The effect of iron deficiency and anaemia on women's health.

Iron deficiency and anaemia are global health problems and major causes of morbidity in women. Current definitions of anaemia in women are historic and have been challenged by recent data from observational studies. Menstrual loss, abnormal uterine bleeding and pregnancy put women at risk of developing iron deficiency which can result in severe fatigue, reduced exercise capacity and poor work performance. Iron deficiency and anaemia during pregnancy are associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, including neurocognitive deficits in children born to iron-deficient mothers. Both iron deficiency and anaemia are common in women undergoing surgery but their association with poor outcomes remains uncertain. The enduring burden of iron deficiency and anaemia in women suggests that current strategies for recognition, prevention and treatment are limited in their utility. Improvements in our understanding of iron homeostasis and the development of new iron preparations, which are better absorbed with fewer side-effects, may improve therapeutic effectiveness of oral iron. Intravenous iron is efficacious for correcting anaemia rapidly but high-quality data on patient-centred outcomes and cost-effectiveness are currently lacking. Many recommendations for the treatment of iron deficiency and anaemia in national guidelines are not supported by high-quality evidence. There is a need for robust epidemiological data and well-designed clinical trials. The latter will require collaborative working between researchers and patients to design studies in ways that incorporate patients' perspectives on the research process and target outcomes that matter to them.

Prophylactic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer at the time of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Most serous ovarian cancers are now understood to originate in the fallopian tubes. Removing the tubes (salpingectomy) likely reduces the risk of developing high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Numerous gynaecological societies now recommend prophylactic (or opportunistic) salpingectomy at the time of gynaecological surgery in appropriate women, and this is widely done. Salpingectomy at the time of non-gynaecological surgery has not been explored and may present an opportunity for primary prevention of ovarian cancer. METHODS: This study investigated whether prophylactic salpingectomy with the intention of reducing the risk of developing ovarian cancer would be accepted and could be accomplished at the time of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Women aged at least 45 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recruited. They were counselled and offered prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cholecystectomy. Outcome measures were rate of accomplishment of salpingectomy, time and procedural steps needed for salpingectomy, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were included in the study. The rate of acceptance of salpingectomy was approximately 60 per cent. Salpingectomy was performed in 98 of 105 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (93·3 per cent) and not accomplished because of poor visibility or adhesions in seven (6·7 per cent). Median additional operating time was 13 (range 4-45) min. There were no complications attributable to salpingectomy. One patient presented with ovarian cancer 28 months after prophylactic salpingectomy; histological re-evaluation of the tubes showed a previously undetected, focal serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic salpingectomy can be done during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

ANTECEDENTES: La mayoría de carcinomas serosos de ovario se originan en las trompas de Falopio. La exéresis de las trompas (salpingectomía) probablemente reduce el riesgo de desarrollar un carcinoma seroso ovárico de alto grado. Numerosas sociedades ginecológicas recomiendan efectuar una salpingectomía profiláctica (u oportunista) en el momento de una cirugía ginecológica en determinadas mujeres, y esta conducta está ampliamente difundida. Sin embargo, no se ha analizado la realización de la salpingectomía durante cirugías no ginecológicas como forma de prevención primaria del carcinoma ovárico. MÉTODOS: Determinar si la salpingectomía profiláctica con intención de reducir el riesgo de desarrollar cáncer de ovario sería aceptada y podría llevarse a cabo durante una colecistectomía laparoscópica electiva. Se reclutaron mujeres ≥ 45 años de edad programadas para colecistectomía laparoscópica electiva. A todas ellas se les aconsejó y ofreció la realización de una salpingectomía bilateral profiláctica en el momento de su colecistectomía. Las variables analizadas fueron la tasa de realización de la salpingectomía, la duración y las etapas quirúrgicos para efectuar este procedimiento, y las complicaciones. RESULTADOS: La aceptación de la salpingectomía fue aproximadamente del 60%. La salpingectomía se realizó en 98 de 105 colecistectomías laparoscópicas (93%) y no se pudo realizar en 7 pacientes (7%) por escasa visibilidad o adherencias. La mediana del tiempo quirúrgico adicional fue de 13 (rango 4-45) minutos. No hubo complicaciones atribuibles a la salpingectomía. Una paciente presentó cáncer de ovario 28 meses después de la salpingectomía profiláctica; la reevaluación histológica de las trompas mostró un carcinoma intraepitelial seroso focal tubárico (serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, STIC) no detectado previamente. CONCLUSIÓN: La salpingectomía profiláctica se puede realizar durante la colecistectomía laparoscópica electiva.

[Pitfalls and common problems in the differential diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors]. / Fallstricke und Probleme bei der Differenzialdiagnose epithelialer Ovarialtumoren.

Epithelial ovarian tumors may cause various diagnostic problems of practical relevance. For the distinction between cystadenomas and borderline tumors/atypically proliferative tumors, a minimum extent of 10% of the atypical epithelial proliferation has been suggested by the WHO. The micropapillary variant of serous borderline tumors is more frequently associated with invasive growth and extraovarian lesions. Extraovarian lesions of borderline tumors are relevant for prognosis and cause a higher stage; their classification is crucial. Traditionally, they were classified into noninvasive and invasive implants based on their morphology. Based on the 2014 WHO classification, invasive lesions should be designated as low-grade serous carcinomas whereas only noninvasive lesions are considered implants. The most frequent invasive growth pattern in low-grade serous carcinomas consists of haphazardly arranged tumor cell nests and small papillae in clefts, whereas mucinous and endometrioid carcinomas mainly show a confluent glandular pattern with maze-like and cribriform structures. For metastatic mucinous tumors a nodular growth pattern is characteristic; ruling them out requires clinical information including imaging and immunohistochemistry. Differential diagnosis between low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma is based on the degree of nuclear polymorphism and mitotic count. The seromucinous tumor category replaces the endocervical subtype of mucinous tumors and resembles histologically, biologically, and on the molecular level serous and endometrioid tumors. Endometrioid tumors with fibromatous stroma need to be distinguished from tumors with Sertoli cell differentiation and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. For differential diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors, in particular carcinomas, a panel of antibodies for immunohistochemistry is very useful under consideration of histomorphology.

[Mesenchymal and mixed uterine tumors : Current overview and practical aspects]. / Mesenchymale und gemischte Uterustumoren : Aktuelle Übersicht und praktische Aspekte.

Benign leiomyomas are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. In contrast, uterine sarcomas are very rare. Leiomyosarcomas are the most frequent sarcomas followed by endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS). Leiomyosarcomas are characterized by marked nuclear atypia and high mitotic count and may also show tumor cell necrosis and myometrial and vascular invasion. For cases of diagnostic uncertainty, the category of smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) may be considered but should be rarely used. Besides low-grade ESS and stromal nodules, a category of high-grade ESS was reconsidered by the WHO in 2014. High-grade ESS are characterized by fibromyxoid and round cell histology, myoinvasive growth, and immunoreactivity for cyclin D1 and BCOR and distinct gene fusions involving YWHAE and BCOR, respectively. The very rare undifferentiated uterine sarcomas need to be redefined due to overlap with high-grade ESS. Uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors (UTROSCT) rarely behave malignant, but need to be distinguished from endometrial carcinomas. Mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumors of the uterus are rare with carcinosarcomas occurring more frequently than adenosarcomas. For prognosis of adenosarcomas the recognition of sarcomatous overgrowth is crucial. Carcinosarcomas are histologically heterogeneous although genetically clonal; biologically they are considered as undifferentiated carcinomas. There will be an increasing importance of molecular pathology for the classification of rare and unusual mesenchymal uterine tumors.

[Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma]. / Vorläuferläsionen der Endometriumkarzinome.

The 2014 WHO classification distinguishes between endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (EH) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AEH/EIN). AEH/EIN is characterized by crowded glands with cytologically atypical epithelium separated by little intervening stroma. Cellular atypia is characterized by nuclear enlargement and rounding, pleomorphism, loss of polarity, and presence of nucleoli. The diagnosis of atypia is facilitated by comparison with areas of adjacent normal and non-atypical glands, respectively. AEH/EIN is often associated with squamous but also secretory and mucinous metaplasia. Loss of PTEN and/or PAX2 immunoreactivity occurs in up to two thirds of AEH/EIN. In contrast, invasive low-grade endometrioid carcinoma shows confluent growth with loss of stroma and formation of labyrinth-like or cribriform structures. Differential diagnosis includes different forms of metaplasias, papillary proliferations, and hyperplastic polyps. Epithelial metaplasia may be present in various benign endometrial lesions as well as in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. AEH/EIN may also occur in endometrial polyps. Progestin therapy of AEH/EIN has low level of evidence but frequently leads to complete regression. Serous intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is characterized by high-grade cellular atypia and polymorphism, detachment of cells, a mutant immunoreactive pattern for the P53 and an increased Ki67 labeling index. Although designated as precursor of serous carcinoma of the endometrium, biologically it is considered a non-invasive serous carcinoma since it may already be associated with massive extrauterine spread.

[S3 guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the endometrium : Requirements for pathology]. / S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie des Endometriumkarzinoms : Anforderungen an die Pathologie.

The present article summarises the relevant aspects of the S3 guidelines on endometrioid carcinomas. The recommendations include the processing rules of fractional currettings as well as for hysterectomy specimens and lymph node resections (including sentinel lymph nodes). Besides practical aspects, the guidelines consider the needs of the clinicians for appropriate surgical and radiotherapeutic treatment of the patients. Carcinosarcomas are assigned to the endometrial carcinoma as a special variant. For the first time, an algorithmic approach for evaluation of the tumour tissue for Lynch syndrome is given. Prognostic factors based on morphologic findings are summarised.

Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series.

Background: We have previously developed and confirmed a pragmatic molecular classifier for endometrial cancers; ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer). Inspired by the Cancer Genome Atlas, ProMisE identifies four prognostically distinct molecular subtypes and can be applied to diagnostic specimens (biopsy/curettings) enabling earlier informed decision-making. We have strictly adhered to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for the development of genomic biomarkers, and herein present the final validation step of a locked-down classifier before clinical application. Patients and methods: We assessed a retrospective cohort of women from the Tübingen University Women's Hospital treated for endometrial carcinoma between 2003 and 2013. Primary outcomes of overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival were evaluated for clinical, pathological, and molecular features. Results: Complete clinical and molecular data were evaluable from 452 women. Patient age ranged from 29 to 93 (median 65) years, and 87.8% cases were endometrioid histotype. Grade distribution included 282 (62.4%) G1, 75 (16.6%) G2, and 95 (21.0%) G3 tumors. 276 (61.1%) patients had stage IA disease, with the remaining stage IB [89 (19.7%)], stage II [26 (5.8%)], and stage III/IV [61 (13.5%)]. ProMisE molecular classification yielded 127 (28.1%) MMR-D, 42 (9.3%) POLE, 55 (12.2%) p53abn, and 228 (50.4%) p53wt. ProMisE was a prognostic marker for progression-free (P = 0.001) and disease-specific (P = 0.03) survival even after adjusting for known risk factors. Concordance between diagnostic and surgical specimens was highly favorable; accuracy 0.91, κ 0.88. Discussion: We have developed, confirmed, and now validated a pragmatic molecular classification tool (ProMisE) that provides consistent categorization of tumors and identifies four distinct prognostic molecular subtypes. ProMisE can be applied to diagnostic samples and thus could be used to inform surgical procedure(s) and/or need for adjuvant therapy. Based on the IOM guidelines this classifier is now ready for clinical evaluation through prospective clinical trials.

Better resource utilisation and quality of care for ovarian cancer patients using internet-based pathology review.

BACKGROUND: The current literature indicates that a considerable number of patients in ovarian carcinoma clinical trials have histopathological diagnoses in conflict with inclusion criteria. It has been suggested that specialised pathology review prior to randomisation should become the standard procedure in study protocols. We hypothesised that our new, internet-based high-throughput infrastructure would be capable of providing specialised pathology review within 10 working days (w.d.). METHODS: Patients scheduled for the AGO OVAR17 ovarian carcinoma chemotherapy trial were registered for expert pathologic case review using a new internet-based central pathology review platform prior to randomisation. All original slides were requested from local pathologists. Slides were scanned and uploaded to a secured internet server. A network of experienced gynaecological pathologists was connected to the server through a custom-designed software platform. If deemed necessary by the expert pathologists, immunohistochemistry was available through a collaborating pathology lab. RESULTS: A total of 880 patients with an original diagnosis of ovarian epithelial carcinoma were registered for expert pathology review from October 2011 to July 2013. For case review, five gynaecopathologists from Austria, Switzerland and Germany were available online. Median number of w.d. required to complete the whole process from patient registration to transmission of final review diagnoses was 4 (range 2-31) (w.d.), and in 848 out of 880 (97.5%) cases, it amounted to ⩽10 w.d. In 2.5% (n=22) of cases, a major diagnostic discrepancy of potential clinical relevance was found leading to exclusion from the chemotherapy trial. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the use of a new internet-based infrastructure makes timely specialised case review, prior to patient randomisation feasible within ⩽10 w.d. Our new approach helped to protect against overtreatment with chemotherapy of patients with ovarian borderline tumours and inadequate treatment of patients with ovarian metastases, as a result of their inappropriate entry into a clinical trial designed for patients with primary ovarian carcinoma.

[Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer]. / Familiäres Mamma- und Ovarialkarzinom.

Hereditary breast and ovarian carcinomas are frequently caused by germline mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (BRCA1/2 syndromes) and are often less associated with other hereditary syndromes such as Li-Fraumeni and Peutz-Jeghers. The BRCA1/2 proteins have a special role in DNA repair. Therefore, loss of function due to mutation causes an accumulation of mutations in other genes and subsequent tumorigenesis at an early age. BRCA1/2 mutations are irregularly distributed over the length of the genes without hot spots, although special mutations are known. Breast and ovarian cancer occur far more frequently in women with BRCA1/2 germline mutations compared with the general population. Breast cancer occurs increasingly from the age of 30, ovarian cancer in BRCA1 syndrome from the age of 40 and BRCA2 from the age of 50. Suspicion of a BRCA syndrome should be prompted in the case of clustering of breast cancer in 1st degree relatives, in particular at a young age, if breast and ovarian cancer have occurred, and if cases of male breast cancer are known. Breast carcinomas with medullary differentiation seem to predominate in BRCA syndromes, but other carcinoma types may also occur. BRCA germline mutations seem to occur frequently in triple-negative breast carcinomas, whereas an association with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is rare. Ovarian carcinomas in BRCA syndromes are usually high-grade serous, mucinous carcinomas and borderline tumors are unusual. Pathology plays a special role within the multidisciplinary team in the recognition of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes.

[Endometritis : Rare disease with clinical importance?] / Endometritis : Seltene Erkrankung mit klinischer Relevanz?

Endometritis is nowadays rare in developed countries and typically shows a subclinical or mild course; therefore, there are probably more cases of endometritis than diagnosed but they lack clinical relevance. In the fertile period of life it can be the reason for vaginal bleeding and infertility. The most common causes for non-specific endometritis are residual placental tissue after abortion or childbirth, intrauterine interventions, lesions within the uterine cavity, such as endometrial polyps, endometrial hyperplasia and neoplasms, intrauterine devices (IUD) and cervical stenosis. The histological detection of plasma cells in the endometrial stroma is required for the diagnosis of chronic endometritis. These can be detected immunohistochemically using anti-CD138 antibodies, which should be carried out particularly in cases of infertility with only slight inflammatory symptoms and few plasma cells. The use of an IUD containing progestin is frequently associated with an asymptomatic lymphoplasmacytic infiltration. After curettage or endometrial biopsy, an eosinophilic xanthogranulomatous or granulomatous endometritis and also a foreign body granuloma reaction can occur. Specific forms of endometritis, such as caused by tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, mycoplasma and herpes are very rare. Cytomegalovirus endometritis is associated with immunosuppression. Endometritis caused by infections with Chlamydia trachomatis is characterized by an extensive lymphoplasmacytic infiltration. The differential diagnoses of chronic endometritis include the very rare malignant lymphoma, which is usually characterized by a relatively monotonous cell infiltration.

[New features in the 2014 WHO classification of uterine neoplasms]. / Neues in der WHO-Klassifikation 2014 der Tumoren des Corpus uteri.

The 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of uterine tumors revealed simplification of the classification by fusion of several entities and the introduction of novel entities. Among the multitude of alterations, the following are named: a simplified classification for precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma now distinguishes between hyperplasia without atypia and atypical hyperplasia, the latter also known as endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). For endometrial carcinoma a differentiation is made between type 1 (endometrioid carcinoma with variants and mucinous carcinoma) and type 2 (serous and clear cell carcinoma). Besides a papillary architecture serous carcinomas may show solid and glandular features and TP53 immunohistochemistry with an "all or null pattern" assists in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma with ambiguous features. Neuroendocrine neoplasms are categorized in a similar way to the gastrointestinal tract into well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (small cell and large cell types). Leiomyosarcomas of the uterus are typically high grade and characterized by marked nuclear atypia and lively mitotic activity. Low grade stromal neoplasms frequently show gene fusions, such as JAZF1/SUZ12. High grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is newly defined by cyclin D1 overexpression and the presence of the fusion gene YWHAE/FAM22 and must be distinguished from undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed Mullerian tumors MMMT) show biological and molecular similarities to high-grade carcinomas.

[Pitfalls in the histopathological diagnostics of endometrial carcinoma and its precursors : Clinically relevant differential diagnoses, avoidance of false positive diagnoses]. / Fallstricke bei der histopathologischen Diagnostik des Endometriumkarzinoms und seiner Vorstufen : Klinisch wichtige Differenzialdiagnosen, Vermeidung falsch-positiver Diagnosen.

Making an incorrect histopathological diagnosis of an endometrial lesion may lead to unwanted loss of fertility and therapy-associated morbidity; therefore, endometrial carcinomas need to be correctly typed and differentiated from hyperplastic precursors, benign lesions and artifacts. Typical diagnostic pitfalls are described in this article. Misdiagnosing endometrial lesions can be avoided by paying thorough attention to gross as well as microscopic features and by taking crucial differential diagnoses into consideration. These are, in particular, well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium versus atypical endometrial hyperplasia, myoinvasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma versus atypical polypoid adenomyoma and endometrioid carcinoma versus serous carcinoma of the endometrium with a predominantly glandular pattern. It is also important to consider the possibility of a false positive diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma in cases of biopsy-induced artifacts.

[Metastatic mechanisms of uterine malignancies and therapeutic consequences]. / Metastasierung von Malignomen des Uterus und therapeutische Konsequenzen.

Malignancies of the uterus metastasize by direct invasion of neighboring structures, lymphatically or hematogenously. Endometrial and cervical cancers lymphatically spread to the pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes. For endometrial cancer the depth of myometrial invasion, lymphosvascular space involvement (LVSI) and a microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF) glandular invasion pattern are predictors for lymph node metastases. Metastases to the pelvic lymph nodes occur in approximately 10 % of endometrial cancer patients and in 30 % of these cases the para-aortic lymph nodes are also involved. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is possible for clinical stage I endometrial cancer and early stages of cervical cancer but is not yet routine. The presence of LVSI is considered to be the strongest predictor of distant metastases, particularly if assessed by immunohistochemistry with antibodies against factor VIII-related antigen or CD31. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas can hematogenously metastasize to the lungs, bones, liver and brain and can rarely be manifested as a solitary metastasis. In contrast, serous carcinomas can show extensive peritoneal spread. To date molecular biomarkers cannot predict the occurrence of distant metastasis. Overexpression of P53, p16 and L1CAM have been identified as negative prognostic factors and are associated with the prognostically unfavorable serous tumor type. The metastatic spread of squamous cell cervical cancer is strongly associated with tumor volume. Microinvasive carcinomas have a very low rate of parametrial and lymph node involvement and do not require radical hysterectomy. In contrast, lymph node metastases occur in up to 50 % of bulky stages IB and II cervical cancers. Distant metastases can occur in the lungs, liver, bones and brain. Molecular biomarkers have not been shown to predict metastatic spread. In well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the cervix the pattern of invasion is strongly predictive for the presence of lymph node metastases, irrespective of tumor size and depth of invasion.

[Categorization of uterine cervix tumors : What's new in the 2014 WHO classification]. / Kategorisierung der Tumoren der Cervix uteri : Neues in der WHO-Klassifikation 2014.

In the 2014 WHO classification, squamous cell precursor lesions are classified as low-grade and high-grade intraepithelial lesions. LSIL corresponds to CIN1, HSIL includes CIN2 and CIN3. Only adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is accepted as precursor of adenocarcinoma and includes the stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE). Although relatively rare, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma can be mixed with a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Most cervical adenocarcinomas are low grade and of endocervical type. Mucinous carcinomas show marked intra- and extracellular mucin production. Almost all squamous cell carcinomas, the vast majority of adenocarcinomas, and many rare carcinoma types are HPV related. For low grade endocervical adenocarcinomas, the pattern-based classification according to Silva should be reported. Neuroendocrine tumors are rare and are classified into low-grade and high-grade, whereby the term carcinoid is still used.

[Cervical cancer : Update on morphology]. / Zervixkarzinom : Aktuelles zur Morphologie.

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification from 2014 differentiates between different subtypes of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. A gastric subtype was recently described that showed no association with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections, has a poor prognosis, is mainly diagnosed in women of Asian origin and can occur in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Although no clear grading system has been recommended in the WHO classification, it is likely that grading of adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix will partly be based on the different patterns of invasion. Deep stromal infiltration of macroinvasive carcinomas is defined as an infiltration of >66 % of the cervical stroma. In the near future a maximum tumor size of 2 cm could act as a discriminator for planning of less radical surgery. Parameters of the histopathological report that are relevant for the prognostic assessment as well as the choice of adjuvant treatment and function as quality indicators during certification are described. The histological type of an adenocarcinoma alone is of no predictive or prognostic relevance for patients undergoing primary surgical treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, combined chemo-radiotherapy or treatment with angiogenesis inhibitors. Currently, molecular parameters and biomarkers are of no relevance.

Lymphoma incidence, survival and prevalence 2004-2014: sub-type analyses from the UK's Haematological Malignancy Research Network.

BACKGROUND: Population-based information about cancer occurrence and survival are required to inform clinical practice and research; but for most lymphomas data are lacking. METHODS: Set within a socio-demographically representative UK population of nearly 4 million, lymphoma data (N=5796) are from an established patient cohort. RESULTS: Incidence, survival (overall and relative) and prevalence estimates for >20 subtypes are presented. With few exceptions, males tended to be diagnosed at younger ages and have significantly (P<0.05) higher incidence rates. Differences were greatest at younger ages: the <15 year male/female rate ratio for all subtypes combined being 2.2 (95% CI 1.3-3.4). These gender differences impacted on prevalence; most subtype estimates being significantly (P<0.05) higher in males than females. Outcome varied widely by subtype; survival of patients with nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma approached that of the general population, whereas less than a third of those with other B-cell (e.g., mantle cell) or T-cell (e.g., peripheral-T) lymphomas survived for ≥5 years. No males/female survival differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Major strengths of our study include completeness of ascertainment, world-class diagnostics and generalisability. The marked variations demonstrated confirm the requirement for 'real-world' data to inform aetiological hypotheses, health-care planning and the future monitoring of therapeutic changes.

The genomic expression test EndoPredict is a prognostic tool for identifying risk of local recurrence in postmenopausal endocrine receptor-positive, her2neu-negative breast cancer patients randomised within the prospective ABCSG 8 trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine whether EndoPredict (EP), a novel genomic expression test, is effective in predicting local recurrence (LR)-free survival (LRFS) following surgery for breast cancer in postmenopausal women. In addition, we examined whether EP may help tailor local therapy in these patients. METHODS: From January 1996 to June 2004, 3714 postmenopausal patients were randomly assigned to either tamoxifen or tamoxifen followed by anastrozole within the prospective ABCSG 8 trial. Using assay scores from EP, we classified breast tumour blocks as either low or high risk for recurrence. RESULTS: Data were gathered from 1324 patients. The median follow-up was 72.3 months and the cumulative incidence of LR was 2.6% (0.4% per year). The risk of LR over a 10-year period among patients with high-risk lesions (n=683) was significantly higher (LRFS=91%) when compared with patients with low-risk lesions (n=641) (10-year LRFS=97.5%) (HR: 1.31 (1.16-1.48) P<0.005). The groups that received breast conservation surgery (BCT) and mastectomy (MX) had similar LR rates (P=0.879). Radiotherapy (RT) after BCT significantly improved LRFS in the cohorts predicted by EP to be low-risk for LR (received RT: n=436, 10-year LRFS 99.8%; did not receive RT: n=63, 10-year LRFS 83.6%, P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: EndoPredict is an effective prognostic tool for predicting LRFS. Among postmenopausal, low-risk patients, EP does not appear to be useful for tailoring local therapy.

LGR5 rs17109924 is a predictive genetic biomarker for time to recurrence in patients with colon cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

We recently found variants in cancer stem cell genes (CD44, ALCAM and LGR5) significantly associated with increased time to recurrence (TTR) in patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. In this study, we validated these genetic biomarkers in a large and independent patient cohort (n=599). Patients who received 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=391) carrying at least one C allele in LGR5 rs17109924 had a significantly increased TTR compared with patients carrying the homozygous T/T variant (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.19-0.79; P=0.006). In patients treated with surgery alone (n=208), no association between LGR rs17109924 and TTR was found (P=0.728). In the multivariate Cox-analysis, LGR5 rs17109924 remained statistically significant (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.18-0.78; P=0.008) for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. We confirmed in a large and independent study cohort that LGR5 rs17109924 is a predictive genetic biomarker for TTR in patients with colon cancer treated with 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

[Mucinous ovarian neoplasms. Prognostically mostly excellent, infrequently a wolf in sheep's clothing]. / Muzinöse Ovarialtumoren. Prognostisch meist exzellent, selten Wölfe im Schafspelz.

Mucinous ovarian neoplasms represent the second largest group of epithelial ovarian tumors after serous neoplasms, of which benign cystadenomas constitute more than 80 %. Mucinous cystadenomas and carcinomas cannot be distinguished by the clinical features or the mean age of onset of the disease. They typically occur unilaterally, are confined to the adnexae (FIGO stage I) and clinically present with non-specific abdominal symptoms or are diagnosed by chance. The mean age of disease onset is around 50 years old. The prognosis is excellent. Implants, peritoneal metastases and bilateral occurrence of ovarian mucinous neoplasms should lead to the suspicion of metastasis particularly from a gastrointestinal tumor. Neither microinvasion defined as a maximum extent of invasion of 5 mm, nor intraepithelial carcinoma characterized by high grade atypia without invasion, affect the prognosis of mucinous borderline tumors. Mucinous carcinomas typically show confluent glandular, expansile growth that leads to a labyrinth-like pattern. A destructive infiltrative or nodular growth pattern, however, should lead to the consideration of metastasis. Mural nodules that may reveal a spindle cell sarcomatous or anaplastic carcinomatous pattern occur infrequently in mucinous and do not affect the prognosis. Pax8 positivity is indicative of a primary ovarian neoplasm. In this case, however, mucinous tumors associated with teratomas may show the colonic immunoreaction pattern (CK7-/CK20+/CDX2+). The rare mucinous tumors with endocervical differentiation are now designated as seromucinous tumors and consist of two or more distinct cell types, are frequently associated with endometriosis and seem to show a molecular genetic relationship to endometrioid neoplasms.