RESUMEN
Escherichia coli sequence type 131 (ST131) is a globally dominant multidrug-resistant clone, although its clinical impact on patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) is incompletely understood. This study aims to further define the risk factors, clinical outcomes, and bacterial genetics associated with ST131 BSI. A prospectively enrolled cohort study of adult inpatients with E. coli BSI was conducted from 2002 to 2015. Whole-genome sequencing was performed with the E. coli isolates. Of the 227 patients with E. coli BSI in this study, 88 (39%) were infected with ST131. Patients with E. coli ST131 BSI and those with non-ST131 BSI did not differ with respect to in-hospital mortality (17/82 [20%] versus 26/145 [18%]; P = 0.73). However, in patients with BSI from a urinary tract source, ST131 was associated with a numerically higher in-hospital mortality than patients with non-ST131 BSI (8/42 [19%] versus 4/63 [6%]; P = 0.06) and increased mortality in an adjusted analysis (odds ratio of 5.85; 95% confidence interval of 1.44 to 29.49; P = 0.02). Genomic analyses showed that ST131 isolates primarily had an H4:O25 serotype, had a higher number of prophages, and were associated with 11 flexible genomic islands as well as virulence genes involved in adhesion (papA, kpsM, yfcV, and iha), iron acquisition (iucC and iutA), and toxin production (usp and sat). In patients with E. coli BSI from a urinary tract source, ST131 was associated with increased mortality in an adjusted analysis and contained a distinct repertoire of genes influencing pathogenesis. These genes could contribute to the higher mortality observed in patients with ST131 BSI.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli , Sepsis , Infecciones Urinarias , Sistema Urinario , Adulto , Humanos , Escherichia coli/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Antibacterianos , beta-Lactamasas/genéticaRESUMEN
The purpose of this guideline is to provide evidence-based guidance for the most effective strategies for the diagnosis and management of babesiosis. The diagnosis and treatment of co-infection with babesiosis and Lyme disease will be addressed in a separate Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guideline [1]. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of human granulocytic anaplasmosis can be found in the recent rickettsial disease guideline developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2]. The target audience for the babesiosis guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition, such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, intensivists, internists, pediatricians, hematologists, and transfusion medicine specialists.
Asunto(s)
Babesiosis , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Enfermedad de Lyme , Animales , Babesiosis/diagnóstico , Babesiosis/terapia , Humanos , Sociedades , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The purpose of this guideline is to provide evidence-based guidance for the most effective strategies for the diagnosis and management of babesiosis. The diagnosis and treatment of co-infection with babesiosis and Lyme disease will be addressed in a separate Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guideline [1]. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of human granulocytic anaplasmosis can be found in the recent rickettsial disease guideline developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2]. The target audience for the babesiosis guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition, such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, intensivists, internists, pediatricians, hematologists, and transfusion medicine specialists.
Asunto(s)
Babesiosis , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Enfermedad de Lyme , Animales , Babesiosis/diagnóstico , Babesiosis/terapia , Humanos , Sociedades , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The scope of this guideline includes prevention of Lyme disease, and the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease presenting as erythema migrans, Lyme disease complicated by neurologic, cardiac, and rheumatologic manifestations, Eurasian manifestations of Lyme disease, and Lyme disease complicated by coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens. This guideline does not include comprehensive recommendations for babesiosis and tick-borne rickettsial infections, which are published in separate guidelines. The target audience for this guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, internists, pediatricians, family physicians, neurologists, rheumatologists, cardiologists and dermatologists in North America.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Enfermedad de Lyme , Neurología , Reumatología , Animales , Humanos , Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Lyme/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Lyme/prevención & control , América del Norte , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The scope of this guideline includes prevention of Lyme disease, and the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease presenting as erythema migrans, Lyme disease complicated by neurologic, cardiac, and rheumatologic manifestations, Eurasian manifestations of Lyme disease, and Lyme disease complicated by coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens. This guideline does not include comprehensive recommendations for babesiosis and tick-borne rickettsial infections, which are published in separate guidelines. The target audience for this guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, internists, pediatricians, family physicians, neurologists, rheumatologists, cardiologists and dermatologists in North America.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Enfermedad de Lyme , Neurología , Reumatología , Animales , Humanos , Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Lyme/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Lyme/prevención & control , América del Norte , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study harnessed an institutional cancer registry to construct a childhood cancer survivorship cohort, integrate electronic health record (EHR) and geospatial data to stratify survivors based on late-effect risk, analyze follow-up care patterns, and determine factors associated with suboptimal follow-up care. PROCEDURE: The survivorship cohort included patients ≤18 years of age reported to the institutional cancer registry between January 1, 1994 and November 30, 2012. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, third revision (ICD-O-3) coding and treatment exposures facilitated risk stratification of survivors. The EHR was linked to the cancer registry based on medical record number (MRN) to extract clinic visits. RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety pediatric hematology-oncology (PHO) and 275 pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) survivors were included in the final analytic cohort. Two hundred and eight-two survivors (32.6%) were not seen in any oncology-related subspecialty clinic at Duke 5-7 years after initial diagnosis. Factors associated with follow-up included age (p = .008), diagnosis (p < .001), race/ethnicity (p = .010), late-effect risk strata (p = .001), distance to treatment center (p < .0001), and area deprivation index (ADI) (p = .011). Multivariable logistic modeling attenuated the association for high-risk (OR 1.72; 95% CI 0.805, 3.66) and intermediate-risk (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.644, 2.36) survivors compared to survivors at low risk of late effects among the PHO cohort. PNO survivors at high risk for late effects were more likely to follow up (adjusted OR 3.66; 95% CI 1.76, 7.61). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a third of survivors received suboptimal follow-up care. This study provides a reproducible model to integrate cancer registry and EHR data to construct risk-stratified survivorship cohorts to assess follow-up care.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Neoplasias/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Neoplasias/clasificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Drug overdoses are a national and global epidemic. However, while overdoses are inextricably linked to social, demographic, and geographical determinants, geospatial patterns of drug-related admissions and overdoses at the neighborhood level remain poorly studied. The objective of this paper is to investigate spatial distributions of patients admitted for drug-related admissions and overdoses from a large, urban, tertiary care center using electronic health record data. Additionally, these spatial distributions were adjusted for a validated socioeconomic index called the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). We showed spatial heterogeneity in patients admitted for opioid, amphetamine, and psychostimulant-related diagnoses and overdoses. While ADI was associated with drug-related admissions, it did not correct for spatial variations and could not account alone for this spatial heterogeneity.
Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Hospitalización , Áreas de Pobreza , Características de la Residencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Estudios de Cohortes , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Espacial , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapiaRESUMEN
Background: The conventional 2-tiered serologic testing protocol for Lyme disease (LD), an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) followed by immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G Western blots, performs well in late-stage LD but is insensitive in patients with erythema migrans (EM), the most common manifestation of the illness. Western blots are also complex, difficult to interpret, and relatively expensive. In an effort to improve test performance and simplify testing in early LD, we evaluated several modified 2-tiered testing (MTTT) protocols, which use 2 assays designed as first-tier tests sequentially, without the need of Western blots. Methods: The MTTT protocols included (1) a whole-cell sonicate (WCS) EIA followed by a C6 EIA; (2) a WCS EIA followed by a VlsE chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA); and (3) a variable major protein-like sequence, expressed (VlsE) CLIA followed by a C6 EIA. Sensitivity was determined using serum from 55 patients with erythema migrans; specificity was determined using serum from 50 patients with other illnesses and 1227 healthy subjects. Results: Sensitivity of the various MTTT protocols in patients with acute erythema migrans ranged from 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25%-50%) to 54% (95% CI, 42%-67%), compared with 25% (95% CI, 16%-38%) using the conventional protocol (P = .003-0.3). Among control subjects, the 3 MTTT protocols were similarly specific (99.3%-99.5%) compared with conventional 2-tiered testing (99.5% specificity; P = .6-1.0). Conclusions: Although there were minor differences in sensitivity and specificity among MTTT protocols, each provides comparable or greater sensitivity in acute EM, and similar specificity compared with conventional 2-tiered testing, obviating the need for Western blots.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Pruebas Serológicas/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Swine can harbor influenza viruses that are pathogenic to humans. Previous studies support an increased risk of human influenza cases among individuals with swine contact. North Carolina has the second-largest swine industry in the United States. METHODS: We investigated the spatiotemporal association between influenza-like illnesses (ILIs) and licensed swine operations from 2008 to 2012 in North Carolina. We determined the week in which ILI cases peaked and statistically estimated their week of onset. This was performed for all 100 North Carolina counties for 4 consecutive influenza seasons. We used linear models to correlate the number of permitted swine operations per county with the weeks of onset and peak ILI activity. RESULTS: We found that during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 influenza seasons, both seasons in which the pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus circulated, ILI peaked earlier in counties with a higher number of licensed swine operations. We did not observe this in 2008-2009 or 2011-2012, nor did we observe a relationship between ILI onset week and number of swine operations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that concentrated swine feeding operations amplified transmission of influenza during years in which H1N1 was circulating. This has implications for vaccine strategies targeting swine workers, as well as virologic surveillance in areas with large concentrations of swine.
Asunto(s)
Agricultura , Gripe Humana/transmisión , Porcinos , Animales , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/etiología , North Carolina/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/transmisión , ZoonosisRESUMEN
In our cross-sectional sample of 7289 serologic tests for Lyme disease, we identified 167 instances of a positive IgM immunoblot but a negative IgG immunoblot test result. Considering that only 71% (95% CI 64%-78%) of patients had Lyme disease, a positive IgM immunoblot alone should be interpreted with caution to avoid over-diagnosis of Lyme disease.
Asunto(s)
Immunoblotting , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad de Lyme/sangre , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lyme disease is diagnosed by 2-tiered serologic testing in patients with a compatible clinical illness, but the significance of positive test results in low-prevalence regions has not been investigated. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who tested positive for Lyme disease with standardized 2-tiered serologic testing between 2005 and 2010 at a single hospital system in a region with little endemic Lyme disease. Based on clinical findings, we calculated the positive predictive value of Lyme disease serology. Next, we reviewed the outcome of serologic testing in patients with select clinical syndromes compatible with disseminated Lyme disease (arthritis, cranial neuropathy, or meningitis). RESULTS: During the 6-year study period 4723 patients were tested for Lyme disease, but only 76 (1.6%) had positive results by established laboratory criteria. Among 70 seropositive patients whose medical records were available for review, 12 (17%; 95% confidence interval, 9%-28%) were found to have Lyme disease (6 with documented travel to endemic regions). During the same time period, 297 patients with a clinical illness compatible with disseminated Lyme disease underwent 2-tiered serologic testing. Six of them (2%; 95% confidence interval, 0.7%-4.3%) were seropositive, 3 with documented travel and 1 who had an alternative diagnosis that explained the clinical findings. CONCLUSIONS: In this low-prevalence cohort, fewer than 20% of positive Lyme disease tests are obtained from patients with clinically likely Lyme disease. Positive Lyme disease test results may have little diagnostic value in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Pruebas Serológicas/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Some patients with medically unexplained symptoms or alternative medical diagnoses suspect that they chronically suffer from the tick-borne infection Lyme disease. These patients are commonly targeted by providers of alternative therapies. This study was designed to identify and characterize the range of unorthodox alternative therapies advertised to patients with a diagnosis of Lyme disease. METHODS: Internet searches using the Google search engine were performed to identify the websites of clinics and services that marketed nonantimicrobial therapies for Lyme disease. We subsequently used the PubMed search engine to identify any scientific studies evaluating such treatments for Lyme disease. Websites were included in our review so long as they advertised a commercial, nonantimicrobial product or service that specifically mentioned utility for Lyme disease. Websites with patient testimonials (such as discussion groups) were excluded unless the testimonial appeared as marketing on a commercial site. RESULTS: More than 30 alternative treatments were identified, which fell into several broad categories: these included oxygen and reactive oxygen therapy; energy and radiation-based therapies; nutritional therapy; chelation and heavy metal therapy; and biological and pharmacological therapies ranging from certain medications without recognized therapeutic effects on Borrelia burgdorgeri to stem cell transplantation. Review of the medical literature did not substantiate efficacy or, in most cases, any rationale for the advertised treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Providers of alternative therapies commonly target patients who believe they have Lyme disease. The efficacy of these unconventional treatments for Lyme disease is not supported by scientific evidence, and in many cases they are potentially harmful.
Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Internet , Enfermedad de Lyme/terapia , Borrelia burgdorferi , Humanos , Motor de BúsquedaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Much of the controversy that surrounds Lyme disease pertains to whether it produces prolonged, treatment-refractory infection, usually referred to as chronic Lyme disease. Some have proposed that round morphologic variants of Borrelia burgdorferi, known variably as "cyst forms" and "L-forms," are responsible for the pathogenesis of chronic Lyme disease. We have undertaken a systematic review of the literature to determine if there is a documented role of these variants in Lyme disease pathogenesis or in syndromes compatible with chronic Lyme disease. METHODS: Two systematic literature searches were performed to identify studies in which round morphologic variants of B. burgdorferi have been described in situ in human specimens. RESULTS: Our primary literature search identified 6 studies that reported round morphologic variants of B. burgdorferi in specimens obtained from 32 total patients. No study described these forms in patients who had purely subjective symptom complexes (eg, fatigue or pain). No study investigated a causal relationship between morphologic variants and clinical disease or evaluated treatment of morphologic variants in vivo. Of 29 additional studies that described the morphology of B. burgdorferi from patients with Lyme disease, the organism was invariably described as having spirochetal morphology. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of the broader medical literature, it is not currently possible to ascribe a pathogenic role to morphologic variants of B. burgdorferi in either typical manifestations of Lyme disease or in other chronic disease states that are often labeled chronic Lyme disease. There is no clinical literature to justify specific treatment of B. burgdorferi morphologic variants.
Asunto(s)
Borrelia burgdorferi/citología , Borrelia burgdorferi/patogenicidad , Enfermedad de Lyme/microbiología , Enfermedad de Lyme/patología , Enfermedad Crónica , HumanosRESUMEN
Lyme disease is a spatially heterogeneous tick-borne infection, with approximately 85% of US cases concentrated in the mid-Atlantic and northeastern states. Surveillance for Lyme disease and its causative agent, including public health case reporting and entomologic surveillance, is necessary to understand its endemic range, but currently used case detection methods have limitations. To evaluate an alternative approach to Lyme disease surveillance, we have performed a geospatial analysis of Lyme disease cases from the Johns Hopkins Health System in Maryland. We used two sources of cases: a) individuals with both a positive test for Lyme disease and a contemporaneous diagnostic code consistent with a Lyme disease-related syndrome; and b) individuals referred for a Lyme disease evaluation who were adjudicated to have Lyme disease. Controls were individuals from the referral cohort judged not to have Lyme disease. Residential address data were available for all cases and controls. We used a hierarchical Bayesian model with a smoothing function for a coordinate location to evaluate the probability of Lyme disease within 100 km of Johns Hopkins Hospital. We found that the probability of Lyme disease was greatest in the north and west of Baltimore, and the local probability that a subject would have Lyme disease varied by as much as 30-fold. Adjustment for demographic and ecological variables partially attenuated the spatial gradient. Our study supports the suitability of electronic medical record data for the retrospective surveillance of Lyme disease.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Lyme , Enfermedad de Lyme/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Teorema de Bayes , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano , Mid-Atlantic Region/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Niño , Maryland/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Background: Early identification of newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) is necessary to provide antiviral therapy and other interventions that can improve outcomes. Prior research demonstrates that universal newborn CMV screening would be the most cost-effective approach to identifying newborns who are infected. CMV is not uniformly prevalent, and it is uncertain whether universal screening would remain cost-effective in lower-prevalence neighborhoods. Our aim was to identify geographic heterogeneity in the cost-effectiveness of universal newborn CMV screening by combining a geospatial analysis with a preexisting cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: This study used the CMV testing results and zip code location data of 96 785 newborns in 7 metropolitan areas who had been tested for CMV as part of the CMV and Hearing Multicenter Screening study. A hierarchical bayesian generalized additive model was constructed to evaluate geographic variability in the odds of CMV. The zip code-level odds of CMV were then used to weight the results of a previously published model evaluating universal CMV screening vs symptom-targeted screening. Results: The odds of CMV were heterogeneous over large geographic scales, with the highest odds in the southeastern United States. Universal screening was more cost-effective and afforded more averted cases of severe hearing loss than targeted testing. Universal screening remained the most cost-effective option even in areas with the lowest CMV prevalence. Conclusions: Universal newborn CMV screening is cost-effective regardless of underlying CMV prevalence and is the preferred strategy to reduce morbidity from congenital CMV.
RESUMEN
Importance: Fertility preservation (FP), including oocyte and embryo cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy, is an urgent and essential component of comprehensive cancer care. Geographic proximity to a center offering FP is a critical component of ensuring equitable access for people with cancer desiring future fertility. Objective: To characterize the distribution of centers offering FP services in the US, quantify the number of self-identified reproductive-age female individuals living outside of geographically accessible areas, and investigate the association between geographic access and state FP mandates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis calculated 2-hour travel time isochrone maps for each center based on latitude and longitude coordinates. Population-based geospatial analysis in the US was used in this study. Fertility clinics identified through the 2018 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report were defined as oncofertility centers by meeting 4 criteria: (1) offered oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, (2) performed at least 1 FP cycle in 2018, (3) served people without partners, and (4) had an accredited laboratory. County-level data were obtained from the 2020 US Census, with the primary at-risk population identified as reproductive-age female individuals aged 15 years to 44 years. The analysis was performed from 2021 to 2022. Exposures: Location outside of 2-hour travel time isochrone of an oncofertility center. Main Outcomes and Measures: Oncofertility centers were compared with centers not meeting criteria and were classified by US region, state FP mandate status, number of assisted reproductive technology cycles performed, and number of FP cycles performed. The number and percentage of at-risk patients, defined as those living outside of accessible service areas by state, were identified. Results: Among 456 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-reporting fertility clinics, 86 (18.9%) did not meet the criteria as an oncofertility center. A total of 3.63 million (5.70%) reproductive-age female individuals lack geographic access to an oncofertility center. States with FP mandates have the highest rates of eligible female patients with geographic access (98.54%), while states without active or pending legislation have the lowest rates (79.57%). The greatest disparities in geographic access to care are most concentrated in the Mountain West and West North Central regions. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients face numerous barriers to comprehensive cancer care, including a lack of geographic access to centers capable of offering FP services. This cross-sectional study identified disparities in geographic access and potential opportunities for strategic expansion.
RESUMEN
The epidemiological profile of rabies virus within Mongolia remains poorly characterized despite 21,302 domestic animal cases being reported between 1970-2005. This lack of knowledge is particularly concerning given that roughly 26% of the population lives a pastoral herding lifestyle and livestock production contributes up to 18% of Mongolia's total gross domestic product (GDP). The gaps in knowledge of the rabies disease ecology within Mongolia combined with the lack of routine vaccination of domestic animals and wildlife poses a significant threat to the more than 60 million heads of livestock within Mongolia. Animal rabies case data from the General Authority for Veterinary Services and National Center for Zoonotic Diseases were used in this study. Each data point included year of report, an animal descriptor, geographic coordinates and the aimag (province) of origin. A total of 2,359 animal rabies cases were reported between 2012-2018. Cattle were the most commonly reported animal overall (861 cases), followed by goats (268), sheep (251) and dogs (221) within the domestic animal category. Red foxes were responsible for most reported wildlife cases (317) followed by wolves (151). Most rabid animals were reported in the Khuvsgul, Uvurkhangai and Govi-Altai aimags, and a positive correlation was found between livestock numbers per soum and the number of rabies cases reported. Rabies poses a significant threat to the Mongolian economy and the health of human and animal populations within Mongolia. The close association of the nomadic pastoralists with both domestic animals and wildlife represents a significant threat for disease emergence and necessitates studies that describe the ecology of rabies, which may threaten these populations.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros , Enfermedades de las Cabras , Rabia , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Lobos , Animales , Animales Domésticos , Animales Salvajes , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Perros/epidemiología , Perros , Zorros , Cabras , Humanos , Ganado , Mongolia/epidemiología , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/veterinaria , OvinosRESUMEN
Only indirect or circumstantial evidence has been published to support transmission of Rickettsia rickettsii by Amblyomma americanum (lone star) ticks in North America. This study provides molecular evidence that A. americanum ticks can function, although most likely infrequently, as vectors of Rocky Mountain spotted fever for humans.
Asunto(s)
Rickettsia rickettsii/fisiología , Fiebre Maculosa de las Montañas Rocosas/transmisión , Garrapatas/microbiología , Adolescente , Animales , Proteínas de la Membrana Bacteriana Externa/genética , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Mitocondrias/genética , North Carolina , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Fiebre Maculosa de las Montañas Rocosas/diagnóstico , Fiebre Maculosa de las Montañas Rocosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Piel/patología , Garrapatas/genéticaAsunto(s)
Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Administración Tópica , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Doxiciclina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Immunoblotting , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Enfermedad de Lyme/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Síntomas , Tiña/diagnóstico , Tiña/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Congenital CMV (cCMV) is the leading cause of non-genetic sensorineural hearing loss. Babies with cCMV can present with hearing loss any time but failing the initial hearing screen should trigger cCMV testing. cCMV must be identified within 3 weeks after birth to differentiate congenital from acquired CMV, yet follow-up hearing screens may not occur until after 21 days. A new electronic health record protocol to test cCMV in babies who fail their initial hearing screen was established at our institution in 2013. The purpose of this study is to evaluate adherence and deviations from this protocol. METHODS: All term infants born in 2013-2016 who failed initial hearing screen were included. The records were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data, dates of hearing screens, CMV testing results and follow-up hearing test results were collected. RESULTS: A total of 19,069 newborn babies were screened between 2013 and 2016. Babies who were in the neonatal intensive care unit whether premature or not were excluded as these infants are often in the hospital longer than 3 weeks so audiologic diagnostic testing may be delayed. Among term newborns screened, 1358 failed initial screen and 444 failed subsequent hearing testing prior to discharge. We identified 60 babies who did not follow up and 59 underwent additional audiologic testing. Overall 38 babies were tested for cCMV with 2 positives. We found an increase in cCMV testing over time and a significant decrease between physical distance from birth hospital and outpatient audiologic follow-up testing within 21 days of birth. DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with a 0.4% rate of cCMV in full-term babies who failed their newborn hearing screen. From 2013 to 2016, more babies received CMV tests, but post-screening follow up was still delayed. Further research is necessary to address factors affecting follow up. Use of electronic health record eased identification of results and improved tracking.