 3.9% in the palliatively treated patients. There are early indications that female patients have fared better than males. Toxicity levels were modest in all three groups. Following definitive treatment, severe myelotoxicity (World Health Organization grades 3 and 4) occurred in 19%, severe esophagitis (World Health Organization grade 3) in 11%, and moderate or severe benign stricture in 17%, depending upon age and sex of the patient (being worse in female patients). CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that the concurrent addition of modest dose cisplatin and infusional dose fluorouracil to radiation in the definitive, preoperative, and palliative settings contribute to high rates of durable dysphagia-free survival, with overall survival comparable to (and possibly better than) the chemoradiation arm of the recently reported Intergroup Study, but at the cost of less morbidity.

Long-term results of accelerated radiation treatment for advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This report presents long-term follow-up data from a prospective but unrandomized trial of a continuous 3.5-week course of accelerated radiation treatment (ART) used as primary treatment for patients with loco-regionally advanced head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients in three centres in New Zealand and Australia were treated with ART (59.40 Gy in 33 fractions over 24-25 days). Their disease originated from three anatomical regions (oral cavity, 35 patients; pharynx, 31 patients; larynx, 27 patients). Seventy-nine of these patients had stage III or IV cancers. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 68 to 203 months (median 139 months). Loco-regional (LR) failure occurred in 52 patients leading to a 10-year actuarial expectation of LR control of 38%. The actuarial expectation of LR control at 10 years was highly dependent on stage and for stage III, IVA and IVB patients it was 57+/-8.1%, 32+/-1.7% and 7+/-0.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis could not confirm an independent impact of primary site or histological differentiation on LR failure. Two patients died of acute toxicity of treatment and six patients developed grade 3/4 late complications affecting soft tissues only, yielding an actuarial expectation of complications of this severity at 5 years of 9%. No cases of osteoradionecrosis or myelitis were observed. CONCLUSION: This ART, which has proved easy to use at a number of large and small centres, has produced encouraging long-term LR control at a cost of limited soft tissue morbidity.

Accelerated fractionation radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer.

Between 1981 and 1986, 89 patients with advanced head and neck squamous cancer were treated with a continuous accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFRT) regimen. Three fractions of 1.80 Gy, 4 h apart, were given on three treatment days per week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday), and the tumour dose was taken to 59.40 Gy in 33 fractions in 24-25 days. Acute mucosal reactions were generally quite severe, but a split was avoided by providing the patient with intensive support, often as an in-patient, until the reactions settled. Late radiation effects have been comparable to those obtained with conventional fractionation. The probability of local-regional control was 47% at 3 years for 69 previously untreated patients, whereas it was only 12% at one year for 20 patients treated for recurrence after radical surgery. Fifty-eight previously untreated patients with tumours arising in the upper aero-digestive tract were analysed in greater detail. The probability of local-regional control at 3 years was 78% for 17 Stage III patients and 15% for 31 Stage IV patients. This schedule of continuous AFRT is feasible and merits further investigation.

Factors influencing outcome following radio-chemotherapy for oesophageal cancer. The Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: To define new directions, the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) has conducted a detailed analysis of its unrandomised experience with radio-chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Since 1984, 373 patients with oesophageal cancer have been treated on three prospective, but unrandomised, protocols involving radiation with concurrent cisplatin and infusional fluorouracil. Centres in Australia and New Zealand have contributed patients. Reasons for case selection have been examined in detail and prognostic models have been examined in the light of biases exposed. RESULTS: Cause specific survival in 92 patients treated pre-operatively with 35 Gy, infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin was 25.5 +/- 6.0% at 5 years and similar to the 5 year expectations of 169 patients treated with 60 Gy and two courses of the same chemotherapy (23.8 +/- 4.7%). Analysis of failure in these groups suggests that local relapse precedes the development of metastases and competes as a cause for ultimate failure. Although patients treated surgically were less likely to relapse locally, survival was no better because more developed metastases. Some of the 112 patients treated "palliatively" with 30-35 Gy concurrent with chemotherapy without surgery have become long-term survivors with 5 year survival figure in this group 7.7 +/- 3.4%. Apart from variables related to disease stage and performance status at presentation, tumour site emerged as a strong predictor of outcome. Prognosis worsens the nearer the tumour is to the stomach. In addition, indications of a radiation dose response relationship emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent radio-chemotherapy protocols can improve outcome in patients fit enough to tolerate these approaches. New strategies remain necessary, however.

Do acute mucosal reactions lead to consequential late reactions in patients with head and neck cancer?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The relationship between acute and late mucosal reactions remains ill defined but is of considerable relevance to efforts to produce therapeutic gains through the use of altered fractionation schemes and concurrent chemotherapy. We therefore investigated whether acute mucosal reactions in patients treated with an accelerated and a conventionally fractionated radiotherapy regime predicted the severity of late mucosal reactions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 191 patients randomised on a prospective trial comparing conventional fractionation at 2 Gy/fraction per day, 70 Gy over 47 days with an accelerated regimen of 59.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy b.i.d over 24 days for Stage III-IV carcinoma of the head and neck. Acute and late mucosal reactions were scored according to RTOG/EORTC criteria and analyzed using multiple regression techniques. RESULTS: The duration of time spent by patients at the acute confluent mucositis grade 3 level was inversely related to the time to onset of the reaction for both fractionation schedules. Time to onset was more rapid for patients treated on the accelerated schedule but time spent at the reaction grade did not differ significantly between the schedules. After correction for treatment and patient related factors, anatomical site (oral cavity/oropharynx versus hypopharynx/larynx) and increasing duration of confluent mucositis emerged as independent predictors of the hazard of late mucosal reactions with the latter effect being more pronounced in the accelerated treatment arm. The expected reduction in late mucosal effects in the accelerated fractionation arm, predicted by the LQ model for late effects was identified only in patients whose acute confluent mucosal reactions lasted less than 20 days. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of individual patient susceptibility factors that determine the severity of acute mucosal reactions is suggested. A link between severe and prolonged acute reactions and the risk of developing late mucosal reactions that is independent of biological dose, has also been found. Purpose designed prospective studies of these issues are necessary.

Mucosal regeneration during radiotherapy. Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Regeneration of the aerodigestive mucosa is known to occur during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. The circumstances surrounding its time of onset and magnitude are not well understood, however. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Mucosal reactions were observed in 100 patients undergoing conventionally fractionated treatment at 2 Gy/day over 7 weeks and 88 receiving accelerated treatment at 1.8 Gy twice daily over 3 1/2 weeks on the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group head and neck cancer trials. Similar observations in 61 patients treated palliatively at dose rates between 0.8 and 240 Gy/h using ten 3.0-4.2 Gy fractions over 2 weeks are compared. RESULTS: Several findings emerged from these studies: 1. Reactions evolved more quickly at oropharyngeal sites than in the hypopharynx. 2. Reactions at both sites evolved more rapidly at greater rates of dose accumulation. 3. The timing of reactions suggested the presence of a strong regenerative mucosal response that started before the manifestation of "patchy' (grade II) mucosal reactions. 4. The regenerative response was strong enough to "make good' damage accumulated at a rate of 2 Gy/day in over a third of cases. 5. The linear quadratic model without time correction failed to provide an adequate prediction of the frequency or intensity of mucosal reactions produced by any of the regimes. A simple model of the regenerative response is presented. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the timing and magnitude of the regenerative response vary between sites and individuals but are linked to the amount of epithelial cellular depletion occurring during treatment.

A randomised trial of accelerated and conventional radiotherapy for stage III and IV squamous carcinoma of the head and neck: a Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: The aims of this randomized controlled trial were to determine whether there were differences in the disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity between conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and a continuous 3 week accelerated radiotherapy regimen (ART) in stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from 14 centres throughout Australia and New Zealand were randomly assigned to either CRT, using a single 2 Gy/day to a dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions in 49 days or to ART, using 1.8 Gy twice a day to a dose of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions in 24 days. Treatment allocation was stratified for site and stage. The accrual began in 1991 and the trial was closed in 1998 when the target of 350 patients was reached. RESULTS: The median potential follow-up time was 53 months (range, 14-101). The DFS at 5 years was 41% (95% CI, 33-50%) for ART and 35% (95% CI, 27-43%) for CRT (P=0.323) and the hazard ratio was 0.87 in favour of ART (95% CI, 0.66-1.15). The 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 40% for CRT and 46% for ART (P=0.398) and the loco-regional control was 47% for CRT vs. 52% for ART (P=0.300). The respective hazard ratios were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.65-1.2) and 0.85 (0.62-1.16), favouring the accelerated arm. In the ART arm, confluent mucositis was more severe (94 vs. 71%; P<0.001) and peaked about 3 weeks earlier than in the CRT arm, but healing appeared complete in all cases. There were statistically significant reductions in the probability of grade 2 or greater late soft tissue effects over time in the ART arm (P<0.05), except for the mucous membrane where late effects were similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in DFS, disease-specific survival and loco-regional control have not been demonstrated. ART resulted in more acute mucosal toxicity, but this did not result in greater prolongation of the treatment time compared with the CRT arm. There were less late effects in the ART arm, with the exception of late mucosal effects. This trial has confirmed that tumour cell repopulation occurs during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. However, it has also provided additional evidence that overall improvements in the therapeutic ratio using accelerated fractionation strategies are seriously constrained by the need to limit total doses to levels that do not exceed acute mucosal tolerance. The accelerated schedule tested has been shown in this trial to be an acceptable alternative to conventionally fractionated irradiation to 70 Gy.

Prostate irradiation does not affect the serum prostatic acid phosphatase level.

Twenty-nine consecutive patients with localized prostatic carcinoma were studied prospectively to assess the effect of radical pelvic irradiation on the serum prostatic acid phosphatase level (SPAPL). The doses of radiation given ranged from 64.00 to 66.00 Gy. SPAPLs were taken before, during and shortly after their treatment. No significant individual variations in SPAPLs were found. When patients with prostatic carcinoma show rises in serum prostatic acid phosphatase during or after pelvic irradiation, these are unlikely to be due to their treatment and occult pelvic nodal or bony disease should be considered.

Blindness in patients after external beam irradiation for pituitary adenomas: two cases occurring after small daily fractional doses.

We report two cases of blindness occurring within 10 months of completion of radiation with 45 Gy in 1.80 Gy fractions given five times weekly. The literature on blindness as a complication of pituitary irradiation is reviewed. There have been no reported cases of total visual loss occurring as a consequence of treatment with fractional doses of less than 2 Gy. Visual loss due to radiation damage usually occurs within two years of completion of treatment in contrast to visual loss due to recurrence or empty sella syndrome, which usually occur more than two years after the completion of therapy. Other causes of blindness not related to the radiation, and potentially reversible, must be considered. However, these causes usually have a distinctively different clinical picture. Fraction size, total dose, and treatment time are all important factors when considering the biological effects of radiation to the pituitary region.

Artificial pneumothorax can be used to prevent lung toxicity in chest wall radiotherapy.

We report two patients in whom an artificial pneumothorax was induced to reduce the risk of radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis after treatment for chest wall tumours. The procedure was well tolerated; the only complication observed was a single episode of syncope following over-inflation. High doses of radiation were given to large chest wall fields with no clinical or radiological evidence of pneumonitis or fibrosis, either during or after treatment. The available literature on the use of artificial pneumothorax with radiation is reviewed, and the technique of induction is described.

Arteriovenous malformations of the brain: outcome of conventional radiotherapy in the management of 33 cases.

Thirty three patients with inoperable arteriovenous malformations of the brain received conventionally fractionated megavoltage photon radiotherapy. The dose varied between 30.00 wand 50.00 Gy with a median of 40.00 Gy. Treatment was not associated with any significant morbidity. Follow-up ranged from 16 months to 148 months, with a median of 79 months. The projected 5-year survival is 92% and rebleed-free survival 78%. There was a trend of increased bleed-free survival for doses greater than 46.00 Gy.

Localized grade I non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of treatment with radiotherapy alone in 88 patients.

Eighty-eight patients entered into the British National Lymphoma Investigation with clinical stage I and II, grade I non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated initially with involved field radiotherapy alone. Eighty-one per cent presented with nodal disease. The duration of follow-up was 25-116 months, with a median of 54 months. Fifteen patients died of disease and the 5-year survival of the whole group was 83%. The complete response rate was dependent on the radiotherapy dose and was greater than 90% for doses of 3500 cGy and over. Most failures occurred at distant rather than adjacent sites, suggesting that extended field radiotherapy would not have affected the outcome. Second-line treatment induced complete remission in 66% of patients who relapsed. The prognosis was significantly worse in patients with intra-abdominal disease.

Relapse patterns after chemo-radiation for carcinoma of the oesophagus.

AIM: The detailed review of patterns of failure in this report was undertaken to identify the continuing obstacles to the successful management of oesophageal cancer, and to establish whether there is a case to compare definitive chemo-radiation (Def-CR) and surgery for patients with squamous cancer in a randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First and subsequent sites of failure were reviewed in 274 patients treated with Def-CR using two cycles of cisplatin, infusional fluorouracil and 60 Gy; and 92 patients with limited chemo-radiation (CR), using one cycle and 35 Gy, followed by surgery (CR-Surg). All were treated on prospective non-randomized trials run by the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group between 1985 and 1999. Failure patterns were analysed using competing risks methodology, and pre-treatment variables predicting survival were identified by proportional hazards modelling. RESULTS: Site, stage, performance status and gender were independently predictive of survival following Def-CR. Local failure was evident in 42.3% of patients, but distant failure in isolation occurred in an additional 18.1%. Lowest rates of local and distant failure at 5 years (29.9% and 26%) occurred in patients with squamous cancer (SCC) located in the upper-third, whose 5-year survival was also the most favourable (49.2%). Survival was least favourable in patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) in the lower two-thirds (18.1%) due to higher rates of local (51.5%) and distant (36.1%) failure. Local failure occurred in 31.5% of patients undergoing CR-Surg but distant failure in isolation was observed in a further 34.7%. Outcomes were least favourable in patients with AC of the lower-third in whom 57.7% failed distantly and 5-year survival was 3.8%. Response to pre-operative chemo-radiation was also strongly predictive of outcome. Patients with no residual cancer in the resection specimen had the lowest rates of local (0%) and distant (16.7%) failure and the best survival (64.9%). Survival in patients with residual cancer in nodes, however, was extremely poor (3.5%) with distant failure occurring in 66.7%. CONCLUSION: The concurrent administration of chemotherapy with radiotherapy seems to have improved loco-regional control and has exposed distant failure as an obstacle to further improvements in outcome. Site, histological subtype, gender and response to chemo-radiation may predict biological differences in oesophageal cancer (OC) that influence outcome. A good case for a randomized comparison between Def-CR and CR-Surg in patients with SCC in the lower two-thirds exists.

Treatment and planning decisions in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung: an Australasian patterns of practice study.

Fourteen practising radiation oncologists were surveyed to assess their treatment and planning habits utilizing six sample cases of non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Respondents were first given a general questionnaire, designed to evaluate their theoretical treatment and planning recommendations based on various tumour and patient related variables. Respondents then undertook a practical planning exercise utilizing planning CT and simulator radiographs for each of the six sample cases. Each case was accompanied by a brief history and report outlining specific tumour stage and non-stage related variables. The practical planning exercise was repeated on the second day of the survey utilizing different non-stage related variables but identical radiology and stage-related information. This design enabled firstly, a comparison of clinicians' intended policy and planning methods with actual policy and planning decisions, and secondly, an assessment of intra-clinician variability in decision making and planning practice. Good agreement was evident among clinicians with respect to general, non-case specific treatment policies; however, very significant variation occurred at an inter- and intra-clinician level and involved the entire treatment and planning process for individual cases. Despite identical treatment intent across identical radiological case pairings, clinicians chose widely differing margins and target volumes in their planning exercise. Treatment intent appeared to be influenced more by non-stage related variables rather than stage related information and radiological appearances per se. We have shown that experienced radiation oncologists do not adhere to stated case selection criteria and show inconsistencies in their treatment planning for non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Cervical cancer: changing trends in the Wellington region.

AIM: To identify changes in patient and tumour characteristics of women with carcinoma of the cervix treated through the Wellington Regional oncology unit between 1975-89. METHODS: The medical records of the patients treated between 1985-9 were reviewed. The age and stage of disease was noted in each case and results compared with the previous two 5-year cohorts. RESULTS: Over the 15 year period there was no obvious reduction in the incidence of cervical cancer. There was a significant trend towards women presenting with earlier stage disease. In the 1985-9 cohort, patients less than 40 years old were significantly more likely to present with earlier stage disease, and there was no detectable difference between the incidence of cervical cancer in Maori and nonMaori. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that cervical screening has not yet made an impact on the incidence of cervical cancer in the greater Wellington region, and possible reasons for this are discussed.

Results of treatment of cancer of the cervix in Wellington 1980-4.

A review was undertaken of all 115 women with invasive carcinoma of the cervix referred for treatment to the Wellington regional centre during the period 1980-4. In comparison with the previous five year period, there were 31 (37%) more patients, and a higher proportion of patients had stage I and II disease. The incidence of disease was significantly greater in Maori compared with nonMaori. Treatment was by various combinations of surgery and radiation according to agreed protocols. The actuarial survival at five years was 73% for the whole group, 89% for 64 stage I patients, 65% for 28 stage II patients and 45% for 19 stage III patients. The actuarial risk of a major treatment complication within the first five years was 8.8%. These results confirm that regional centres in New Zealand employing a multidisciplinary approach to patient assessment and treatment can achieve high cure rates with an acceptable incidence of treatment complications. However, prevention of the disease by effective cervical screening programmes should remain an objective of health services in New Zealand.

Can cancer centres in New Zealand help the cancer registry generate survival data? A pilot study in prostate cancer.

AIMS: One of the current limitations of reports issued by the New Zealand Cancer Registry (NZCR) is that the only measure of the success of treatment is provided by the mortality ratio. A pilot study was therefore carried out to see if collaboration between cancer centres and the NZCR might allow the generation of more meaningful survival data that could be used for the audit of treatment outcome. METHODS: Clinical details of patients seen at the Wellington Cancer Centre (WCC), in whom a diagnosis of prostate cancer was made in 1997, were provided to the NZCR. These details were matched with registration and mortality data held by the NZCR. RESULTS: WCC records identified 82 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer in 1997. Of these, the NZCR registered 60 (73%) in 1997, 3 (4%) prior to 1997, and 14 (17%) after 1997. Five patients (6%) were not registered at all. In the cohort of 82 patients, 17 (21%) had subsequently died. Of these, 11 (65%) had been treated with palliative intent, and six (35%) with radical intent. Of those patients treated radically, three had died of prostate cancer and three of other causes. CONCLUSIONS: Cooperation between Cancer Centres and the NZCR would allow the NZCR to generate useful survival data. This could help evaluate the impact on survival of specific treatments and interventions, such as screening programs. Regional variations in outcome could be detected. The exercise is feasible, without compromising patient confidentiality.