Impaired retinal microcirculation in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

PURPOSE: To quantitatively investigate alterations of retinal microcirculation in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and to identify the ability of retinal microcirculation parameters in differentiating coronary artery disease (CAD) subtypes. METHODS: All participants with angina pectoris underwent coronary computed tomography angiography. Patients with lumen diameter reduction of 20-50 % in all major coronary arteries were defined as NOCAD, while patients with at least one major coronary artery lumen diameter reduction ≥ 50 % were recruited as obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD). Participants without a history of ophthalmic or systemic vascular disease were recruited as healthy controls. Retinal neural-vasculature was measured quantitatively by OCTA, including peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and vessel density (VD) of the optic disc, superficial vessel plexus (SVP), deep vessel plexus (DVP), and foveal density (FD 300). p < 0.017 is considered significant in multiple comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 185 participants (65 NOCAD, 62 OCAD, and 58 controls) were enrolled. Except for the DVP fovea (p = 0.069), significantly reduced VD in all other regions of SVP and DVP was detected in both the NOCAD and OCAD groups compared to control group (all p < 0.017), while a more significant decrease was found in OCAD compared to NOCAD. Multivariate regression analysis showed that lower VD in superior hemi part of whole SVP (OR: 0.582, 95 % CI: 0.451-0.752) was an independent risk factor for NOCAD compared to controls, while lower VD in the whole SVP (OR: 0.550, 95 % CI: 0.421-0.719) was an independent risk factor for OCAD compared to NOCAD. Using the integration of retinal microvascular parameters, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for NOCAD versus control and OCAD versus NOCAD were 0.840 and 0.830, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant retinal microcirculation impairment, while milder than that in OCAD was observed in NOCAD patients, indicating retinal microvasculature assessment might provide a new systemic microcirculation observation window for NOCAD. Furthermore, retinal microvasculature may serve as a new indicator to assess the severity of CAD with good performance of retinal microvascular parameters in identifying different CAD subtypes.

Difference of central foveal thickness measurement in patients with macular edema using optical coherence tomography in different display modes.

Purpose: To assess the differences in the measurement of central foveal thickness (CFT) in patients with macular edema (ME) between two display modes (1:1 pixel and 1:1 micron) on optical coherence tomography (OCT). Design: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Methods: Group A consisted of participants with well-horizontal OCT B-scan images and group B consisted of participants with tilted OCT B-scan. We manually measured the CFT under the two display modes, and the values were compared statistically using the paired t-test. Spearman's test was used to assess the correlations between the OCT image tilting angle (OCT ITA) and the differences in CFT measurement. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to define the OCT ITA cutoff for a defined CFT difference. Results: In group A, the mean CFT in the 1:1 pixel display mode was 420.21 ± 130.61 µm, similar to the mean CFT of 415.27 ± 129.85 µm in the 1:1 micron display mode. In group B, the median CFT in the 1:1 pixel display mode is 409.00 µm (IQR: 171.75 µm) and 368.00 µm (IQR: 149.00 µm) in the 1:1 micron display mode. There were significant differences between the two display modes with the median (IQR) absolute difference and median (IQR) relative difference of 38.00 µm (75.00 µm) and 10.19% (21.91%) (all p = 0.01). The differences in CFT measurement between the two display modes were correlated with the OCT ITA (absolute differences, r = 0.88, p < 0.01; relative differences, r = 0.87, p < 0.01). The AUC for a predefined CFT difference was 0.878 (10 µm), 0.933 (20 µm), 0.938 (30 µm), 0.961 (40 µm), 0.962 (50 µm), and 0.970 (60 µm). Conclusion: In patients with DM, when the OCT B-scan images were well-horizontal, manual CFT measurements under the two display modes were similar, but when the B-scan images were tilted, the CFT measurements were different under the two display modes, and the differences were correlated to the OCT ITA.

Association of hyperopia with incident clinically significant depression: epidemiological and genetic evidence in the middle-aged and older population.

AIMS: To investigate the association between hyperopia and clinically significant depression (CSD) in middle-aged and older individuals. The effect of genetic determinants of hyperopia on incident CSD was also explored. METHODS: We included participants who had available data on mean spherical equivalent (MSE) and were free of depression at baseline from the UK Biobank. For the phenotypic association, hyperopia was defined as MSE of+2.00 dioptres (D) or greater, and was divided into mild, moderate and high groups. Diagnosis of CSD across follow-up was determined based on electronic hospital inpatients records. For the genetic association analysis, the association between hyperopia Polygenic Risk Score and incident CSD was assessed. Mendelian randomisation was assessed for causality association. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 11.11 years (IQR: 10.92-11.38), hyperopia was significantly associated with incident CSD independent of genetic risk (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.59) compared with emmetropia participants, especially in those hyperopic patients without optical correction (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.76). In addition, participants in the high degree of hyperopia were more likely to have incident CSD than participants in the mild degree of hyperopia (P for trend=0.009). Genetic analyses did not show any significant associations between hyperopia and incident CSD (p≥0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperopia was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident CSD. This was independent of genetic predisposition to hyperopia, emphasising the importance of regular vision screening and correction of hyperopia to reduce the risk of CSD regardless of genetic risk.