RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It remains elusive how the characteristics, the course of disease, the clinical management and the outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) worldwide have changed over the course of the pandemic. METHODS: Prospective, observational registry constituted by 90 ICUs across 22 countries worldwide including patients with a laboratory-confirmed, critical presentation of COVID-19 requiring advanced organ support. Hierarchical, generalized linear mixed-effect models accounting for hospital and country variability were employed to analyse the continuous evolution of the studied variables over the pandemic. RESULTS: Four thousand forty-one patients were included from March 2020 to September 2021. Over this period, the age of the admitted patients (62 [95% CI 60-63] years vs 64 [62-66] years, p < 0.001) and the severity of organ dysfunction at ICU admission decreased (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment 8.2 [7.6-9.0] vs 5.8 [5.3-6.4], p < 0.001) and increased, while more female patients (26 [23-29]% vs 41 [35-48]%, p < 0.001) were admitted. The time span between symptom onset and hospitalization as well as ICU admission became longer later in the pandemic (6.7 [6.2-7.2| days vs 9.7 [8.9-10.5] days, p < 0.001). The PaO2/FiO2 at admission was lower (132 [123-141] mmHg vs 101 [91-113] mmHg, p < 0.001) but showed faster improvements over the initial 5 days of ICU stay in late 2021 compared to early 2020 (34 [20-48] mmHg vs 70 [41-100] mmHg, p = 0.05). The number of patients treated with steroids and tocilizumab increased, while the use of therapeutic anticoagulation presented an inverse U-shaped behaviour over the course of the pandemic. The proportion of patients treated with high-flow oxygen (5 [4-7]% vs 20 [14-29], p < 0.001) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (14 [11-18]% vs 24 [17-33]%, p < 0.001) throughout the pandemic increased concomitant to a decrease in invasive mechanical ventilation (82 [76-86]% vs 74 [64-82]%, p < 0.001). The ICU mortality (23 [19-26]% vs 17 [12-25]%, p < 0.001) and length of stay (14 [13-16] days vs 11 [10-13] days, p < 0.001) decreased over 19 months of the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Characteristics and disease course of critically ill COVID-19 patients have continuously evolved, concomitant to the clinical management, throughout the pandemic leading to a younger, less severely ill ICU population with distinctly different clinical, pulmonary and inflammatory presentations than at the onset of the pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , COVID-19/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty about the optimal respiratory support strategies in critically ill COVID-19 patients is widespread. While the risks and benefits of noninvasive techniques versus early invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are intensely debated, actual evidence is lacking. We sought to assess the risks and benefits of different respiratory support strategies, employed in intensive care units during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic on intubation and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality rates. METHODS: Subanalysis of a prospective, multinational registry of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Patients were subclassified into standard oxygen therapy ≥10 L/min (SOT), high-flow oxygen therapy (HFNC), noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIV), and early IMV, according to the respiratory support strategy employed at the day of admission to ICU. Propensity score matching was performed to ensure comparability between groups. RESULTS: Initially, 1421 patients were assessed for possible study inclusion. Of these, 351 patients (85 SOT, 87 HFNC, 87 NIV, and 92 IMV) remained eligible for full analysis after propensity score matching. 55% of patients initially receiving noninvasive respiratory support required IMV. The intubation rate was lower in patients initially ventilated with HFNC and NIV compared to those who received SOT (SOT: 64%, HFNC: 52%, NIV: 49%, p = 0.025). Compared to the other respiratory support strategies, NIV was associated with a higher overall ICU mortality (SOT: 18%, HFNC: 20%, NIV: 37%, IMV: 25%, p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of critically ill patients with COVID-19, a trial of HFNC appeared to be the most balanced initial respiratory support strategy, given the reduced intubation rate and comparable ICU mortality rate. Nonetheless, considering the uncertainty and stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, SOT and early IMV represented safe initial respiratory support strategies. The presented findings, in agreement with classic ARDS literature, suggest that NIV should be avoided whenever possible due to the elevated ICU mortality risk.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Terapia Respiratoria/métodos , Terapia Respiratoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , COVID-19/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Metabolic acidosis is common among hospitalized patients. However, in a few cases a long-term administration of acetaminophen can lead to transient 5-oxoproline accumulation and causes metabolic acidosis with high anion gap in adults. A 73-year-old man was hospitalized with Staph. aureus sepsis after right knee prosthesis infection and received analgesic treatment with acetaminophen 2 g/d and antibiotic therapy with flucloxacillin over several weeks. The patient had a protracted course of illness and was transferred to intensive care unit with progressing vigilance reduction and for metabolic acidosis with high anion gap. Further medical investigation confirmed an increased concentration of 5-oxoproline in urine. A change in antibiotic treatment, interruption of acetaminophen and administration of acetylcysteine lead to a normalization of the acid-base balance. In a patient with metabolic acidosis under acetaminophen administration, particularly in the context of sepsis, malnutrition, liver and kidney diseases as well as antibiotic treatment with flucloxacillin an accumulation of 5-oxoproline must be considered. The treatment with acetaminophen must be interrupted and acetylcysteine should be administered.
Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/efectos adversos , Acidosis/inducido químicamente , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Acidosis/diagnóstico , Acidosis/fisiopatología , Anciano , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Bicarbonato de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/complicaciones , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
A patient with fever, headache and discrete neurologic symptoms developed a coma followed by severe paralysis. The cause was a tick-borne encephalitis. In the follow-up, the patient required supportive care on the intensive care unit for almost two months and further on, a rehabilitation of almost seven months was needed. The patient has not been vaccinated, even though he fulfilled the criteria for the recommendation of vaccination because he occasionally visited areas at risk.