The efficacy of EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for molecular testing in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of obtaining adequate cytologic specimens by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for molecular testing of lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved study of all patients who had undergone EBUS-TBNA from April 2010 through March 2012 for the diagnosis, staging, or both of lung cancer. Patients with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma were reflexively tested for molecular markers by polymerase chain reaction, sequencing, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). All procedures were performed with patients under conscious sedation in the bronchoscopy suite. RESULTS: Of 205 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA, 56 patients (24 male, 32 female) had a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma warranting molecular analysis. Molecular analysis was available for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma (Kras) mutation, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement. The institution's clinical protocol involved initial testing for EGFR mutation with a reflex Kras test if the EGFR test result was negative. ALK FISH molecular testing was completed if both EGFR and Kras test results were negative. A total of 52 of 56 (93%) patients had sufficient cytologic material for complete or partial molecular testing, whereas 46 of 56 (82%) patients had sufficient material for all clinically indicated testing. EGFR, Kras, and ALK analysis yielded positive results in 5 (10%), 10 (25%), and 5 (12%) tested specimens, respectively. No complications were associated with EBUS-TBNA. CONCLUSIONS: EBUS-TBNA performed with the patient under moderate sedation can be expected to yield sufficient tissue for sequential molecular analysis in the majority of patients. In an era of targeted therapy for lung adenocarcinomas, EBUS-TBNA is effective in clinical practice for complete diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning in these patients.

Minimally invasive thymectomy and open thymectomy: outcome analysis of 263 patients.

BACKGROUND: An open thymectomy is a morbid procedure. If a minimally invasive thymectomy is performed without compromising the tenets of thymic surgery, it has the potential for decreasing morbidity and may offer similar clinical and oncologic results. METHODS: This is an institutional review board-approved, retrospective study of a single center's experience with both open (transsternal) and minimally invasive (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) thymectomy. Survival estimates and statistical comparisons were calculated using standard software. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2011, 263 patients (93 men; median age, 49 years; interquartile range, 37 to 60 years) underwent thymectomy for indications including myasthenia gravis (n=139) and mediastinal mass (n=108). Seventy-seven thymectomies were performed by minimally invasive approach. Both groups were equally stratified by sex, body mass index, World Health Organization and Masaoka-Koga staging, incidence of myasthenia gravis, and comorbidities except hyperlipidemia and diabetes. The minimally invasive thymectomy cohort had significantly shorter hospital (p<0.01) and intensive care unit lengths of stay (p<0.01) and a lower estimated blood loss (p<0.01). There was an insignificant difference in postoperative cardiac and respiratory complication rates as well as vocal cord paralysis (p=0.60). There was no difference in terms of operative room times (p=0.88) or volume of blood products transfused (p=0.16) between the two groups. Higher estimated blood loss was associated with higher intensive care unit admission rates (p<0.01). All minimally invasive thymoma resections were complete, with negative margins. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive thymectomy is safe and achieves a comparable resection and postoperative complication profile when used selectively for all indications, including myasthenia gravis and small thymomas without vascular invasion.